1
|
Hanrahan AJ, Chen Z, Rosen N, Solit DB. BRAF - a tumour-agnostic drug target with lineage-specific dependencies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:224-247. [PMID: 38278874 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00852-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
In June 2022, the FDA granted Accelerated Approval to the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib for the treatment of adult and paediatric patients (≥6 years of age) with unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600E-mutant solid tumours, except for BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancers. The histology-agnostic approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib marks the culmination of two decades of research into the landscape of BRAF mutations in human cancers, the biochemical mechanisms underlying BRAF-mediated tumorigenesis, and the clinical development of selective RAF and MEK inhibitors. Although the majority of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant tumours derive clinical benefit from BRAF inhibitor-based combinations, resistance to treatment develops in most. In this Review, we describe the biochemical basis for oncogenic BRAF-induced activation of MAPK signalling and pan-cancer and lineage-specific mechanisms of intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors. We also discuss novel RAF inhibitors and drug combinations designed to delay the emergence of treatment resistance and/or expand the population of patients with BRAF-mutant cancers who benefit from molecularly targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aphrothiti J Hanrahan
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ziyu Chen
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Physiology, Biophysics & Systems Biology, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal Rosen
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - David B Solit
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schnöller LE, Piehlmaier D, Weber P, Brix N, Fleischmann DF, Nieto AE, Selmansberger M, Heider T, Hess J, Niyazi M, Belka C, Lauber K, Unger K, Orth M. Systematic in vitro analysis of therapy resistance in glioblastoma cell lines by integration of clonogenic survival data with multi-level molecular data. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:51. [PMID: 36906590 PMCID: PMC10007763 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02241-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite intensive basic scientific, translational, and clinical efforts in the last decades, glioblastoma remains a devastating disease with a highly dismal prognosis. Apart from the implementation of temozolomide into the clinical routine, novel treatment approaches have largely failed, emphasizing the need for systematic examination of glioblastoma therapy resistance in order to identify major drivers and thus, potential vulnerabilities for therapeutic intervention. Recently, we provided proof-of-concept for the systematic identification of combined modality radiochemotherapy treatment vulnerabilities via integration of clonogenic survival data upon radio(chemo)therapy with low-density transcriptomic profiling data in a panel of established human glioblastoma cell lines. Here, we expand this approach to multiple molecular levels, including genomic copy number, spectral karyotyping, DNA methylation, and transcriptome data. Correlation of transcriptome data with inherent therapy resistance on the single gene level yielded several candidates that were so far underappreciated in this context and for which clinically approved drugs are readily available, such as the androgen receptor (AR). Gene set enrichment analyses confirmed these results, and identified additional gene sets, including reactive oxygen species detoxification, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (MTORC1) signaling, and ferroptosis/autophagy-related regulatory circuits to be associated with inherent therapy resistance in glioblastoma cells. To identify pharmacologically accessible genes within those gene sets, leading edge analyses were performed yielding candidates with functions in thioredoxin/peroxiredoxin metabolism, glutathione synthesis, chaperoning of proteins, prolyl hydroxylation, proteasome function, and DNA synthesis/repair. Our study thus confirms previously nominated targets for mechanism-based multi-modal glioblastoma therapy, provides proof-of-concept for this workflow of multi-level data integration, and identifies novel candidates for which pharmacological inhibitors are readily available and whose targeting in combination with radio(chemo)therapy deserves further examination. In addition, our study also reveals that the presented workflow requires mRNA expression data, rather than genomic copy number or DNA methylation data, since no stringent correlation between these data levels could be observed. Finally, the data sets generated in the present study, including functional and multi-level molecular data of commonly used glioblastoma cell lines, represent a valuable toolbox for other researchers in the field of glioblastoma therapy resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Emanuel Schnöller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Piehlmaier
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics (ZYTO), Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Peter Weber
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics (ZYTO), Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Group 'Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer' Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Nikko Brix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Felix Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Edward Nieto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Selmansberger
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics (ZYTO), Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Theresa Heider
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics (ZYTO), Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Julia Hess
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics (ZYTO), Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Group 'Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer' Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BKFZ), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Group 'Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer' Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BKFZ), Munich, Germany
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Group 'Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer' Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Kristian Unger
- Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics (ZYTO), Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Group 'Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer' Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Michael Orth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takano K, Munehira Y, Hatanaka M, Murakami R, Shibata Y, Shida T, Takeuchi K, Takechi S, Tabata T, Shimada T, Kishikawa S, Matsui Y, Ubukata O, Seki T, Kaneta Y. Discovery of a Novel ATP-Competitive MEK Inhibitor DS03090629 that Overcomes Resistance Conferred by BRAF Overexpression in BRAF-Mutated Melanoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2023; 22:317-332. [PMID: 36622773 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-22-0306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Patients with melanoma with activating BRAF mutations (BRAF V600E/K) initially respond to combination therapy of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. However, their clinical efficacy is limited by acquired resistance, in some cases driven by amplification of the mutant BRAF gene and subsequent reactivation of the MAPK pathway. DS03090629 is a novel and orally available MEK inhibitor that inhibits MEK in an ATP-competitive manner. In both in vitro and in vivo settings, potent inhibition of MEK by DS03090629 or its combination with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib was demonstrated in a mutant BRAF-overexpressing melanoma cell line model that exhibited a higher MEK phosphorylation level than the parental cell line and then became resistant to dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib. DS03090629 also exhibited superior efficacy against a melanoma cell line-expressing mutant MEK1 protein compared with dabrafenib and trametinib. Biophysical analysis revealed that DS03090629 retained its affinity for the MEK protein regardless of its phosphorylation status, whereas the affinity of trametinib declined when the MEK protein was phosphorylated. These results suggest that DS03090629 may be a novel therapeutic option for patients who acquire resistance to the current BRAF- and MEK-targeting therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Takano
- Oncology Research Laboratories II, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoichi Munehira
- Oncology Research Laboratories II, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mana Hatanaka
- Oncology Research Laboratories II, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Murakami
- Oncology Research Laboratories II, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Shibata
- Medicinal Chemistry Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Shida
- Medicinal Chemistry Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Takeuchi
- Medicinal Chemistry Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sho Takechi
- Medicinal Chemistry Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiki Tabata
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Research Laboratories, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Shimada
- Organic Synthesis Department, Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Kishikawa
- Organic Synthesis Department, Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yumi Matsui
- Biological Research Department, Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Ubukata
- Biological Research Department, Daiichi Sankyo RD Novare Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiko Seki
- Early Clinical Development Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Kaneta
- Oncology Research Laboratories II, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Response and Resistance to Trametinib in MAP2K1-Mutant Triple-Negative Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24054520. [PMID: 36901951 PMCID: PMC10003177 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of targeted therapies for non-BRAF p.Val600-mutant melanomas remains a challenge. Triple wildtype (TWT) melanomas that lack mutations in BRAF, NRAS, or NF1 form 10% of human melanomas and are heterogeneous in their genomic drivers. MAP2K1 mutations are enriched in BRAF-mutant melanoma and function as an innate or adaptive resistance mechanism to BRAF inhibition. Here we report the case of a patient with TWT melanoma with a bona fide MAP2K1 mutation without any BRAF mutations. We performed a structural analysis to validate that the MEK inhibitor trametinib could block this mutation. Although the patient initially responded to trametinib, he eventually progressed. The presence of a CDKN2A deletion prompted us to combine a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, with trametinib but without clinical benefit. Genomic analysis at progression showed multiple novel copy number alterations. Our case illustrates the challenges of combining MEK1 and CDK4/6 inhibitors in case of resistance to MEK inhibitor monotherapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Szeto C, Kurzrock R, Kato S, Goloubev A, Veerapaneni S, Preble A, Reddy S, Adashek J. Association of differential expression of immunoregulatory molecules and presence of targetable mutations may inform rational design of clinical trials. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100396. [PMID: 35158206 PMCID: PMC8850727 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and genomic biomarker-driven targeted therapies have revolutionized the modern oncologic treatment arsenal. The next step has been to combine targeted agents and ICIs. In doing so, some combination regimens may be more logical than others. Patients and methods Whole-exome and whole-transcriptome sequencing were performed on 2739 unselected later-stage clinical cases from 24 solid tumor subtypes in the NantHealth database, and data were also curated from 5746 similarly sequenced patients across 28 solid tumor subtypes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Significant differential expression of 10 immunoregulatory molecules [IRMs (genes)] was analyzed for association with mutant versus wild-type genes. Results Twenty-three significant associations between currently actionable variants and RNA-expressed checkpoint genes were identified in the TCGA cases; 10 were validated in the external cohort of 2739 clinical cases from NantHealth (P values were adjusted using Benjamini–Hochberg multiple hypothesis correction to reduce false-discovery rate). Within the same 5746 TCGA profiles, 2740 TCGA patients were identified as having one or more potentially oncogenic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) mutation within an established 50-gene hotspot panel. Of the 50 genes, SNVs within 15 were found to be significantly associated with differential expression of at least one IRM after adjusting for tissue enrichment; six were confirmed significant associations in an independent set of 2739 clinical cases from NantHealth. Conclusions Logically combining ICIs with targeted therapies may offer unique treatment strategies for patients with cancer. The presence of specific mutations impacts the expression of IRMs, an observation of potential importance for selecting combinations of gene- and immune-targeted therapeutics. Altered actionable genes correlated with specific checkpoint transcripts. Associations between IRMs and altered genes were validated in independent datasets. Combining immune- and gene-targeted drugs based on IRM/gene correlations merits study.
