Reproducibility and Expression of Skin Biomarkers in Sun-Damaged Skin and Actinic Keratoses

Risk factors for actinic keratoses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To integrate evidence and assess the risk factors associated with actinic keratosis (AK).

Methods

Unrestricted searches were conducted on five electronic databases, with an end-date parameter of September 2021. We summarized the study characteristics and pooled the results from individual studies by using a random-effects model. The risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was estimated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

Sixteen studies were included in final analysis, and we assessed the AK risk among a variety of risk factors. Overall, the male sex (odds ratio (OR): 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.94-3.25; P < 0.01), age >45 years (OR = 7.65, 95% CI: 2.95-19.86; P < 0.01), light Fitzpatrick skin phototype (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.74-3.10; P < 0.01), light hair color (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.40-3.36; P < 0.01), light eye color (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03-2.70; P = 0.04), freckles on face/arms (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.37-2.58; P < 0.01), suffered positive history of other types of non-melanoma skin cancer (OR = 4.46, 95% CI: 2.71-7.33; P < 0.01), sunburns in childhood (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.47-3.70; P < 0.01) and adulthood (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.12-2.00; P < 0.01), severe sunburn (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.62-2.31; P < 0.01), and chronic occupational and/or recreational sun exposure (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 2.16-4.81; P < 0.01) increased the risk of AK. Moreover, sunscreen use (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77; P < 0.01) and history of atopy reduced the risk of AK. Sensitivity analysis yielded consistent results. The included studies showed a high risk of bias.

Conclusion

We confirm several well-known AK risk factors and their quantitative data, and summarized the uncommon risk factors and protective factors. Our results may inform on the design and implementation of AK screening and educational programs.

Photosensitization Induced by Heterophyllaea pustulata in Goats: Sequential Development of Skin Lesions

Five adult Saanen goats received a single oral dose of Heterophyllaea pustulata containing 42.25 μg/kg rubiadin (anthraquinone) and 3 adult goats were untreated controls. All goats were exposed to sunlight and sequential ear skin biopsies were collected before treatment and at 32 hours, 3 days, 8 days, and 15 days after treatment. Changes at 32 hours after dosing included epidermal spongiosis, single cell death and acantholysis, an increased BAX/BCL-2 protein ratio, and dermal edema. Lesions at day 3 included epidermal and adnexal necrosis, crust formation, and acanthosis. Acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and dermal fibrosis and neovascularization were present at day 15. The pro-apoptotic (BAX)/anti-apoptotic (BCL-2) protein ratio increased at 32 hours, whereas epidermal and dermal PCNA immunolabeling increased between days 8 and 15 after treatment. The cutaneous lesions were consistent with sunlight-induced damage, and the occurrence in treated but not control goats indicates photosensitization.

Earliest stage treatment of actinic keratosis with imiquimod 3.75% cream: Two case reports-Perspective for non melanoma skin cancer prevention

Imiquimod 3.75% cream is licensed for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Two case reports on the treatment of facial UV-exposed skin shall open the discussion if subclinical AKs can be detected by the use of imiquimod cream in UV-exposed areas even if no lesions can be found clinically. A 87-year old female showing small scaly AK lesions on her right cheek was treated with imiquimod 3.75% cream. A 59-year old female without obvious clinical signs of UV-damage on the face experimentally applied imiquimod 3.75% cream twice daily on the entire face for 2 weeks. In the 87-year old, inflammatory reaction developed from day 3 onward and showed field cancerization, the lesions healed without scarring. In the 59-year old at the end of the treatment phase, distinct signs of inflammation appeared, then taking 2 weeks for healing without sequalae. These results open the discussion if the use of imiquimod 3.75% cream could be recommended preventively in UV-exposed skin areas to obviate a later development of AKs/squamous cell carcinoma/nonmelanoma skin cancer.

TLR4-directed Molecular Strategies Targeting Skin Photodamage and Carcinogenesis

Background:

Exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a causative factor in skin photodamage and carcinogenesis, and inflammatory dysregulation is a key mechanism underlying detrimental effects of acute and chronic UV exposure. The health and economic burden of skin cancer treatment is substantial, creating an increasingly urgent need for the development of improved molecular strategies for photoprotection and photochemoprevention.

Methods:

A structured search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature revealed 139 articles including our own that are presented and critically evaluated in this TLR4-directed review.

Objective:

To understand the molecular role of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) as a key regulator of skin anti-microbial defense, wound healing, and cutaneous tumorigenic inflammation. The specific focus of this review is on recent published evidence suggesting that TLR4 represents a novel molecular target for skin photoprotection and cancer photochemoprevention.

Results:

Cumulative experimental evidence indicates that pharmacological and genetic antagonism of TLR4 suppresses UV-induced inflammatory signaling involving the attenuation of cutaneous NF-κB and AP-1 stress signaling observable in vitro and in vivo. TLR4-directed small molecule pharmacological antagonists [including eritoran, (+)-naloxone, ST2825, and resatorvid] have now been identified as a novel class of molecular therapeutics. TLR4 antagonists are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development for the modulation of dysregulated TLR4-dependent inflammatory signaling that may also contribute to skin photodamage and photocarcinogenesis in human populations.

