Potent and specific antitumor efficacy of CMC-544, a CD22-targeted immunoconjugate of calicheamicin, against systemically disseminated B-cell lymphoma

Pharmaceutical innovation and advanced biotechnology in the biotech-pharmaceutical industry for antibody-drug conjugate development

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), from prototypes in the 1980s to first- and second-generation products in the 2000s, and now in their multiformats, have progressed tremendously to meet oncological challenges. Currently, 13 ADCs have been approved for medical practice, with over 200 candidates in clinical trials. Moreover, ADCs have evolved into different formats, including bispecific ADCs, probody-drug conjugates, pH-responsive ADCs, target-degrading ADCs, and immunostimulating ADCs. Technologies from biopharmaceutical industries have a crucial role in the clinical transition of these novel biotherapeutics. In this review, we highlight several features contributing to the prosperity of bioindustrial ADC development. Various proprietary technologies from biopharmaceutical companies are discussed. Such advances in biopharmaceutical industries are the backbone for the success of ADCs in development and clinical application.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: past progress, current research and future directions

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate that was first evaluated in B-cell lymphomas but was subsequently shown to be highly effective in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). INO improved response rates and survival in a randomized study in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL, leading to its regulatory approval in the United States in 2017. While the formal approval for INO is as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory ALL, subsequent studies with INO administered in combination with chemotherapy and/or blinatumomab both in the frontline and salvage settings have yielded promising results. In this review, we discuss the clinical development of INO in ALL, highlighting lessons learned from the initial clinical trials of INO, as well as the many ongoing studies that are seeking to expand the role of INO in ALL.

Nano-Based Approved Pharmaceuticals for Cancer Treatment: Present and Future Challenges

Cancer is one of the main causes of death worldwide. To date, and despite the advances in conventional treatment options, therapy in cancer is still far from optimal due to the non-specific systemic biodistribution of antitumor agents. The inadequate drug concentrations at the tumor site led to an increased incidence of multiple drug resistance and the appearance of many severe undesirable side effects. Nanotechnology, through the development of nanoscale-based pharmaceuticals, has emerged to provide new and innovative drugs to overcome these limitations. In this review, we provide an overview of the approved nanomedicine for cancer treatment and the rationale behind their designs and applications. We also highlight the new approaches that are currently under investigation and the perspectives and challenges for nanopharmaceuticals, focusing on the tumor microenvironment and tumor disseminate cells as the most attractive and effective strategies for cancer treatments.

Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometric method for the quantification of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and its preclinical pharmacokinetics

MMAE is a potent antimitotic drug used as payload of an antibody-drug conjugate which shows potent activity in preclinical and clinical studies against a range of lymphomas, leukemia and solid tumors. Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometric method was developed for the quantification of MMAE and its preclinical pharmacokinetics. The method consisted of protein precipitation using acetonitrile (ACN) for sample preparation and liquid chromatography - quadrupole - time-of-flight - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-qTOF-MS/MS) analysis in the positive ion mode. A quadratic regression (weighted 1/concentration² ), with an equation y = ax²  + bx + c, was used to fit calibration curves over the concentration range of 1.01-2,200 ng/mL for MMAE. The qualification run met the acceptance criteria of ±25% accuracy and precision values for QC samples. Recovery was 42.84%. The dilution integrity was determined for 5-fold dilution and the accuracy and precision ranged within ±25%. The stability results indicated that MMAE was stable for the following conditions: short-term (4 h), long-term (4 weeks), freeze/thaw (3 cycles) and post-preparative stability (12 h). This qualified method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of MMAE in rat as a preclinical animal model. The PK results suggest that MMAE has moderate CL and low BA.Also, these results would be helpful in having a comprehensive understanding of the PK characteristics of MMAE and developing ADC in future.

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) method development and characterization of resolved drug-load variants in site-specifically conjugated pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer-based antibody drug conjugates (PBD-ADCs)

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are heterogeneous biopharmaceutical products that demand extensive characterization to ensure batch consistency, safety, and efficacy. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) is the state-of-the-art analytical tool to monitor conjugation-related critical quality attributes (CQAs) e.g. drug-load distribution and Drug-to-Antibody Ratio (DAR). For the next generation site-specific PBD-ADCs (PBD: pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer), denaturing RP-HPLC (reverse-phase high-performance chromatography) is the current method to determine average DAR. In this manuscript, we have utilized native HIC for the first time to understand conjugation related CQAs in PBD-ADCs. In terms of the method development, the type of stationary phase and salt, coupled with reduction of the reactive imine in the PBD drug-linker to an amine form in the sample preparation, have played a key role in achieving the best HIC resolution for the drug-load variants. The established HIC conditions resolved DAR 0, DAR 1, and two DAR 2 peaks for PBD-ADCs. Extended characterization of the DAR 2 peaks confirmed that they have retained characteristically distinct antibody Fc N-glycan distributions (Fc = Fragment crystallization region). Therefore, the results support that the HIC conditions established for PBD-ADCs is valuable in not only determining DAR values but also other important attributes including native drug-load distribution and unique DAR 2 conformations existed as a result of the N-glycan heterogeneity.