Collapse
|
6
|
Aldea M, Andre F, Marabelle A, Dogan S, Barlesi F, Soria JC. Overcoming Resistance to Tumor-Targeted and Immune-Targeted Therapies. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:874-899. [PMID: 33811122 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Resistance to anticancer therapies includes primary resistance, usually related to lack of target dependency or presence of additional targets, and secondary resistance, mostly driven by adaptation of the cancer cell to the selection pressure of treatment. Resistance to targeted therapy is frequently acquired, driven by on-target, bypass alterations, or cellular plasticity. Resistance to immunotherapy is often primary, orchestrated by sophisticated tumor-host-microenvironment interactions, but could also occur after initial efficacy, mostly when only partial responses are obtained. Here, we provide an overview of resistance to tumor and immune-targeted therapies and discuss challenges of overcoming resistance, and current and future directions of development. SIGNIFICANCE: A better and earlier identification of cancer-resistance mechanisms could avoid the use of ineffective drugs in patients not responding to therapy and provide the rationale for the administration of personalized drug associations. A clear description of the molecular interplayers is a prerequisite to the development of novel and dedicated anticancer drugs. Finally, the implementation of such cancer molecular and immunologic explorations in prospective clinical trials could de-risk the demonstration of more effective anticancer strategies in randomized registration trials, and bring us closer to the promise of cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihaela Aldea
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice Andre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,INSERM U981, PRISM Institute, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Paris Saclay University, Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Aurelien Marabelle
- INSERM U981, PRISM Institute, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Semih Dogan
- INSERM U981, PRISM Institute, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice Barlesi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- Paris Saclay University, Saint-Aubin, France. .,Drug Development Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hegedüs L, Okumus Ö, Livingstone E, Baranyi M, Kovács I, Döme B, Tóvári J, Bánkfalvi Á, Schadendorf D, Aigner C, Hegedüs B. Allosteric and ATP-Competitive MEK-Inhibition in a Novel Spitzoid Melanoma Model with a RAF- and Phosphorylation-Independent Mutation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:829. [PMID: 33669371 PMCID: PMC7920251 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Spitzoid melanoma is a rare malignancy with histological characteristics similar to Spitz nevus. It has a diverse genetic background and in adults, a similarly grim clinical outcome as conventional malignant melanoma. We established a spitzoid melanoma cell line (PF130) from the pleural effusion sample of a 37-year-old male patient. We found that the cell line carries a rare MEK1 mutation (pGlu102_Lys104delinsGln) that belongs to the RAF- and phosphorylation-independent subgroup of MEK1 alternations supposedly insensitive to allosteric MEK inhibitors. The in vivo tumorigenicity was tested in three different models by injecting the cells subcutaneously, intravenously or into the thoracic cavity of SCID mice. In the intrapleural model, macroscopic tumors formed in the chest cavity after two months, while subcutaneously and intravenously delivered cells showed limited growth. In vitro, trametinib-but not selumentinib-and the ATP-competitive MEK inhibitor MAP855 strongly decreased the viability of the cells and induced cell death. In vivo, trametinib but not MAP855 significantly reduced tumor growth in the intrapleural model. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first patient-derived melanoma model with RAF- and phosphorylation-independent MEK mutation and we demonstrated its sensitivity to trametinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Hegedüs
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, Tüschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Germany; (L.H.); (Ö.O.); (C.A.)
| | - Özlem Okumus
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, Tüschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Germany; (L.H.); (Ö.O.); (C.A.)
| | - Elisabeth Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, University Medicine Essen, Esmarchstraße 14, 45147 Essen, Germany; (E.L.); (D.S.)
| | - Marcell Baranyi
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 93, 1091 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Ildikó Kovács
- National Korányi Institute of Pulmonology, Pihenő út 1, 1122 Budapest, Hungary; (I.K.); (B.D.)
| | - Balázs Döme
- National Korányi Institute of Pulmonology, Pihenő út 1, 1122 Budapest, Hungary; (I.K.); (B.D.)
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - József Tóvári
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György u. 7-9, 1122 Budapest, Hungary;
| | - Ágnes Bánkfalvi
- Department of Pathology, University Medicine Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Medicine Essen, Esmarchstraße 14, 45147 Essen, Germany; (E.L.); (D.S.)
| | - Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, Tüschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Germany; (L.H.); (Ö.O.); (C.A.)
| | - Balázs Hegedüs
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, Tüschener Weg 40, 45239 Essen, Germany; (L.H.); (Ö.O.); (C.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Proietti I, Skroza N, Bernardini N, Tolino E, Balduzzi V, Marchesiello A, Michelini S, Volpe S, Mambrin A, Mangino G, Romeo G, Maddalena P, Rees C, Potenza C. Mechanisms of Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance in Melanoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2801. [PMID: 33003483 PMCID: PMC7600801 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This systematic review investigated the literature on acquired v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma. We searched MEDLINE for articles on BRAF inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma published since January 2010 in the following areas: (1) genetic basis of resistance; (2) epigenetic and transcriptomic mechanisms; (3) influence of the immune system on resistance development; and (4) combination therapy to overcome resistance. Common resistance mutations in melanoma are BRAF splice variants, BRAF amplification, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) mutations. Genetic and epigenetic changes reactivate previously blocked mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, activate alternative signaling pathways, and cause epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Once BRAF inhibitor resistance develops, the tumor microenvironment reverts to a low immunogenic state secondary to the induction of programmed cell death ligand-1. Combining a BRAF inhibitor with a MEK inhibitor delays resistance development and increases duration of response. Multiple other combinations based on known mechanisms of resistance are being investigated. BRAF inhibitor-resistant cells develop a range of 'escape routes', so multiple different treatment targets will probably be required to overcome resistance. In the future, it may be possible to personalize combination therapy towards the specific resistance pathway in individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Proietti
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Nevena Skroza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Nicoletta Bernardini
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Ersilia Tolino
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Veronica Balduzzi
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Anna Marchesiello
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Simone Michelini
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Salvatore Volpe
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Alessandra Mambrin
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | - Giorgio Mangino
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (G.R.)
| | - Giovanna Romeo
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (G.R.)
- Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Immune-Mediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Maddalena
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| | | | - Concetta Potenza
- Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Bio-Technologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Fiorini Hospital, Polo Pontino, 04019 Terracina, Italy; (N.S.); (N.B.); (E.T.); (V.B.); (A.M.); (S.M.); (S.V.); (A.M.); (P.M.); (C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang D, Hop CECA, Patilea-Vrana G, Gampa G, Seneviratne HK, Unadkat JD, Kenny JR, Nagapudi K, Di L, Zhou L, Zak M, Wright MR, Bumpus NN, Zang R, Liu X, Lai Y, Khojasteh SC. Drug Concentration Asymmetry in Tissues and Plasma for Small Molecule-Related Therapeutic Modalities. Drug Metab Dispos 2019; 47:1122-1135. [PMID: 31266753 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.086744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The well accepted "free drug hypothesis" for small-molecule drugs assumes that only the free (unbound) drug concentration at the therapeutic target can elicit a pharmacologic effect. Unbound (free) drug concentrations in plasma are readily measurable and are often used as surrogates for the drug concentrations at the site of pharmacologic action in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis and clinical dose projection in drug discovery. Furthermore, for permeable compounds at pharmacokinetic steady state, the free drug concentration in tissue is likely a close approximation of that in plasma; however, several factors can create and maintain disequilibrium between the free drug concentration in plasma and tissue, leading to free drug concentration asymmetry. These factors include drug uptake and extrusion mechanisms involving the uptake and efflux drug transporters, intracellular biotransformation of prodrugs, membrane receptor-mediated uptake of antibody-drug conjugates, pH gradients, unique distribution properties (covalent binders, nanoparticles), and local drug delivery (e.g., inhalation). The impact of these factors on the free drug concentrations in tissues can be represented by K p,uu, the ratio of free drug concentration between tissue and plasma at steady state. This review focuses on situations in which free drug concentrations in tissues may differ from those in plasma (e.g., K p,uu > or <1) and discusses the limitations of the surrogate approach of using plasma-free drug concentration to predict free drug concentrations in tissue. This is an important consideration for novel therapeutic modalities since systemic exposure as a driver of pharmacologic effects may provide limited value in guiding compound optimization, selection, and advancement. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of the relationship between free drug concentrations in plasma and tissues is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donglu Zhang
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Cornelis E C A Hop
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Gabriela Patilea-Vrana
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Gautham Gampa
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Herana Kamal Seneviratne
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Jashvant D Unadkat
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Jane R Kenny
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Karthik Nagapudi
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Li Di
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Lian Zhou
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Mark Zak
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Matthew R Wright
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Namandjé N Bumpus
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Richard Zang
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Xingrong Liu
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - Yurong Lai
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| | - S Cyrus Khojasteh
- Genentech, South San Francisco, California (D.Z., C.E.C.A.H., J.R.K., K.N., M.Z., M.R.W., R.Z., S.C.K.); Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (H.K.S., N.N.B.); Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.P.-V., J.D.U.); Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (X.L.); Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc., Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut (L.D.); Drug Disposition, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana (L.Z.); and Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, California (Y.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Novel small molecule decreases cell proliferation, migration, clone formation, and gene expression through ERK inhibition in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines. Anticancer Drugs 2019; 30:618-627. [PMID: 30741723 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The Ras-Raf-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway is an attractive target for the development of anticancer agents because of the high prevalence of ERK activation in human cancers. However, resistance is often developed despite initial clinical response, most likely because of activation of cross-talk pathways. In Research Genetic Cancer Center (RGCC), we are in the process of synthesizing a novel ERK inhibitor, targeting the final stage of the pathway, thus minimizing cross-talk. We have synthesized an intermediate molecule -RGCC416 - and tested its biological activity. MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were used. Cell viability was measured by crystal violet and cell proliferation by the methyl tetrazolium assay using various compound concentrations. Cell migration and colony formation were determined to assess the ability of invasion and single cancer cell growth, respectively. Expression of genes linked to MAPK/PI3K pathways was determined by PCR. ERK and phospho-ERK levels were determined in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus by western blot. It was found that although the compound did not affect viability, it significantly decreased cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation in both cell lines. In MDA-MB-231, this is possibly through retaining phospho-ERK to the cytoplasm, where it cannot activate cancer-associated genes. There was no difference in ERK levels in MCF-7 cells. This could be because of the different pathways that these cells utilize for survival. We have synthesized a molecule, which could be a promising ERK inhibitor, leading to possible novel treatment options for breast cancer patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Babiker HM, Byron SA, Hendricks WPD, Elmquist WF, Gampa G, Vondrak J, Aldrich J, Cuyugan L, Adkins J, De Luca V, Tibes R, Borad MJ, Marceau K, Myers TJ, Paradiso LJ, Liang WS, Korn RL, Cridebring D, Von Hoff DD, Carpten JD, Craig DW, Trent JM, Gordon MS. E6201, an intravenous MEK1 inhibitor, achieves an exceptional response in BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic malignant melanoma with brain metastases. Invest New Drugs 2018; 37:636-645. [PMID: 30264293 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-018-0668-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Malignant melanoma (MM) exhibits a high propensity for central nervous system dissemination with ~50% of metastatic MM patients developing brain metastases (BM). Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved overall survival for MM patients with BM. However, responses are usually of short duration and new agents that effectively penetrate the blood brain barrier (BBB) are needed. Here, we report a MM patient with BM who experienced an exceptional response to E6201, an ATP-competitive MEK1 inhibitor, on a Phase 1 study, with ongoing near-complete response and overall survival extending beyond 8 years. Whole exome and transcriptome sequencing revealed a high mutational burden tumor (22 mutations/Megabase) with homozygous BRAF V600E mutation. Correlative preclinical studies demonstrated broad activity for E6201 across BRAF V600E mutant melanoma cell lines and effective BBB penetration in vivo. Together, these results suggest that E6201 may represent a potential new treatment option for BRAF-mutant MM patients with BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hani M Babiker
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Program, University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
- Honor Health Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, #200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA.