Conclusion:

Future research should explore the skin photoprotective and photochemopreventive efficacy of topical TLR4 antagonism if employed in conjunction with other molecular strategies including sunscreens.

Defining the actinic keratosis field: a literature review and discussion

Despite the chronic and increasingly prevalent nature of actinic keratosis (AK) and existing evidence supporting assessment of the entire cancerization field during clinical management, a standardized definition of the AK field to aid in the understanding and characterization of the disease is lacking. The objective of this review was to present and appraise the available evidence describing the AK cancerization field, with the aim of determining a precise definition of the AK field in terms of its molecular (including genetic and immunological), histological and clinical characteristics. Eight European dermatologists collaborated to conduct a review and expert appraisal of articles detailing the characteristics of the AK field. Articles published in English before August 2016 were identified using PubMed and independently selected for further assessment according to predefined preliminary inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition, a retrospective audit of patients with AK was performed to define the AK field in clinical terms. A total of 32 review articles and 47 original research articles provided evidence of sun-induced molecular (including genetic and immunological) and histological skin changes in the sun-exposed area affected by AK. However, the available literature was deemed insufficient to inform a clinical definition of the AK field. During the retrospective audit, visible signs of sun damage in 40 patients with AK were assessed. Telangiectasia, atrophy and pigmentation disorders emerged as 'reliable or very reliable' indicators of AK field based on expert opinion, whereas 'sand paper' was deemed a 'moderately reliable' indicator. This literature review has revealed a significant gap of evidence to inform a clinical definition of the AK field. Therefore, the authors instead propose a clinical definition of field cancerization based on the identification of visible signs of sun damage that are reliable indicators of field cancerization based on expert opinion.

Mechanisms of Photoaging and Cutaneous Photocarcinogenesis, and Photoprotective Strategies with Phytochemicals

Photoaging and photocarcinogenesis are primarily due to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, which alters DNA, cellular antioxidant balance, signal transduction pathways, immunology, and the extracellular matrix (ECM). The DNA alterations include UV radiation induced thymine-thymine dimers and loss of tumor suppressor gene p53. UV radiation reduces cellular antioxidant status by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the resultant oxidative stress alters signal transduction pathways such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the nuclear factor-kappa beta (NF-κB)/p65, the janus kinase (JAK), signal transduction and activation of transcription (STAT) and the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). UV radiation induces pro-inflammatory genes and causes immunosuppression by depleting the number and activity of the epidermal Langerhans cells. Further, UV radiation remodels the ECM by increasing matrixmetalloproteinases (MMP) and reducing structural collagen and elastin. The photoprotective strategies to prevent/treat photoaging and photocarcinogenesis include oral or topical agents that act as sunscreens or counteract the effects of UV radiation on DNA, cellular antioxidant balance, signal transduction pathways, immunology and the ECM. Many of these agents are phytochemical derivatives and include polyphenols and non-polyphenols. The flavonoids are polyphenols and include catechins, isoflavones, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins, whereas the non-flavonoids comprise mono phenolic acids and stilbenes. The natural sources of polyphenols include tea, cocoa, grape/wine, soy, pomegranate, and Polypodium leucotomos. The non-phenolic phytochemicals include carotenoids, caffeine and sulphoraphance (SFN). In addition, there are other phytochemical derivatives or whole extracts such as baicalin, flavangenol, raspberry extract, and Photomorphe umbellata with photoprotective activity against UVB radiation, and thereby carcinogenesis.

Visualization and treatment of subclinical actinic keratoses with topical imiquimod 5% cream: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Imiquimod 5% is licensed for the treatment of external genital warts, superficial basal cell carcinoma, and actinic keratosis (AK) and is being used experimentally in various other dermato-oncological conditions.

OBJECTIVE

This observational study shall show that nonmelanoma skin cancer can be detected at its earliest subclinical stage by its reaction with imiquimod and can be cleared by finishing the course of treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this single arm trial 15 patients with chronically sun-exposed skin who had no clinical evidence of AK were treated with 5% imiquimod cream on the face or scalp for 4 weeks three times per week.

RESULTS

During treatment, all patients developed multiple areas with mild to moderate inflammatory skin reactions, such as erythema, induration, and scaling. Biopsies obtained from 12 patients prior to treatment revealed no malignancies. However, in cases with more pronounced inflammation during treatment, targeted biopsies indicated very early malignant alterations.

CONCLUSION

Topical imiquimod treatment of chronically sun-exposed skin without overt clinical signs of AK is able to detect subclinical actinic keratoses (SAK) and to completely clear the lesions, even before they can be clinically diagnosed as AK. In such patients, imiquimod might be able to prevent the evolution of SCC.

