Improvement in sensitivity with delayed imaging of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET

Diagnostic accuracy of visual analysis versus dual time-point imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT for the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules with low uptake

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of visual analysis and the retention index (RI) with dual-time point ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for the characterization of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) with low FDG uptake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 43 patients (28 men, 64 ± 11 years old, range 36-83 years) referred for IPN characterization with ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and maximum standard uptake value ≤ 2.5 at 60 minutes post-injection (SUV_max1). Nodules were analyzed by size, visual score for FDG uptake on standard (OSEM 2,8) and high definition (HD) reconstructions, SUV_max1, SUV_max at 180 minutes post-injection (SUV_max2), and RI was calculated. The definitive diagnosis was based on histopathological confirmation (n = 28) or ≥ 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (56%) nodules were malignant. RI ≥ 10% on standard reconstruction detected 18 nodules that would have been considered negative using the standard SUV_max ≥ 2.5 criterion for malignancy. RI ≥ 10% had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 75, 73.7, 78.3, 70, and 74.4%, respectively, while for FDG uptake > liver on HD these were 79.1, 63.2, 73.1, 70.6, and 72.1%, respectively. SUV_max1 ≥ 2, SUV_max2 > 2.5 and FDG uptake > liver on standard reconstruction had a PPV of 100%. FDG uptake > mediastinum on HD had a NPV of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

RI ≥ 10% was the most accurate criterion for malignancy, followed by FDG uptake > liver on HD reconstruction. On standard reconstruction, SUV_max1 ≥2 was highly predictive of malignancy, as well as SUV_max2 > 2.5 and FDG uptake > liver. FDG uptake < mediastinum on HD was highly predictive of benign nodules.

Dual-time point 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT for Differentiating Benign From Malignant Musculoskeletal Lesions: Opportunities and Limitations

In this review, we summarize the false-positive and false-negative results of standard ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in characterizing musculoskeletal lesions and discussed the added value and limitations of dual-time point imaging (DTPI) and delayed imaging in differentiating malignant from benign musculoskeletal lesions, based on review of the peer-reviewed literature. The quantitative and semiquantitative parameters adopted for DTPI are standardized uptake value (mainly maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax]) and retention index (RI), calculated as RI (%) = 100% × (SUV [maxD-Delayed] - SUV [maxE-Early])/SUV [maxE-Early], although the criteria and cutoff for diagnosing malignancy in studies have varied considerably. Also, there has been considerable heterogeneity in protocol (time point of delayed imaging), interpretation, and results in dual-time point (DTP) ¹⁸F-FDG-PET for differentiating malignant from benign musculoskeletal lesions in various research studies. The specificity of DTPI is a function of many factors such as the nature of the musculoskeletal lesion or malignancy in question, the prevalence of false-positive etiologies in the patient population, and the cutoff values (either SUVmax or RI) employed to define a malignancy. Despite the apparent conflicting reports on the performance, there have been certain common points of agreement regarding DTPI: (1) DTP PET increases the sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT due to continued clearance of background activity and increasing ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation in malignant lesions, when the same diagnostic criteria (as in the initial standard single-time point imaging) are used. Increased sensitivity for lesion detection can be viewed as a strong point of DTP and delayed-time point imaging. (2) The causes for false positives (such as active infectious or inflammatory lesions and locally aggressive benign tumors) and false negatives (eg, low-grade sarcomas) are the major hurdles accounting for reduced diagnostic value of the technique, with overlap of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake patterns between benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions on DTPI. (3) DTPI, however, could still be potentially useful in increasing the confidence of interpretation such as differentiating malignancy from sites of inactive or chronic inflammation, post-treatment viable residue vs necrosis, and certain other benign lesions. (4) Consideration of diagnostic CT component of PET/CT and the patient's clinical picture can lead to increase in specificity of interpretation in a given case scenario. Further systematic research, adoption of uniform protocol, and interpretation criterion could evolve the specific indications and interpretation criteria of DTPI for improved diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions and its clinical applications.

Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in areas with infectious lung disease: a meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Positron emission tomography (PET) combined with fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) is recommended for the noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer. In populations with endemic infectious lung disease, FDG-PET may not accurately identify malignant lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET for pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer in regions where infectious lung disease is endemic and compare the test accuracy in regions where infectious lung disease is rare.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Web of Science were searched from October 1, 2000, through April 28, 2014. Articles reporting information sufficient to calculate sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer were included. Only studies that enrolled more than 10 participants with benign and malignant lesions were included. Database searches yielded 1923 articles, of which 257 were assessed for eligibility. Seventy studies were included in the analysis. Studies reported on a total of 8511 nodules; 5105 (60%) were malignant.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Abstracts meeting eligibility criteria were collected by a research librarian and reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. A random-effects logistic regression model was used to summarize and assess the effect of endemic infectious lung disease on test performance.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The sensitivity and specificity for FDG-PET test performance.

RESULTS

Heterogeneity for sensitivity (I2 = 87%) and specificity (I2 = 82%) was observed across studies. The pooled (unadjusted) sensitivity was 89% (95% CI, 86%-91%) and specificity was 75% (95% CI, 71%-79%). There was a 16% lower average adjusted specificity in regions with endemic infectious lung disease (61% [95% CI, 49%-72%]) compared with nonendemic regions (77% [95% CI, 73%-80%]). Lower specificity was observed when the analysis was limited to rigorously conducted and well-controlled studies. In general, sensitivity did not change appreciably by endemic infection status, even after adjusting for relevant factors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The accuracy of FDG-PET for diagnosing lung nodules was extremely heterogeneous. Use of FDG-PET combined with computed tomography was less specific in diagnosing malignancy in populations with endemic infectious lung disease compared with nonendemic regions. These data do not support the use of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in endemic regions unless an institution achieves test performance accuracy similar to that found in nonendemic regions.

18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and background tissues

Background

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established imaging modality for a wide variety of solid malignancies. Currently, only limited data exists regarding the utility of PET/CT imaging at very extended injection-to-scan acquisition times. The current retrospective data analysis assessed the feasibility and quantification of diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals.

Methods

¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesions (not surgically manipulated or altered during ¹⁸F-FDG-directed surgery, and visualized both on preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging) and corresponding background tissues were assessed for ¹⁸F-FDG accumulation on same-day preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Multiple patient variables and ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion variables were examined.

Results

For the 32 ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesions making up the final ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion data set (from among 7 patients), the mean injection-to-scan times of the preoperative and postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were 73 (±3, 70-78) and 530 (±79, 413-739) minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion SUV_max values were 7.7 (±4.0, 3.6-19.5) and 11.3 (±6.0, 4.1-29.2), respectively (P < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative mean background SUV_max values were 2.3 (±0.6, 1.0-3.2) and 2.1 (±0.6, 1.0-3.3), respectively (P = 0.017). The preoperative and postoperative mean lesion-to-background SUV_max ratios were 3.7 (±2.3, 1.5-9.8) and 5.8 (±3.6, 1.6-16.2), respectively, (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging can be successfully performed at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals of up to approximately 5 half-lives for ¹⁸F-FDG while maintaining good/adequate diagnostic image quality. The resultant increase in the ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lesion SUV_max values, decreased background SUV_max values, and increased lesion-to-background SUV_max ratios seen from preoperative to postoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging have great potential for allowing for the integrated, real-time use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging in conjunction with ¹⁸F-FDG-directed interventional radiology biopsy and ablation procedures and ¹⁸F-FDG-directed surgical procedures, as well as have far-reaching impact on potentially re-shaping future thinking regarding the “most optimal” injection-to-scan acquisition time interval for all routine diagnostic ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging.

When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET?

