1
|
Lee Argov EJ, Rodriguez CB, Agovino M, Schmitt KM, Desperito E, Karr AG, Wei Y, Terry MB, Tehranifar P. Screening mammography frequency following dense breast notification among a predominantly Hispanic/Latina screening cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2024:10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7. [PMID: 38607569 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01871-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nationally legislated dense breast notification (DBN) informs women of their breast density (BD) and the impact of BD on breast cancer risk and detection, but consequences for screening participation are unclear. We evaluated the association of DBN in New York State (NYS) with subsequent screening mammography in a largely Hispanic/Latina cohort. METHODS Women aged 40-60 were surveyed in their preferred language (33% English, 67% Spanish) during screening mammography from 2016 to 2018. We used clinical BD classification from mammography records from 2013 (NYS DBN enactment) through enrollment (baseline) to create a 6-category variable capturing prior and new DBN receipt (sent only after clinically dense mammograms). We used this variable to compare the number of subsequent mammograms (0, 1, ≥ 2) from 10 to 30 months after baseline using ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS In a sample of 728 women (78% foreign-born, 72% Hispanic, 46% high school education or less), first-time screeners and women who received DBN for the first time after prior non-dense mammograms had significantly fewer screening mammograms within 30 months of baseline (Odds Ratios range: 0.33 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.12-0.85) to 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.82)) compared to women with prior mammography but no DBN. There were no differences in subsequent mammogram frequency between women with multiple DBN and those who never received DBN. Findings were consistent across age, language, health literacy, and education groups. CONCLUSION Women receiving their first DBN after previous non-dense mammograms have lower mammography participation within 2.5 years. DBN has limited influence on screening participation of first-time screeners and those with persistent dense mammograms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica J Lee Argov
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Carmen B Rodriguez
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Mariangela Agovino
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Karen M Schmitt
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Division of Academics, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elise Desperito
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anita G Karr
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ying Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Tehranifar
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168Th St., New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isautier JMJ, Wang S, Houssami N, McCaffery K, Brennan ME, Li T, Nickel B. The impact of breast density notification on psychosocial outcomes in racial and ethnic minorities: A systematic review. Breast 2024; 74:103693. [PMID: 38430905 PMCID: PMC10918326 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High breast density is an independent risk factor for breast cancer and decreases the sensitivity of mammography. This systematic review synthesizes the evidence on the impact of breast density (BD) information and/or notification on women's psychosocial outcomes among women from racial and ethnic minority groups. METHODS A systematic search was performed in March 2023, and the articles were identified using CINHAL, Embase, Medline, and PsychInfo databases. The search strategy combined the terms "breast", "density", "notification" and synonyms. The authors specifically kept the search terms broad and did not include terms related to race and ethnicity. Full-text articles were reviewed for analysis by race, ethnicity and primary language of participants. Two authors evaluated the eligibility of studies with verification from the study team, extracted and crosschecked data, and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS Of 1784 articles, 32 articles published from 2003 to 2023 were included. Thirty-one studies were conducted in the United States and one in Australia, with 28 quantitative and four qualitative methodologies. The overall results in terms of breast density awareness, knowledge, communication with healthcare professionals, screening intentions and supplemental screening practice were heterogenous across studies. Barriers to understanding BD notifications and intentions/access to supplemental screening among racial and ethnic minorities included socioeconomic factors, language, health literacy and medical mistrust. CONCLUSIONS A one-size approach to inform women about their BD may further disadvantage racial and ethnic minority women. BD notification and accompanying information should be tailored and translated to ensure readability and understandability by all women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M J Isautier
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales Australia; Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N Houssami
- Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K McCaffery
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales Australia; Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M E Brennan
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Sydney, Australia; National School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - T Li
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Nickel
- The University of Sydney, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, New South Wales Australia; Wiser Healthcare, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhattacharjee A, Walsh D, Dasari P, Hodson LJ, Edwards S, White SJ, Turnbull D, Ingman WV. Factors Associated with Increased Knowledge about Breast Density in South Australian Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Screening. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:893. [PMID: 38473255 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: There is growing awareness of breast density in women attending breast cancer screening; however, it is unclear whether this awareness is associated with increased knowledge. This study aims to evaluate breast density knowledge among Australian women attending breast cancer screening. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on women undergoing breast cancer screening at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Breast/Endocrine outpatient department. Participants were provided with a questionnaire to assess knowledge, awareness, and desire to know their own breast density. Result: Of the 350 women who participated, 61% were familiar with 'breast density' and 57% had 'some knowledge'. Prior breast density notification (OR = 4.99, 95% CI = 2.76, 9.03; p = 0.004), awareness (OR = 4.05, 95% CI = 2.57, 6.39; p = 0.004), younger age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96, 0.99; p = 0.02), and English as the language spoken at home (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.23, 8.77; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of 'some knowledge' of breast density. A significant proportion of participants (82%) expressed desire to ascertain their individual breast density. Conclusions: While knowledge of breast density in this Australian cohort is generally quite low, we have identified factors associated with increased knowledge. Further research is required to determine optimal interventions to increase breast density knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avisak Bhattacharjee