| | - Sara A Byron
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - William P D Hendricks
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - William F Elmquist
- Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, 308 SE Harvard Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Gautham Gampa
- Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, 308 SE Harvard Street, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Jessica Vondrak
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Program, University of Arizona Cancer Center, 1515 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Jessica Aldrich
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Lori Cuyugan
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Jonathan Adkins
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Valerie De Luca
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
- Arizona State University, 427 E. Tyler Mall #320, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Raoul Tibes
- Honor Health Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, #200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA
| | - Mitesh J Borad
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
- Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd., Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Katie Marceau
- Honor Health Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, #200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA
| | - Thomas J Myers
- Spirita Oncology, LLC, 2450 Holcombe Blvd., Suite J, Houston, TX, 77021, USA
| | - Linda J Paradiso
- Spirita Oncology, LLC, 2450 Holcombe Blvd., Suite J, Houston, TX, 77021, USA
| | - Winnie S Liang
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Ronald L Korn
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
- Honor Health Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, #200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA
- Imaging Endpoints, 9700 N. 91st St, STE B-200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA
| | - Derek Cridebring
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Daniel D Von Hoff
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
- Honor Health Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, #200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA
| | - John D Carpten
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - David W Craig
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Trent
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N. Fifth Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Michael S Gordon
- Honor Health Research Institute, 10510 N. 92nd Street, #200, Scottsdale, AZ, 85258, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gao Y, Chang MT, McKay D, Na N, Zhou B, Yaeger R, Torres NM, Muniz K, Drosten M, Barbacid M, Caponigro G, Stuart D, Moebitz H, Solit DB, Abdel-Wahab O, Taylor BS, Yao Z, Rosen N. Allele-Specific Mechanisms of Activation of MEK1 Mutants Determine Their Properties. Cancer Discov 2018; 8:648-661. [PMID: 29483135 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-1452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Mutations at multiple sites in MEK1 occur in cancer, suggesting that their mechanisms of activation might be different. We analyzed 17 tumor-associated MEK1 mutants and found that they drove ERK signaling autonomously or in a RAS/RAF-dependent manner. The latter are sensitive to feedback inhibition of RAF, which limits their functional output, and often cooccur with RAS or RAF mutations. They act as amplifiers of RAF signaling. In contrast, another class of mutants deletes a hitherto unrecognized negative regulatory segment of MEK1, is RAF- and phosphorylation-independent, is unaffected by feedback inhibition of upstream signaling, and drives high ERK output and transformation in the absence of RAF activity. Moreover, these RAF-independent mutants are insensitive to allosteric MEK inhibitors, which preferentially bind to the inactivated form of MEK1. All the mutants are sensitive to an ATP-competitive MEK inhibitor. Thus, our study comprises a novel therapeutic strategy for tumors driven by RAF-independent MEK1 mutants.Significance: Mutants with which MEK1 mutants coexist and their sensitivity to inhibitors are determined by allele-specific properties. This study shows the importance of functional characterization of mutant alleles in single oncogenes and identifies a new class of MEK1 mutants, insensitive to current MEK1 inhibitors but treatable with a new ATP-competitive inhibitor. Cancer Discov; 8(5); 648-61. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Maust et al., p. 534This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 517.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijun Gao
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew T Chang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel McKay
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Na Na
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neilawattie M Torres
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Keven Muniz
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthias Drosten
- Molecular Oncology Programme, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariano Barbacid
- Molecular Oncology Programme, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Darrin Stuart
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Henrik Moebitz
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - David B Solit
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Omar Abdel-Wahab
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Barry S Taylor
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhan Yao
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neal Rosen
- Program in Molecular Pharmacology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. .,Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Center for Mechanism-Based Therapeutics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gampa G, Kim M, Cook-Rostie N, Laramy JK, Sarkaria JN, Paradiso L, DePalatis L, Elmquist WF. Brain Distribution of a Novel MEK Inhibitor E6201: Implications in the Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastases. Drug Metab Dispos 2018; 46:658-666. [PMID: 29437873 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.117.079194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinically meaningful efficacy in the treatment of brain tumors, including melanoma brain metastases (MBM), requires selection of a potent inhibitor against a suitable target, and adequate drug distribution to target sites in the brain. Deregulated constitutive signaling of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway has been frequently observed in melanoma, and mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) has been identified to be an important target. E6201 is a potent synthetic small-molecule MEK inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate brain distribution of E6201, and examine the impact of active efflux transport at the blood-brain barrier on the central nervous system (CNS) exposure of E6201. In vitro studies utilizing transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II (MDCKII) cells indicate that E6201 is not a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (Bcrp). In vivo studies also suggest a minimal involvement of P-gp and Bcrp in E6201's brain distribution. The total concentrations in brain were higher than in plasma, resulting in a brain-to-plasma AUC ratio (Kp) of 2.66 in wild-type mice. The brain distribution was modestly enhanced in Mdr1a/b-/-, Bcrp1-/-, and Mdr1a/b-/-Bcrp1-/- knockout mice. The nonspecific binding of E6201 was higher in brain compared with plasma. However, free-drug concentrations in brain following 40 mg/kg intravenous dose reach levels that exceed reported in vitro half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, suggesting that E6201 may be efficacious in inhibiting MEK-driven brain tumors. The brain distribution characteristics of E6201 make it an attractive targeted agent for clinical testing in MBM, glioblastoma, and other CNS tumors that may be effectively targeted with inhibition of MEK signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautham Gampa
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - Minjee Kim
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - Nicholas Cook-Rostie
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - Janice K Laramy
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - Linda Paradiso
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - Louis DePalatis
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| | - William F Elmquist
