Peri-operative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal lung metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Several studies have evaluated surgical resection of pulmonary metastases as a standard treatment option for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with resectable pulmonary metastases. However, the role of peri-operative chemotherapy after complete resection of pulmonary metastases from CRC patients is still controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of peri-operative chemotherapy after resection of CRC pulmonary metastases.

Methods

PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, and Embase were searched for studies evaluating the effect of peri-operative chemotherapy on the survival of patients with CRC after pulmonary metastasectomy. The hazard ratio (HR) was used for analyzing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Eight studies were included in the final analysis. The outcome showed that peri-operative chemotherapy had a significant favourable effect on OS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75–0.92, p < 0.05) and PFS/RFS/DFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53–0.86, p < 0.05) in patients who received pulmonary metastasectomy. Multivariate analysis also validated this result (OS: HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.86, p < 0.05; PFS/RFS/DFS: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46–0.87, p < 0.05). There was a significant benefit in peri-operative group on OS and PFS/RFS/DFS in studies with R0 resection of pulmonary metastases (OS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.97, p < 0.05; PFS/RFS/DFS: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54–0.95, p < 0.05) and metachronous pulmonary metastases (OS: HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.75, p < 0.05; PFS/RFS/DFS: HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49–0.92, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favor of peri-operative chemotherapy in CRC patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases. More clinical data and studies are needed to validate the findings of our study.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-020-03142-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve the prognosis of patients after resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after resection of pulmonary metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). This meta-analysis was intended to evaluate the efficacy of ACT in patients after resection of PM from CRC.

METHODS

We systematically retrieved articles from PMC, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase (up to March 5, 2019). Survival data, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were tested by hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 18 cohort studies with a total of 3885 patients. The meta-analysis showed that ACT had no significant effect on OS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.60-1.03; P = 0.077) and DFS (HR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.74-1.11; P = 0.339) in patients after resection of PM from CRC. There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.42-1.50; P = 0.474) in patients after resection of PM from CRC treated with bevacizumab (BV). Subgroup analysis showed that ACT did not improve OS (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.57-1.29; P = 0.461) in patients who had undergone previous resection of extra PM. ACT did not improve OS in patients who had positive hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis (HR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.57-1.14; P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, ACT does not provide survival benefits for patients after resection of PM from CRC. ACT and targeted agents (BV) are not suggested for these patients.

Survival after initial lung metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer in the modern chemotherapeutic era

Background

A clear survival benefit has been reported for lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer, and several clinicopathological prognostic factors have been proposed in the past. However, clinical advances, such as chemotherapy and radiographic imaging, should have improved patient outcome and may have altered prognosticators. This study aimed to assess patient survival and determine prognostic factors for survival and recurrence in patients who underwent initial lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer in the modern clinical era.

Methods

Clinicopathological data and outcomes of 59 patients who underwent curative initial lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2012 at a single institution in Japan were retrospectively investigated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan - Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the prognostic impacts of each variable in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

The 5-years overall and disease-free survival rates were 54.3 and 40.6%, respectively. A disease-free interval < 24 months after colorectal cancer resection (P = 0.004) and a serum carcinoembryonic antigen ≥ 5.0 ng/mL before initial lung metastasectomy (P = 0.015) were independent predictors for poor overall survival. Moreover, the disease-free interval after colorectal cancer resection < 24 months (P = 0.010) and a colorectal cancer with N2 stage disease (P = 0.018) were independently associated with poor disease-free survival. On the other hand, the number of lung metastasis was not identified as a poor prognostic factor for both overall and disease-free survival.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrated similar or slightly better overall survival, and substantially favorable disease-free survival as compared with past reports. Poor prognostic factors for overall survival appeared not to differ from those of past studies, although this modern series did not determine the number of lung metastasis as a poor prognostic factor, which should be investigated in future studies. Moreover, initial lung metastasectomy is not expected to be a curable treatment for patients with both a short disease-free survival after colorectal cancer resection and colorectal cancers with N2 stage disease.

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with resected pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the impact of modern chemotherapy regimens and bevacizumab following pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) from metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

A total of 122 consecutive patients who were curatively resected for pulmonary metastases of CRC in twelve oncology centers were retrospectively analysed between January 2000 and April 2012.

