Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Leukemia Inhibitory Factor

A Novel Targeted Delivery of Valeric Acid Using Liposomal Nanoparticles in Treatment of Lung Cell Carcinoma

With a high mortality rate, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major challenge for patients and clinicians. The high cost and side effects of chemo-drugs severely influence disease outcome. With advantages of action prolongation and solitary target for embedded drugs, liposomal nanoparticle-based modification was investigated in this study with valeric acid, aimed at exploring its impacts and value on NSCLC. The efficacy comparisons of chemo-drugs (cisplatin, paclitaxel and liposomal nanoparticle-modified valeric acid) were conducted utilizing human NSCLC cell lines, normal lung fibroblasts, pulmonary epithelial cell line, and mouse tumor models. Additionally, the underlying therapeutic mechanisms for this novel liposomal nanoparticle in NSCLC were also explored via analysis of protein changes in tumor tissues. Results showed that, in comparison with conventional chemotherapeutics (cisplatin and paclitaxel), novel liposomal nanoparticle-modified valeric acid effectively retarded the growth of human NSCLC cell lines to a greater extent, and even successfully restrained further progression of tumor tissues in vivo. Furthermore, this novel liposomal nanoparticle-modified valeric acid exhibited lower cytotoxicity towards normal lung cell lines. Additionally, the anti-cancer function of this novel liposomal nanoparticle-modified valeric acid was found to be related to STAT3/Cyclin D1 pathway. The current study confirmed that, compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel, this novel liposomal nanoparticle-modified valeric acid displayed significant therapeutic effect on NSCLC, with lower cytotoxicity to normal cells. It has therefore further promoted research progress and significance on NSCLC research in the clinical management of NSCLC.

Phenethyl Isothiocyanate and Cisplatin Co-Encapsulated in a Liposomal Nanoparticle for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the Unites States, and approximately 85% of all lung cancers are classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is extremely difficult to treat and its survival rate is low. After decades of clinical trials, the most effective treatments are still those that implement the first-generation platinum anticancer agent cisplatin (CDDP) in combination with other drugs. We previously demonstrated that the naturally-occurring compound phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) can be used to sensitize NSCLC cells to CDDP. Furthermore, co-encapsulation of PEITC and CDDP in liposomes enhances their toxicity toward NSCLC cells. We here optimize liposomal-PEITC-CDDP, demonstrate the release of PEITC and CDDP from the nanoparticle, and show that liposomal-PEITC-CDDP is much more toxic toward both A549 and H596 human NSCLC cell lines than toward WI-38 and BEAS-2B human normal lung cell lines. Thus, we have prepared an efficacious therapy that has significantly higher toxicity toward cancer cell lines than normal cell lines.

Pain in cancer survivors

Cancer and its treatment exert a heavy psychological and physical toll. Of the myriad symptoms which result, pain is common, encountered in between 30% and 60% of cancer survivors. Pain in cancer survivors is a major and growing problem, impeding the recovery and rehabilitation of patients who have beaten cancer and negatively impacting on cancer patients' quality of life, work prospects and mental health. Persistent pain in cancer survivors remains challenging to treat successfully. Pain can arise both due to the underlying disease and the various treatments the patient has been subjected to. Chemotherapy causes painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), radiotherapy can produce late effect radiation toxicity and surgery may lead to the development of persistent post-surgical pain syndromes. This review explores a selection of the common causes of persistent pain in cancer survivors, detailing our current understanding of the pathophysiology and outlining both the clinical manifestations of individual pain states and the treatment options available.