Antibody Structure and Function: The Basis for Engineering Therapeutics

Antibodies and antibody-derived macromolecules have established themselves as the mainstay in protein-based therapeutic molecules (biologics). Our knowledge of the structure–function relationships of antibodies provides a platform for protein engineering that has been exploited to generate a wide range of biologics for a host of therapeutic indications. In this review, our basic understanding of the antibody structure is described along with how that knowledge has leveraged the engineering of antibody and antibody-related therapeutics having the appropriate antigen affinity, effector function, and biophysical properties. The platforms examined include the development of antibodies, antibody fragments, bispecific antibody, and antibody fusion products, whose efficacy and manufacturability can be improved via humanization, affinity modulation, and stability enhancement. We also review the design and selection of binding arms, and avidity modulation. Different strategies of preparing bispecific and multispecific molecules for an array of therapeutic applications are included.

Pharmacokinetic and Metabolism Studies of Monomethyl Auristatin F via Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

A simple liquid chromatography–quadrupole-time-of-flight–mass spectrometric assay (LC-TOF-MS/MS) has been developed for the evaluation of metabolism and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) in rat, which is being used as a payload for antibody-drug conjugates. LC-TOF-MS/MS method was qualified for the quantification of MMAF in rat plasma. The calibration curves were acceptable over the concentration range from 3.02 to 2200 ng/mL using quadratic regression. MMAF was stable in various conditions. There were no significant matrix effects between rat and other preclinical species. The PK studies showed that the bioavailability of MMAF was 0% with high clearance. Additionally, the metabolite profiling studies, in vitro/in vivo, were performed. Seven metabolites for MMAF were tentatively identified in liver microsome. The major metabolic pathway was demethylation, which was one of the metabolic pathways predicted by MedChem Designer. Therefore, these results will be helpful to understand the PK, catabolism, and metabolism behavior of MMAF comprehensively when developing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the future.

90Y-NM600 targeted radionuclide therapy induces immunologic memory in syngeneic models of T-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Finding improved therapeutic strategies against T-cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) remains an unmet clinical need. We implemented a theranostic approach employing a tumor-targeting alkylphosphocholine (NM600) radiolabeled with ⁸⁶Y for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and ⁹⁰Y for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) of T-cell NHL. PET imaging and biodistribution performed in mouse models of T-cell NHL showed in vivo selective tumor uptake and retention of ⁸⁶Y-NM600. An initial toxicity assessment examining complete blood counts, blood chemistry, and histopathology of major organs established ⁹⁰Y-NM600 safety. Mice bearing T-cell NHL tumors treated with ⁹⁰Y-NM600 experienced tumor growth inhibition, extended survival, and a high degree of cure with immune memory toward tumor reestablishment. ⁹⁰Y-NM600 treatment was also effective against disseminated tumors, improving survival and cure rates. Finally, we observed a key role for the adaptive immune system in potentiating a durable anti-tumor response to TRT, especially in the presence of microscopic disease.

Hernandez et al. show the effectiveness of ⁹⁰Y for targeted radionucleotide therapy of T-cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL). This study suggests that delivering radiation to all NHL disease sites elicits minimal toxicity and induces a memory T-cell response, inviting combination therapies with immune activating agents.

B-cell depleting immunotherapies: therapeutic opportunities and toxicities

INTRODUCTION

The last few years have witnessed what can certainly be defined as a 'period of renaissance' for immunotherapy in the field of hematological malignancies. In particular, antibody-mediated and cell-mediated immunotherapy have significantly changed the treatment approach of patients with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. These therapies, initially employed in patients with refractory/relapsed disease, are now integrated in the treatment of newly diagnosed patients. Together with the therapeutic success, we have also learnt that these innovative therapies can induce relevant, sometimes life-threatening or even fatal, side effects. Areas covered: In this review article, we analyzed the applicative therapeutic scenario and the peculiar toxicities associated with approaches of immunotherapy, paying particular attention to the new emerging side effects, substantially unknown before the introduction of these therapies. Expert commentary: Both monoclonal antibodies and cell therapy with lymphocytes genetically modified to be redirected against leukemia targets through the transduction with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have obtained unprecedented success in rescuing patients with resistant B-cell malignancies. Complications, such as neurotoxicity, cytokine release syndrome or persistent B-cell lymphopenia, must always be taken into consideration and diagnosed in a timely manner in patients with B-cell neoplasms to guarantee optimal management, thus avoiding they blunting the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Inotuzumab: from preclinical development to success in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a recently US Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). InO consists of a CD22-targeting immunoglobulin G4 humanized monoclonal antibody conjugated to calicheamicin. Although initially developed for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) because of activity in preclinical models and high response rates in indolent lymphomas, a phase 3 trial was negative and further development focused on CD22+ ALL. Although results in NHL were disappointing, parallel testing in early-phase trials of CD22+ ALL demonstrated feasibility and efficacy. Subsequently, the randomized phase 3 Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia trial showed that InO was superior to standard of care regimens with a significantly improved complete remission (CR) rate in patients with relapsed/refractory disease (80.7% vs 29.4%, P < .001). Patients achieving CR with InO also had a significantly higher rate of undetectable minimal residual disease compared with chemotherapy (78.4% vs 28.1%, P < .001). InO-specific side effects, including veno-occlusive disease, have been an ongoing area of concern, and consensus guidelines for minimizing toxicities are now available. Ongoing trials are investigating the combination of InO with other agents in the relapse setting and the addition of InO to frontline therapy. This review details the preclinical and clinical development of InO, focusing on how best to use it and future directions for further development.

