[Comprehensive guidelines translate research findings into clinical policy for HIV-infected transplant candidates and recipients]

Kidney Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients: Therapeutic Strategy and Outcomes in Monocentric Experience

BACKGROUND

In Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients undergoing kidney transplantation, outcomes and immunosuppression (IS) protocol are not yet established due to infectious and neoplastic risks as well as to pharmacokinetic interactions with antiretroviral therapy (TARV).

METHODS

We report a retrospective, 1-center study on 18 HIV+ patients undergoing, between October 2007 and September 2015, kidney transplantation (13 cases) or combined kidney-liver transplant (5 cases). Inclusion criteria for transplant were based on the Italian National Transplant Center protocol. IS regimen was based on quick tapering of steroids and the use of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) with low dose of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). In the early post-transplant period, TARV was based on enfuvirtide, raltegravir, plus 1 or more nucleoside analogues.

RESULTS

In a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, patient survival rate at 1 and 3 years was, respectively, 86.6% and 84.6%, whereas graft survival was 81.2% and 78.6%. Cumulative rejection rate was 20.0% and 26.6% (1- and 3-year results). Median eGFR (MDRD) was 58.8 mL/min and 51.9 mL/min at 1 and 3 years. We had 9 cases of clinically relevant infections (2 Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, 1 pulmonary aspergillosis, 2 severe sepsis, and 4 HCV reactivation) as well as 1 case (5.5%) of HIV reactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

IS therapy based on mTORi and low CNI dose ensures good graft survival, low rate of acute rejection, limited drug toxicity, and control of HIV disease. TARV has no significant interaction with IS therapy.

Liver transplantation in HCV/HIV positive patients

Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in 1996 for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, the incidence of liver diseases secondary to co-infection with hepatitis C has increased. Although data on the outcome of liver transplantation in HIV-infected recipients is limited, the overall results to date seem to be comparable to that in non-HIV-infected recipients. Liver transplant centers are now accepting HIV-infected individuals as organ recipients. Post-transplantation HIV replication is controlled by HAART. Hepatitis C re-infection of the liver graft, however, remains an important problem because cirrhotic changes of the liver graft may be more rapid in HIV-infected recipients. Interactions between the HAART components and immunosuppressive drugs influence drug metabolism and therefore meticulous monitoring of drug blood level concentrations is required. The risk of opportunistic infection in HIV-positive transplant patients seems to be similar to that in HIV-negative transplant recipients.

Liver transplantation in HIV-positive patients

This article reviews the worldwide evolution of liver transplantation as a therapeutic intervention in HIV-infected patients. Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), liver disease secondary to viral hepatitis has become a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among HIV-positive individuals. The authors contrast survival data from pilot studies in the pre-HAART era to those data emerging from more recent trials. Particular emphasis is placed on current selection criteria for HIV-positive transplant candidates. Additional consideration is given to the effect of prolonged transplant waiting time on survival outcome. The complexity of the post-transplant medication regime, including drug interactions, optimal immunosuppression and most appropriate HAART regimes, are discussed in detail. Postoperative challenges including optimal management of hepatitis B virus and recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are reviewed separately. The ethical and practical arguments relating to the use of a scarce and valuable resource in this population are debated. The authors conclude with several recommendations to assist pretransplant assessment and postoperative management of such complex patients and speculate on the direction and evolution of this field in the coming years.