- Discipline of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| | - David Walsh
- Discipline of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia
| | - Pallave Dasari
- Discipline of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| | - Leigh J Hodson
- Discipline of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| | - Suzanne Edwards
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Sarah J White
- Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Deborah Turnbull
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| | - Wendy V Ingman
- Discipline of Surgical Specialties, Adelaide Medical School, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, SA 5011, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Best R, Wilkinson LS, Oliver-Williams C, Tolani F, Yates J. Should we share breast density information during breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom? an integrative review. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230122. [PMID: 37751169 PMCID: PMC10646652 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Dense breasts are an established risk factor for breast cancer and also reduce the sensitivity of mammograms. There is increasing public concern around breast density in the UK, with calls for this information to be shared at breast cancer screening. METHODS We searched the PubMed database, Cochrane Library and grey literature, using broad search terms in October 2022. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of each included study. The results were narratively synthesised by five research questions: desire for information, communication formats, psychological impact, knowledge impact and behaviour change. RESULTS We identified 19 studies: three Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), three cohort studies, nine cross-sectional studies, one qualitative interview study, one mixed methods study and two 2021 systematic reviews. Nine studies were based in the United States of America (USA), five in Australia, two in the UK and one in Croatia. One systematic review included 14 USA studies, and the other 27 USA studies, 1 Australian and 1 Canadian. The overall GRADE evidence quality rating for each research question was very low to low.Generally, participants wanted to receive breast density information. Conversations with healthcare professionals were more valued and effective than letters. Breast density awareness after notification varied greatly between studies.Breast density information either did not impact frequency of mammography screening or increased the intentions of participants to return for routine screening as well as intention to access, and uptake of, supplementary screening. People from ethnic minority groups or of lower socioeconomic status (SES) had greater confusion following notification, and, along with those without healthcare insurance, were less likely to access supplementary screening. CONCLUSION Breast density specific research in the UK, including different communities, is needed before the UK considers sharing breast density information at screening. There are also practical considerations around implementation and recording, which need to be addressed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Currently, sharing breast density information at breast cancer screening in the UK may not be beneficial to participants and could widen inequalities. UK specific research is needed, and measurement, communication and future testing implications need to be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Best
- NHS England Screening Quality Assurance Service, Health Education England, England, United Kingdom
| | | | - Clare Oliver-Williams
- NHS England Screening Quality Assurance Service, Health Education England, England, United Kingdom
| | - Foyeke Tolani
- Public Health Department, Bedford Borough Council, Bedford, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Yates
- NHS England Screening Quality Assurance Service, Health Education England, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brown AL, Vijapura C, Patel M, De La Cruz A, Wahab R. Breast Cancer in Dense Breasts: Detection Challenges and Supplemental Screening Opportunities. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230024. [PMID: 37792590 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Dense breast tissue at mammography is associated with higher breast cancer incidence and mortality rates, which have prompted new considerations for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts. The authors review the definition and classification of breast density, density assessment methods, breast cancer risk, current legislation, and future efforts and summarize trials and key studies that have affected the existing guidelines for supplemental screening. Cases of breast cancer in dense breasts are presented, highlighting a variety of modalities and specific imaging findings that can aid in cancer detection and staging. Understanding the current state of breast cancer screening in patients with dense breasts and its challenges is important to shape future considerations for care. Shifting the paradigm of breast cancer detection toward early diagnosis for women with dense breasts may be the answer to reducing the number of deaths from this common disease. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Yeh in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann L Brown
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3188 Bellevue Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45219-0772 (A.L.B., C.V., A.D.L.C., R.W.); and Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (M.P.)
| | - Charmi Vijapura
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3188 Bellevue Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45219-0772 (A.L.B., C.V., A.D.L.C., R.W.); and Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (M.P.)
| | - Mitva Patel
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3188 Bellevue Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45219-0772 (A.L.B., C.V., A.D.L.C., R.W.); and Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (M.P.)
| | - Alexis De La Cruz
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3188 Bellevue Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45219-0772 (A.L.B., C.V., A.D.L.C., R.W.); and Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (M.P.)