FDG PET and PET/CT are now widely used in oncological imaging for tumor characterization, staging, restaging, and response evaluation. However, numerous benign etiologies may cause increased FDG uptake indistinguishable from that of malignancy. Multiple studies have shown that dual time-point imaging (DTPI) of FDG PET may be helpful in differentiating malignancy from benign processes. However, exceptions exist, and some studies have demonstrated significant overlap of FDG uptake patterns between benign and malignant lesions on delayed time-point images. In this review, we summarize our experience and opinions on the value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging in oncology, with a review of the relevant literature. We believe that the major value of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging is the increased sensitivity due to continued clearance of background activity and continued FDG accumulation in malignant lesions, if the same diagnostic criteria (as in the initial standard single time-point imaging) are used. The specificity of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging depends on multiple factors, including the prevalence of malignancies, the patient population, and the cut-off values (either SUV or retention index) used to define a malignancy. Thus, DTPI and delayed time-point imaging would be more useful if performed for evaluation of lesions in regions with significant background activity clearance over time (such as the liver, the spleen, the mediastinum), and if used in the evaluation of the extent of tumor involvement rather than in the characterization of the nature of any specific lesion. Acute infectious and non-infectious inflammatory lesions remain as the major culprit for diminished diagnostic performance of these approaches (especially in tuberculosis-endemic regions). Tumor heterogeneity may also contribute to inconsistent performance of DTPI. The authors believe that selective use of DTPI and delayed time-point imaging will improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretation confidence in FDG PET imaging.

Potential value of dual-time-point ¹⁸F-FDG PET compared with initial single-time-point imaging in differentiating malignant from benign pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to assess the potential value of dual-time-point (DTP) imaging as compared with initial single-time-point (STP) scanning with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET in differentiating malignant from benign single pulmonary nodules. Data on the performance of DTP 18F-FDG PET imaging in assessing lung nodules were extracted from articles of prospective or retrospective original research published between January 2001 and April 2010. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool was used to assess the quality of study methodology. Heterogeneity in the results of the studies was assessed, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were constructed. Eleven studies comprising a total of 788 patients who underwent initial scanning, 778 of whom also underwent DTP imaging, were included in the final analysis. The quality of study methodology was judged to be moderate. Substantial heterogeneity in the results of the studies, with inconsistency (I2) index values above 85%, reflected important differences in study methods and populations, including varying lesion sizes, 18F-FDG avidity, uptake interval for delayed imaging, and threshold for positive result on DTP imaging. SROC curve analysis revealed a statistically nonsignificant trend toward higher sensitivity with DTP imaging, at moderate levels of specificity, when compared with initial STP scanning. The area under the curve (SE) values for DTP and initial STP imaging were 0.839 (0.079) and 0.757 (0.074), respectively. Although the results of our analysis do not support the routine use of DTP imaging with 18F-FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, this technique may provide additional information in selected cases with equivocal results from initial scanning. Further prospective research is required to better define the potential benefits of DTP 18F-FDG PET imaging.

First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses

The recently introduced first integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner allows simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI data in humans and, thus, may offer new opportunities, particularly regarding diagnostics in oncology. This scanner features major technologic differences from conventional PET/CT devices, including the replacement of photomultipliers with avalanche photodiodes and the need for MRI-based attenuation correction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of clinical performance between conventional PET/CT and PET/MR in patients with oncologic diseases.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with different oncologic diagnoses underwent a single-injection, dual-imaging protocol consisting of a PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR scan. PET/CT scans were performed according to standard clinical protocols (86 ± 8 min after injection of 401 ± 42 MBq of (18)F-FDG, 2 min/bed position). Subsequently (140 ± 24 min after injection), PET/MR was performed (4 min/bed position). PET images of both modalities were reconstructed iteratively. Attenuation and scatter correction as well as regional allocation of PET findings were performed using low-dose CT data for PET/CT and Dixon MRI sequences for PET/MR. PET/MR and PET/CT were compared visually by 2 teams of observers by rating the number and location of lesions suspicious for malignancy, as well as image quality and alignment. For quantitative comparison, standardized uptake values (SUVs) of the detected lesions and of different tissue types were assessed.

