Intrapleural administration of cisplatin and etoposide to treat malignant pleural effusions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Local biomaterial-assisted antitumour immunotherapy for effusions in the pleural and peritoneal cavities caused by malignancies

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and malignant ascites (MA), which are common but serious conditions caused by malignancies, are related to poor quality of life and high mortality. Current treatments, including therapeutic thoracentesis and indwelling pleural catheters or paracentesis and catheter drainage, are largely palliative. An effective treatment is urgently needed. MPE and MA are excellent candidates for intratumoural injections that have direct contact with tumour cells and kill tumour cells more effectively and efficiently with fewer side effects, and the fluid environment of MPE and MA can provide a homogeneous area for drug distribution. The immunosuppressive environments within the pleural and peritoneal cavities suggest the feasibility of local immunotherapy. In this review, we introduce the current management of MPE and MA, discuss the latest advances and challenges in utilizing local biomaterial-assisted antitumour therapies for the treatment of MPE and MA, and discuss further opportunities in this field.

Prolonged retention of liposomes in the pleural cavity of normal mice and high tumor distribution in mice with malignant pleural effusion, after intrapleural injection

Background: Intrapleural administration of compounds is a lung targeted, innovative therapeutic strategy for mesothelioma, which can be refined as a route for drug delivery that minimizes the potential for systemic toxicity. However, little is currently known about the retention of liposomal drugs at the site, after such topical administration. Purpose: To evaluate the retention of liposomes in lungs following intrapleural injection, and how this might be modulated by liposome properties and disease progression. Methods: DiR-incorporating liposomes with various lipid compositions and sizes were prepared, characterized (for size distribution and zeta potential) and injected intrapleurally in normal mice and mice with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). DiR retention in pleural cavity was followed by biofluorescence imaging. Results: Experimental results demonstrate that liposome size and PEG-coating, have a significant effect on residence time in the pleural cavity; negative surface charge does not. More than 20% liposomal-DiR is retained 24 d post-injection (in some cases), indicating the high potential towards localized diseases. Ex-vivo liposomal-DiR signal in tumors of MPE mice was similar to signal in liver, suggesting high tumor targeting potential of intrapleurally injected liposomes. Finally, no difference was noticed in liposomal-DiR retention between tumor-inoculated (MPE) and healthy mice, indicating the stability of liposomes in the presence of effusion (in MPE mice). Conclusion: The current study provides novel insights for using liposomes by intrapleural administration for the treatment of lung diseases.

Hapten-enhanced therapeutic effect in advanced stages of lung cancer by ultra-minimum incision personalized intratumoral chemoimmunotherapy therapy

Aim

The objective of the study reported here was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of hapten-enhanced chemoimmunotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancer by ultra-minimum incision personalized intratumoral chemoimmunotherapy (UMIPIC) and to analyze the effect of this immune booster.

Materials and methods

A total of 97 patients with advanced lung cancer were treated with UMIPIC or intratumoral chemotherapy (ITCT). UMIPIC was delivered intratumorally in combination with a proprietary therapeutic regimen composed of three components – an oxidant, a cytotoxic drug, and hapten. ITCT applied using the same procedures and regimen, only without hapten. All data from the two groups were reviewed and analyzed. A total of 55 patients were treated with UMIPIC and 42 with ITCT. Patient responses were assessed with computed tomography scan 4–6 weeks after treatment, and all of the patients were followed until their deaths.

Results

Median overall survival was 11.23 months in the UMIPIC (test) group and 5.62 months in the ITCT (control) group (P<0.01). The 6-month and 1-year survival rates of the UMIPIC and ITCT groups were 76.36% versus 45.23% (P<0.01) and 45.45% versus 23.81% (P<0.05), respectively. Two cycles of UMIPIC treatment (n=19) conferred a significant survival benefit compared with two cycles of ITCT (n=29); significant benefits in survival time were also found with UMIPIC (n=20) compared with ITCT (n=13) when both were utilized without adjuvant treatment.

Conclusion

The hapten-enhanced clinical effect of UMIPIC conferred a superior survival time in patients with advanced lung cancer compared with ITCT. The addition of the hapten in UMIPIC demonstrates a significant advantage in terms of prolonged survival time.