| | - Rifat Wahab
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3188 Bellevue Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45219-0772 (A.L.B., C.V., A.D.L.C., R.W.); and Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Acheampong T, Rodríguez CB, O'Neill SC, Agovino M, Argov EJL, Tehranifar P. Scientific uncertainty and perceived mammography benefits in women screened for breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:611-619. [PMID: 37085746 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01697-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Personal aversion to scientific uncertainty may influence how women perceive the benefits of mammography, a breast cancer screening practice with conflicting scientific opinions and guidelines. Such associations may even exist among women who participate in screening. METHODS We evaluated the distribution of aversion to ambiguous medical information (AA-Med), using a 6-item scale capturing the level of agreement with statements about obtaining a cancer screening test with conflicting medical recommendations in 665 women (aged 40-60 years; 79.5% Hispanic) recruited during screening mammography appointments in New York City. We assessed the association of AA-Med with perceptions of benefits of mammography (breast cancer mortality reduction, worry reduction, early detection, treatment improvement) using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Over a quarter of participants expressed negative reactions to medical ambiguity about a cancer screening test (e.g., fear, lower trust in experts), but a majority endorsed intention to undergo screening. AA-Med was higher in women who were U.S.-born, non-Hispanic black, and had marginal to adequate health literacy, but there were no differences by clinical factors or screening experiences (e.g., family history, prior breast biopsy). Women with higher AA-Med were more likely to perceive treatment benefits from mammography (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.99-1.90), but AA-Med was not associated with other perceived mammography benefits. CONCLUSIONS Aversion to uncertainty regarding cancer screening varies by sociodemographic characteristics but has limited associations with perceived mammography benefits in women who already participate in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teofilia Acheampong
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carmen B Rodríguez
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Suzanne C O'Neill
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mariangela Agovino
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erica J Lee Argov
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Tehranifar
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Edmonds CE, O'Brien SR, Conant EF. Mammographic Breast Density: Current Assessment Methods, Clinical Implications, and Future Directions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2023; 44:35-45. [PMID: 36792272 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Mammographic breast density is widely accepted as an independent risk factor for the development of breast cancer. In addition, because dense breast tissue may mask breast malignancies, breast density is inversely related to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Given the risks associated with breast density, as well as ongoing efforts to stratify individual risk and personalize breast cancer screening and prevention, numerous studies have sought to better understand the factors that impact breast density, and to develop and implement reproducible, quantitative methods to assess mammographic density. Breast density assessments have been incorporated into risk assessment models to improve risk stratification. Recently, novel techniques for analyzing mammographic parenchymal complexity, or texture, have been explored as potential means of refining mammographic tissue-based risk assessment beyond breast density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Edmonds
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Sophia R O'Brien
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily F Conant
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chalfant JS, Hoyt AC. Breast Density: Current Knowledge, Assessment Methods, and Clinical Implications. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:357-370. [PMID: 38416979 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Breast density is an accepted independent risk factor for the future development of breast cancer, and greater breast density has the potential to mask malignancies on mammography, thus lowering the sensitivity of screening mammography. The risk associated with dense breast tissue has been shown to be modifiable with changes in breast density. Numerous studies have sought to identify factors that influence breast density, including age, genetic, racial/ethnic, prepubertal, adolescent, lifestyle, environmental, hormonal, and reproductive history factors. Qualitative, semiquantitative, and quantitative methods of breast density assessment have been developed, but to date there is no consensus assessment method or reference standard for breast density. Breast density has been incorporated into breast cancer risk models, and there is growing consciousness of the clinical implications of dense breast tissue in both the medical community and public arena. Efforts to improve breast cancer screening sensitivity for women with dense breasts have led to increased attention to supplemental screening methods in recent years, prompting the American College of Radiology to publish Appropriateness Criteria for supplemental screening based on breast density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S Chalfant
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Anne C Hoyt
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Radiological Sciences, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dolan H, McCaffery K, Houssami N, Cvejic E, Brennan M, Hersch J, Dorrington M, Verde A, Vaccaro L, Nickel B. Australian Women's Intentions and Psychological Outcomes Related to Breast Density Notification and Information: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2216784. [PMID: 35708691 PMCID: PMC9204548 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Whether the benefits of notifying women about breast density outweigh the potential harms to inform current and future mammogram screening practice remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of mammographic breast density notification and information provision on women's intention to seek supplemental screening and psychological outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A 3-arm online randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 10 to 31, 2021. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to October 20, 2021. Participants included Australian residents identifying as female, aged between 40 and 74 years, with no history of breast cancer who were residing in jurisdictions without existing breast density notification with screening mammograms. INTERVENTIONS Women were randomized to receive 1 of the following hypothetical breast screening test result letters: screening mammogram result letter without breast density messaging (control), screening mammogram result letter with breast density messaging and an existing density information letter taken from a screening service in Australia (intervention 1), and screening mammogram result letter with breast density messaging and a health literacy-sensitive version of the letter adapted for people with lower health literacy (intervention 2). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were intention to seek supplemental screening; feeling anxious (uneasy, worried, or nervous), informed, or confused; and having breast cancer worry. RESULTS A total of 1420 Australian women were randomized and included in the final analysis. The largest group consisted of 603 women aged 60 to 74 years (42.5%). Compared with the control cohort (n = 480), women who received density notification via intervention 1 (n = 470) and intervention 2 (n = 470) reported a significantly higher intention to seek supplemental screening (0.8% vs 15.6% and 14.2%; P < .001) and feeling anxious (14.2% vs 49.4% and 48.5%; P < .001), confusion (7.8% vs 24.0% and 23.6%; P < .001), and worry about breast cancer (quite/very worried: 6.9% vs 17.2% and 15.5%; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in these outcomes between the 2 intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial, breast density notification and information integrated with screening mammogram results increased women's intention to seek supplemental screening and made women feel anxious, confused, or worried about breast cancer. These findings have relevance and implications for mammogram screening services and policy makers considering whether and, if so, how best to implement widespread notification of breast density as part of mammography screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12621000253808.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hankiz Dolan
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meagan Brennan
- University of Notre Dame Australia, School of Medicine Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jolyn Hersch
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Angela Verde
- Breast Cancer Network Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa Vaccaro
- Health Consumers New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee Argov EJ, Rodriguez CB, Agovino M, Wei Y, Shelton RC, Kukafka R, Schmitt KM, Desperito E, Terry MB, Tehranifar P. Breast cancer worry, uncertainty, and perceived risk following breast density notification in a longitudinal mammography screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:95. [PMID: 36544225 PMCID: PMC9773500 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01584-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dense breast notification (DBN) legislation aims to increase a woman's awareness of her personal breast density and the implications of having dense breasts for breast cancer detection and risk. This information may adversely affect women's breast cancer worry, perceptions of risk, and uncertainty about screening, which may persist over time or vary by sociodemographic factors. We examined short- and long-term psychological responses to DBN and awareness of breast density (BD). METHODS In a predominantly Hispanic New York City screening cohort (63% Spanish-speaking), ages 40-60 years, we assessed breast cancer worry, perceived breast cancer risk, and uncertainties about breast cancer risk and screening choices, in short (1-3 months)- and long-term (9-18 months) surveys following the enrollment screening mammogram (between 2016 and 2018). We compared psychological responses by women's dense breast status (as a proxy for DBN receipt) and BD awareness and examined multiplicative interaction by education, health literacy, nativity, and preferred interview language. RESULTS In multivariable models using short-term surveys, BD awareness was associated with increased perceived risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99, 5.20 for high, OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.34, 3.58 for moderate, vs. low risk) in the overall sample, and with increased uncertainty about risk (OR 1.97 per 1-unit increase, 95% CI 1.15, 3.39) and uncertainty about screening choices (OR 1.73 per 1-unit increase, 95% CI 1.01, 2.9) in Spanish-speaking women. DBN was associated with decreased perceived risk among women with at least some college education (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11, 0.89, for high, OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29, 0.89, for moderate vs. low risk), while those with a high school education or less experienced an increase (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.05, 8.67 high vs. low risk). There were no associations observed between DBN or BD awareness and short-term breast cancer worry, nor with any psychological outcomes at long-term surveys. CONCLUSIONS Associations of BD awareness and notification with breast cancer-related psychological outcomes were limited to short-term increases in perceived breast cancer risk dependent on educational attainment, and increases in uncertainty around breast cancer risk and screening choices among Spanish-speaking women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica J. Lee Argov
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA
| | - Carmen B. Rodriguez
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA
| | - Mariangela Agovino
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA
| | - Ying Wei
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA ,grid.239585.00000 0001 2285 2675Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY USA
| | - Rita Kukafka
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA ,grid.239585.00000 0001 2285 2675Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY USA ,grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 622 West 168th St., New York, NY USA
| | - Karen M. Schmitt
- grid.239585.00000 0001 2285 2675Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY USA ,grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Division of Academics, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY USA
| | - Elise Desperito
- grid.239585.00000 0001 2285 2675Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA ,grid.239585.00000 0001 2285 2675Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY USA
| | - Parisa Tehranifar
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St., New York, NY USA ,grid.239585.00000 0001 2285 2675Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave., New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|