Pilot study evaluating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the combination of exemestane and tamoxifen

Effects of raloxifene against letrozole-induced bone loss in chemically-induced model of menopause in mice

INTRODUCTION

The deleterious effects of letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, used in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women, on bone are well-documented and represent a major drawback to its clinical use. Raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator and a clinically approved anti-osteoporotic drug, has been recently demonstrated to be efficacious in women with breast cancer. The present study evaluated the effects of preventive and curative treatment with raloxifene on letrozole-induced alterations of bone microarchitecture and turnover markers in a chemically-induced menopause model in mice.

METHOD

Swiss strain albino female mice were made menopausal by inducing ovotoxicity using vinyl cyclohexene di epoxide (VCD, 160 mg/kg for 15 days followed by 30 days drug-free period) confirmed by ovarian histology and serum estradiol levels. Effects on femoral and lumbar bones were evaluated by micro CT determination of bone volume, trabecular number, separation, thickness, connective density and trabecular pattern factor and bone turnover markers including ALP, TRAP5b, hydroxyproline and RANKL. In addition to these, markers of Wnt signaling (sclerostin and dickkopf-1) were also evaluated. To rule out the involvement of pharmacokinetic interaction, plasma levels of letrozole and raloxifene were measured following drugs alone and in combination.

RESULTS

Though bone loss was observed in VCD treated mice (as indicated by micro CT measurements), it was further enhanced with letrozole administration (1 mg/kg) for one month particularly in epiphysis of femoral bones. Raloxifene (15 mg/kg), whether administered concurrently or post-letrozole was able to revert the structural alterations and changes in turnover markers caused by letrozole to varying degrees (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). Further, estrogen deficiency following letrozole treatment in ovotoxic mice was associated with significant increase in sclerostin and dickkopf-1 in both lumbar and femur bones (p < 0.001) which was attenuated with preventive and curative treatment with raloxifene (p < 0.05). The plasma levels of letrozole remained unaffected by raloxifene administration and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates the potential of raloxifene in preventing and attenuating letrozole-induced bone loss. Further, these effects were found to be independent of a pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs.

In vitro cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of exemestane

Exemestane is a potent and irreversible steroidal aromatase inhibitor drug used for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Our aim was to identify and assess the contribution of the specific cytochromes P450 (P450s) responsible for exemestane primary in vitro metabolism. With the use of high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analytical techniques, 17-hydroexemestane (MI) formation and 6-hydroxymethylexemestane (MII) formation were found to be the predominant exemestane metabolic pathways. In a bank of 15 well characterized human liver microsomes with known P450 isoform-specific activities, the MI formation rate correlated significantly with CYP1A2 (Spearman r = 0.60, p = 0.02) and CYP4A11 (Spearman r = 0.67, p = 0.01) isoform-specific activities, whereas the MII production rate significantly correlated with CYP2B6 (Spearman r = 0.57, p = 0.03) and CYP3A (Spearman r = 0.76, p = 0.005) isoform-specific activities. Recombinant CYP1A1 metabolized exemestane to MI with a catalytic efficiency (Cl(int)) of 150 nl/pmol P450 × min that was at least 3.5-fold higher than those of other P450s investigated. Recombinant CYP3A4 catalyzed MII formation from exemestane with a catalytic efficiency of 840 nl/pmol P450 × min that was at least 4-fold higher than those of other P450s investigated. Among a panel of 10 chemical inhibitors tested, only ketoconazole and troleandomycin (CYP3A-specific chemical inhibitors) significantly inhibited the formation of MII by 45 and 95%, respectively. None of them markedly inhibited the formation of MI. In summary, exemestane seems to be metabolized to MI by multiple P450s that include CYP4A11 and CYP1A1/2, whereas its oxidation to MII is primarily mediated by CYP3A.

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of exemestane and its metabolite 17-dihydroexemestane in human plasma