Downregulation of erythroid differentiation regulator 1 as a novel marker of skin tumors

BACKGROUND

Erythroid differentiation regulator 1 is decreased in malignant melanoma. However, the expression of erythroid differentiation regulator 1 has not been reported in normal epidermis, vessel, nerve, dermal adnexae, and various skin tumors.

METHODS

To investigate the expression of erythroid differentiation regulator 1 in normal skin and various skin tumors, immunohistochemical analysis of normal skin, epidermal tumors, sebaceous tumors, and eccrine tumors was performed. The image analysis was quantitatively performed using HistoQuant(™) software.

RESULTS

Erythroid differentiation regulator 1 was strongly expressed in the nuclei of normal epidermis, sebaceous gland, eccrine gland, vessel, and nerve. Expression of erythroid differentiation regulator 1 was weak in seborrheic keratosis, sebaceous hyperplasia, and eccrine spiradenoma. Erythroid differentiation regulator 1 was rarely observed in malignant skin tumors, including squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, sebaceous carcinoma, and eccrine porocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of erythroid differentiation regulator 1 was negatively correlated with the malignant potential in various skin tumors. The results support the role of erythroid differentiation regulator 1 in cutaneous carcinogenesis and indicate its potential as a novel marker of skin tumors.

New agents for prevention of ultraviolet-induced nonmelanoma skin cancer

With the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer on the rise, current prevention methods, such as the use of sunscreens, have yet to prove adequate to reverse this trend. There has been considerable interest in identifying compounds that will inhibit or reverse the biochemical changes required for skin cancers to develop, either by pharmacologic intervention or by dietary manipulation. By targeting different pathways identified as important in the pathogenesis of nonmelanoma skin cancers, a combination approach with multiple agents or the addition of chemopreventative agents to topical sunscreens may offer the potential for novel and synergistic therapies in treating nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Suberythemal ultraviolet B radiation alters the expression of cell cycle-related proteins in the epidermis of human subjects without leading to photoprotection

BACKGROUND

Deregulation of the cell cycle proteins is one of the critical factors leading to cutaneous carcinogenesis.

OBJECTIVES

To monitor the expression of cell cycle proteins in the epidermis of subjects after repeated exposure to ultraviolet (UV) B radiation, and to test for the development of photoprotection by subsequent irradiation with a single erythemal UVB dose.

METHODS

A total of 26 healthy volunteers were divided into four groups: group 1 (n = 9) were given whole-body UVB irradiation for 10 consecutive days with 0.7 minimal erythema dose (MED), group 2 (n = 9) were irradiated as in group 1 followed 24 h later by a single UVB dose of 3 MED on buttock skin, group 3 (n = 4) were irradiated with a UVB dose of 3 MED on buttock skin, and group 4 (n = 4) were not irradiated. Skin biopsies were collected 24 h after the final irradiation and stained for cyclins A, B1, D1, and p16, p18, p21, p27, p53, pRB, Bax and Bcl-2.

RESULTS

The expression of cyclin D1, p18 and p21 was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared with the nonirradiated group 4 controls and, in group 2, the expression of pRB, p53 and Bax was also increased. In group 3, only p53 and Bax proteins were significantly elevated compared with group 4. The expression of cyclin D1, p16, p18, p27, pRB and Bcl-2 was higher in group 2 compared with group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Suberythemal UVB radiation was sufficient to cause changes in the expression of several epidermal cell cycle proteins. When tested by irradiation with a single erythemal UVB dose following the repeated exposures, no photoprotection against the UV-induced alteration in cell cycle protein expression was apparent.

Do nonmelanoma skin cancers develop from extra-cutaneous stem cells?

A hypothesis is presented that nonmelanoma skin cancers can develop from extra-cutaneous stem cells, and not exclusively from skin keratinocytes. This idea is supported by recent findings regarding the initiation of cancers in the digestive tract, and by a cancer stem cell model of a neoplasia. It is known that multipotent adult progenitor cells can trans-differentiate into very diverse cellular lineages and can be recruited to areas of profound tissue injury. In these settings, they might also initiate malignant transformation. Some epidemiological data and recent findings regarding mechanisms of wound healing indicate that skin cancers could also originate from bone marrow-derived or other extra-cutaneous stem cells in addition to local stem cells. It can therefore be speculated that the biology of keratinocyte stem cells derived from these sources differs from that of local epidermal stem cells, and consequently, these cells might be poorly controlled within their niches. Furthermore, in chronically inflamed skin, or in an immunodeficient patient, malignant transformation of extra-cutaneous stem cells is more likely to occur. There is one well-documented case of basal cell cancer which has arisen from donor cells in a kidney transplant recipient, but it remains unclear if this cancer developed directly from a donor-derived cell, or via fusion of such cells with premalignant keratinocytes. Hopefully, combining animal models of skin cancer initiation with experiments exploring the role of bone marrow-derived cells in skin healing will bring to light the exact mechanism of carcinogenesis of nonmelanoma skin cancers.