Tiotropium for the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend the use of inhaled tiotropium in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, this statement is based on a relatively small number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and related systematic reviews. This review was undertaken to incorporate the more recent evidence available about the effectiveness of tiotropium bromide compared with placebo, iptratropium bromide or long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), for the treatment of stable COPD patients.

DATA SOURCE

Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (to February 2006) were searched to identify all published RCTs. We also searched bibliographies of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Data from 13 RCT (6078 subjects, 80% male) showed that tiotropium reduced COPD-related exacerbations (OR=0.76; 95% CI: 0.68-0.87) and hospital admissions (OR=0.59; 95% CI: 0.47-0.73) compared with placebo. Also, tiotropium showed statistically significant improvement in lung function, including trough, average, and peak FEV(1) and FVC from baseline, compared with placebo and ipratropium. The administration of inhaled tiotropium lead to 30% reduction in COPD-related admissions (OR= 0.67; 95% CI: 0.46-0.98) compared with LABAs. Finally, increases in FEV(1) and FVC from baseline were significantly larger with tiotropium than with LABAs.

CONCLUSIONS

This review clearly supports the beneficial effects of the use of tiotropium in stable moderate-to-severe COPD patients, and increases the evidence in favor of the superiority of tiotropium on LABAs.

[Calculation of morbidity, use of resources and costs of patients treated with tiotropium bromide for COPD in a Spanish population]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the co-morbidity and economic impact of treatment with tiotropium bromide (TB) for COPD, in a population cared for by Spanish primary care teams (PCTs) and specialist physicians, in the context of routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective multi-centre study.

SETTING

Four PCTs and 2 urban hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with COPD receiving regular treatment with TB, during 2004.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Age and sex, episodes of co-morbidity, clinical parameters, resource use, and pharmacological groups. The costs model was established by differentiating semi-fixed from variable costs (pharmacy, tests, referrals) in the PCTs, as well as the visits, emergencies and hospital admissions occurring in the hospitals. A logistical regression analysis was made to correct the model. The costs were contrasted by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the estimation of marginal means (Bonferroni adjustment).

RESULTS

Of 900 patients with COPD, 14.3% (n=129) received treatment with TB (95% CI, 12.0%-16.6%). The mean episodes/patient/year was 2.1 (1.4) versus 1.8 (1.3) (NS), seriousness/severity 41.3% versus 26.3% (P =.001), defined daily dose (DDD) 5928.5 (9624.1) versus 6187.7 (12471.3) (NS) and number visits/patient/year 15.1 (9.4) versus 17.3(11.9) (P=.044). After adjustments for age and sex, TB use was associated with Diabetes Mellitus (OR=1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5; P=.034) and severity of patients' illness (OR=1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8; P=.004). Quantification of unit cost/year was 2793.16 (3166.30) euros (3359.27 [3423.25] euros versus 2703.09 [3113.75] euros; P=.001). The adjusted patient cost/year was 2831.23 euros (SE, 217.32) with TB versus 2786.86 euros (SE, 88.53) without TB (NS).

CONCLUSIONS

TB is associated, as therapy complementing routine treatment, with the presence of Diabetes, and with the severity of the disease. The costs of COPD entail high resource consumption. The prescription of TB does not imply greater overall cost of the disease.