1
|
Lee M, Larose H, Gräbeldinger M, Williams J, Baird AM, Brown S, Bruns J, Clark R, Cortes J, Curigliano G, Ferris A, Garrison LP, Gupta Y, Kanesvaran R, Lyman G, Pani L, Pemberton-Whiteley Z, Salmonson T, Sawicki P, Stein B, Suh DC, Velikova G, Grueger J. The evolving value assessment of cancer therapies: Results from a modified Delphi study. HEALTH POLICY OPEN 2024; 6:100116. [PMID: 38464704 PMCID: PMC10924144 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The move toward early detection and treatment of cancer presents challenges for value assessment using traditional endpoints. Current cancer management rarely considers the full economic and societal benefits of therapies. Our study used a modified Delphi process to develop principles for defining and assessing value of cancer therapies that aligns with the current trajectory of oncology research and reflects broader notions of value. 24 experts participated in consensus-building activities across 5 months (16 took part in structured interactions, including a survey, plenary sessions, interviews, and off-line discussions, while 8 participated in interviews). Discussion focused on: 1) which oncology-relevant endpoints should be used for assessing treatments for early-stage cancer and access decisions for early-stage treatments, and 2) the importance of additional value components and how these can be integrated in value assessments. The expert group reached consensus on 4 principles in relation to the first area (consider oncology-relevant endpoints other than overall survival; build evidence for endpoints that provide earlier indication of efficacy; develop evidence for the next generation of predictive measures; use managed entry agreements supported by ongoing evidence collection to address decision-maker evidence needs) and 3 principles in relation to the second (routinely use patient reported outcomes in value assessments; assess broad economic impact of new medicines; consider other value aspects of relevance to patients and society).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Italy
| | | | | | - Y.K. Gupta
- All India Institute of Medical Science Bhopal, India
| | | | - Gary Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, USA
| | - Luca Pani
- University of Miami, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Zack Pemberton-Whiteley
- Leukaemia Care, UK, Acute Leukemia Advocates Network (ALAN), Switzerland, Blood Cancer Alliance (BCA), UK
| | | | | | | | - Dong-Churl Suh
- Chung-Ang University, South Korea; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Jens Grueger
- Boston Consulting Group, Switzerland, Zurich, University of Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zavarykina TM, Lomskova PK, Pronina IV, Khokhlova SV, Stenina MB, Sukhikh GT. Circulating Tumor DNA Is a Variant of Liquid Biopsy with Predictive and Prognostic Clinical Value in Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:17073. [PMID: 38069396 PMCID: PMC10706922 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper introduces the reader to the field of liquid biopsies and cell-free nucleic acids, focusing on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in breast cancer (BC). BC is the most common type of cancer in women, and progress with regard to treatment has been made in recent years. Despite this, there remain a number of unresolved issues in the treatment of BC; in particular, early detection and diagnosis, reliable markers of response to treatment and for the prediction of recurrence and metastasis, especially for unfavorable subtypes, are needed. It is also important to identify biomarkers for the assessment of drug resistance and for disease monitoring. Our work is devoted to ctDNA, which may be such a marker. Here, we describe its main characteristics and potential applications in clinical oncology. This review considers the results of studies devoted to the analysis of the prognostic and predictive roles of various methods for the determination of ctDNA in BC patients. Currently known epigenetic changes in ctDNA with clinical significance are reviewed. The possibility of using ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic marker for monitoring BC and predicting the recurrence and metastasis of cancer is also discussed, which may become an important part of a precision approach to the treatment of BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana M. Zavarykina
- N.M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia;
- “B.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117997, Russia; (S.V.K.); (G.T.S.)
| | - Polina K. Lomskova
- N.M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119334, Russia;
| | - Irina V. Pronina
- Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow 125315, Russia;
| | - Svetlana V. Khokhlova
- “B.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117997, Russia; (S.V.K.); (G.T.S.)
| | - Marina B. Stenina
- “N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 115522, Russia;
| | - Gennady T. Sukhikh
- “B.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 117997, Russia; (S.V.K.); (G.T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|