Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging for Phenotyping and Management of Lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) represents molecular imaging for non-invasive phenotyping of physiological and biochemical processes in various oncological diseases. PET imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) for glucose metabolism evaluation is the standard imaging modality for the clinical management of lymphoma. One of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET applications is the detection and pre-treatment staging of lymphoma, which is highly sensitive. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also applied during treatment to evaluate the individual chemo-sensitivity and accordingly guide the response-adapted therapy. At the end of the therapy regiment, a negative PET scan is indicative of a good prognosis in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy may be alleviated. Future PET studies using non-¹⁸F-FDG radiotracers, such as ⁶⁸Ga-labeled pentixafor (a cyclic pentapeptide that enables sensitive and high-contrast imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4), ⁶⁸Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) that reflects the tumor microenvironment, and ⁸⁹Zr-labeled atezolizumab that targets the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), may complement ¹⁸F-FDG and offer essential tools to decode lymphoma phenotypes further and identify the mechanisms of lymphoma therapy.

The optimal use of PET/CT in the management of lymphoma patients

¹⁸F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans play an important role in the management of lymphoma patients. They are critical to accurately stage disease and assess its response to therapy. In addition, PET/CT scans enable precise target delineation for radiation therapy planning. In this review, we describe the use of PET/CT scans in lymphoma, with a focus on their role in staging disease, assessing response to therapy, predicting prognosis, and planning RT.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of Hodgkin and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: An update

¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is now an integral part of lymphoma staging and management. Because of its greater accuracy compared with CT alone, PET/CT is currently routinely performed for staging and for response assessment at the end of treatment in the vast majority of FDG-avid lymphomas and is the cornerstone of response classification for these lymphomas according to the Lugano classification. Interim PET/CT, typically performed after 2 to 4 of 6 to 8 chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy cycles with or without radiation, is commonly performed for prognostication and potential treatment escalation or de-escalation early in the course of therapy, a concept known as response-adapted or risk-adapted treatment. Quantitative PET is an area of growing interest. Metrics, such as the standardized uptake value, changes (Δ) in the standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis, are being investigated as more reproducible and potentially more accurate predictors of response and prognosis. Despite the progress made in standardizing the use of PET/CT in lymphoma, challenges remain, particularly with respect to its limited positive predictive value, emphasizing the need for more specific molecular probes. This review highlights the most relevant applications of PET/CT in Hodgkin and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, its strengths and limitations, as well as recent efforts at implementing PET/CT-based metrics as promising tools for precision medicine.

Overview and recent advances in PET/CT imaging in lymphoma and multiple myeloma

Imaging in hematological diseases has evolved extensively over the past several decades. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with of 2-[18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ([18 F] FDG) is currently essential for accurate staging and for early and late therapy response assessment for all FDG-avid lymphoproliferative histologies. The widely adopted visual Deauville 5-point scale and Lugano Classification recommendations have recently standardized PET scans interpretation and improved lymphoma patient management. In addition [18 F] FDG-PET is routinely recommended for initial evaluation and treatment response assessment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) with significant contribution in risk-stratification and prognostication, although magnetic resonance imaging remains the Gold Standard for the assessment of bone marrow involvement. In this review, an overview of the role of [18 F] FDG-PET, in hematological malignancies is provided, particularly focusing on Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), both in adult and pediatric populations, and MM, at each point of patient management. Potential alternative molecular imaging applications in this field, such as non-[18 F] FDG-tracers, whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), hybrid PET/MRI and emerging radiomics research are briefly presented.

FDG-PET Imaging for Hodgkin and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma-An Updated Overview

Since the mid-1990s, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with computed tomography has come to play a prominent role in the management of malignant lymphomas. One of the first PET applications in oncology was the detection of lymphoma manifestations at staging, where it has shown high sensitivity. Nowadays, this imaging modality is also used during treatment to evaluate the individual chemosensitivity and adapt further therapy accordingly. If the end-of-treatment PET is negative, irradiation in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients can be safely omitted after highly effective chemotherapy. Thus far, lymphoma response assessment has mainly been performed using visual criteria, such as the Deauville five-point scale, which became the international standard in 2014. However, novel measures such as metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis have recently been recognized by several working groups and may further increase the diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG-PET in the future.

Performance of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography and Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detecting Bone Marrow Infiltration in Lymphoma Cases

Objective:

Bone marrow infiltration (BMI) affects the stage diagnosis, and treatment of lymphoma. We aimed to evaluate the performance of bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting BMI in lymphoma patients.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 269 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and 110 Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) patients were evaluated retrospectively. Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for PET/CT and BMB in detecting BMI.

Results:

Sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy for PET/CT in detecting BMI in NHL cases were 65%, 78%, and 84.4%, respectively, while they were 55%, 73.4%, and 79.9% for BMB. PET/CT performance for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma was better than that of BMB, whereas the performance of BMB was better for mantle-cell lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy for PET/CT in HL cases were 91.3%, 97.75%, and 98.18%, respectively, while they were 56.52%, 89.69%, and 90.91% for BMB. Due to BMB, 43 (15.9%) patients in the NHL group and 2 (1.8%) patients in the HL group were protected from downstaging.

Conclusion:

Although their results vary according to NHL subtypes, PET/CT and BMB are complementary methods in determining BMI. In HL, PET/CT is an important diagnostic tool for detecting BMI, and BMB is not necessary in a significant proportion of cases.

Detection of bone marrow involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma

Background

Bone marrow involvement (BMI) affects the lymphoma stage, survival, and treatment. Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography- computed tomography (PET/CT) are useful techniques to detect BMI. Both have advantages and disadvantages. We aimed to identify factors that could be used to predict BMI with positive and negative results on PET/CT compare them with BMB in newly diagnosed patients with lymphoma.

Methods

We included 22 non-Hodgkin and 16 Hodgkin lymphoma patients in this single center study. All patients had PET/CT examination and BMB before treatment. BMI in BMB was reported as negative or positive. Bone marrow was classified into 3 types by FDG uptake on PT/CT; diffuse involvement, focal involvement, and normal bone marrow.

Results

PET/CT and BMB results were concordant (7 positive, 15 negative) in 22 patients (57%). We evaluated concordant and discordant patient characteristics and risk-stratified patients for BMI. Our findings suggest that patients with diffuse FDG uptake on PET/CT, especially patients with advanced age and low platelet and white blood cell counts, are likely to have BMI and could potentially forego BMB. Patients with negative PET/CT findings and no significant laboratory abnormalities are very unlikely to have BMI.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that BMI should not be decided solely based PET/CT or BMB findings. It is reasonable to use both diagnostic assays along with clinical and laboratory findings. PET/CT result, clinical and laboratory findings could be useful for predicting BMI in patient for whom BMB is contraindicated.

Evaluation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography versus 18FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in initial staging and restaging after treatment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To prospectively compare the accuracy in initial staging and end-of-treatment restaging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) between 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (64MDCT) and 18FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FGD PET/CT) with intravenous contrast injection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Randomised and blind controlled clinical multicentric trial that included biopsy-proven DLBCL patients. Seventy-two patients from five different hospitals in the region of Madrid, Spain, were enrolled in the study between January 2012 and June 2015. Thirty-six were randomly allocated to 18FDG PET/TC and the other 36 to 64MDCT for initial staging and end-of-treatment restaging. A nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist independently analysed 18FDG PET/TC images and reached an agreement post-hoc. 64MDCT images were separately evaluated by a different radiologist. Every set of images was compared to the reference standard that included clinical data, complementary tests and follow-up. The study was approved by participating centres' ethics committees and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

RESULTS

A good agreement was observed between both diagnostic techniques and the reference standard in initial staging [18FDG PET/CT (k=0.5) and 64MDCT (k=0.6)], although only the 18FDG PET/TC showed a good agreement with the reference standard for the end-of-treatment restaging (k=0.7).

CONCLUSION

In DLBCL, both 18FDG PET/TC and 64MDCT have shown good agreement with the reference standard in initial staging. Nevertheless, 18FDG PET/CT has shown to be superior to 64MDCT in end-of-treatment response assessment.

FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions

FDG-PET/CT is the current state-of-the-art imaging in lymphoma and plays a central role in treatment decisions. At diagnosis, accurate staging is crucial for appropriate therapy selection: FDG-PET/CT can identify areas of lymphoma missed by CT alone and avoid under-treatment of patients with advanced disease stage who would have been misclassified as having limited stage disease by CT. Particularly in Hodgkin lymphoma, positive interim FDG-PET/CT scans are adversely prognostic for clinical outcomes and can inform PET-adapted treatment strategies, but such data are less consistent in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The use of quantitative FDG-PET/CT metrics using metabolic tumour volume, possibly in combination with other biomarkers, may better define prognostic subgroups and thus facilitate better treatment selection. After chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT response is predictive of outcome and may identify a subgroup who benefit from consolidative radiotherapy. Novel therapies, in particular immunotherapies, exhibit different response patterns than conventional chemotherapy, which has led to modified response criteria that take into account the risk of transient pseudo-progression. In relapsed lymphoma, FDG-PET/CT after second-line therapy and prior to high-dose therapy is also strongly associated with outcome and may be used to guide intensity of salvage therapy in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma. Currently, FDG-PET/CT has no role in the routine follow-up after complete metabolic response to therapy, but it remains a powerful tool for excluding relapse if patients develop clinical features suggestive of disease relapse. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT plays major roles in the various phases of management of lymphoma and constitutes a step towards the pursuit of personalized treatment.

Multicenter Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced FDG PET/CT and 64-Slice Multi-Detector-Row CT for Initial Staging and Response Evaluation at the End of Treatment in Patients With Lymphoma

Objectives

To compare staging correctness between contrast-enhanced FDG PET/ceCT and 64-slice multi–detector-row CT (ceCT64) for initial staging and response evaluation at the end of treatment (EOT) in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and follicular lymphoma.

Methods

This prospective study compared initial staging and response evaluation at EOT. One hundred eighty-one patients were randomly assigned to either ceCT64 or FDG PET/ceCT. A nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist read FDG PET/ceCT scans independently and achieved post hoc consensus, whereas another independent radiologist interpreted ceCT64 separately. The reference standard included all clinical information, all tests, and follow-up. Ethics committees of the participating centers approved the study, and all participants provided written consent.

Results

Ninety-one patients were randomized to ceCT64 and 90 to FDG PET/ceCT; 72 had Hodgkin lymphoma, 72 had DLBCL, and 37 had follicular lymphoma. There was excellent correlation between the reference standard and initial staging for both FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.96) and ceCT64 (κ = 0.84), although evaluation of the response at EOT was excellent only for FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.91).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated satisfactory agreement between FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.96) and ceCT64 (κ = 0.84) in initial staging compared with the reference standard (P = 0.16). Response evaluation at EOT with FDG PET/ceCT (κ = 0.91) was superior compared with ceCT64 (κ = 0.307) (P < 0.001).

FDG PET/CT in cancer therapy monitoring

Objectives: We developed and tested a software tool for computer-assisted analysis of FDG-PET/CT in cancer therapy monitoring. The tool provides automatic semi-quantitative analysis of a baseline scan together with up to two follow-up scans (standardized uptake values, glycolytic volume). The tool also supports visual analysis by local spatial registration which allows display of tumor lesions with the same orientation in all scans. The tool’s stability and accuracy was tested at typical everyday image quality. Patients, methods: Ten unselected cancer patients in whom three FDG PET/CT scans had been performed were included. A total of 18 lesions were analyzed. Results: Automatic lesion tracking worked properly in all lesions but one. In this lesion local coregistration had to be adjusted manually tuwhich, however, is easily performed with the tool. Semi-automatic lesion segmentation and fully automatic semi-quantitative analysis worked properly in all cases. Computer-assisted analysis was significantly less time consuming than manual analysis. Conclusions: The novel software tool appears useful for analysis of FDGPET/ CT in cancer therapy monitoring in clinical routine patient care.

Pulmonary intravascular lymphoma detected by FDG PET-CT: a case report

Intravascular lymphoma is a rare subtype of extranodal Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Its prognosis is poor in a high percentage of cases due to its insidious appearance and low clinical suspicion. Its diagnosis is usually only reached after an autopsy. It may affect different organs as a whole or only one organ. It is extremely rare that the lung is the only damaged organ. Its diagnosis depends of the clinician's suspicion and proper evaluation with imaging studies as well as correct selection of the organ to be biopsied. When detected on time, the treatment of choice is a combination of a series of chemotherapy associated to a monoclonal antibody (anti-CD20). We present the case of a male patient who underwent a positron emission tomography-computed tomography with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2 deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) due to symptoms suggestive of a lymphoproliferative disease with no clear structural abnormalities. The images led to a diagnosis of pulmonary intravascular large B cell lymphoma.

Prognostic value of quantitative parameters derived on initial staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

This study was carried out to evaluate the role of quantitative parameters in staging PET in predicting prognosis in patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

A total of 51 histopathologically proven high-grade NHL patients treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens were included in the study. Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and functional volumes (FVs) were defined as per the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) criteria. All patients were followed up for a minimum period of 1 year or until an event, whichever occurred earlier.

RESULTS

Of the four semiquantitative parameters studied, SUV max and SUV mean did not show a statistically significant correlation with progression-free survival or overall survival, whereas TLG and FV showed a weak but statistically significant negative correlation. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, optimal cut-offs were derived for FV and TLG to predict progression and death. Using the cut-off values of 416 cm3 and 3340 g for FV and TLG, respectively, a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival and overall survival was obtained in the groups with FV and TLG above and below the threshold. On multivariate analysis of all the conventional prognostic factors and TLG more than 3340 and FV more than 416 cm3, only age greater than 60 years (P=0.013) and FV more than 416 cm3 (P=0.012) were found to be independently associated with disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that FV and TLG in staging PET/CT could be useful indices in predicting outcomes in patients with high-grade NHL treated with standard first-line chemotherapy regimens.

[Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma staging: a prospective study of the value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) versus PET and CT]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To prospectively analyze the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and to evaluate the most appropriate study protocol of this technique.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Seventy-six biopsy proven NHL patients were enrolled in this prospective study for 3 years. Patients initially underwent a low-dose CT without intravenous contrast, then a PET emission scan and finally a full-dose CT with intravenous contrast. For every patient, two modalities of PET/CT images were reconstructed: a low-dose unenhanced PET/CT and a full-dose enhanced PET/CT. Each modality was evaluated by either of two pairs of readers, different for each modality. Enhanced CT and PET images were evaluated by an independent radiologist and nuclear medicine physician respectively.

RESULTS

Agreement between reference standard and techniques was as follows: 52.2% of patients with enhanced CT (κ=0.458), 46% with PET (κ=0.335), 75% with low-dose unenhanced PET/CT (κ=0.664) and 76.8% with full-dose enhanced PET/CT (κ=0.679), with p<0.001. Although all techniques underestimated the stage in comparison to gold standard, the lowest percentage was for full-dose enhanced PET/CT (20.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT improved staging accuracy of NHL, being full-dose enhanced PET/CT the most accurate technique in our study.

PET imaging in lymphoma

PET has become a cornerstone procedure in modern lymphoma management. This paper reviews, from a clinical point of view, the evidence for using PET in the different subtypes of lymphoma and the different steps of their management. The reader is given an overview of the current PET-based interventional lymphoma trials and an insight into possible future developments in the field, including new PET tracers.