Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Combined with Plain Film X-Ray in Spinal Injuries

Value of MRI in the cervical spine imaging series of trauma patients: A state-of-the-art review

INTRODUCTION

Clinical decision protocols for evaluation and assessment of traumatic cervical spine injuries (TCSI) lean more towards the use of CT imaging. Investigation with MRI is therefore considered unnecessary following negative CT findings according to some local protocols. This review aims to explore what benefits MRI may offer in the clinical management of TCSI patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the following databases: AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE using defined key terms and synonyms optimised for each database. The eligible articles were subjected to data extraction and thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

The initial electronic search yielded 2527 articles. Of these, 15 articles remained following the application of a pre-defined inclusion criteria and full-text assessment. Four themes (mechanism of injury, type of patient, injuries detected on MRI, significance of injuries detected on MRI) were developed relating to the usage and value of MRI in the management of CSI.

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate that MRI may be very valuable in some situations for the evaluation of TCSI, however, its usage must be cautiously considered on a case-by-case basis in light of additional clinical benefit, patient safety and resource availability following a normal CT scan or in conjunction with CT or projection radiography where appropriate.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

MRI may serve as a confirmatory test in the management pathway of TCSI based on individual clinical needs. Consideration for key limitations (e.g., patients' cooperation) and accessibility challenges (e.g., cost) against the clinical benefit to the patient must be noted. Development of centre-specific policies from standard trauma imaging protocols may be essential for the timely management of TCSI.

Evaluation and analysis of surgical treatment for single-level or multi-level lumbar degenerative disease based on radiography

Background

Radiography has a low level of radiation exposure while providing valuable information. Due to its cost effectiveness and widespread availability, the preoperative radiographic imaging examination is a valuable approach for assessing patients with spinal disease. This study aimed to examine the influence of preoperative X-ray evaluation on the surgical treatment of patients with single- or multi-level lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 172 patients diagnosed with LDD who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery between December 2021 and February 2023 at the Shanghai Changzheng Hospital. Various parameters were measured on preoperative radiographs, including the iliac crest height, median iliac angle (MIA), lumbar lordosis (LL), intervertebral facet joint degeneration, lumbosacral angle (LSA), intervertebral foramen height (IFH), and surgical segment. The surgical treatment was evaluated based on the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications. A correlation analysis and independent sample t-tests were used to assess the relationship between preoperative radiographic variables and surgical treatments. Further, a multivariate linear regression analysis was employed to identify the risk factors affecting the clinical outcomes.

Results

The correlation analysis and t-test results showed that the MIA, height of the iliac crest, intervertebral facet joint degeneration, and surgical segment were significantly correlated with the surgical treatments (P<0.05). Specifically, the height of the iliac crest, intervertebral facet joint degeneration, and surgical segment were positively correlated with the surgical treatments. Conversely, the MIA was negatively correlated with the surgical treatments. However, no significant differences were observed between the IFH, LSA, and LL in relation to posterior lumbar surgery (P>0.05). The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the height of the iliac crest, MIA, intervertebral facet joint degeneration, and surgical segment were independent factors affecting the surgical treatments of patients with single- or multi-level LDD. These findings highlight the importance of considering these factors when planning and performing lumbar surgery.

Conclusions

The measurements taken from radiographs, including the height of the iliac crest, MIA, intervertebral facet joint degeneration, and surgical segment, demonstrate potential influences on the treatment of single- and multi-level lumbar spine surgery. These variables can be captured in plain film imaging and can provide valuable insights into the surgical procedure and offer guidance for the operation. By analyzing these radiographic measurements, surgeons can gain a better understanding of a patient's condition and tailor the surgical approach accordingly, thus optimizing the outcomes of the surgery.

Which Indicator Among Lumbar Vertebral Hounsfield Unit, Vertebral Bone Quality, or Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry-Measured Bone Mineral Density Is More Efficacious in Predicting Thoracolumbar Fragility Fractures?

OBJECTIVE

Hounsfield units (HU), vertebral bone quality (VBQ), and bone mineral density (BMD) can all serve as predictive indicators for thoracolumbar fragility fractures. This study aims to explore which indicator provides better risk prediction for thoracolumbar fragility fractures.

METHODS

Patients who have received medical attention from The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University for thoracolumbar fragility fractures were selected. A total of 78 patients with thoracolumbar fragility fractures were included in the study. To establish a control group, 78 patients with degenerative spinal diseases were matched to the fracture group on the basis of gender, age, and body mass index. The lumbar vertebral HU, the VBQ, and the BMD were obtained for all the 156 patients through computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The correlations among these parameters were analyzed. The area under curve (AUC) analysis was employed to assess the predictive efficacy and thresholds of lumbar vertebral HU, VBQ, and BMD in relation to the risk of thoracolumbar fragility fractures.

RESULTS

Among the cohort of 156 patients, lumbar vertebral HU exhibited a positive correlation with BMD (p < 0.01). Conversely, VBQ showed a negative correlation with HU, BMD (p < 0.05). HU and BMD displayed a favorable predictive efficacy for thoracolumbar fragility fractures (p < 0.01), with HU (AUC = 0.863) showcasing the highest predictive efficacy, followed by the DEXA-measured BMD (AUC = 0.813). VBQ (AUC = 0.602) ranked lowest among the 3 indicators. The thresholds for predicting thoracolumbar fragility fractures were as follows: HU (88),VBQ (3.37), and BMD (0.81).

CONCLUSION

All 3 of these indicators, HU, VBQ, and BMD, can predict thoracolumbar fragility fractures. Notably, lumbar vertebral HU exhibits the highest predictive efficacy, followed by the BMD obtained through DEXA scanning, with VBQ demonstrating the lowest predictive efficacy.

Diagnostic Value Comparison between Multislice Spiral Computerized Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in Diagnosing Occult Fractures of the Knee Joint

The aim of this study was to explore the application value of multislice spiral computerized tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) under intelligent algorithm in the diagnosis of occult fractures of the knee joint (OFKJ). 47 patients with negative X-ray examination and suspected fracture were included for this research. According to the examination methods, the patients were divided into the MSCT group and MRI group. The diagnostic results of the two methods were compared, and then compared with the traditional algorithm to explore their superiorities. The results demonstrated that the algorithm applied in this study had a clearer segmentation than traditional algorithms, and it run significantly faster than other algorithms. The results of MSCT, MRI, and pathological examination were all different, but which was of no statistical significance, P > 0.05. The specificity, accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MSCT were 83%, 96%, 94%, and 98%, respectively; and its coincidence rate, missed diagnosis rate, and misdiagnosis rate were 98.20%, 1.60%, and 0.20%, respectively. Compared with MRI, the differences were significant statistically, P < 0.05. The segmentation effect of MSCT was closer to the standard segmentation, with the higher efficiency. MSCT under the intelligent algorithm produced the better diagnostic performance and the higher detection rate than MRI in diagnosing OFKJ. It could be used for clinical auxiliary diagnosis and evaluation of OFKJ, deserving an application value.