ABL Alternative Splicing Is Quite Frequent in Normal Population - Letter

[Discovery of a novel spliceosome of ABL gene (ABL(Δexon7+35INS)) and its association with TKIs resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia]

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the ABL(Δexon7) and ABL(35INS) spliceosome contributed to TKIs resistance.

METHODS

Screening ABL(Δexon7) and ABL(35INS) in 74 normal people and 76 CML patients (53 patients in remission and 23 patients with TKIs resistance) by using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis combined with cloning sequencing.

RESULTS

A novel spliceosome ABL(Δexon7+ 35INS) (ABL(Δexon7) and ABL(3)5INS existed at the same time) was identified and the mutation was detected in 8 (10.8%) of 74 normal people, 4 (7.5%) of 53 remission patients and 2 (8.7%) of 23 resistant patients. While 47 (63.5%) cases expressed ABL(Δexon7) and 8 (10.8% ) cases expressed ABL(35INS) in 74 healthy people, 30 (56.6%) cases expressed ABL(Δexon7) and 5 (9.4% ) cases expressed ABL(35INS) in 53 remission patients, 12 (52.2%) cases expressed ABL(Δexon7) and 3(13.0%) cases expressed ABL(35INS) in 23 resistant patients. Three kinds of spliceosome in all groups had no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

ABL(Δexon7+ 35INS), ABL(Δexon7) and ABL(35INS) may be not uncommon in ABL gene and were unrelated to resistance in CML with TKIs treatment. ABL(35INS) were often accompanying with exon 7 deletion.

Profiling of the kinome of cytomegalovirus-infected cells reveals the functional importance of host kinases Aurora A, ABL and AMPK

Human cytomegalovirus infection can lead to life-threatening clinical manifestations particularly in the immunocompromised host. Current therapy options face severe limitations leading to a continued search for alternative drug candidates. Viral replication is dependent on a balanced interaction between viral and cellular proteins. Especially protein kinases are important regulators of virus-host interaction indicated by remarkable kinome alterations induced upon HCMV infection. Here we report a novel approach of kinome profiling with an outcome that suggests an important role of specific cellular protein kinases, such as AMPK, ABL2 and Aurora A. Inhibition of AMPK and ABL kinases showed a significant reduction, whereas inhibition of Aurora A kinase led to a slight activation of HCMV replication, as measured in a GFP reporter-based replication assay. Furthermore, analysis of the mode of antiviral action suggested a substantial benefit for the efficiency of viral replication at the immediate early (AMPK) or early-late (ABL) phases of HCMV gene expression. In contrast, inhibition of Aurora A kinase promoted an enhancement of viral early-late gene expression, suggesting a putative role of Aurora A signaling in host defense. Thus, the combined data provide new information on host cell kinases involved in viral replication and uncovered potential targets for future antiviral strategies.

Alternative splicing in oncogenic kinases: from physiological functions to cancer

Among the 518 protein kinases encoded by the human kinome, several of them act as oncoproteins in human cancers. Like other eukaryotic genes, oncogenes encoding protein kinases are frequently subjected to alternative splicing in coding as well as noncoding sequences. In the present paper, we will illustrate how alternative splicing can significantly impact on the physiological functions of oncogenic protein kinases, as demonstrated by mouse genetic model studies. This includes examples of membrane-bound tyrosine kinases receptors (FGFR2, Ret, TrkB, ErbB4, and VEGFR) as well as cytosolic protein kinases (B-Raf). We will further discuss how regular alternative splicing events of these kinases are in some instances implicated in oncogenic processes during tumor progression (FGFR, TrkB, ErbB2, Abl, and AuroraA). Finally, we will present typical examples of aberrant splicing responsible for the deregulation of oncogenic kinases activity in cancers (AuroraB, Jak2, Kit, Met, and Ron).

The BCR-ABL35INS insertion/truncation mutant is kinase-inactive and does not contribute to tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia is effectively treated with imatinib, but reactivation of BCR-ABL frequently occurs through acquisition of kinase domain mutations. The additional approved ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) nilotinib and dasatinib, along with investigational TKIs such as ponatinib (AP24534) and DCC-2036, support the possibility that mutation-mediated resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia can be fully controlled; however, the molecular events underlying resistance in patients lacking BCR-ABL point mutations are largely unknown. We previously reported on an insertion/truncation mutant, BCR-ABL(35INS), in which structural integrity of the kinase domain is compromised and all ABL sequence beyond the kinase domain is eliminated. Although we speculated that BCR-ABL(35INS) is kinase-inactive, recent reports propose this mutant contributes to ABL TKI resistance. We present cell-based and biochemical evidence establishing that BCR-ABL(35INS) is kinase-inactive and does not contribute to TKI resistance, and we find that detection of BCR-ABL(35INS) does not consistently track with or explain resistance in clinical samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Exon 7 deletion in the bcr-abl gene is frequent in chronic myeloid leukemia patients and is not correlated with resistance against imatinib

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with imatinib develop frequent resistance generally due to a point mutation. Recently, large rearrangements of abl sequence have also been described. In this study, we focused on the complete deletion of exon 7. We screened for bcr-abl(delexon7) in 63 resistant patients by high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis and direct sequencing. Moreover, we analyzed expression of abl(delexon7) and bcr-abl(delexon7) in 17 CML patients at diagnosis, 32 patients at resistance, and 20 negative controls by quantitative PCR or fragment length analysis. bcr-abl(delexon7) was detected on 34 (54%) among 63 resistant patients by HRM, showing an increase in the sensitivity of screening, because only 3.2% could be detected by direct sequencing. This deletion was not associated with a point mutation (P = 0.3362). In addition, abl(delexon7) was found in all tested samples with the same pattern of expression, suggesting an alternative splicing mechanism. In the bcr-abl component, there was no statistical difference between CML patients at diagnosis and resistant patients (P = 0.2815) as regarding bcr-abl(delexon7) proportion, thus arguing against involvement of deletion in resistance. Moreover, among two patients harboring bcr-abl(delexon7) at diagnosis, one experienced a complete disappearance of this transcript, and the other decreased >75% at resistance. In conclusion, bcr-abl(delexon7) is frequently observed in CML patients when using sensitive techniques. It seems to be the result of an alternative splicing mechanism and to be independent from the occurrence of resistance.