Sex Hormones and Satellite Cell Regulation in Women

Influence of menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptive phase on exercise performance in endurance-trained females

BACKGROUND

Limited data exists on the influence of menstrual cycle (MC) phase and oral contraceptive (OC) phase on physical performance in endurance-trained females due to poor control regarding MC verification and differentiation. We aimed to evaluate exercise performance and the respiratory response to exercise in three distinct phases of the MC and OC cycle in endurance-trained females.

METHODS

Using a prospective cohort study design, we recruited trained females (Vo2max 52±4 mL O2/min/kg) who were either not using oral contraceptives (NOC) or using monophasic OCs. NOC were tested in the early and late follicular phase (FP) and the mid-luteal phase (LP). OC-users were tested in the withdrawal phase (WP) and two times in the active OC phase (OCP). The test battery included DXA scans, blood sampling, a submaximal bike test, a maximal isometric knee-extensor strength test, 4 and 20-second bike sprints, and a 6 min time trial on a bike. MC phases were verified by the use of ovulation kits and circulating sex hormone levels.

RESULTS

After the exclusion of four NOCs due to inadequate sex hormone levels, 11 NOC and 13 OC users were included in the final analysis. 6 min time trial performance, sprint performance, and most submaximal exercise intensity variables did not differ between MC phases and OC cycle phases. However, in NOC, ventilation (L/min) during exercise at 30% of aerobic peak power was 7.6% lower in the late FP compared to the LP (P<0.05). In OC users, muscle strength was 3.9% higher in the early OCP compared to WP (P<0.05), whereas body mass was higher in the late OCP compared to WP (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our study suggests that MC phase and OCP influence exercise performance to a limited extent in endurance-trained females.

Menstrual cycle hormones and oral contraceptives: a multimethod systems physiology-based review of their impact on key aspects of female physiology

Hormonal changes around ovulation divide the menstrual cycle (MC) into the follicular and luteal phases. In addition, oral contraceptives (OCs) have active (higher hormone) and placebo phases. Although there are some MC-based effects on various physiological outcomes, we found these differences relatively subtle and difficult to attribute to specific hormones, as estrogen and progesterone fluctuate rather than operating in a complete on/off pattern as observed in cellular or preclinical models often used to substantiate human data. A broad review reveals that the differences between the follicular and luteal phases and between OC active and placebo phases are not associated with marked differences in exercise performance and appear unlikely to influence muscular hypertrophy in response to resistance exercise training. A systematic review and meta-analysis of substrate oxidation between MC phases revealed no difference between phases in the relative carbohydrate and fat oxidation at rest and during acute aerobic exercise. Vascular differences between MC phases are also relatively small or nonexistent. Although OCs can vary in composition and androgenicity, we acknowledge that much more work remains to be done in this area; however, based on what little evidence is currently available, we do not find compelling support for the notion that OC use significantly influences exercise performance, substrate oxidation, or hypertrophy. It is important to note that the study of females requires better methodological control in many areas. Previous studies lacking such rigor have contributed to premature or incorrect conclusions regarding the effects of the MC and systemic hormones on outcomes. While we acknowledge that the evidence in certain research areas is limited, the consensus view is that the impact of the MC and OC use on various aspects of physiology is small or nonexistent.