FDG PET and FES PET Predict PFS on Endocrine Therapy—Response

Fluorine-18-Labeled Fluoroestradiol PET/CT: Current Status, Gaps in Knowledge, and Controversies-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

PET/CT using 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol (FES) noninvasively images tissues expressing estrogen receptors (ERs). FES has undergone extensive clinicopathologic validation for ER+ breast cancer and received FDA approval in 2020 for clinical use as an adjunct to biopsy in patients with recurrent or metastatic ER+ breast cancer. Clinical use of FES PET/CT is increasing, but is not widespread in the United States. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review explores the present status and future directions of FES PET/CT, including image interpretation, existing and emerging uses, knowledge gaps, and current controversies. Specific controversies discussed include whether both FES PET/CT and FDG PET/CT are warranted in certain scenarios, whether further workup is required after negative FES PET/CT results, whether FES PET/CT findings should inform endocrine therapy selection, and whether immunohistochemistry should remain the standalone reference standard for determining ER status for all breast cancers. Consensus opinions from the panel include agreement with the appropriate clinical uses of FES PET/CT published by a multidisciplinary expert workgroup in 2023; anticipated expanded clinical use of FES PET/CT for staging ER-positive invasive lobular carcinomas and low-grade invasive ductal carcinomas pending ongoing clinical trial results; and the need for further research regarding use of FES PET/CT for ER-expressing nonbreast malignancies.

Imaging Androgen Receptors in Breast Cancer with 18F-Fluoro-5α-Dihydrotestosterone PET: A Pilot Study

Most breast cancers express androgen receptors (ARs). This prospective imaging substudy explored imaging of ARs with 18F-fluoro-5α-dihydrotestosterone (18F-FDHT) PET in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving selective AR modulation (SARM) therapy (GTx-024). Methods: Eleven postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive MBC underwent 18F-FDHT PET/CT at baseline and at 6 and 12 wk after starting SARM therapy. Abnormal tumor 18F-FDHT uptake was quantified using SUVmax AR status was determined from tumor biopsy specimens. 18F-FDHT SUVmax percentage change between scans was calculated. Best overall response was categorized as clinical benefit (nonprogressive disease) or progressive disease using RECIST 1.1. Results: The median baseline 18F-FDHT SUVmax was 4.1 (range, 1.4-5.9) for AR-positive tumors versus 2.3 (range, 1.5-3.2) for AR-negative tumors (P = 0.22). Quantitative AR expression and baseline 18F-FDHT uptake were weakly correlated (Pearson ρ = 0.39, P = 0.30). Seven participants with clinical benefit at 12 wk tended to have larger declines in 18F-FDHT uptake than did those with progressive disease both at 6 wk after starting GTx-024 (median, -26.8% [range, -42.9% to -14.1%], vs. -3.7% [range,-31% to +29%], respectively; P = 0.11) and at 12 wk after starting GTx-024 (median, -35.7% [range, -69.5% to -7.7%], vs. -20.1% [range, -26.6% to +56.5%], respectively; P = 0.17). Conclusion: These hypothesis-generating data suggest that 18F-FDHT PET/CT is worth further study as an imaging biomarker for evaluating the response of MBC to SARM therapy and reiterate the feasibility of including molecular imaging in multidisciplinary therapeutic trials.