Therapeutic potential of SGN-CD19B, a PBD-based anti-CD19 drug conjugate, for treatment of B-cell malignancies

Patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia have a poor prognosis. Despite measurable clinical activity with new targeted therapies, many patients do not achieve a complete or durable response suggesting an opportunity to improve upon existing therapies. Here we describe SGN-CD19B, a pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD)-based anti-CD19 antibody drug conjugate (ADC) being investigated for treatment of B-cell malignancies, which has improved potency compared with other ADCs. CD19-expressing tumor cells rapidly internalize SGN-CD19B, and the released PBD drug induces DNA damage, resulting in G2/M cell cycle arrest and cell death. SGN-CD19B demonstrated activity against a broad panel of malignant B-cell lines and induced durable regressions in mice bearing xenografts derived from these B-cell malignancies. A single dose of SGN-CD19B induced durable regressions at 300 μg/kg (3 μg/kg drug equivalents); combination with rituximab decreased the curative dose to 100 μg/kg (1 μg/kg drug equivalents). These doses are significantly lower than the level of drug required with other ADC payloads. In cynomolgus monkeys, SGN-CD19B effectively depleted CD20+ B lymphocytes in peripheral blood and lymphoid tissues confirming that SGN-CD19B is pharmacodynamically active at well-tolerated doses. In summary, preclinical studies show SGN-CD19B is a highly active ADC, which releases a DNA cross-linking agent rather than a microtubule inhibitor. The distinct mechanism of action, broad potency, and potential to combine with rituximab suggest that SGN-CD19B may offer unique clinical opportunities in B-cell malignancies. A phase 1 clinical trial is in progress to investigate the therapeutic potential of SGN-CD19B in relapsed/refractory B-NHL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02702141.

Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults

Patients with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have a dismal prognosis with less than 10 % of patients surviving 5 years. Most such patients cannot be rescued with currently available therapies, whatever the initial treatment they receive. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel treatment options. Fortunately, over the past several years, an improved understanding of the biology of the disease has allowed the identification of rational molecular targets for therapeutic endeavors and the emergence of novel therapies has sparked great interest. This review will discuss the current treatment landscape for adult patients with relapsed and/or refractory ALL.

Recent advances and novel treatment paradigms in acute lymphocytic leukemia

This is an exciting time in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) given the advances in the relapsed/refractory setting. The development of antibody treatments (including antibody drug conjugates with toxins) offers a different treatment approach compared with conventional chemotherapy regimens. Moreover, the use of bispecific T-cell-engager antibodies (BiTEs) such as blinatumomab harness the cytotoxic activity of T cells against CD19-positive lymphoblasts. Another strategy involves the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. CAR T cells have demonstrated promising results in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, the use of BiTEs and CAR T cells is also associated with a distinct set of adverse reactions that must be taken into account by the treating physician. Apart from the above strategies, the use of other targeted therapies has attracted interest. Namely, the discovery of the Philadelphia (Ph)-like signature in children and young adults with ALL has led to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in these patients. The different drugs and strategies that are being tested in the relapsed/refractory ALL setting pose a unique challenge in identifying the optimum sequence of treatment and determining which approaches should be considered for frontline treatment.

Cancer Therapy with Radiolabeled and Drug/Toxin-conjugated Antibodies

Radioimmunotherapy and antibody-directed chemotherapy have emerged as cancer treatment modalities with the regulatory approval of products for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Antibody-toxin therapy is likewise on the verge of clinical fruition. Accumulating evidence suggests that radioimmunotherapy may have the best impact in minimal-disease and adjuvant settings, especially with radioresistant solid tumors. For the latter, ongoing efforts in ‘pretargeting’ to increase deliverable tumor radiation dose, combination therapies, and locoregional applications are also of importance. Antibody-drug conjugates have the potential to increase the therapeutic index of chemotherapy by minimizing systemic toxicity and improving tumor targeting. The design of optimal drug conjugates in this regard is predicated upon the proper choice of the target antigen, the cleavable-linker, and the drug. In respect of antibody-toxin conjugates, considerable progress has been made in chemical and recombinant immunotoxin designs, and in the advancement of many products to clinical trials. Continued development of antibody-directed therapies should expand the options available for the management of cancer.