Malignant pleural effusions: a review

Malignant pleural effusions are a cause of significant symptoms and distress in patients with end-stage malignancies and portend a poor prognosis. Management is aimed at symptom relief, with minimally invasive interventions and minimal requirement for hospital length of stay. The management options include watchful waiting if no symptoms are present, repeat thoracentesis, medical or surgical thoracoscopic techniques to achieve pleurodesis, pleuroperitoneal shunts, placement of tunneled pleural catheters, or a combination of modalities. To determine the best modality for management, patients must be assessed individually with concern for symptoms, functional status, prognosis, and their social and financial situations.

Intracavitary therapeutics for pleural malignancies

Pleural malignancies are ideal for novel therapeutic approaches because they are invariably fatal. Intrapleural (IP) chemotherapy has only marginal benefit in pleural malignancies, but may prove efficacious with hyperthermic chemotherapy administered in combination with maximal tumor debulking. IP immunotherapies may be most effective in those patients with early-stage pleural malignancy, and may prove superior to standard pleurodesis methods in control of effusion and prolongation of survival. Immunogene therapy may be unable to successfully treat bulky tumors on its own, but success may be achieved with combination approaches that combine debulking surgery and chemotherapy with IP genetic immunotherapy.

The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are a significant source of cancer-related morbidity. Over 150,000 patients in the United States suffer from breathlessness and diminished quality of life due to MPE each year. Current management strategies are of mostly palliative value and focus on symptom control; they do not address the pathobiology of the effusion, nor do they improve survival. Further elucidation of the pathophysiological mechanisms, coupled with the development of novel treatments such as intrapleural chemotherapeutics targeting this process, has the potential to greatly improve the efficacy of our current management options. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) has been implicated as a critical cytokine in the formation of malignant pleural effusions. Elevated levels of VEGF produced by tumor cells, mesothelial cells, and infiltrating immune cells result in increased vascular permeability, cancer cell transmigration, and angiogenesis. Therefore antiangiogenic therapies such as Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF-A, may have a potential role in the management of malignant pleural effusions. Herein we review the pathogenesis and potential treatment strategies of malignant pleural effusions, with a focus on angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapeutics.

Intrapleural combination therapy with bevacizumab and cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancer‑mediated malignant pleural effusion

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been shown to be efficient in suppressing the accumulation of pleural fluid. However, whether intrapleural delivery of bevacizumab can be used to treat MPE remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined intrapleural therapy with bevacizumab and cisplatin, an antineoplastic agent, in controlling MPE. A total of 72 NSCLC study subjects with MPE were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group received intrapleural bevacizumab (300 mg) with cisplatin (30 mg) therapy and the second group received intrapleural cisplatin (30 mg) therapy alone. Pleural fluid was collected from both groups prior to and following treatment. The levels of VEGF and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the pleural fluid were determined by ELISA. In 70 evaluable study subjects, the curative efficacy in the bevacizumab group was significantly higher than that found in the cisplatin group (83.33 vs. 50.00%, respectively; p<0.05). Therapy with combined bevacizumab plus cisplatin significantly reduced VEGF levels in the pleural fluid (p<0.01). In the bevacizumab group, the levels of VEGF in the pleural fluid were significantly lower compared to those of the cisplatin group after treatment, which showed greater efficacy (p<0.01). In addition, combination therapy showed greater efficacy in the patients with high levels of VEGF expression (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in grade III/IV adverse events between the two groups. All procedures were well tolerated by the patients. Combined intrapleural therapy with bevacizumab and cisplatin was effective and safe in managing NSCLC-mediated MPE. We propose that VEGF expression levels in MPE could serve as a prognostic marker for bevacizumab therapy.

Intrapleural chemo- and hyperthermotherapies for malignant pleural effusion: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The current prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined intrapleural cisplatin and OK-432 (picibanil) plus hyperthermotherapy in patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE).

METHODS

A total of 358 patients with MPE due to end-stage malignancies were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups, A and B: the intrapleural combination of cisplatin and OK-432 with hyperthermotherapy (n = 179) or without hyperthermotherapy (n = 179), respectively. Mild toxicities such as nausea, vomiting or anorexia, bone marrow depression, and pyrexia were similar in both groups.

