肝脏分段解剖的新认识

Advances in research of segmental anatomy of the liver

Since the concept of liver segmental anatomy was first put forward by Francis Glisson in 1654, Hjortsjo segmentation, Healey arteriobiliary segmentation, Couinaud portal and hepatic vein segmentation have been proposed. Although the nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections was introduced in the international conference of HPB held in Brisbane, Australia in 2000, the development of liver anatomical techniques (such as iconography and virtual digital technique) as well as the constantly updating knowledge about segmentation of the liver lobe and understanding of the anatomy have raised some new issues. Retrospective analysis and understanding of the features of various segmentation methods and the rules of clinical practice will help us find the most suitable idea of "precise liver resection" in nowadays.

An experimental study of triple split-liver transplantation in dogs

AIM: To explore the feasibility of a strategy of tripartition of a whole deceased liver graft for use in 3 recipients in dogs to ultimately maximize donor organ use.

METHODS: Adult healthy mongrel dogs were selected to be donors (n = 30, weighing between 20-25 kg) and recipients (n = 30, weighing between 8-15 kg). Donor/recipient pairs were randomly matched. For donor operation, transection of the parenchymal bridge was performed between the right lateral lobe and right middle lobe, and between the left middle lobe and the quadrate lobe. After in vivo perfusion, the left, middle and right liver grafts were procured, and their primary branches were cut near the main stem. Among the three liver grafts, the one was chosen to be implanted if it's GRWR (graft-to-recipient weight ratio) was more than 1.0% and was nearest to 1.5%. Recipients entered Groups A, B and C if the left, middle and right grafts were chosen, respectively. With the piggyback technique, the outflow orifice of liver graft was anastomosed to the anterolateral wall of the recipient vena cava. The graft was revascularized via reconstructed hepatic vein and portal vein, and then the hepatic artery and bile duct were anastomosed both in an end-to-end manner. Biliary and abdominal drainage was inspected postoperatively. Autopsies were performed promptly after recipients' death to investigate the possibility of technical complications.

RESULTS: By prominent fissures, the canine liver was divided into 7 lobes, among which the parenchymal bridges were thin. The parenchymal bridge connecting the right lateral lobe to the right middle lobe was much thinner than that connecting the left middle lobe to the quadrate lobe. No major conduit was found during transection of these two parenchymal bridges. The portal vein was split into three branches. The common bile duct was formed by the union of three hepatic ducts-the left, middle and right hepatic ducts. The hepatic vein consisted of the left, median and right hepatic veins. Anatomical variations in the hepatic arteries could be found. Among three recipient groups, the operation time, anhepatic time and blood loss did not show significant differences (P > 0.05), but the mean recipient weight, liver graft weight, and GRWR differed significantly (all P < 0.01). In the three groups, none of the recipients died during surgery. Once the hepatic vein and the portal vein were anastomosed and declamped, the implanted liver regained its color soon and its appearance returned to normal following arterial revascularization. There was no statistical difference in survival duration among the three groups (128.3 h ± 48.5 h vs 102.7 h ± 59.8 h vs 98.7 h ± 46.8 h, P = 0.234). Ascites and liver necrosis were not found at autopsy. Bile was present in the bile duct and all anastomoses were patent.

CONCLUSION: Our experimental results indicate that the whole liver of a big dog can be split into three parts, every one of which can be transplanted to a small recipient as an independent allograft.