Pap Screening in a U.S. Health Plan

Harms of cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands

We studied harms related to cervical cancer screening and management of screen-positive women in the United States (US) and the Netherlands. We utilized data from four US integrated health care systems (SEARCH), the US National Health Interview Survey, New Mexico state, the Netherlands national histopathology registry, and included studies on adverse health effects of cervical screening. We compared the number of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear tests, abnormal test results, punch biopsies, treatments, health problems (anxiety, pain, bleeding and discharge) and preterm births associated with excisional treatments. Results were age-standardized to the 2007 US population. Based on SEARCH, an estimated 36 million Pap tests were performed in 2007 for 91 million US women aged 21-65 years, leading to 2.3 million abnormal Pap tests, 1.5 million punch biopsies, 0.3 million treatments for precancerous lesions, 5 thousand preterm births and over 8 million health problems. Under the Netherlands screening practice, fewer Pap tests (58%), abnormal test results (64%), punch biopsies (75%), treatment procedures (40%), preterm births (60%) and health problems (63%) would have occurred. The SEARCH data did not differ much from other US data for 2007 or from more recent data up to 2013. Thus compared to the less intensive screening practice in the Netherlands, US practice of cervical cancer screening may have resulted in two- to threefold higher harms, while the effects on cervical cancer incidence and mortality are similar. The results are also of high relevance in making recommendations for HPV screening. Systematic collection of harms data is needed for monitoring and for better incorporation of harms in making screening recommendations.

Mean direct medical care costs associated with cervical cancer for commercially insured patients in Texas

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mean cervical cancer medical care costs for patients enrolled in commercial insurance in Texas. Cost is represented by insurer and patient payments for care.

METHODS

We estimated the mean medical care costs during the first 2years after the index diagnosis date for patients with cervical cancer (cases). Cases were identified using claims-based International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9), diagnosis codes and matched to controls without a claims-based ICD-9 code for cancer using a 2-step propensity score matching method. Index dates for the cases were randomly assigned to potential controls, and cases and controls were matched by index date. Data for cancer cases and controls were obtained from the de-identified 2011-2014 U.S. MarketScan databases. A generalized linear model was employed to compute the cost for censored months during the 2-year follow-up period. Differential costs were assessed by subtracting the medical costs incurred by controls from those incurred by cases.

RESULTS

During 2011-2014, 475 commercially insured Texas patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer met the inclusion criteria. The first-year and second-year mean medical costs were $60,828 and $37,721 for cases and $9982 and $10,066 for controls, respectively. The differential costs of cervical cancer for the first and second years were $50,846 and $27,656, respectively. The major correlates of higher monthly cervical cancer costs were higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score during 6months period prior to diagnosis, higher healthcare costs between 6months and 3months prior to diagnosis, and residence in the western region of Texas. Costs for cervical cancer patients decreased steeply between month 1 and month 5 after diagnosis and then were stable, while costs for the control group were stable throughout the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean direct medical costs associated with cervical cancer in Texas were substantial. These data will serve as key cost parameters in models of costs associated with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers in Texas and the economic evaluation of HPV vaccination dissemination in Texas.

Age-based programs for vaccination against HPV

BACKGROUND

The risk of infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) increases with age. Answering the question of which age groups are appropriate to target for catch-up vaccination with the newly licensed quadrivalent HPV vaccine (types 6/11/16/18) will be important for developing vaccine policy recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the value of varying female HPV vaccination strategies by specific age groups of a catch-up program in the United States.

METHODS

The authors used previously published mathematical population dynamic model and cost-utility analysis to evaluate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of alternative quadrivalent HPV (6/11/16/18) vaccination strategies. The model simulates heterosexual transmission of HPV infection and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), cervical cancer, and external genital warts in an age-structured population stratified by sex and sexual activity groups. The cost-utility analysis estimates the cost of vaccination, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of HPV diseases, and quality-adjusted survival.

RESULTS

Compared with the current screening practices, vaccinating girls and women ages 12 to 24 years was the most effective strategy, reducing the number of HPV6/11/16/18-related genital warts, CIN grades 2 and 3, and cervical cancer cases among women in the next 25 years by 3,049,285, 1,399,935, and 30,021; respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this strategy when compared with vaccinating girls and women ages 12 to 19 years was $10,986 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSION;: Relative to other commonly accepted health-care programs, vaccinating girls and women ages 12 to 24 years appears cost-effective.

Reductions in human papillomavirus-disease resource use and costs with quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) recombinant vaccination: the FUTURE Study Economic Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the short-term impact of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) (types 6/11/16/18) recombinant vaccination upon HPV disease-related health-care resource utilization and costs among young women.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial comparing quadrivalent vaccination to placebo, among women (N = 7861) primarily 16 to 23 years of age at enrollment. HPV disease episodes, health-care resource utilization and costs associated with cervical, vaginal, and vulvar precancers, and anogenital warts were analyzed over a period of 2.5 years among women, regardless of baseline HPV status.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a 25.9% (P < 0.001) reduction in total HPV disease-related health-care costs among women receiving vaccine versus placebo (absolute reduction $3939 per 100 trial enrollees). We observed similar overall reductions in HPV-disease episodes and resource utilization. There was a statistically significant reduction in HPV 6/11-related disease episode costs of 65.1% ($1837 per 100), and a reduction of 51.4% ($1781 per 100) in HPV 16/18-related episode costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Quadrivalent HPV vaccination can reduce HPV disease events, resource use and costs when administered to a broad population of young women 16 to 23 years of age. Prevention of HPV types 6 and 11 yielded similar value in terms of HPV disease cost offsets, compared to protection against HPV 16 and 18, during the years initially after vaccination. Over the short-term, costs of vaccination exceed cost offsets associated with prevention of HPV disease; however, quadrivalent HPV vaccination has previously been shown to be cost-effective in the longer term, when fully accounting for health benefits and cost offsets.