Role of inotuzumab ozogamicin in the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to a toxic natural calicheamicin, which is under investigation for the treatment of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. CD22 is commonly expressed in 90-100% of malignant mature B-lymphocyte lineage. The first Phase II study with inotuzumab ozogamicin conducted by Kantarjian et al. gave the opportunity for heavily pretreated patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia to go for allogeneic stem cell transplant. Inotuzumab is well-tolerated with the exception of veno-occlusive disease. Overall inotuzumab ozogamicin is potentially an encouraging and promising therapy for patients.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

INTRODUCTION

The expression profile of the CD22 antigen and its role in B-cell function make it an important target in B-cell leukemias and lymphomas. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD22, is one of the most promising monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the current literature of IO in adult leukemias and lymphomas.

EXPERT OPINION

Single-agent IO has demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed B-cell ALL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). It has also demonstrated favorable early results when combined with chemotherapy in older patients with ALL. There is potential for IO to be combined with other targeted therapies under development for these diseases; data are still early and further studies of IO are warranted. While the pivotal randomized study of IO for relapsed NHL versus physician's choice did not show a statistically significant advantage in response rate, the results of the pivotal study in ALL are not yet available.

A phase 2 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin and rituximab, followed by autologous stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), a targeted humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, plus rituximab (R-INO) every 3 weeks, up to six cycles, followed by high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-aSCT) in patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The primary endpoint was overall response (OR) rate after three cycles of R-INO. Sixty-three patients were enrolled. Common grade 3/4 adverse events during R-INO treatment were thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and neutropenia. OR rate after three cycles of R-INO was 28.6% (95% confidence interval: 17.9-41.4). Eighteen patients underwent HDT-aSCT; 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for these patients was 61.1%. Serious infections and hepatic toxicity following aSCT occurred in 33% and 22%, respectively. One- and 2-year PFS rates for all enrolled patients were 28.9% and 25.3%, respectively (median, 3.0 months). R-INO had lower than expected activity as a salvage regimen for transplant eligible patients with DLBCL.

CuSO4-H-phosphonate catalyzed highly stereo- and regioselective dimerization of terminal alkynes

The readily available CuSO₄-H-phosphonate catalytic system can catalyze the head-to-head dimerization of terminal alkynes to give the corresponding (E) conjugated enynes selectively in high yield.

The anti-lymphoma activity of APO866, an inhibitor of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis, is potentialized when used in combination with anti-CD20 antibody

APO866 is an inhibitor of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) biosynthesis that exhibits potent anti-lymphoma activity. Rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 antibody, kills lymphoma cells by direct apoptosis and antibody- and complement-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicities, and has clinical efficacy in non-Hodgkin cell lymphomas. In the present study, we evaluated whether RTX could potentiate APO866-induced human B-lymphoma cell death and shed light on death-mediated mechanisms associated with this drug combination. We found that RTX significantly increases APO866-induced death in lymphoma cells from patients and lines. Mechanisms include enhancement of autophagy-mediated cell death, activation of caspase 3 and exacerbation of mitochondrial depolarization, but not increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, when compared with those induced by each drug alone. In vivo, combined administration of APO866 with RTX in a laboratory model of human aggressive lymphoma significantly decreased tumor burden and prolonged survival over single-agent treatment. Our study demonstrates that the combination of RTX and APO866 optimizes B-cell lymphoma apoptosis and therapeutic efficacy over both compounds administered separately.

Linked-in: design and efficacy of antibody drug conjugates in oncology

The use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) as targeted chemotherapies has successfully entered clinical practice and holds great promise. ADCs consist of an antibody and toxin-drug combined together via a chemical linker. While the antibody and drug are of vital importance in the direct elimination of cancer cells, more advanced linker technology was instrumental in the delivery of more potent drugs with fewer side effects. Here, we discuss the preclinical experience as well as clinical trials, with a specific emphasis on the clinical outcomes and side effects, in addition to linker strategies for five different ADCs, in order to describe different approaches in the development of this new class of anticancer agents. Brentuximab vedotin is approved for use in Hodgkin&rsquo;s lymphoma and Trastuzumab emtansine is approved for breast cancer. Combotox, Inotuzumab Ozogamicin, and Moxetumomab Pasudotox are in various stages of clinical development and are showing significant efficacy in lymphoid malignancies. These ADCs illustrate the promise and future potential of targeted therapy for presently incurable malignancies.

Targeting CD19 in B-cell lymphoma: emerging role of SAR3419

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma symbolizes a heterogeneous group of diseases resulting from malignant transformation of lymphocytes with differing patterns of behavior and responses to treatment. The potential curability of non-Hodgkin lymphoma differs among the various histologic subtypes and is associated in part with the stage at presentation. CD19 antigen is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin Ig superfamily. CD19 is specifically expressed in normal and neoplastic B-cells. Recent study showed that in a mouse model, CD19 and c-Myc synergize functionally to accelerate B-cell lymphomagenesis, which is associated with increased disease severity. Specificity is the most important challenge in cancer therapeutics. Antibody–drug conjugates have the prospect of enhancing the therapeutic efficacy over unconjugated monoclonal antibodies through the selective delivery of cytotoxic agents to cancer cells. The ubiquitous expression of CD19 in these tumors, especially at an earlier stage and the property of efficient internalization, makes CD19 an attractive and affective target for antibody–drug conjugate therapy as compared to CD20. SAR3419 (huB4-DM4) is a novel antibody–drug conjugate that is composed of a humanized monoclonal IgG1 anti-CD19 antibody (huB4) attached to the potent cytotoxic drug, a maytansine derivative (DM4), through a cleavable disulfide cross-linking agent N-Succinimidyl-4-2-pyridyldithio butanoic acid (SPDB). The preclinical efficacy of maytansine derivative–anti-CD19 conjugate was demonstrated in our laboratory, and SAR3419 was found to be more effective than CHOP in a xenograft model. Phase I trials have also been conducted on the basis of preclinical studies that demonstrated promising antitumor activity with acceptable safety results in human B-cell lymphoma models. Additional trials are ongoing and will provide additional insight into the full potential of this novel drug.

Safety and clinical activity of a combination therapy comprising two antibody-based targeting agents for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a phase I/II study evaluating the immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin with rituximab

PURPOSE

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent composed of a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic agent. We performed a phase I/II study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of INO plus rituximab (R-INO) for treatment of relapsed/refractory CD20(+)/CD22(+) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A dose-escalation phase to determine the MTD of R-INO was followed by an expanded cohort to further evaluate the efficacy and safety at the MTD. Patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL), relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), or refractory aggressive NHL received R-INO every 4 weeks for up to eight cycles.

RESULTS

In all, 118 patients received one or more cycles of R-INO (median, four cycles). Most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31%) and neutropenia (22%). Common low-grade toxicities included hyperbilirubinemia (25%) and increased AST (36%). The MTD of INO in combination with rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) was confirmed to be the same as that for single-agent INO (1.8 mg/m(2)). Treatment at the MTD yielded objective response rates of 87%, 74%, and 20% for relapsed FL (n = 39), relapsed DLBCL (n = 42), and refractory aggressive NHL (n = 30), respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 68% (median, not reached) for FL and 42% (median, 17.1 months) for relapsed DLBCL.

CONCLUSION

R-INO demonstrated high response rates and long PFS in patients with relapsed FL or DLBCL. This and the manageable toxicity profile suggest that R-INO may be a promising option for CD20(+)/CD22(+) B-cell NHL.

Linker technologies for antibody-drug conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which combine the specificity, favorable pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) with the cytotoxic potency of a drug, are promising new therapies for cancer. Along with the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and cytotoxic drugs, the design of the linker is of essential importance, because it impacts the efficacy and tolerability of ADCs. The linker needs to provide sufficient stability during systemic circulation but allow for the rapid and efficient release of the cytotoxic drug in an active form inside the tumor cells. This review provides an overview of linker technologies currently used for ADCs and advances that have resulted in linkers with improved properties. Also provided is a brief summary of some considerations for the conjugation of antibody and drug linker such as drug-to-antibody ratio and site of conjugation.

Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) clinical pipeline: a review

Biological therapies play an increasing role in cancer treatment, although the number of naked antibodies showing clinical efficacy as single agent remains limited. One way to enhance therapeutic potential of antibodies is to conjugate them to small molecule drugs. This combination is expected to bring together the benefits of highly potent drugs on the one hand and selective binders of specific tumor antigens on the other hand. However, designing an ADC is more complex than a simple meccano game, requiring thoughtful combination of antibody, linker, and drugs in the context of a target and a defined cancer indication. Lessons learned from the first-generation antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and improvement of the technology guided the design of improved compounds which are now in clinical trials. Brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris(®)), an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated to a potent microtubule inhibitor for the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphomas, is the only marketed ADC today. A total of 27 ADC are currently undergoing clinical trials in both hematological malignancies and solid tumor indications. Among them, T-DM1 (trastuzumab emtansine), an ADC comprised of trastuzumab conjugated to DM1, via a non-cleavable linker, is showing very promising results in phase III for the treatment of HER2-positive refractory/relapsed metastatic breast cancer. Other compounds, such as CMC-544, SAR3419, CDX-011, PSMA-ADC, BT-062, and IMGN901 currently in clinical trials, targeting varied antigens and bearing different linker and drugs, contribute to the learning curve of ADC, as do the discontinued ADC. Current challenges include improvement of the therapeutic index, linked to a careful selection of the targets, a better understanding of ADC mechanism of action, the management and understanding of ADC off-target toxicities, as well as the selection of appropriate clinical settings (patient selection, dosing regimen) where these molecules can bring highest clinical benefit.

Bioanalytical assay strategies for the development of antibody–drug conjugate biotherapeutics

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are monoclonal antibodies with covalently bound cytotoxic drugs. They are designed to target tumor antigens selectively and offer the hope of cancer treatment without the debilitating side-effects of conventional therapies. The concept of ADCs is not new; however, development of these therapeutics is challenging and only recently are promising clinical data emerging. These challenges include ADC bioanalysis, such as quantifying in serum/plasma for PK studies and strategies for assessing immunogenicity. ADCs have complex molecular structures incorporating large- and small-molecule characteristics and require diverse analytical methods, including ligand-binding assays and MS-based methods. ADCs are typically mixtures with a range of drug-to-antibody ratios. Biotransformations in vivo can lead to additional changes in drug-to-antibody ratios resulting in dynamically changing mixtures. Thus, a standard calibration curve consisting of the reference standard may not be appropriate for quantification of analytes in vivo and represents a unique challenge. This paper will share our perspective on why ADC bioanalysis is so complex and describe the strategies and rationale that we have used for ADCs, with highlights of original data from a variety of nonclinical and clinical case studies. Our strategy has involved novel protein structural characterization tools to help understand ADC biotransformations in vivo and use of the analyte knowledge gained to guide the development of quantitative bioanalytical assays.

Risks and untoward toxicities of antibody-based immunoconjugates

Antibody-based immunoconjugates are specifically targeted monoclonal antibodies that deliver a cytotoxic payload to their target. The cytotoxic agents can be highly potent drugs, radionuclides or toxins. Such molecules, referred to as antibody-drug conjugates, radioimmunoconjugates and immunotoxins, respectively, represent a promising approach for enhancing the efficacy of unconjugated (naked) antibodies for improved therapeutic results. Though tremendous progress has been achieved over the last few decades, the safety of these molecules still remains a matter of concern and a careful design is required for achieving a relatively safe toxicity profile along with therapeutic effectiveness. This review focuses on the toxicities arising from the use of these potent agents.

Antibody-drug conjugates: using monoclonal antibodies for delivery of cytotoxic payloads to cancer cells

One approach to improving activity of anticancer drugs is to conjugate them to antibodies that recognize tumor-associated, cell-surface antigens. The antibody-drug conjugate concept evolved following major advances, first, in the development of humanized and fully human antibodies; second, in the discoveries of highly cytotoxic compounds ('drugs) linkable to antibodies; and finally, in the optimization of linkers that couple the drug to the antibody and provide sufficient stability of the antibody-drug conjugate in the circulation, optimal activation of the drug in the tumor, and the ability of the activated drug to overcome multidrug resistance. In this article, we will review the considerations for selecting a target antigen, the design of the conjugate, and the pre-clinical and clinical experiences with the current generation of antibody-drug conjugates.

Phase I study of anti-CD22 immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544), a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to the potent cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin, targets the CD22 antigen expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This phase I study assessed the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin administered intravenously in combination with rituximab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ten patients were administered rituximab 375 mg/m(2) followed by inotuzumab ozogamicin at the maximum tolerated dose (1.8 mg/m(2)). Treatment was repeated every 28 days up to eight cycles, or until occurrence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The safety profile was similar to that of inotuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy, with hematologic adverse events occurring most frequently. The most common grade three or higher adverse events were thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (30%), and lymphopenia (30%). The overall response rate was 80% (8/10; 95% CI, 44-98%). Drug exposure increased with successive doses, similar to the pharmacokinetic profiles observed in previous phase I monotherapy studies. Efficacy results suggested promising antitumor activity, and the overall findings support the continued clinical development of this therapeutic regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00724971.

Antibody-drug conjugates of calicheamicin derivative: gemtuzumab ozogamicin and inotuzumab ozogamicin

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are an attractive approach for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, which in most cases, are inherently sensitive to cytotoxic agents. CD33 and CD22 are specific markers of myeloid leukemias and B-cell malignancies, respectively. These endocytic receptors are ideal for an ADC strategy because they can effectively carry the cytotoxic payload into the cell. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, Mylotarg) and inotuzumab ozogamicin consist of a derivative of calicheamicin (a potent DNA-binding cytotoxic antibiotic) linked to a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody directed against CD33 or CD22, respectively. Both of these ADCs have a target-mediated pharmacokinetic disposition. GO was the first drug to prove the ADC concept in the clinic, specifically in phase II studies that included substantial proportions of older patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. In contrast, in phase III studies, it has thus far failed to show clinical benefit in first-line treatment in combination with standard chemotherapy. Inotuzumab ozogamicin has shown remarkable clinical activity in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and it has started phase III evaluation. The safety profile of these ADCs includes reversible myelosuppression (especially neutropenia and thrombocytopenia), elevated hepatic transaminases, and hyperbilirubinemia. There have been postmarketing reports of hepatotoxicity, especially veno-occlusive disease, associated with GO. The incidence is ~2%, but patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have an increased risk. As we steadily move toward the goal of personalized medicine, these kinds of agents will provide a unique opportunity to treat selected patient subpopulations based on the expression of their specific tumor targets.