RESULTS

Simultaneous PET/MR acquisition was feasible with high quality in short acquisition time (≤ 20 min). No significant difference was found between the numbers of suspicious lesions (n = 80) or lesion-positive patients (n = 20) detected with PET/MR or PET/CT. Anatomic allocation of PET/MR findings by means of the Dixon MRI sequence was comparable to allocation of PET/CT findings by means of low-dose CT. Quantitative evaluation revealed a high correlation between mean SUVs measured with PET/MR and PET/CT in lesions (ρ = 0.93) and background tissue (ρ = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates, for what is to our knowledge the first time, that integrated whole-body PET/MR is feasible in a clinical setting with high quality and in a short examination time. The reliability of PET/MR was comparable to that of PET/CT in allowing the detection of hypermetabolic lesions suspicious for malignancy in patients with oncologic diagnoses. Despite different attenuation correction approaches, tracer uptake in lesions and background correlated well between PET/MR and PET/CT. The Dixon MRI sequences acquired for attenuation correction were found useful for anatomic allocation of PET findings obtained by PET/MR in the entire body. These encouraging results may form the foundation for future studies aiming to define the added value of PET/MR over PET/CT.

Diagnostic performance of dual-time 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Perform a comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic performance of dual time point deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PUBMED were queried between January 2000 and January 2011. Studies were included if they: 1) used dual time point FDG-PET as a diagnostic test for pulmonary nodules, 2) used pathology or clinical follow-up as the reference standard, and 3) reported absolute number of true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) results or stated sufficient data to derive these values. Summary sensitivity (SN), summary specificity (SP), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+) and (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated. Heterogeneity of the results was assessed using Forest plots and the value of inconsistency index (I(2)).

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 10 articles with a total of 816 patients and 890 pulmonary nodules. The summary sensitivity was 85% (82%-89% at 95% confidence interval [CI]) and summary specificity was 77% (CI: 72%-81%), with a LR+ of 2.7 (CI: 1.4-5.2) and a LR- of 0.26 (CI: 0.14-0.49). Diagnostic odds ratio was 11 (CI: 3.8-32.2). Significant heterogeneity was found in the sensitivity (I(2) = 77%) and specificity (90.3%).

CONCLUSION

Dual time point FDG-PET demonstrates similar sensitivity and specificity to single time point FDG-PET in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. The additive value of the dual time point FDG-PET is questionable, primarily because of the significant overlap of benign and malignant nodule FDG-PET characteristics and lack of consensus criteria for quantitative thresholds to define nodules as malignant.

(18)F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications

AIM

To evaluate the effect of the 18F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating (4D) study in the correct documentation of pulmonary lesions with faint uptake in standard PET-CT.

METHODS

Forty-two pulmonary lesions with a low or no detectable uptake of FDG (SUV(max) < 2.5) in 3D PET-CT were prospectively evaluated in 28 patients (19 males and 9 females), mean age 66.5 years (41-81). 22 patients had neoplastic background. A conventional PET-CT (3D) total body scan was performed approximately 60 min after iv injection of a mean dose of 370 MBq. Furthermore, a 4D PET-CT (synchronized with respiratory movement) thorax study was acquired. SUV(max) was determined for each lesion in both studies. For the 4D studies, we selected the SUV(max) in respiratory period with the highest uptake ("best bin"). We calculated the SUV(max) percentage difference between 3D and 4D PET-CT (% difference = SUV(max) 4D - SUV(max) 3D/SUV(max) 3D x 100) and the relation of this value with the size and locations of the lesions. In 4D study, any lesion with SUV(max) > or = 2.5 was classified as malignant. We assessed the changes of lesion classification (from benign to malignant) applying the 4D technique. The final diagnosis was obtained by histological assessment or clinical and radiological follow-up longer than 12 months.

RESULTS

Forty out of 42 lesions showed an increase of SUV(max) in the 4D study with respect to 3D. The mean SUV(max) in the 3D and 4D PET-CT studies were 1.33 (+/-0.59) and 2.26 (+/-0.87), respectively. The SUV(max) percentage difference mean between both techniques was 83.3% (+/-80.81).The smaller the lesion the greater was the SUV(max) percentage difference (P < 0.05). No differences were observed depending on the location of the lesion. In 40% of cases, there was a change in the final classification of lesions from benign to malignant. In the final diagnosis, 24 lesions were malignant. 4D PET-CT diagnosed correctly the 52% of them.

CONCLUSIONS

The 4D PET-CT study permitted a better characterization of malignant lung lesions compared with the standard PET-CT, because of its higher sensitivity. 4D PET-CT is a recommendable technique in the early diagnosis of malignant lesions.

Evaluation of pulmonary nodules and lung cancer with one-inch crystal gamma coincidence positron emission tomography/CT versus dedicated positron emission tomography/CT

Dedicated positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scanners using BGO and related detectors (d-PET) have become standard imaging instruments in many malignancies. Hybrid gamma camera systems using NaI detectors in coincidence mode (g-PET) have been compared to d-PET but reported usefulness has been variable when gamma cameras with half-inch to three-fourth-inch thick crystals have been used without CT. Our aim was to compare g-PET with a 1-in.-thick crystal and inbuilt CT for lesion localization and attenuation correction (g-PET/CT) and d-PET/CT in patients presenting with potential and confirmed lung malignancies. One hour after (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), patients underwent BGO d-PET/CT from jaw to proximal thigh. This was followed by one to two bed position g-PET/CT 194 +/- 27 min after FDG. Each study pair was independently analysed with concurrent CT. d-PET/CT was interpreted by a radiologist experienced in both PET and CT, and g-PET/CT by consensus reading of an experienced PET physician and an experienced CT radiologist. A TNM score was assigned and studies were then unblinded and compared. Fifty-seven patients underwent 58 scan pairs over 2 years. Eighty-nine per cent concordance was shown between g-PET/CT and d-PET/CT for the assessment of intrapulmonary lesions, with 100% concordance for intrapulmonary lesions >10 mm (36 of 36). Eighty-eight per cent (51 of 58) concordance was shown between g-PET/CT and d-PET/CT for TNM staging. Coincidence imaging using an optimized dual-head 1-in.-thick crystal gamma camera with inbuilt CT compares reasonably well with dedicated PET/CT for evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary lesions and staging of pulmonary malignancies and may be of some value when d-PET/CT is not readily available.

Accuracy of early and delayed FDG PET-CT and of contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of lung nodules: a preliminary study on 30 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of our prospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of early, delayed and dual-time-point positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition with contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) within a PET-CT examination in the evaluation of pulmonary solitary nodules (SPNs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients underwent a dual-time-point PET-CT examination. Whole-body PET images were acquired at 50 min after fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) administration (early), followed by a chest acquisition (delayed). Lung nodules with maximum standardised uptake value SUVmax > or =2.5 were considered malignant. SUVmax was calculated on early and delayed images; SUV increasing > or =10% (Delta SUVmax) was considered suggestive of malignancy. Absence of significant lung nodule enhancement (<15 Delta HU) at CT was considered strongly predictive of benignity. For the CT morphological assessment, the irregularity of the shape of each lesion was rated. PET-CT results were related to histological assays and clinical records. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by area under the receiveroperarting characteristic (ROC) curves analysis.