RESULT

Patients in Group A (with hyperthermotherapy) showed a significantly higher overall response (93.4%) compared to those in Group B (79.8%, χ(2) = 43.11, p < .05). The median survival time for patients in Group A and Group B were 8.9 and 6.2 months, respectively (p > .05). After treatment, the quality of life scores were significantly increased in both groups as compared to prior treatment (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study suggests that combined intrapleural cisplatin and OK-432 followed by hyperthermotherapy are more effective in the control of MPE and improve patients' quality of life.

Intrapleural paclitaxel for malignant pleural effusion from ovarian and breast cancer: a phase II study with pharmacokinetic analysis

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a frequent complication in many types of tumors diminishing the patient's ability to perform activities. Despite various studies on talc treatment, some doubts about its safety and effectiveness remain, so the search for a more ideal intrapleural agent continues. We analyzed the effectiveness and safety of intrapleural paclitaxel in ovarian and breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary objectives included time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and safety of intrapleural paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetics of the drug was also analyzed. After drainage of pleural effusion and lung re-expansion, paclitaxel 120 mg/m(2) diluted in normal saline was infused through a preinserted catheter which was immediately closed and reopened 24 h later. Blood and pleural fluid samples were collected 1, 4 and 24 h after the end of paclitaxel instillation. When MPE was less than 200 ml/24 h the catheter was removed. Chest radiographs were performed at the beginning of intrapleural paclitaxel, at 1 and 2 months later or with clinical deterioration.

RESULTS

We enrolled 18 patients with recurrent MPE: 11 with ovarian cancer and 7 with breast cancer. ORR was 77.8% at 1 month and 88.8%. at 2 months. Median TTP was 5.5 months (CI 95% 0.9-10.1) and median OS was 8.9 months (CI 95% 0.1-17.6). Patients achieving a complete response obtained a statistically significant longer survival than did patients with partial response or progressive disease. Chest pain, fever, and dyspnea were the most frequent side effects. Intrapleural paclitaxel concentrations were very high (mean ± SD = 478 ± 187 mg/l) and declined slowly (mean 24 h reduction ~30%). Detectable but low taxol plasma levels were found in most patients (mean ± SD = 0.045 ± 0.073 mg/l).

CONCLUSION

Intrapleural paclitaxel is a safe and effective palliative treatment for MPE from breast and ovarian cancers and may be integrated with systemic chemotherapy.

Phase I trial of intrapleural docetaxel administered through an implantable catheter in subjects with a malignant pleural effusion

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in patients with advanced malignancy. This dose escalation phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of intrapleural docetaxel administered through an implantable catheter in subjects with MPE.

METHODS

Subjects with MPE (n = 15) with median age of 64.6 years and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 at baseline were enrolled into four single dose levels of docetaxel administered intrapleurally after drainage of the pleural effusion and insertion of an intrapleural catheter. The study determined the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical response, and toxicity profile of intrapleural docetaxel.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the therapy well and there were no significant toxicities. The majority of patients had a complete radiographic response. All patients receiving dose 100 mg/m2 or higher had a complete radiographic response. One dose-limiting toxicity was encountered in the dose 50 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrated peak plasma concentration of docetaxel between 30 minutes and 6 hours after infusion. Pleural exposure to docetaxel was 1000 times higher than systemic exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose intrapleural administration of doxetaxel is well tolerated in patients with MPE with minimal toxicity. The excellent clinical responses in this study after treatment with intrapleural doxetaxel suggest that further investigation is warranted.

Randomized phase II trial of three intrapleural therapy regimens for the management of malignant pleural effusion in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9515

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of three intrapleural therapy regimens consisting of bleomycin (BLM), OK-432 (a pulverized product of heat-killed Streptococcus pyogenes) or cisplatin plus etoposide (PE) for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer. Eligible patients were randomized to the BLM arm: BLM 1mg/kg (maximum 60mg/body), the OK-432 arm: OK-432 0.2 Klinische Einheit units (KE)/kg (maximum 10KE/body), or the PE arm: cisplatin (80mg/m(2)) and etoposide (80mg/m(2)). Pleural response was evaluated every 4 weeks according to the study-specific criteria. All responders received systemic chemotherapy consisting of PE every 3-4 weeks for two or more courses. Pleural progression-free survival (PPFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of pleural progression or death due to any cause. The primary endpoint was the 4-week PPFS rate. Of 105 patients enrolled, 102 were assessed for response. The 4-week PPFS rate for the BLM arm was 68.6%, 75.8% for the OK-432 arm, and 70.6% for PE arm. Median survival time (MST) for the BLM arm was 32.1 weeks, 48.1 weeks for the OK-432 arm, and 45.7 weeks for the PE arm. However, the outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Toxicity was tolerable in all arms except for one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia induced by BLM. We will select intrapleural treatment using OK-432 in the management of MPE in NSCLC for further investigation because it had the highest 4-week PPFS rate.