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (G.G., M.K., N.C.-R., J.K.L., W.F.E.); Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S.); and Strategia Therapeutics Inc., Spring, Texas (L.P., L.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arozarena I, Wellbrock C. Overcoming resistance to BRAF inhibitors. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:387. [PMID: 29114545 PMCID: PMC5653517 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The discovery of activating mutations in the serine/threonine (S/T) kinase BRAF followed by a wave of follow-up research manifested that the MAPK-pathway plays a critical role in melanoma initiation and progression. BRAF and MEK inhibitors produce an unparalleled response rate in melanoma, but it is now clear that most responses are transient, and while some patients show long lasting responses the majority progress within 1 year. In accordance with the key role played by the MAPK-pathway in BRAF mutant melanomas, disease progression is mostly due to the appearance of drug-resistance mechanisms leading to restoration of MAPK-pathway activity. In the present article we will review the development, application and clinical effects of BRAF and MEK inhibitors both, as single agent and in combination in the context of targeted therapy in melanoma. We will then describe the most prominent mechanisms of resistance found in patients progressed on these targeted therapies. Finally we will discuss strategies for further optimizing the use of MAPK inhibitors and will describe the potential of alternative combination therapies to either delay the onset of resistance to MAPK inhibitors or directly target specific mechanisms of resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imanol Arozarena
- Navarrabiomed-Fundación Miguel Servet-Idisna, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Claudia Wellbrock
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sanders H, Qu K, Li H, Ma L, Barlan C, Zhang X, Prentice J, Wolfson D, Crossley B, Sferruzza A, Sninsky J, Ross D, Grupe A, Catanese J, Hantash F, Waldman F. Mutation Yield of a 34-Gene Solid Tumor Panel in Community-Based Tumor Samples. Mol Diagn Ther 2017; 20:241-53. [PMID: 27084556 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-016-0197-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several targeted therapies have been approved for treatment of solid tumors. Identification of gene mutations that indicate response to these therapies is rapidly progressing. A 34-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, developed and validated by us, was evaluated to detect additional mutations in community-based cancer specimens initially sent to our reference laboratory for routine molecular testing. METHODS Consecutive de-identified clinical specimens (n = 121) from melanoma cases (n = 31), lung cancer cases (n = 27), colorectal cancer cases (n = 33), and breast cancer cases (n = 30) were profiled by NGS, and the results were compared with routine molecular testing. RESULTS Upon initial mutation testing, 20 % (24/121) were positive. NGS detected ≥1 additional mutation not identified by routine testing in 74 % of specimens (90/121). Of the specimens with additional mutations, 16 harbored mutations in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline genes. These various additional mutations were in gene regions not routinely covered, in genes not routinely tested, and/or present at low allele frequencies. Moreover, NGS yielded no false negatives. Overall, NGS detected mutations in 59 % of the genes (20/34) included in the panel, 75 % of which (15/20) were detected in multiple tumor types. Mutations in TP53 were found in 51 % of tumors tested (62/121). Mutations in at least one other (non-TP53) gene present in the panel were detected in 64 % of cases (77/121). CONCLUSION This assay provides improved breadth and sensitivity for profiling clinically relevant genes in these prevalent solid tumor types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Sanders
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA.
| | - Kevin Qu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - Hairong Li
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - Cindy Barlan
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - Xi Zhang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - James Prentice
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | | | - Beryl Crossley
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - Anthony Sferruzza
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Feras Hantash
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| | - Frederic Waldman
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, 33608 Ortega Highway, San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang J, Farren MR, Ahn D, Bekaii-Saab T, Lesinski GB. Signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in biliary tract cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2017; 21:485-498. [PMID: 28282502 DOI: 10.1080/14728222.2017.1306055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is increasing, and the disease is frequently diagnosed during advanced stages, leading to poor overall survival. Limited treatment options are currently available and novel therapeutic approaches are needed. A number of completed clinical trials have evaluated the role of chemotherapy for BTC, demonstrating a marginal benefit. Thus, there is increased interest in applying targeted therapies for this disease. Areas covered: This review article summarizes the role of chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of BTC, and highlights key signal transduction pathways of interest for targeted inhibition. Of particular interest are the MEK or MAP2K (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase), phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) pathways. We discuss the available data on several promising inhibitors of these pathways, both in the pre-clinical and clinical settings. Expert opinion: Future treatment strategies should address targeting of MEK, PI3K and STAT3 for BTC, with a focus on combined therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Yang
- a Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology Graduate Program , The Ohio State University , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Matthew R Farren
- b Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology , The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA
| | - Daniel Ahn
- c Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Phoenix , AZ , USA
| | - Tanios Bekaii-Saab
- c Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Phoenix , AZ , USA
| | - Gregory B Lesinski
- b Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology , The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Activated MEK cooperates with Cdkn2a and Pten loss to promote the development and maintenance of melanoma. Oncogene 2017; 36:3842-3851. [PMID: 28263969 PMCID: PMC5501768 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The development of targeted inhibitors, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, has led to improved clinical outcome for melanoma patients with BRAFV600E mutations. Although the initial response to these inhibitors can be dramatic, sometimes causing complete tumor regression, the majority of melanomas eventually become resistant. Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) mutations are found in primary melanomas and frequently reported in BRAF melanomas that develop resistance to targeted therapy; however, melanoma is a molecularly heterogeneous cancer, and which mutations are drivers and which are passengers remains to be determined. In this study, we demonstrate that in BRAFV600E melanoma cell lines, activating MEK mutations drive resistance and contribute to suboptimal growth of melanoma cells following the withdrawal of BRAF inhibition. In this manner, the cells are drug-addicted, suggesting that melanoma cells evolve a ‘just right’ level of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and the additive effects of MEK and BRAF mutations are counterproductive. We also used a novel mouse model of melanoma to demonstrate that several of these MEK mutants promote the development, growth and maintenance of melanoma in vivo in the context of Cdkn2a and Pten loss. By utilizing a genetic approach to control mutant MEK expression in vivo, we were able to induce tumor regression and significantly increase survival; however, after a long latency, all tumors subsequently became resistant. These data suggest that resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors is probably inevitable, and novel therapeutic approaches are needed to target dormant tumors.
