Real-Life Distribution of KRAS and NRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma from French Routine Genotyping

RAS/RAF/MAPK Pathway Mutations as Predictive Biomarkers in Middle Eastern Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

Background

This review article aims to investigate the prevalence and spectrum of rat sarcoma (RAS) and V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (BRAF) mutations, and their connection with geographical location, clinicopathological features, and other relevant factors in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in the Middle East.

Methods

A systematic literature review, employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, was conducted to investigate the association between the frequency of relevant mutations and the descriptive clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients. Multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched to analyze the relevant literature.

Results

A total of 19 eligible studies comprising 2960 patients with CRC were included in this review. A comprehensive analysis of the collected literature data as well as descriptive and methodological insights is provided. Men were predominant in reviewed studies for the region, accounting for 58.6%. Overall, RAS mutation prevalence was 38.1%. Kirsten RAS Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) mutations were the most common, accounting for 37.1% of cases and distributed among different exons, with the G12D mutation being the most frequent in exon 2 (23.2%) followed by G12V (13.7%), G13D (10.1%), G12C (5.1%), G12A (5.04%), and G12S (3.6%). Neuroblastoma RAS Viral Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) mutations were identified in 3.3% of tumor samples, with the most common mutation site located in exons 2, 3, and 4, and codon 61 being the most common location for the region. The total mutation frequency in the BRAF gene was 2.6%, with the V600E mutation being the most common.

Conclusion

The distribution patterns of RAS and BRAF mutations among CRC patients exhibit notable variations across diverse ethnic groups. Our study sheds light on this phenomenon by demonstrating a higher prevalence of KRAS mutations in CRC patients from the Middle East, as compared with those from other regions. The identification of these mutations and geographical differences is important for personalized treatment planning and could potentially aid in the development of novel targeted therapies. The distinct distribution patterns of RAS and BRAF mutations among CRC patients across different ethnic groups, as well as the regional variability in mutation prevalence, highlight the need for further research in this area.

Tumor profiling of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS gene mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: A Lebanese major center cohort study

BACKGROUND

In the era of precision medicine, treatment schemes for advanced Colorectal (CRC) disease include monoclonal antibodies which block the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) implicated in tumor proliferation, invasion, migration and neovascularization. Resistance to these agents has been correlated with activating downstream mutations in KRAS, BRAF and NRAS genes, among others, leading to constitutive activation of the EGFR axis bypassing EGFR blockade. The assessment of tumor RASandBRAFmutational status has thus become standard clinical practice. While multiple investigations reported roughly mutations rates of 40% in KRAS, 7% in NRAS and 5-15 % in BRAF, numbers vary across different populations with limited data specifically from the Middle East.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational Laboratory information system (LIS) chart review of all the patients with pathologically confirmed colorectal carcinoma (CRC) or metastatic CRC who underwent KRAS, NRAS and/or BRAF mutational analysis testing at the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory of the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) from January 2012 to December 2018, inclusive. Data retrieved included the results of mutation testing performed for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes, the age, gender, and tumor location for each patient. Analysis of the mutations was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) hybridization StripAssay® (ViennaLab, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

130 (47.6%) out of 273 histologically confirmed CRC cases, had positive KRAS mutations, namely in codons 12 (82%), 13 (17%), 146 (1.5%), 117 (0.75%), or 61 (0.75%). Two patients had two concomitant mutations: 12 + 12 (different mutations) and 12 + 146. Of 203 CRC cases tested for NRAS mutations, 16 (7.8%) were found to be positive for a mutation in codon 12 (37.5%), 61 (37.5%), or 13 (12.5%). Two patients had two concomitant mutations: 12 + 13 and 59 + 61. Of 172 CRC cases tested for BRAF mutations, 2 (1.2 %) were positive for the V600E -.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study is the first to report the frequencies of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF gene mutations in a Lebanese CRC cohort diagnosed and managed at a tertiary care center. The frequencies of the studied somatic gene mutations were similar to previously reported cohorts in other populations however the rate of BRAF mutation was lower in this cohort than expected.

Next-Generation Sequencing Targeted Panel in Routine Care for Metastatic Colon Cancers

Simple Summary

The place of Next-Generation-Sequencing (NGS) targeted panel in routine practice in digestive oncology should be addressed. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the results and impact of NGS panel for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. In total, 210 patients with mCRC were included. Based on our findings, a major advantage of the NGS panel over single gene techniques is that, beyond the classical hotspots, it allows for an exhaustive search for molecular abnormalities in routinely recommended genes. In addition, routine NGS is a way to detect amplifications associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapies and low-prevalence mutations in actionable genes, providing patients with the opportunity to access innovative targeted therapies. In conclusion, NGS targeted panel in mCRC is feasible in routine practice. Nevertheless, panels need to be regularly updated and in-depth studies are needed to better analyse the prognostic factors.