Nitric oxide- and cisplatin-releasing silica nanoparticles for use against non-small cell lung cancer

Nitric oxide (NO) and cisplatin releasing wrinkle-structured amine-modified mesoporous silica (AMS) nanoparticles have been developed for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The AMS and NO- and cisplatin-loaded AMS materials were characterized using TEM, BET surface area, FTIR and ICP-MS, and tested in cell culture. The results show that for NSCLC cell lines (i.e., H596 and A549), the toxicity of NO- and cisplatin-loaded silica nanoparticles (NO-Si-DETA-cisplatin-AMS) is significantly higher than that of silica nanoparticles loaded with only cisplatin (Si-DETA-cisplatin-AMS). In contrast, the toxicity of NO-Si-DETA-cisplatin-AMS toward normal lung cell lines is not significantly different from that of Si-DETA-cisplatin-AMS (normal lung fibroblast cells WI-38) or is even lower than that of Si-DETA-cisplatin-AMS (normal lung epithelial cells BEAS-2B). The NO-induced sensitization of tumor cell death demonstrates that NO is a promising enhancer of platinum-based lung cancer therapy.

Prevention of post-traumatic reinnervation with microtubule inhibitors

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Functional recovery after a recurrent laryngeal nerve or facial nerve injury may be impaired due to aberrant reinnervation. Previous work in a rat peripheral nerve injury model found vincristine to be a potent inhibitor of reinnervation, and it has since been used to effectively block neural regeneration in other animal models. However, vincristine's narrow therapeutic index may limit its utility; therefore, another microtubule inhibitor, paclitaxel, which has a higher therapeutic index, was tested.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal (rat) study.

METHODS

After controlled injury to the rat posterior tibial (PT) nerve, the gastrocnemius/soleus complex was injected with saline (control, n = 14), vincristine (n = 30), or paclitaxel (n = 20). Injections without a crush injury were performed using saline (n = 5) or paclitaxel (n = 9). The functional recovery (FR) of the PT nerve was assessed using walking track analysis.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, controls had already recovered to baseline (FR = 1.0), whereas the paclitaxel group had FR = 0.724 ± 0.064 and the vincristine group had FR = 0.709 ± 0.078. At 6 months, the paclitaxel rats had FR = 0.798 ± 0.167 and the vincristine rats had FR = 0.754 ± 0.240. These differences were significantly different from baseline, but the two agents were not different from each other. Paclitaxel did not affect the FR in the absence of a nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramuscular paclitaxel and vincristine both significantly inhibit regeneration of the PT nerve after crush injury for at least 6 months. Potential clinical uses of inhibition of reinnervation are discussed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Part II. Prevention

The incidence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in the population of cancer patients is estimated at 3-7% in cytostatic monotherapy and as high as 38% in the case of polytherapy. While testing drugs that may reduce the damage to the peripheral nervous system, particular attention should be paid to their protective action against the severe and painful complication in the patient. Another aspect, perhaps a more important one, is the confidence that application of preventive drugs will not exert a significant impact on progression of the neoplastic disease or the effectiveness of the causal treatment. Many drugs have been tested for prevention of CIPN; however, none of them have thus far been irrefutably proven to possess preventive properties. No guidelines on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy preventive action have been established, either. This article is an attempt to present reports from the available literature about the possibilities of prevention of CIPN.

Sensitization of non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin by naturally occurring isothiocyanates

We show that naturally occurring isothiocyanates (ITCs) sensitize human non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin. Moreover, the structure of the ITC side chain moiety is important for sensitization. In NCI-H596 cells, 20 microM benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) and phenethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) enhance the efficacy of various concentrations of cisplatin, but sulforaphane (SFN) does not. Reducing the concentration of BITC and PEITC to 10 microM still allows for the sensitization of cells to cisplatin. Neither cellular platinum accumulation nor DNA platination account for this increased cytotoxicity. BITC and PEITC deplete beta-tubulin, but SFN does not; this correlates with and may be important for sensitization.

Somatosensory evoked potential for detection of subclinical neuropathy in Egyptian children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