Collapse
|
18
|
Sini P, Gürtler U, Zahn SK, Baumann C, Rudolph D, Baumgartinger R, Strauss E, Haslinger C, Tontsch-Grunt U, Waizenegger IC, Solca F, Bader G, Zoephel A, Treu M, Reiser U, Garin-Chesa P, Boehmelt G, Kraut N, Quant J, Adolf GR. Pharmacological Profile of BI 847325, an Orally Bioavailable, ATP-Competitive Inhibitor of MEK and Aurora Kinases. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 15:2388-2398. [PMID: 27496137 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 07/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Although the MAPK pathway is frequently deregulated in cancer, inhibitors targeting RAF or MEK have so far shown clinical activity only in BRAF- and NRAS-mutant melanoma. Improvements in efficacy may be possible by combining inhibition of mitogenic signal transduction with inhibition of cell-cycle progression. We have studied the preclinical pharmacology of BI 847325, an ATP-competitive dual inhibitor of MEK and Aurora kinases. Potent inhibition of MEK1/2 and Aurora A/B kinases by BI 847325 was demonstrated in enzymatic and cellular assays. Equipotent effects were observed in BRAF-mutant cells, whereas in KRAS-mutant cells, MEK inhibition required higher concentrations than Aurora kinase inhibition. Daily oral administration of BI 847325 at 10 mg/kg showed efficacy in both BRAF- and KRAS-mutant xenograft models. Biomarker analysis suggested that this effect was primarily due to inhibition of MEK in BRAF-mutant models but of Aurora kinase in KRAS-mutant models. Inhibition of both MEK and Aurora kinase in KRAS-mutant tumors was observed when BI 847325 was administered once weekly at 70 mg/kg. Our studies indicate that BI 847325 is effective in in vitro and in vivo models of cancers with BRAF and KRAS mutation. These preclinical data are discussed in the light of the results of a recently completed clinical phase I trial assessing safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of BI 847325 in patients with cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(10); 2388-98. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Sini
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Ulrich Gürtler
- Department of R&D Project Management, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany
| | - Stephan K Zahn
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Baumann
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dorothea Rudolph
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rosa Baumgartinger
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Strauss
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Haslinger
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrike Tontsch-Grunt
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Irene C Waizenegger
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Flavio Solca
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerd Bader
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Zoephel
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Treu
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ulrich Reiser
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pilar Garin-Chesa
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guido Boehmelt
- Research Networking, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Norbert Kraut
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jens Quant
- Research ADME, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Günther R Adolf
- Department of Pharmacology and Translational Research, Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang SQ, Goh SS, Chai CLL, Chen A. An efficient synthesis of an exo-enone analogue of LL-Z1640-2 and evaluation of its protein kinase inhibitory activities. Org Biomol Chem 2016; 14:639-645. [PMID: 26541872 DOI: 10.1039/c5ob01948f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
An efficient synthesis of an exo-enone analogue (5) of resorcylic acid lactone (RAL), natural product LL-Z1640-2 (1), has been achieved using a Ni-catalysed regioselective reductive coupling macrocyclisation of an alkyne-aldehyde as a key step. The synthetic route is significantly shorter than those for the natural product and avoids the isomerisation problem of the cis-double bond in the molecule. The preliminary biological evaluation showed that the exo-enone analogue is a potent inhibitor of several important kinases relevant to cancer drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Q Wang
- Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences (ICES), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 8 Biomedical Grove, Neuros #07-01, Singapore 138665.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Buscà R, Pouysségur J, Lenormand P. ERK1 and ERK2 Map Kinases: Specific Roles or Functional Redundancy? Front Cell Dev Biol 2016; 4:53. [PMID: 27376062 PMCID: PMC4897767 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The MAP kinase signaling cascade Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK has been involved in a large variety of cellular and physiological processes that are crucial for life. Many pathological situations have been associated to this pathway. More than one isoform has been described at each level of the cascade. In this review we devoted our attention to ERK1 and ERK2, which are the effector kinases of the pathway. Whether ERK1 and ERK2 specify functional differences or are in contrast functionally redundant, constitutes an ongoing debate despite the huge amount of studies performed to date. In this review we compiled data on ERK1 vs. ERK2 gene structures, protein sequences, expression levels, structural and molecular mechanisms of activation and substrate recognition. We have also attempted to perform a rigorous analysis of studies regarding the individual roles of ERK1 and ERK2 by the means of morpholinos, siRNA, and shRNA silencing as well as gene disruption or gene replacement in mice. Finally, we comment on a recent study of gene and protein evolution of ERK isoforms as a distinct approach to address the same question. Our review permits the evaluation of the relevance of published studies in the field especially when measurements of global ERK activation are taken into account. Our analysis favors the hypothesis of ERK1 and ERK2 exhibiting functional redundancy and points to the concept of the global ERK quantity, and not isoform specificity, as being the essential determinant to achieve ERK function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roser Buscà
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7284, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre A. Lacassagne, Institute for Research on Cancer and Ageing of Nice, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis Nice, France
| | - Jacques Pouysségur
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7284, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre A. Lacassagne, Institute for Research on Cancer and Ageing of Nice, University of Nice-Sophia AntipolisNice, France; Centre Scientifique de MonacoMonaco, Monaco
| | - Philippe Lenormand