Antitumor efficacy and local distribution of doxorubicin via intratumoral delivery from polymer millirods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor efficacy and local drug distribution from doxorubicin-containing poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) implants for intratumoral treatment of liver cancer in a rabbit model. Cylindrical polymer millirods (length 8 mm, diameter 1.5 mm) were produced using 65% PLGA, 21.5% NaCl, and 13.5% doxorubicin. These implants were placed in the center of VX2 liver tumors (n = 16, 8 mm in diameter) in rabbits. Tumors were removed 4 and 8 days after millirod implantation, and antitumor efficacy was assessed using tumor size measurements, tumor histology, and fluorescent measurement of drug distribution. The treated tumors were smaller than the untreated controls on both day 4 (0.17 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.31 +/- 0.08 cm(2), p = 0.048) and day 8 (0.14 +/- 0.04 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.8 cm(2), p = 0.025). Drug distribution profiles demonstrated high doxorubicin concentrations (>1000 microg/g) at the tumor core at both time points and drug penetration distances of 2.8 and 1.3 mm on day 4 and 8, respectively. Histological examination confirmed necrosis throughout the tumor tissue. Biodegradable polymer millirods successfully treated the primary tumor mass by providing high doxorubicin concentrations to the tumor tissue over an eight day period.

Intrapleural hypotonic cisplatin treatment for malignant pleural effusion in 80 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial

To assess the effect and toxicity of hypotonic cisplatin treatment (HPT) consisting of the intrapleural administration of cisplatin in distilled water for malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-small-cell lung cancer patients with cytologically proven and previously untreated malignant pleural effusion were enrolled into this study. Firstly, the lung was fully re-expanded by a tube thoracostomy, and then 25 mg cisplatin in 500 ml of distilled water was instilled through a chest tube and then the tube was clamped. After 1 h, the tube was declamped and allowed to drain. The chest tube was removed when the pleural effusion volume decreased to 200 ml or less per day. A complete response (CR) was considered to occur when the pleural effusion disappeared. A partial response (PR) was determined to occur when the volume of pleural effusion remained under ¼ of hemithorax. The response at 4 weeks was evaluated by an extramural review. Out of 84 patients enrolled from February 1998 to August 2002, 80 patients were eligible and analysed in the present study. The toxicity of HPT was acceptable. Neither a haematological toxicity of any grade nor grade 4 nonhaematological toxicity was observed. Grade 3 nonhaematological toxicities were observed, including nausea (4%), vomiting (3%), pyothorax (1%) and dyspnoea (1%). The median time of drainage from HTP was 4 days. Twenty-seven (34%) and 39 (49%) patients achieved CR and PR, respectively, for an overall response rate of 83% (95% confidence interval, 74–91%). The median duration of the response was 206 days. The median survival time of all patients was 239 days. Hypotonic cisplatin treatment for malignant pleural effusion of NSCLC is therefore considered to be feasible and effective. A phase III study of HPT is thus warranted.

Fatal pneumonitis associated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for mesothelioma