Update on novel monoclonal antibodies and immunoconjugates for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders

The year 1997 was pivotal in lymphoma research, as it was the year that the US FDA approved rituximab. Rituximab significantly altered clinical management and outcomes of patients with B-cell malignancies. Despite a high initial response rate, the majority of patients subsequently develop variable degrees of therapeutic resistance to rituximab. Research attempting to understand the mechanisms of rituximab resistance and potential ways to overcome them has given rise to the development of novel targeted immunotherapeutics. This article will update the readers on advances in bioengineering of monoclonal antibodies and immunoconjugates that target CD20, as well as other surface antigens. Some additional novel immunotherapeutics, including small modular immunopharmaceuticals, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, T-cell engaging antibodies and immunoconjugates, will also be discussed.

The novel calicheamicin-conjugated CD22 antibody inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) effectively kills primary pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells

We investigated whether the newly developed antibody (Ab) -targeted therapy inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544), consisting of a humanized CD22 Ab linked to calicheamicin, is effective in pediatric primary B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) cells in vitro, and analyzed which parameters determine its efficacy. CMC-544 induced dose-dependent cell kill in the majority of BCP-ALL cells, although IC(50) values varied substantially (median 4.8 ng/ml, range 0.1-1000 ng/ml at 48 h). The efficacy of CMC-544 was highly dependent on calicheamicin sensitivity and CD22/CMC-544 internalization capacity of BCP-ALL cells, but hardly on basal and renewed CD22 expression. Although CD22 expression was essential for uptake of CMC-544, a repetitive loop of CD22 saturation, CD22/CMC-544 internalization and renewed CD22 expression was not required to achieve intracellular threshold levels of calicheamicin sufficient for efficient CMC-544-induced apoptosis in BCP-ALL cells. This is in contrast to studies with the comparable CD33 immunotoxin gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, in which complete and prolonged CD33 saturation was required for apoptosis induction. These data suggest that CMC-544 treatment may result in higher response rates in ALL compared with response rates obtained in AML with Mylotarg, and that therefore clinical studies in ALL, preferably with multiple low CMC-544 dosages, are warranted.

Novel antibodies against follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of patients with follicular B-cell lymphoma. With the combination of chemotherapy and rituximab the overall survival rate has increased with approximately 30%. Unfortunately, there is resistance to rituximab with relapse of the disease in about 60% of the patients during the first five years of treatment and eventually in all patients. To this end, there is a need to develop improved anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and antibodies that target other attractive molecules expressed on the follicular lymphoma cell. This review describes the development and clinical achievements so far of next generation anti-CD20 and other antibodies in the treatment of follicular B-cell lymphoma.

The identification of irreversible rituximab-resistant lymphoma caused by CD20 gene mutations

C-terminal mutations of CD20 constitute part of the mechanisms that resist rituximab therapy. Most CD20 having a C-terminal mutation was not recognized by L26 antibody. As the exact epitope of L26 has not been determined, expression and localization of mutated CD20 have not been completely elucidated. In this study, we revealed that the binding site of L26 monoclonal antibody is located in the C-terminal cytoplasmic region of CD20 molecule, which was often lost in mutated CD20 molecules. This indicates that it is difficult to distinguish the mutation of CD20 from under expression of the CD20 protein. To detect comprehensive CD20 molecules including the resistant mutants, we developed a novel monoclonal antibody that recognizes the N-terminal cytoplasm region of CD20 molecule. We screened L26-negative cases with our antibody and found several mutations. A rituximab-binding analysis using the cryopreserved specimen that mutation was identified in CD20 molecules indicated that the C-terminal region of CD20 undertakes a critical role in presentation of the large loop in which the rituximab-binding site locates. Thus, combination of antibodies of two kinds of epitope permits the identification of C-terminal CD20 mutations associated with irreversible resistance to rituximab and may help the decision of the treatment strategy.

Investigational antibody-drug conjugates for hematological malignancies

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) consist of potent cytotoxic drugs linked to antibodies via chemical linkers. ADCs facilitate the specific targeting of drugs to neoplastic cells. This technology is showing efficacy with manageable toxicity for the treatment of hematological malignancies.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

ADCs for the treatment of hematological malignancies are in pre-clinical and early clinical trials. This review describes these ADCs in detail and explores the challenges of optimizing the use of this technology.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader should understand that, although ADCs are conceptually simple, the application of this idea to practice has not been straightforward, and the challenges of developing ADCs include identifying targets with appropriate expression profiles and biology, developing successful linker chemistries, and the selection of a potent cytotoxic drug.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Hematological malignancies are particularly suited to the development of ADC therapeutics as their surface proteins are well characterized, and the consequences of expression of the target in the normal tissue like the bone marrow results in manageable toxicities since, in many cases, the normal tissue can regenerate. While this technology is complex, the ADCs for hematological malignancies currently in clinical use show great promise.