RESULTS

Of 122 patients, 14 did not receive any treatment following PM. The remaining 108 patients received fluoropyrimidine-based (n = 12), irinotecan-based (n = 56) and oxaliplatin-based (n = 40) chemotherapy combinations. Among these, 52 patients received bevacizumab (BEV) while 56 did not (NoBEV). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 17 months and median overall survival (OS) has not been reached at a median follow-up of 25 months after PM. Three and five-year OS rates were 66% and 53%, respectively. RFS and OS were similar, irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen or BEV use. Positive pulmonary margin, KRAS mutation status, and previous liver metastasectomy were negative independent prognostic factors for RFS, while pathologically confirmed thoracic lymph node involvement was the only negative independent prognostic for OS in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant RFS or OS difference was observed in respect to chemotherapy regimens with or without BEV in patients with pulmonary metastases of CRC following curative resection.

Colorectal cancer pulmonary oligometastases: pooled analysis and construction of a clinical lung metastasectomy prognostic model

BACKGROUND

Although resecting colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastasis is associated with long-term survival, identification of prognostic groups is needed for future randomized trials, and construction of a lung metastasectomy prognostic model (LMPM) is warranted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for retrospective studies evaluating prognostic factors following resecting CRC lung metastasis. Individual patient data were analyzed. Independent prognostic factors were used to construct an LMPM.

RESULTS

Between 1983 and 2008, 1112 metastasectomies were carried out on 927 patients included in eight studies. Five-year survival rate was 54.3% following the first lung resection. Multivariate analysis identified three independently poor prognostic factors: pre-thoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen ≥5 ng/ml, disease-free interval <36 months, and more than one metastatic lesion. Patients with good-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups according to the LMPM had a 5-year survival of 68.2%, 46.4%, and 26.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Perioperative chemotherapy and previously resected liver metastasis had no influence on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The low- and intermediate-risk groups have a good chance of long-term survival following metastasectomy. However, more studies are needed to investigate whether surgery offers any advantage over systemic therapy for the poor-risk group.

[Prognostic factors of colorectal cancer lung metastases]

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the third most common neoplasia and the second cause of death due to cancer in developed countries. Approximately 10% of patients with this diagnosis develop lung metastases, although only 2-4% of them have lung metastases as the only extension location.

OBJECTIVE

To study the prognostic factors of colorectal cancer lung metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted on 30 patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases who were operated on in our hospital between January 2003 and December 2007.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients who received surgery, 19 were males (63%) and 11 were female (37%), with a mean age of 63.37 years (range 35-82 years). The mean overall survival was 36.64 months (range 18.58-54.70 months). A total of 13 pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters were used in the statistical analysis. In the univariate analysis, the number of metastases greater than 3 (P=.051), whether they were bilateral (P=.001), or bilobar (P<.001), were statistically significant factors of a poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, only being bilobar was shown to be a statistically significant factor of a poor prognosis (P=.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In our patient series affected by colorectal carcinoma lung metastases, the number of metastases greater than three, whether they are bilobar and bilateral, are factors of a poor prognosis. These factors should be taken into account in the follow-up of these patients, although prospective studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm these findings.

[Detection of lymph node involvement and surgical treatment of pulmonary neoplastic processes. Current state of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures]

An analysis is made of different publications associated with the surgical staging and treatment of primary and metastasic pulmonary neoplastic processes. A suitable treatment program is essential to determine lymph node involvement in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. The indication and sequence of the procedure to use (CT-PET, transbronchial puncture, videomediastinoscopic ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration) is evaluated in accordance to the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of the different methods. Another interesting challenge is to define the criteria for indicating a sublobar resection in certain tumours and patients. Different factors, age, lung function, tumour location and type of sublobar resection, are analysed. Levels of evidence and recommendations of the procedure are also considered. Surgical resection is an accepted therapeutic option in the treatment of colorectal cancer lung metastases. Its indication is based on acceptable survival rates and knowledge of the impact of various factors (interval free of disease, number of metastases, presence of liver metastasis, presence of lymph node involvement, or increased pre-operative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen), is analysed in detail.

[Survival analysis of resection of lung metastases from colorectal cancer]

INTRODUCTION

The publication of the International Registry of Lung Metastases (IRLM) in 1997 was a turning point in favor of surgical resection of lung metastases. Prognostic groups were defined according to resectability, number of metastases, and disease-free interval. The objective of this study was to determine survival in patients who underwent resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma and to evaluate how applicable the prognostic factors established by the IRLM are in this specific patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma who underwent resection between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2006, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with log-rank comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

Survivals at 1, 3, 5, and 6 years was 92%, 75%, 54%, and 43%, respectively. The main finding was that 3-year survival was better in patients who underwent atypical resection of the metastasis (75%) than those who required lobectomy (55%). There were no significant differences in survival in terms of number of lung metastases resected or disease-free interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival in patients requiring lobectomy for resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma was worse than in those who underwent atypical resection. The number of metastases and disease-free interval may be questionable prognostic factors in the case of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma.