Oropharyngeal candidiasis with dry-powdered fluticasone propionate: 500 microg/day versus 200 microg/day

Basis of preventive and non-pharmacological interventions in asthma

Asthma is one of the most common atopic disorders in all stages of life. Its etiology is likely due to a complex interaction between genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Due to this, different non-pharmacological interventions can be implemented to reduce or alleviate the symptoms caused by this disease. Thus, the present narrative review aimed to analyze the preventive and non-pharmacological interventions such as physical exercise, physiotherapy, nutritional, ergonutritional, and psychological strategies in asthma treatment. To reach these aims, an extensive narrative review was conducted. The databases used were MedLine (PubMed), Cochrane (Wiley), Embase, PsychINFO, and CinAhl. Asthma is an immune-mediated inflammatory condition characterized by increased responsiveness to bronchoconstrictor stimuli. Different factors have been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma, however, the treatments used to reduce its incidence are more controversial. Physical activity is focused on the benefits that aerobic training can provide, while physiotherapy interventions recommend breathing exercises to improve the quality of life of patients. Nutritional interventions are targeted on implement diets that prioritize the consumption of fruits and vegetables and supplementation with antioxidants. Psychological interventions have been proposed as an essential non-pharmacological tool to reduce the emotional problems associated with asthma.

Dental Management of Pediatric Patients with Bronchial Asthma

Asthma is a disease marked by recurrent dyspnea caused by spasmodic bronchoconstriction. Bronchial asthma is a serious global problem that has steadily increased in prevalence during the past two decades. Oral manifestations of pediatric patients suffering from bronchial asthma are an increased upper anterior and total anterior facial height, higher palatal vaults, greater overjets, and a higher prevalence of posterior crossbites. Dental treatment of such patients requires the role of a pedodontist. Behavior management techniques, conscious sedation techniques along with medical management, and comprehensive dental treatment by a pediatric dentist may prove beneficial to such patients.

Utility of immunology, microbiology, and helminth investigations in clinical assessment of severe asthma

OBJECTIVE

Systematic assessment of patients with potential severe asthma is key to identification of treatable traits and optimal management. Assessment of antimicrobial immune function is part of that assessment at many centers although there is little evidence-base on its added value in clinical assessment of this patient group. As part of reviewing our local pathway, we have retrospectively reviewed these tests in 327 consecutive referrals to our severe asthma service, in an evaluation to describe the utility of these tests and allow refinement of the local guideline for patient assessment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serum immunoglobulin concentrations were in the normal range in most patients though 12 patients had serum IgG < 5.5 g/L and many had suboptimal anti-Haemophilus (127 of 249 patients tested) and anti-Pneumococcal (111 of 239) immune responses. As expected many patients had evidence of sensitization to Aspergillus although specific IgG was not confined to those with evidence of allergic sensitization/allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Eighteen of 277 patients tested had serological evidence of Strongyloides infection. Bacteria and/or yeast were cultured from the sputum in 76 out of 110 patients productive of sputum, and the most common microbes cultured were Candida sp. (44 patients), Staphylococcus aureus (21 patients), Haemophilus influenzae (18 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients had evidence of infection, colonization, or sensitization to potential pathogens relevant to asthma. Strongyloides infection was evident in several patients, which may be a major issue when considering the risk of hyper-infection following immunosuppression and supports our local screening strategy.

Oral health in asthmatic patients: a review : Asthma and its therapy may impact on oral health

Different drugs used to treat asthma, such as beta 2 agonists and inhaled steroids, may promote a higher risk of caries, dental erosion, periodontal disease and oral candidiasis. This article reviews the evidences of mechanisms involved in oral diseases in patients affected by asthma. The main mechanism involved is the reduction of salivary flow. Other mechanisms include: acid pH in oral cavity induced by inhaled drugs (particularly dry powder inhaled), lifestyle (bad oral hygiene and higher consumption of sweet and acidic drinks), gastroesophageal reflux, and the impairment of local immunity. In conclusion asthma is involved in the genesis of oral pathologies both directly and indirectly due to the effect of the drugs used to treat them. Other cofactors such as poor oral hygiene increase the risk of developing oral diseases in these patients. Preventive oral measures, therefore, should be part of a global care for patients suffering from asthma.

Inhaler technique: facts and fantasies. A view from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team (ADMIT)

Health professionals tasked with advising patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) how to use inhaler devices properly and what to do about unwanted effects will be aware of a variety of commonly held precepts. The evidence for many of these is, however, lacking or old and therefore in need of re-examination. Few would disagree that facilitating and encouraging regular and proper use of inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and COPD is critical for successful outcomes. It seems logical that the abandonment of unnecessary or ill-founded practices forms an integral part of this process: the use of inhalers is bewildering enough, particularly with regular introduction of new drugs, devices and ancillary equipment, without unnecessary and pointless adages. We review the evidence, or lack thereof, underlying ten items of inhaler ‘lore’ commonly passed on by health professionals to each other and thence to patients. The exercise is intended as a pragmatic, evidence-informed review by a group of clinicians with appropriate experience. It is not intended to be an exhaustive review of the literature; rather, we aim to stimulate debate, and to encourage researchers to challenge some of these ideas and to provide new, updated evidence on which to base relevant, meaningful advice in the future. The discussion on each item is followed by a formal, expert opinion by members of the ADMIT Working Group.

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

The frequent use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), especially at higher doses, has been accompanied by concern about both systemic and local side effects. Patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more at risk from side effects, likely because of the use of higher doses of ICS in COPD to overcome corticosteroid unresponsiveness.

AREAS COVERED

There is considerable concern about increased incidence of pneumonia, osteoporosis and hyperglycemia in diabetic patients and cataracts. The local side effects of ICSs, such as hoarseness and pharyngeal discomfort, oral and oropharyngeal candidiasis, cough during inhalation, and a sensation of thirst, are not usually serious but are of clinical importance because they may lead to patients discontinuing therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The possibility that ICSs induce adverse side effects should not lead us to avoid their use in patients in whom clinical evidence suggests that they may be helpful. However, clinicians should balance the potential benefits of ICSs in COPD against their potential side effects and always consider using the lowest possible dose to achieve the best possible management.

Safety and tolerability of the novel inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate in combination with the β2 agonist vilanterol administered once daily for 52 weeks in patients >=12 years old with asthma: a randomised trial

Background

The inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) in combination with the long-acting β₂ agonist vilanterol (VI) is in development for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Objective

To assess the safety and tolerability of FF/VI over 52 weeks in patients with asthma.

Methods

Patients (aged ≥12 years; on inhaled corticosteroid) were randomised (2:2:1) to FF/VI 100/25 µg or FF/VI 200/25 µg once daily in the evening, or fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 µg twice daily. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs), non-fasting glucose, potassium, 24-h urinary cortisol excretion, ophthalmic assessments, heart rate and pulse rate.

Results

On-treatment AEs were similar across groups (FF/VI 66–69%; 73% FP). Oral candidiasis/oropharyngeal candidiasis was more common with FF/VI (6–7%) than FP (3%). Twelve serious AEs were reported; one (worsening hepatitis B on FP) was considered drug related. Statistically significant cortisol suppression was seen with FP compared with both FF/VI groups at Weeks 12 and 28 (ratios [95% CI] to FP ranged from 1.43 [1.11 to 1.84] to 1.67 [1.34 to 2.08]; p≤0.006), but not at Week 52 (ratios to FP were 1.05 [0.83 to 1.33] for FF/VI 100/25 µg and 1.09 [0.87 to 1.38] for FF/VI 200/25 µg). No clinically important changes in non-fasting glucose, potassium, QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTc[F]) or ophthalmic assessments were reported. Pulse rate (10 min post dose [T_max], Week 52) was significantly increased with FF/VI versus FP (3.4 bpm, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.6; p=0.002 [FF/VI 100/25 µg]; 3.4 bpm, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.6; p=0.003 [FF/VI 200/25 µg]). Mean heart rate (24-h Holter monitoring) decreased from screening values in all groups (0.2–1.1 bpm FF/VI vs 5 bpm FP; Week 52).

Conclusions

FF/VI (100/25 µg or 200/25 µg) administered once daily over 52 weeks was well tolerated by patients aged ≥12 years with asthma. The overall safety profile of FF/VI did not reveal any findings of significant clinical concern.

ClinicalTrials.gov

NCT01018186

Oral Health in Individuals With Asthma

Objective. The prevalence of bronchial asthma is increasing globally by 50% every decade. With more individuals presenting with a medical history of asthma and concurrent medication usage, its impact on oral cavity needs to be recognized. The present study was conducted with an aim to assess the oral health status of individuals with asthma aged 12 years and older and to evaluate the effect of various antiasthma medications on oral health. Materials and Methods. Forty individuals with asthma (22 females and 18 males) between 12 and 66 years of age were included in the study after following extensive exclusion criteria. For all subjects a detailed case history was taken. A thorough oral examination was conducted to determine caries experience, periodontal status, and candidiasis. Furthermore, whole unstimulated saliva was collected for pH estimation and cytological smears obtained for the screening of candidiasis. Results. Of the 40 subjects examined, a history of xerostomia was found in 55%, stomatopyrosis in 22%, and halitosis in 5%. The mean DMFT (decayed, missing, filled teeth) was 4.97. Periodontal treatment need evaluation revealed the requirement for oral hygiene education and professional prophylaxis in most of the subjects. However, no significant correlation was found between use of antiasthma medications and periodontal needs. An acidic pH was found in 52.5% of the subjects and candidiasis was detected in 65%. Conclusion. A high incidence of xerostomia, acidic pH, and candidiasis was found in those having asthma. Studies with a larger sample size may help confirm these findings. However, it is suggested that asthma patients on regular antiasthma treatment need special attention in the area of oral health care.

Influence of dentures on residual inhaled corticosteroids in the mouths of elderly asthma patients

BACKGROUND

The influence of dentures on residual inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in the mouths of elderly asthmatic patients and the appropriate time for gargling after inhaling ICSs are unclear.

METHODS

Twenty elderly patients in whom moderate persistent asthma was stably controlled using fluticasone propionate Diskus (FP, n = 10) or hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP, n = 10) for more than 3 months and who wore dentures daily were switched to the other type of ICS for 4 weeks in a crossover manner. The residual amount of each ICS in their mouths after inhalation was measured along with determination of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and pharyngeal culture for detecting Candida albicans.

RESULTS

The total amounts of residual ICSs in gargling fluids (μg) with HFA-BDP were significantly greater than those with FP (15.6 ± 14.6 vs. 11.5 ± 13.8, p = 0.028). The residual amounts of HFA-BDP were significantly greater in the patients with complete dentures than in those with partial dentures. The residual amounts of FP were significantly correlated with the PIF values in the FP treatment (p = 0.013) but not in the HFA-BDP treatment (p = 0.202). No residual ICSs remained after the third gargling in either treatment. The occurrence of candidiasis during the HFA-BDP period was significantly higher than that during the FP treatment (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

The dentures of elderly asthmatics affect the oral residues of ICSs and occurrence of candidiasis in HFA-BDP treatment; meanwhile, the PIF values affected these factors in FP treatment. Three times gargling after inhaling ICSs is required.

Asthma and oral health: a review

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition that causes the airways to constrict and produce excess mucus, making breathing difficult. It is characterized by the obstruction of airflow which is variable over a short period of time. This condition is reversible, either spontaneously or can be controlled with the help of drugs. Asthma medication comprises bronchodilators, corticosteroids and anticholinergic drugs. Most of these drugs are inhaled using various forms of inhalers or nebulizers. The effect of these drugs on oral health is the subject of debate among dental practitioners. Patients taking asthma medication may be at risk of dental caries, dental erosion, periodontal diseases and oral candidiasis. Hence, patients with bronchial asthma on medication should receive special prophylactic attention. This article reviews the correlation between asthma and oral health, and suggests various measures to counter possible oral health problems related to asthma.

Prevalence and associated factors of oropharyngeal side effects in users of inhaled corticosteroids in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are extensively used to treat asthma, and more recently, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Oropharyngeal disorders represent the most frequent side effect of these drugs, which may have a negative impact on adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence of oropharyngeal disorders in users of ICS in a real-life setting and investigate the factors associated with their occurrence.

METHODS

For this observational cross-sectional study, general practitioners and pulmonologists were contacted and asked to include patients suffering from asthma or COPD treated by ICS. Physicians collected data during a medical examination. A multivariate regression model for the occurrence of oropharyngeal disorders was constructed.

RESULTS

A total of 1778 physicians included 6740 patients. The mean (SD) age was 51.3 (18.5) years, 44.0% had no smoking history, and the ICS indication was asthma in 63.9% of subjects. Of the study subjects, 52.3% used beclometasone (43.4% without a long-acting ss(2)-agonist, LABA); 22.1% used budesonide (18.8% with a LABA), and 25.6% used fluticasone (19.3% with a LABA in a single inhaler). One-third (34.7%) of subjects suffered from at least one oropharyngeal disorder; the most frequently reported were hoarseness, tingling, mouth irritation, and reddening. Multivariate regression analysis found that the factors positively associated with oropharyngeal disorders were COPD indication [odds ratio (OR) 1.600; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 1.391, 1.839], nominal daily dose (OR = 1.388; 95% CI 1.227, 1.569), decreased adherence (OR = 1.318; 95% CI 1.104, 1.574) and the use of fluticasone (OR = 1.176; 95% CI 1.008, 1.372), whereas those negatively associated were the absence of smoking history (OR = 0.837; 95% CI 0.742, 0.945), increased adherence (OR = 0.663; 95% CI 0.581, 0.755), and beclometasone use (OR = 0.630; 95% CI 0.543, 0.732).

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of oropharyngeal disorders and the association of adherence with these must be taken into account by prescribers, especially in patients suffering from COPD, a relatively new group of ICS users.