Abstract

In digestive oncology, the clinical impact of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in routine practice should be addressed. In this work, we studied the impact of a 22-gene NGS amplicon-based panel with Ion Torrent Proton Sequencing, prospectively performed in routine practice. We analyzed the results of extended molecular testing, beyond RAS and BRAF, in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in a single-center, retrospective, observational study of consecutive mCRC patients followed up at the Georges Pompidou European Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018. Overall, 210 patients with mCRC were included. Median follow-up was 25.4 months (IQR: 14.9–39.5). The three most frequently mutated genes were: TP53 (63%), KRAS (41%) and PIK3CA (19%). A positive association was found between overall survival and performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (HR: 4.91 (1.84–13.1); p = 0.001) and differentiation (HR: 4.70 (1.51–14.6); p = 0.007) in multivariate analysis. The NGS panel enabled five patients to access a targeted therapy not currently registered for CRC. In conclusion, targeted NGS panels in mCRC are feasible in routine practice, but need to be regularly updated and in-depth studies are needed to better analyze the prognostic factors.

Phase Ib/II Study of Cetuximab plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the antitumor efficacy of cetuximab in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with RAS wild-type (RASwt), metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase Ib/II study, cetuximab was combined with pembrolizumab in patients with RASwt mCRC with ≥ one prior line of therapy for advanced disease. We analyzed baseline on-treatment tumor tissues for changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), using flow cytometry and multispectral immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were evaluable for efficacy. The study was negative for the primary efficacy endpoint [overall response rate: 2.6%, 6-month progression-free survival (PFS): 31%; P = 0.52]. Median PFS was 4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9-5.5 months]. No increase in adverse effects was identified. We observed favorable immunomodulation with 47% increase in the number of intratumoral CTLs posttreatment (P = 0.035). These changes were more pronounced in patients with tumor shrinkage (P = 0.05). The TME was characterized by high numbers of TIM3⁺ and CTLA4⁺ cells; there were few activated OX40⁺ cells. PD-L1 expression was higher in pretreatment tumor cells from metastatic sites versus primary tumor samples (P < 0.05). Higher numbers of PD-L1⁺ tumor cells at baseline were associated with tumor shrinkage (P = 0.04). Analysis of immune populations in the blood demonstrated decreases in PD-1⁺ memory effector cells (P = 0.04) and granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (P = 0.03), with simultaneous increases in CD4⁺/CTLA4⁺ cells (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cetuximab and pembrolizumab is inactive in patients with RASwt mCRC, despite its partial local immunologic efficacy. Further development of immuno-oncology combinations with enhanced efficacy and/or targeting additional or alternative immune checkpoints merits investigation.

Mutation Status and Prognostic Value of KRAS and BRAF in Southeast Iranian Colorectal Cancer Patients: First Report from Southeast of Iran

MAIN PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine any association of KRAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer with clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of Southeast Iranian colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

Overall, KRAS and BRAF status were assessed in 100 Iranian CRC subjects. A hundred consecutive stages I-IV CRC patients, who underwent surgical tumor resection from February 2012 to August 2015, were prospectively attained from three centers and were enrolled in the research. Direct sequencing and real-time PCR methods were used to the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to detect associations of KRAS and BRAF mutations with clinical/clinicopathological features. Kaplan-Meier model was used to estimate overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, KRAS and BRAF mutations were detected in 29 (29%) and 7 (7%) of 100 CRC patients, respectively. BRAF mutations that all comprised V600E and KRAS mutations were found in codon 12, 13, and 61 (72.4%, 20.7 and 6.9%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, older age (≥ 60) was significantly associated with higher KRAS mutations rate and high BRAF mutation rate was significantly associated with older age (≥ 60) and poorly differentiated tumors. KRAS and BRAF mutant vs. wild type of KRAS and BRAF, 5-year OS was 62.1% vs. 71.8% (p value > 0.05) and 57.1% vs. 67.7% (p value > 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Mutations were found in both KRAS and BRAF genes in Iranian colorectal cancers patients and were associated with clinical/clinicopathologic features. Our data emphasizes the importance of these molecular features in Iranian CRC patients.