A simple and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been developed and validated for the quantitation of exemestane (Exe) and its main metabolite 17-dihydroexemestane (DhExe) in human plasma. The analytes were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile, containing stable 13C-labelled Exe (13C3-Exe) as internal standard, and measured by LC-MS/MS. The best chromatographic separation of the analytes from the interferences was achieved by using a Phenyl column operating under isocratic regime conditions. The total chromatographic runtime was 5.0 min and the elution of Exe and DhExe occurred at 2.5 min and 2.9 min, respectively. Quantitation was performed by employing the positive electrospray ionization (ESI) technique and multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). The monitored precursor to product-ion transitions for Exe, DhExe and 13C3-Exe internal standard were m/z 297.0 --> 120.8, m/z 299.1 --> 134.9 and m/z 300.0 --> 123.2, respectively. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.1 ng/ml for DhExe and 0.2 ng/ml for Exe. The method was linear up to 36-51 ng/ml with r2 > or = 0.998. The intra- and inter-assay precision were < or = 7.7% and 5.1% for Exe and < or = 8.1 and 4.9% for DhExe while deviations from nominal values were in the 1.5-13.2% and - 9.0-5.8% ranges for Exe and DhExe, respectively. The analytical method resulted robust and suitable for pharmacokinetic monitoring of Exe and its main metabolite during adjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Aromatase inhibitors: are there differences between steroidal and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors and do they matter?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are approved for use in both early- and advanced-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Although the currently approved "third-generation" AIs all powerfully inhibit estrogen synthesis, they may be subdivided into steroidal and nonsteroidal inhibitors, which interact with the aromatase enzyme differently. Nonsteroidal AIs bind noncovalently and reversibly to the aromatase protein, whereas steroidal AIs may bind covalently and irreversibly to the aromatase enzyme. The steroidal AI exemestane may exert androgenic effects, but the clinical relevance of this has yet to be determined. Switching between steroidal and nonsteroidal AIs produces modest additional clinical benefits, suggesting partial noncrossresistance between the classes of inhibitor. In these circumstances, the response rates to the second AI have generally been low; additional research is needed regarding the optimal sequence of AIs. To date, clinical studies suggest that combining an estrogen-receptor blocker with a nonsteroidal AI does not improve efficacy, while combination with a steroidal AI has not been evaluated. Results from head-to-head trials comparing steroidal and nonsteroidal AIs will determine whether meaningful clinical differences in efficacy or adverse events exist between the classes of AI. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding known differences and evaluates their potential clinical impact.

Molecular signatures of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: characteristics of response or intrinsic resistance

Approximately 30% of patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers exhibit de novo or intrinsic resistance to endocrine therapies. The purpose of this study was to define genes that distinguish ER+ resistant from ER+ responsive tumors, prior to the start of hormone therapies. Previously untreated post-menopausal patients with ER+ breast cancers were treated for 4 months in a neoadjuvant setting with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane alone, or in combination with the antiestrogen tamoxifen. Matched pre- and post-treatment tumor samples from the same patient, were analyzed by gene expression profiling and were correlated with response to treatment. Genes associated with tumor shrinkage achieved by estrogen blockade therapy were identified, as were genes associated with resistance to treatment. Prediction Analysis of Microarrays (PAM) identified 50 genes that can predict response or intrinsic resistance to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of ER+ tumors, 8 of which have been previously implicated as useful biomarkers in breast cancer. In summary, we identify genes associated with response to endocrine therapy that may distinguish ER+, hormone responsive breast cancers, from ER+ tumors that exhibit intrinsic or de novo resistance. We suggest that the estrogen signaling pathway is aberrant in ER+ tumors with intrinsic resistance. Lastly, the studies show upregulation of a "lipogenic pathway" in non-responsive ER+ tumors that may serve as a marker of intrinsic resistance. This pathway may represent an alternative target for therapeutic intervention.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of exemestane in combination with raloxifene in postmenopausal women with a history of breast cancer

PURPOSE

Raloxifene is a second-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator that reduces the incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, decreases contralateral new breast cancers in postmenopausal women when taken in the adjuvant setting. Preclinical evidence suggests a rationale for coadministration of these agents to achieve complete estrogen blockade.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We tested the safety and tolerability of combination exemestane and raloxifene in 11 postmenopausal women with a history of hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Patients were randomized to either raloxifene (60 mg PO daily) or exemestane (25 mg PO daily) for 2 weeks. Patients then initiated combination therapy at the same dose levels for a minimum of 1 year. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for plasma estrogens, raloxifene, exemestane, and their metabolites were collected at the end of single-agent therapy and during combination therapy.

RESULTS

Plasma concentration-time profiles for each drug were unchanged with monotherapy versus combination therapy. Raloxifene did not affect plasma estrogen levels. Plasma estrogen concentrations were suppressed below the lower limit of detection by exemestane as monotherapy and when administered in combination with raloxifene. The most common adverse events of any grade included arthralgias, hot flashes, vaginal dryness and myalgias.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study, coadministration of raloxifene and exemestane did not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of either agent to a significant degree in postmenopausal women. The combination of estrogen receptor blockade and suppression of estrogen synthesis is well tolerated and warrants further investigation.

