Alternating 17β-Estradiol and Aromatase Inhibitor Therapies Is Efficacious in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Endocrine-Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer

Molecular features of luminal breast cancer defined through spatial and single-cell transcriptomics

BACKGROUND

Intratumour heterogeneity is a hallmark of most solid tumours, including breast cancers. We applied spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-sequencing on patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to profile spatially resolved cell populations within oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+ ) breast cancer and to elucidate their importance in oestrogen-dependent tumour growth.

METHODS

Two PDXs of 'ER-high' breast cancers with opposite oestrogen-mediated growth responses were investigated: oestrogen-suppressed GS3 (80-100% ER) and oestrogen-dependent SC31 (40-90% ER) models. The observation was validated via single-cell analyses on an 'ER-low' PDX, GS1 (5% ER). The results from our spatial and single-cell analyses were further supported by a public ER+ breast cancer single-cell dataset and protein-based dual immunohistochemistry (IHC) of SC31 examining important luminal cancer markers (i.e., ER, progesterone receptor and Ki67). The translational implication of our findings was assessed by clinical outcome analyses on publicly available cohorts.

RESULTS

Our space-gene-function study revealed four spatially distinct compartments within ER+ breast cancers. These compartments showed functional diversity (oestrogen-responsive, proliferative, hypoxia-induced and inflammation-related). The 'proliferative' population, rather than the 'oestrogen-responsive' compartment, was crucial for oestrogen-dependent tumour growth, leading to the acquisition of luminal B-like features. The cells expressing typical oestrogen-responsive genes like PGR were not directly linked to oestrogen-dependent proliferation. Dual IHC analyses demonstrated the distinct contribution of the Ki67+ proliferative cells toward oestrogen-mediated growth and their response to a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The gene signatures derived from the proliferative, hypoxia-induced and inflammation-related compartments were significantly correlated with worse clinical outcomes, while patients with the oestrogen-responsive signature showed better prognoses, suggesting that this compartment would not be directly associated with oestrogen-dependent tumour progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identified the gene signature in our 'proliferative' compartment as an important determinant of luminal cancer subtypes. This 'proliferative' cell population is a causative feature of luminal B breast cancer, contributing toward its aggressive behaviours.

Estrogen Therapy Induces Receptor-Dependent DNA Damage Enhanced by PARP Inhibition in ER+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical evidence indicates that treatment with estrogens elicits anticancer effects in ∼30% of patients with advanced endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor α (ER)-positive breast cancer. Despite the proven efficacy of estrogen therapy, its mechanism of action is unclear and this treatment remains underused. Mechanistic understanding may offer strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening and transcriptomic profiling in long-term estrogen-deprived ER+ breast cancer cells to identify pathways required for therapeutic response to the estrogen 17β-estradiol (E2). We validated findings in cell lines, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and patient samples, and developed a novel combination treatment through testing in cell lines and PDX models.

RESULTS

Cells treated with E2 exhibited replication-dependent markers of DNA damage and the DNA damage response prior to apoptosis. Such DNA damage was partially driven by the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids (R-loops). Pharmacologic suppression of the DNA damage response via PARP inhibition with olaparib enhanced E2-induced DNA damage. PARP inhibition synergized with E2 to suppress growth and prevent tumor recurrence in BRCA1/2-mutant and BRCA1/2-wild-type cell line and PDX models.

CONCLUSIONS

E2-induced ER activity drives DNA damage and growth inhibition in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells. Inhibition of the DNA damage response using drugs such as PARP inhibitors can enhance therapeutic response to E2. These findings warrant clinical exploration of the combination of E2 with DNA damage response inhibitors in advanced ER+ breast cancer, and suggest that PARP inhibitors may synergize with therapeutics that exacerbate transcriptional stress.

Revisiting Estrogen for the Treatment of Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer: Novel Therapeutic Approaches

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer is the most common subtype, representing 70-75% of all breast cancers. Several ER-targeted drugs commonly used include the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen (TAM), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). Through different mechanisms of action, all three drug classes reduce estrogen receptor signaling. Inevitably, resistance occurs, resulting in disease progression. The counterintuitive action of estrogen to inhibit ER-positive breast cancer was first observed over 80 years ago. High-dose estrogen and diethylstilbestrol (DES) were used to treat metastatic breast cancer accompanied by harsh side effects until the approval of TAM in the 1970s. After the development of TAM, randomized trials comparing TAM to estrogen found similar or slightly inferior efficacy but much better tolerability. After decades of research, it was learned that estrogen induces tumor regression only after a period of long-term estrogen deprivation, and the mechanisms of tumor regression were described. Despite the long history of breast cancer treatment with estrogen, this therapeutic modality is now revitalized due to the development of novel estrogenic compounds with improved side effect profiles, newly discovered predictive biomarkers, the development of non-estrogen small molecules and new combination therapeutic approaches.