To evaluate neurological changes developing during paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) therapy clinically and through electrophysiological Study of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEPs) changes in different phases of therapy. Thirty five-ALL patients with age range from 3-14 years were included compared to 30 healthy controls. History, neurological examination, complete blood counts, cytological examination of bone marrow aspirate and cerebrospinal fluid with Measurement of Serum Methotrexate (MTX) were done. The SSEPs were performed and patients subjected to another SSEP with measurement of serum MTX level before and 10 days after intra-thecal injection (IMTX). Clinical neurological findings in patients after induction were depressed deep tendon reflexes (43.3%), hypotonia (28.6%), lost pain sensation (28.6%), muscle weakness (17.1%) and movement disorders (17.1%). Percentage of delayed SSEPs after induction were at levels of brachial plexus (28.6%), spinal cord (68.6%), cortical conduction (31.4%), ERB-N13 Inter Peak Latency (IPL) (74.3%) and N13-N20 IPL (17.1%) in the studied patients. Significant prolonged latency of N13 (p = 0.005), N20 (p = 0.04) and IPL of ERB-N 13 (p = 0.005), N13-N20 (p = 0.01), Inter-Side Difference (ISD) of N13 (p = 0.01), ERB-N13 (p = 0.02) and N13-N20 (p = 0.03) after induction compared to values at diagnosis. Significant positive correlation were found between serum MTX after IMTX with N13-N20 IPL (p = 0.01), N20 ISD (p = 0.03) with significant prolongation in N20 latency, N13-N20 IPL and ISD of N20 compared to values before injection. ALL patients have prolonged latency of SSEPs at cervical cord and cortical levels which increased after IMTX due to axonal injury throughout the cord. SSEPs could be an early diagnostic tool for subclinical neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Recent advances in the development and administration of chemotherapy for malignant diseases have led to prolonged survival of patients and the promise of a return to normal lives. This progress comes with a price, however, and the nervous system is frequently the target of therapy-induced toxicity. Unlike more immediate toxicities that affect the gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow, chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is frequently delayed in onset and may progress over time. In the peripheral nervous system, the major brunt of the toxic attack is directed against the peripheral nerve, targeting the neuronal cell body, the axonal transport system, the myelin sheath, and glial support structures, resulting in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Therapy of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is still a common and disabling side effect of many chemotherapy agents in use today. Unfortunately, neither prophylactic strategies nor symptomatic treatments have proven useful yet. This review will discuss the diagnosis and evaluation of neuropathy in cancer patients, as well as reviewing the various prophylactic and symptomatic treatments that have been proposed or tried. However, sufficient evidence is lacking to recommend any of these treatments to patients suffering with CIPN. Therefore, the best approach is to treat symptomatically, and to start with broad-spectrum analgesic medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). If NSAIDs fail, a reasonable second-line agent in properly selected patients may be an opioid. Unfortunately, even when effective in other types of neuropathic pain, anti-depressants and anticonvulsants have not yet proven effective for treating the symptoms of CIPN.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Recent advances in the development and administration of chemotherapy for malignant diseases have led to prolonged survival of patients and the promise of a return to normal lives. The cost of progress comes with a price, however, and the nervous system is frequently the target of therapy-induced toxicity. Unlike more immediate toxicities that affect the gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow, chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is frequently delayed in onset and may progress over time. In the peripheral nervous system, the major brunt of the toxic attack is directed against the peripheral nerve, targeting the neuronal cell body, the axonal transport system, the myelin sheath, and glial support structures, resulting in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Recent advances in the development and administration of chemotherapy for malignant diseases have been rewarded with prolonged survival rates. The cost of progress has come at a price and the nervous system is frequently the target of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. Unlike more immediate toxicities that effect the gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow, chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is frequently delayed in onset and may progress over time. In the peripheral nervous system, the major brunt of the toxicity is directed against the peripheral nerve, resulting in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Chemotherapeutic agents used to treat hematologic and solid tumors target a variety of structures and functions in the peripheral nervous system, including the neuronal cell body, the axonal transport system, the myelin sheath, and glial support structures. Each agent exhibits a spectrum of toxic effects unique to its mechanism of toxic injury, and recent study in this field has yielded clearer ideas on how to mitigate injury. Combined with the call for a greater recognition of the potentially devastating ramifications of CIPN on quality of life, basic and clinical researchers have begun to investigate therapy to prevent neurotoxic injury. Preliminary studies have shown promise for some agents including glutamine, glutathione, vitamin E, acetyl-L-carnitine, calcium, and magnesium infusions, but final recommendations await prospective confirmatory studies.