Hormonal therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer: the science of sequencing

Oestrogens play important roles in the natural history of breast cancer. Consequently, therapies have been developed to reduce oestrogen levels or to block signalling through oestrogen receptors (ER). These therapies include tamoxifen, selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and selective oestrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs). All have proven clinical efficacy in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer and can be effective in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and in the management of advanced disease. This range of endocrine therapies offers the opportunity for prolonging benefit from treatment and delaying tumour recurrence/progression by combining the different classes of drugs or by using them sequentially. Evaluation of the potential clinical benefits of concomitant or sequential endocrine therapies should be based on considerations of efficacy and safety profiles, mechanisms of action/resistance and effects on tumour biology. Evidence from preclinical models and from randomized clinical trials in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer suggests that concomitant endocrine therapies are no more effective than AIs alone. However, using AIs either as initial therapy or sequentially after tamoxifen appears to produce more benefits beyond the use of tamoxifen alone.Currently, there are no proven algorithms for the planned, sequential use of the full range of endocrine therapies, particularly for the majority of patients who present with early breast cancer. Prospective, randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the best use of therapies in particular settings, taking into account the spectrum of molecular phenotypes in different tumours.

Effect of exemestane on tamoxifen pharmacokinetics in postmenopausal women treated for breast cancer

PURPOSE

Rodent models of human breast cancer suggest that the combination of the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane with tamoxifen may have additive activity. Clinical trials combining tamoxifen with letrozole or anastrazole have shown minor pharmacokinetic drug interactions. We did an open-label crossover clinical trial of the effect of exemestane on tamoxifen pharmacokinetics.

DESIGN

Thirty-two postmenopausal women who were clinically disease-free following primary treatments for breast cancer receiving tamoxifen for at least 3 months were studied. Blood was collected for pharmacokinetic analysis after at least 4 months of receiving 20 mg tamoxifen daily. Subjects then began 8 weeks of oral exemestane (25 mg daily), followed by another set of blood samples.

RESULTS

There were no serious toxicities noted when the two drugs were combined. There was no significant effect of exemestane on the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of tamoxifen at steady state before [3.04 mg h/L; 90% confidence interval (90% CI), 2.71-3.44] and during exemestane treatment (3.05 mg h/L; 90% CI, 2.72-3.41). There were no significant changes in the formation of primary tamoxifen metabolites. Oral clearance of exemestane averaged 602 L/h based on an average plasma exemestane AUC of 41.5 microg h/L (90% CI, 36.7-62.6). Plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate decreased when exemestane was begun; estradiol concentrations consistently decreased below the limit of quantitation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no pharmacokinetic interaction between tamoxifen and exemestane. No modification in the standard regimen of either drug seems to be indicated if they are used in combination. The combination of the two drugs was well tolerated during the 8-week evaluation period.

The gene associated with trichorhinophalangeal syndrome in humans is overexpressed in breast cancer

A comprehensive differential gene expression screen on a panel of 54 breast tumors and >200 normal tissue samples using DNA microarrays revealed 15 genes specifically overexpressed in breast cancer. One of the most prevalent genes found was trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS-1), a gene previously shown to be associated with three rare autosomal dominant genetic disorders known as the trichorhinophalangeal syndromes. A number of corroborating methodologies, including in situ hybridization, e-Northern analysis using ORF EST (ORESTES) and Unigene EST abundance analysis, immunoblot and immunofluorescence analysis of breast tumor cell lines, and immunohistochemistry, confirmed the microarray findings. Immunohistochemistry analysis found TRPS-1 protein expressed in >90% of early- and late-stage breast cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal, lobular, and papillary carcinomas. The TRPS-1 gene is also immunogenic with processed and presented peptides activating T cells found after vaccination of HLA-A2.1 transgenic mouse. Human T cell lines from HLA-A*0201+ female donors exhibiting TRPS-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity could also be generated.

Endocrine Effects of Tamoxifen Plus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: Table 1

PURPOSE

In some specific circumstances, combined hormonal therapies for breast cancer seem to be more effective than single maneuvers. In two laboratory mammary cancer models, the combination of the aromatase inactivator exemestane plus tamoxifen gives a higher response rate than is found with either agent alone. To evaluate the endocrine effects of the combination of exemestane and tamoxifen, we studied 33 postmenopausal women disease-free following primary treatments for breast cancer who were taking tamoxifen for at least 3 months.

DESIGN

After observation for symptoms on tamoxifen for 4 weeks, blood samples were taken and patients were begun additionally on exemestane 25 mg p.o. qd. Eight weeks later, blood samples were again taken, and exemestane was discontinued.

RESULTS

A decrease in alkaline phosphatase was found with exemestane treatment (P = 0.06), whereas no change in osteocalcin level was observed. A decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was found (P = 0.0025), whereas total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels showed no changes with exemestane treatment. Estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate levels decreased to immeasurable or very low levels with exemestane treatment (all P < 0.001). No significant changes in frequencies of common drug-associated side effects, such as vasomotor symptoms or weight change, were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the absence of adverse endocrine effects with the addition of exemestane to tamoxifen therapy observed in this study, further clinical evaluation of the efficacy of this combination is warranted.