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7284, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre A. Lacassagne, Institute for Research on Cancer and Ageing of Nice, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang W, Borthakur G, Gao C, Chen Y, Mu H, Ruvolo VR, Nomoto K, Zhao N, Konopleva M, Andreeff M. The Dual MEK/FLT3 Inhibitor E6201 Exerts Cytotoxic Activity against Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells Harboring Resistance-Conferring FLT3 Mutations. Cancer Res 2016; 76:1528-37. [PMID: 26822154 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-1580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibition has elicited encouraging responses in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy. Unfortunately, unless combined with a bone marrow transplant, disease relapse is frequent. In addition to the acquired point mutations in the FLT3 kinase domain that contribute to FLT3 inhibitor resistance, MEK/ERK signaling is persistently activated in AML cells even when FLT3 phosphorylation is continually suppressed. Thus, concomitant targeting of FLT3 and MAPK may potentially exert synergistic activity to counteract the resistance of AML cells to FLT3-targeted therapy. In this study, we investigated the antileukemia activity of a MEK1 and FLT3 dual inhibitor, E6201, in AML cells resistant to FLT3 inhibition. We found that E6201 exerted profound apoptogenic effects on AML cells harboring resistance-conferring FLT3 mutations. This activity appeared to be p53 dependent, and E6201-induced cytotoxicity was retained under hypoxic culture conditions and during coculture with mesenchymal stem cells that mimic the AML microenvironment. Furthermore, E6201 markedly reduced leukemia burden and improved the survival of mice in a human FLT3-mutated AML model. Collectively, our data provide a preclinical basis for the clinical evaluation of E6201 in AML patients harboring FLT3 mutations, including those who relapse following FLT3-targeted monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiguo Zhang
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Gautam Borthakur
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Chen Gao
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Ye Chen
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Hong Mu
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Vivian R Ruvolo
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | | | | | - Marina Konopleva
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas
| | - Michael Andreeff
- Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas. Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Aberrant activation of the three-layered protein kinase cascade, Raf/MEK/ERK, is often detected in human cancer, which is mainly attributed to the oncogenic alterations of RAF, or its upstream activators RAS or cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases. Deregulated activity of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway drives uncontrolled tumor cell proliferation and survival, thus providing a rational therapeutic target for the treatment of many cancers. While Raf, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2 are equally important targets for the design of therapeutic small molecular weight inhibitors, the effort to develop MEK1/2-specific inhibitors has been greatly successful. Particularly, MEK1/2 have been relatively advantageous for the design of highly selective adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-noncompetitive inhibitors. Indeed, a plethora of highly selective and potent MEK1/2 inhibitors are now available and many of those inhibitors have been evaluated for their therapeutic potential. Herein, we review different MEK1/2 inhibitors that have been studied for their inhibitory mechanisms and therapeutic potential in cancer. Some of the key structural features of MEK1/2 that are important for the efficacy of these inhibitors are also discussed. In addition, we discuss current challenges and future prospective in using these advanced MEK1/2 inhibitors for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui-Kei Wu
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Jong-In Park
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mandal R, Becker S, Strebhardt K. Stamping out RAF and MEK1/2 to inhibit the ERK1/2 pathway: an emerging threat to anticancer therapy. Oncogene 2015; 35:2547-61. [PMID: 26364606 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Revised: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The RAS-RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway is a key signal transduction pathway in the cells. Critically, it remains constitutively active in approximately 30% of human cancers, having key roles in cancer development, maintenance and progression, while being responsible for poorer prognosis and drug resistance. Consequently, the inhibition of this pathway has been the subject of intense research for >25 years. The advent of better patient screening techniques has increasingly shown that upstream regulators like RAS and RAF remain persistently mutated in many cancer types. These gain-of-function mutations, such as KRAS-4B(G12V/G13D/Q61K), NRAS(Q61L/Q61R) or BRAF(V600E), lead to tremendous increase in their activities, resulting in constitutively active extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2). They were not efficiently targeted by the first-generation inhibitors such as Lonafarnib or Sorafenib, which were essentially broad spectrum inhibitors targeting pan-RAS and pan-RAF, respectively. This triggered the development of the second-generation inhibitors selective against the mutated proteins. Second generation inhibitors such as Vemurafenib (Zelboraf) and Dabrafenib (Tafinlar) targeting BRAF(V600E), Trametinib (Mekinist) targeting MEK1/2 and the first generation pan-RAF inhibitor Sorafenib (Nexavar) have already been approved for treating renal, hepatocellular, thyroid cancers and BRAF(V600E/K) harboring metastatic melanoma. Others against RAF and MEK1/2 are presently undergoing clinical trials. Their success would depend on the better understanding of the acquired resistance mechanisms to these drugs in the cancer cells and the identification of predictive biomarkers for the proper administration of suitable inhibitor(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Mandal
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - S Becker
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Strebhardt
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Uehling DE, Harris PA. Recent progress on MAP kinase pathway inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2015; 25:4047-56. [PMID: 26298497 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.07.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Revised: 07/11/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK, or ERK signaling pathway propagates signals through an intracellular signal transduction cascade. Since approximately one third of human cancers are impacted by mutations in the ERK signaling pathway, intensive efforts to develop drugs targeting members of this cascade are ongoing. While efforts to develop drugs aimed at inhibiting RAS are still at an early stage, substantial progress in discovering clinical drugs targeting RAF, MEK, and ERK have been made. This review will highlight the recent progress in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Uehling
- Department of Drug Discovery, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, 661 University Avenue, Suite 510, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A3, Canada.
| | - Philip A Harris
- Pattern Recognition Receptor DPU, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 S. Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426-0989, United States
| |
Collapse
|