Regulation of KRAS protein expression by miR-544a and KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism in wild-type KRAS sporadic colon adenocarcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) results from the accumulation of genetic mutations and alterations in signaling pathways. KRAS is mutated in 40% of CRC cases and is involved in increased tumor cells proliferation and survival. Although KRAS mutations are a dominant event in CRC tumorigenesis, increased wild-type KRAS expression has a similar effect on accelerated tumor growth. In this study, we investigated the KRAS status in correlation with clinicopathological features in sporadic CRC and more importantly the role of let-7a-5p and miR-544a-3p in the regulation of wild-type KRAS protein expression in the tumor center (T1) and invasive tumor front (T2). Analysis showed that 39.1% of tumor samples had KRAS mutations. In wild-type KRAS tumors, 62.0% were positive for KRAS protein expression and there was a higher percentage of KRAS-positive tumor cells and a higher intensity of immunohistochemical reaction in T2 than in T1 samples. This could not be attributed to differences in KRAS mRNA levels, suggesting regulation via miR-544a-3p expression which was significantly decreased in T2 samples. Furthermore, we demonstrated that tumor samples carrying the KRAS-LCS6 variant allele had significantly higher protein expression of the wild-type KRAS. Our results suggest the role of the KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism and miR-544a-3p expression in the regulation of wild-type KRAS protein expression in sporadic CRC.

Genetic Characterization of Pediatric Sarcomas by Targeted RNA Sequencing

Somatic variants, primarily fusion genes and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) or insertions/deletions (indels), are prevalent among sarcomas. In many cases, accurate diagnosis of these tumors incorporates genetic findings that may also carry prognostic or therapeutic significance. Using the anchored multiplex PCR-based FusionPlex system, a custom RNA sequencing panel was developed that simultaneously detects fusion genes, SNVs, and indels in 112 genes found to be recurrently mutated in solid tumors. Using this assay, a retrospective analysis was conducted to identify somatic variants that may have assisted with classifying a cohort of 90 previously uncharacterized primarily pediatric sarcoma specimens. In total, somatic variants were identified in 45.5% (41/90) of the samples tested, including 22 cases with fusion genes and 19 cases with SNVs or indels. In addition, two of these findings represent novel alterations: a WHSC1L1/NCOA2 fusion and a novel in-frame deletion in the NRAS gene (NM_002524: c.174_176delAGC p.Ala59del). These sequencing results, taken in context with the available clinical data, indicate a potential change in the initial diagnosis, prognosis, or management in 27 of the 90 cases. This study presents a custom RNA sequencing assay that detects fusion genes and SNVs in tandem and has the ability to identify novel fusion partners. These features highlight the advantages associated with utilizing anchored multiplex PCR technology for the rapid and highly sensitive detection of somatic variants.

Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma by Liquid Biopsy (Decalib Study): The ddPCR Challenge

Background: In most countries, participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs with the immunological fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) is low. Mutations of RAS and BRAF occur early in colorectal carcinogenesis and “liquid biopsy” allows detection of mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This prospective study aims to evaluate the performance of RAS and BRAF-mutated ctDNA in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas (AA). Methods: One hundred and thirty patients who underwent colonoscopy for suspicion of colorectal lesion were included and divided into four groups: 20 CRC, 39 AA, 31 non-advanced adenoma and/or hyperplastic polyp(s) (NAA) and 40 with no lesion. Mutated ctDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR. Results: ctDNA was detected in 45.0% of CRC, in 2.6% of AA and none of the NAA and “no-lesion” groups. All patients with stage II to IV mutated CRC had detectable ctDNA (n = 8/8). Among the mutated AA, only one patient had detectable ctDNA (4.3%), maybe due to limited technical sensitivity or to a low rate of ctDNA or even the absence ctDNA in plasma. Specificity and sensitivity of KRAS- and BRAF-mutated ctDNA for the detection of all CRC and AA were 100% and 16.9%, respectively. Conclusions: ctDNA had high sensitivity in detection of advanced mutated CRC but was unable to sensitively detect AA. ctDNA analysis was easy to perform and readily accepted by the population but requires combination with other circulating biomarkers before replacing iFOBT.

Colorectal cancer genomic biomarkers in the clinical management of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is an heterogeneous disease in which different genetic alterations play a role in its pathogenesis and progression and offer potential for therapeutic intervention. The research on predictive biomarkers in metastatic CRC (mCRC) mainly focused on the identification of biomarkers of response or resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. In this respect, international guidelines suggest testing mCRC patients only for KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations and for microsatellite instability. However, the use of novel testing methods is raising relevant issue related to these biomarkers, such as the presence of sub-clonal RAS mutations or the clinical interpretation of rare no-V600 BRAF variants. In addition, a number of novel biomarkers is emerging from recent studies including amplification of ERBB2, mutations in ERBB2, MAP2K1 and NF1 and rearrangements of ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET. Mutations in POLE and the levels of tumor mutation burden also appear as possible biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in CRC. Finally, the consensus molecular subtypes classification of CRC based on gene expression profiling has prognostic and predictive implications. Integration of all these information will be likely necessary in the next future in order to improve precision/personalized medicine in mCRC patients.

Molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer in a Middle Eastern population in a single institution

BACKGROUND

The few studies of the molecular biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Middle Eastern populations have included only small samples of patients.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the frequency and prognostic effect of RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PTEN, and EGFR somatic mutations as well as mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in Lebanese Middle Eastern patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center descriptive study.

SETTING

Lebanese Middle Eastern patients in a tertiary medical cen.ter.

METHODS

We included all patients diagnosed with CRC between January 2010 and December 2015, in whom RAS mutational status and the expression of MLH1 and MSH2 proteins were available.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Genetic mutations detected by direct sequencing while MMR protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

SAMPLE SIZE

645 patients.

RESULTS

RAS, BRAF, EGFR, PI3KCA, and PTEN mutation rates were 38.5%,12.9%, 0%, 11.1% and 0% respectively. The MMR deficiency rate was 20.6%. No factor was associated with RAS mutation whereas MMR-deficient tumors were less likely to be metastatic at diagnosis. Among patients with wild-type RAS females fared better than males (median overall survival [OS]=1734 vs 1079 days respectively, P=.015) even after adjustment for confounding factors by Cox regression analy.sis. This finding was not reproduced in the RAS-mutated group. The median OS of patients with MMR-deficient tumors was not reached, while the median OS was 2475 days in patients who had maintained expression of both MLH1 and MSH2.

CONCLUSION

The RAS mutation rate was similar to Western and East Asian countries, but not for the BRAF mutation and MMR deficiency. We also found a prognostic effect for sex in the RAS wild-type group, a finding worthy of further exploration.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, single center and small sample size. Expression of MSH6 and PMS2 not analyzed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Association between clinicopathological characteristics and RAS mutation in colorectal cancer

In colorectal cancer, KRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4) and NRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4) mutations are associated with resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies, and BRAF mutation is a molecular marker of poor prognosis. KRAS exon 2 and BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers have well-known distinct clinicopathological characteristics. Comparison of tumors with different RAS status (exons 2, 3, and 4 of KRAS and NRAS) based on their clinicopathological characteristics has never been established. All colorectal cancer patients with RAS and BRAF testing from 2011 to 2015 were included in this observational retrospective study. Patient and tumor characteristics were collected and correlation with RAS and BRAF status was evaluated. A total of 1735 patients with colorectal cancer were included. RAS-mutated colorectal cancers (n=1002), compared with RAS wild-type colorectal cancers (n=733), were significantly associated with male gender, classical adenocarcinoma subtype, well/moderately differentiated tumors, and microsatellite stable phenotype. KRAS codon 13-mutated colorectal cancers (n=171), compared with RAS wild-type colorectal cancers, more frequently presented classical adenocarcinoma subtype and microsatellite stable phenotype. In comparison with other RAS mutations, KRAS exon 3-mutated colorectal cancers (n=23) were associated with mucinous/rare histological subtypes and, most likely to located in the rectum. KRAS exon 4-mutated colorectal cancers (n=33) were more frequently associated with mucinous/rare histological subtypes. There was no significant association between NRAS mutation (n=37) and clinicopathological features. Colorectal cancers are associated with different clinicopathological features according to the type of RAS mutation. Consequently, these particular characteristics must be considered when assessing the prognostic value of RAS status in colorectal cancer.

[Detection of RAS genes mutation using the Cobas® method in a private laboratory of pathology: Medical and economical study in comparison to a public platform of molecular biology of cancer]

In France, determination of the mutation status of RAS genes for predictive response to anti-EGFR targeted treatments is carried out by public platforms of molecular biology of cancer created by the French National Cancer Institute. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of these analyses by a private pathology laboratory (MEDIPATH) as per the requirements of accreditation. We retrospectively studied the mutation status of KRAS and NRAS genes in 163 cases of colorectal metastatic cancer using the Cobas^® technique. We compared our results to those prospectively obtained through pyrosequencing and allelic discrimination by the genetic laboratory of solid tumors at the Nice University Hospital (PACA-EST regional platform). The results of both series were identical: 98.7% positive correlation; negative correlation of 93.1%; overall correlation of 95.7% (Kappa=0.92). This study demonstrates the feasibility of molecular analysis in a private pathology laboratory. As this practice requires a high level of guarantee, its accreditation, according to the NF-EN-ISO15189 quality compliance French standard, is essential. Conducting molecular analysis in this context avoids the steps of routing the sample and the result between the pathology laboratory and the platform, which reduces the overall time of rendering the result. In conclusion, the transfer of some analysis from these platforms to private pathology laboratories would allow the platforms to be discharged from a part of routine testing and therefore concentrate their efforts to the development of new analyses constantly required to access personalized medicine.