Phase I study of inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) in Japanese patients with follicular lymphoma pretreated with rituximab-based therapy

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544), an antibody-targeted chemotherapeutic agent composed of an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antibiotic, specifically targets the CD22 antigen present in >90% of B-lymphoid malignancies, rendering it useful for treating patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of inotuzumab ozogamicin in Japanese patients. Eligible patients had relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-NHL without major organ dysfunction. Inotuzumab ozogamicin was administered intravenously once every 28 days (dose escalation: 1.3 and 1.8 mg/m(2)). All 13 patients had follicular lymphoma, were previously treated with > or =1 rituximab-alone or rituximab-containing chemotherapy, and were enrolled into two dose cohorts (1.3 mg/m(2), three patients; 1.8 mg/m(2), 10 patients). No patient had dose-limiting toxicities, and the maximum tolerated dose, previously determined in non-Japanese patients (1.8 mg/m(2)), was confirmed. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (100%), leukopenia (92%), lymphopenia (85%), neutropenia (85%), elevated AST (85%), anorexia (85%), and nausea (77%). Grade 3/4 drug-related AEs in > or =15% patients were thrombocytopenia (54%), lymphopenia (31%), neutropenia (31%), and leukopenia (15%). The AUC and C(max) of inotuzumab ozogamicin increased dose-dependently with pharmacokinetic profiles similar to non-Japanese. Seven patients had complete response (CR, 54%) including unconfirmed CR, four patients had partial response (31%), and two patients had stable disease (15%). The overall response rate was 85% (11/13). Inotuzumab ozogamicin was well tolerated at doses up to 1.8 mg/m(2) and showed preliminary evidence of activity in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma pretreated with rituximab-containing therapy, warranting further investigations. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00717925).

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity of inotuzumab ozogamicin, a novel immunoconjugate for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a phase I study

PURPOSE Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) is an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent composed of a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic agent. This was a phase I study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and preliminary efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in an expanded MTD cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory CD22(+) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Inotuzumab ozogamicin was administered intravenously as a single agent once every 3 or 4 weeks at doses ranging from 0.4 to 2.4 mg/m(2). Outcomes included MTD, safety, pharmacokinetics, response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Results Seventy-nine patients were enrolled. The MTD was determined to be 1.8 mg/m(2). Common adverse events at the MTD were thrombocytopenia (90%), asthenia (67%), and nausea and neutropenia (51% each). The objective response rate at the end of treatment was 39% for the 79 enrolled patients, 68% for all patients with follicular NHL treated at the MTD, and 15% for all patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated at the MTD. Median PFS was 317 days (approximately 10.4 months) and 49 days for patients with follicular NHL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, respectively. CONCLUSION Inotuzumab ozogamicin has demonstrated efficacy against CD22(+) B-cell NHL, with reversible thrombocytopenia as the main toxicity.

Superior antitumor activity of SAR3419 to rituximab in xenograft models for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the activity of SAR3419, a novel humanized anti-CD19 antibody (huB4), conjugated to a cytotoxic maytansine derivative N(2)'-deacetyl-N(2)'-(4-mercapto-4-methyl-1-oxopentyl) maytansine, in preclinical xenograft models for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Antitumor activity of SAR3419 was assessed as a single agent and in comparison with conventional therapies using a subcutaneous model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (WSU-DLCL2) and a systemic model for follicular small cleaved cell lymphoma (WSU-FSCCL) in mice with severe combined immune deficiency.

RESULTS

Our results showed that in these chemotherapy-resistant models, SAR3419 was more effective than CHOP (cyclophosphamide-Adriamycin-vincristine-prednisone) regimen or rituximab. Only treatment with SAR3419 led to survival of the whole group of animals to the end of the experiment (150-155 days) in both models. Higher doses of SAR3419 (15 and 30 mg/kg) were more effective than lower dose of 7.5 mg/kg. The immunoconjugation was necessary because neither huB4 nor DM4 alone had significant activity. Treatment with rituximab resulted in antitumor activity in both models comparable with the low dose of SAR3419. Cyclophosphamide-Adriamycin-vincristine-prednisone alone showed modest activity in both models. Necropsy and tissue staining in the WSU-FSCCL systemic model revealed that all deaths featured leptomeningeal lymphoma in the control and treated groups. Interestingly, some of the animals that survived to the end of the experiment and seemed healthy at time of euthanasia did show microscopic evidence of lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, SAR3419 is a very active immunotoxin in preclinical models for human B-cell lymphoma and holds promise as a novel and well-tolerated therapy in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.