RESULTS

Early and delayed SUVmax of malignant nodules were significantly higher than those of benign disease. Early SUVmax sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 77%, 91%, 79.5% and 66.7%; delayed SUVmax corresponding values were 77%, 66%, 74% and 66%; dual-time-point SUVmax values were 83%, 67%, 75% and 74%; DeltaHU values were 94%, 34%, 67%, 96%; CT morphologic evaluation values were 61%, 46%, 60%, 47%. Area under the curve (AUC) for early SUVmax was 0.79, for delayed SUVmax 0.80, for dual-time-point SUVmax 0.85, for DeltaHU 0.63 and for CT morphologic assessment 0.58.

CONCLUSIONS

In our small series of patients, early and delayed SUVmax showed comparable accuracies, whereas morphological and contrast enhanced CT evaluations showed the lowest accuracies. Dual-time-point SUVmax showed the largest AUC. However, dual-time-point SUVmax was most sensitive, whereas single-time-point SUVmax was most specific.

Dual-time point 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for differentiation between 18F-FDG-avid non-small cell lung cancer and benign lesions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to clarify the difference of F-18 FDG uptake kinetics between FDG-avid non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions associated with various etiologies on dual-time point PET/CT scan, and to determine the optimal parameter for differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The materials were 76 FDG-avid solitary NSCLC in 76 patients and 57 FDG-avid solitary benign lesions associated with various etiologies in 61 patients. FDG PET/CT scan was performed at 60 and 120 min after intravenous injection of 4.4 MBq/kg F-18 FDG. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on early and delayed scans and the percent change of SUVmax (%DeltaSUVmax) between the two time points were measured. The optimal differential parameter was determined by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD of early SUV max, delayed SUVmax and %DeltaSUVmax were 8.3 +/- 5.2, and 10.2 +/- 6.5, and 21.9% +/- 18.9 in FDG-avid NSCLC, and 3.8 +/- 3.2, 4.0 +/- 3.7, and 11.3% +/- 26.0 in FDG-avid benign lesions, respectively. Delayed SUVmax in NSCLC was significantly higher than early SUVmax (P < 0.0001); while not different in benign lesions. Percent change of SUVmax in NSCLC was also significantly higher than that in benign lesions (P < 0.01). The optimal parameter for the differentiation was delayed SUVmax > 5.5 and yielded sensitivity of 77.6%, specificity of 80.7% and accuracy of 78.9%, which provided better differentiation than the use of %DeltaSUVmax or the traditional parameter of early SUVmax > 2.5. However, 11 (19.2%) benign lesions were indistinguishable from NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Although delayed PET/CT scan enhances the difference of FDG uptake between FDG-avid NSCLC and benign lesions, and the use of delayed SUVmax > 5.5 appears to improve the differentiation of these hypermetabolic lesions compared with an early scan, careful interpretation and management for correct differentiation are still required.

Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node staging in patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer and inflammatory lung disease

As (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is taken up by inflammatory lymph nodes, it could be falsely interpreted as metastasis. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of lung cancer when inflammatory lung disease coexisted. Patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer and FDG-avid lymph nodes were retrospectively classified into two groups; those with inflammatory lung disease (ILD) and those without it (NILD). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), pattern of FDG uptake, maximum Hounsfield unit, and size, and then the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were compared between subgroups. There were 124 patients (ILD/NILD = 38/86) and 396 FDG-avid lymph nodes (ILD/NILD = 140/256). The average number of FDG-avid lymph nodes was greater in ILD (3.7 vs. 2.9, p = 0.039), whereas the proportion of metastasis was higher in NILD (25.4% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.002). With all N1-N3 lymph nodes and the NILD group, the AUC values of all four parameters were significantly greater than 0.5 (p < 0.05), and SUVmax was the most valuable parameter for lymph node metastasis. However, in the ILD group, only the AUC value of SUVmax was significantly greater than 0.5. These results were reproduced when analyses were performed with N1-N2 lymph nodes. In conclusion, SUVmax was the most valuable PET/CT parameter for assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer. In addition, it was the only valuable parameter when inflammatory lung disease coexisted.