PURPOSE

To describe the initial experience at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as adjuvant therapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical records of patients treated with IMRT after EPP and adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. IMRT was given to a dose of 54 Gy to the clinical target volume in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Treatment was delivered with a dynamic multileaf collimator using a sliding window technique. Eleven of 13 patients received heated intraoperative cisplatin chemotherapy (225 mg/m(2)). Two patients received neoadjuvant intravenous cisplatin/pemetrexed, and 10 patients received adjuvant cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy after EPP but before radiation therapy. All patients received at least 2 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. The contralateral lung was limited to a V20 (volume of lung receiving 20 Gy or more) of 20% and a mean lung dose (MLD) of 15 Gy. All patients underwent fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for staging, and any FDG-avid areas in the hemithorax were given a simultaneous boost of radiotherapy to 60 Gy. Statistical comparisons were done using two-sided t test.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were treated with IMRT from December 2004 to September 2005. Six patients developed fatal pneumonitis after treatment. The median time from completion of IMRT to the onset of radiation pneumonitis was 30 days (range 5-57 days). Thirty percent of patients (4 of 13) developed acute Grade 3 nausea and vomiting. One patient developed acute Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The median V20, MLD, and V5 (volume of lung receiving 5 Gy or more) for the patients who developed pneumonitis was 17.6% (range, 15.3-22.3%), 15.2 Gy (range, 13.3-17 Gy), and 98.6% (range, 81-100%), respectively, as compared with 10.9% (range, 5.5-24.7%) (p = 0.08), 12.9 Gy (range, 8.7-16.9 Gy) (p = 0.07), and 90% (range, 66-98.3%) (p = 0.20), respectively, for the patients who did not develop pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated RT treatment for mesothelioma after EPP and adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a high rate of fatal pneumonitis when standard dose parameters were used. We therefore recommend caution in the utilization of this technique. Our data suggest that with IMRT, metrics such as V5 and MLD should be considered in addition to V20 to determine tolerance levels in future patients.

Intrapleural cisplatin and OK432 therapy for malignant pleural effusion caused by non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of combined intrapleural therapy with cisplatin, an antineoplastic agent, and OK432, a sclerosing agent, in controlling malignant pleural effusions, when compared with monotherapy with either agent.

METHODS

A total of 49 non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomly assigned to one of three groups: intrapleural cisplatin therapy (n = 17), intrapleural OK432 therapy (n = 17), or both (n = 15). They were compared in terms of success rate, duration of indwelling chest tube and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Rates of pleural effusion recurrence within 180 days following cisplatin, OK432, or combination therapy were 64.7%, 52.9% and 13.3%, respectively, being significantly lower in the combination therapy group (P = 0.01). The mean duration of chest tube drainage was 8.4 days, 5.5 days and 12.9 days, respectively, being significantly longer in the combination therapy group (P < 0.001). All procedures were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although chest tube drainage took longer because of the time required for multiple administration of the agents, intrapleural combination therapy with cisplatin and OK432 was more effective in controlling malignant pleural effusions due to non-small cell lung cancer than monotherapy with either agent.

Combined intrapleural and intravenous chemotherapy, and pulmonary irradiation, for treatment of patients with lung cancer presenting with malignant pleural effusion. A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) are difficult to manage clinically and have a short life expectancy. In this pilot study, we designed a protocol of combined intrapleural (i.p.) and intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy and pulmonary irradiation to enhance local as well as systemic control of the disease.

METHODS

From April 1998 to April 2000, 27 patients with NSCLC and symptomatic MPE were eligible for the study. Patients received pre-radiation chemotherapy (cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.p. on day 1; gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15, q4week x 3) after surgical implantation of i.p. and i.v. port-A, followed by radiotherapy (7,020 cGy/39fr), and, finally, post-radiation chemotherapy (docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) q3week x 3-6 i.v.).

RESULTS

Grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting and impaired renal function were more common from pre-radiation than post-radiation chemotherapy; however, grade 3/4 toxicities from pre-radiation chemotherapy were minimal. Conversely, grade 3/4 leukopenia and grade 1/2 alopecia, diarrhea, elevation of SGOT/SGPT, and sensory impairment were more common following post-radiation chemotherapy. Only two patients experienced recurrence of pleural effusion. The overall response rate was 55% with 7% complete remission, 48% partial remission, 22% stable disease, and 22% progressive disease. The median failure-free and overall survival was 8 and 16 months, respectively. The one-year survival rate was 63% (95% confidence interval, 45-80%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the combination of i.p. and i.v. chemotherapy and pulmonary irradiation is feasible and should be tested in a larger clinical trial to determine whether survival can be improved for this cohort of patients.

Replication-competent herpes virus NV1020 as direct treatment of pleural cancer in a rat model

OBJECTIVE

Innovative treatments are needed for metastatic disease involving the pleura. NV1020 is a novel, multimutated, replication-restricted herpes simplex virus under investigation for its ability to selectively kill tumors by means of direct cell lysis. This study examines NV1020 in a rat model of pleura-based lung cancer.

METHODS

Cytotoxicity and viral proliferation were evaluated in vitro by exposure of the human non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549 to virus. NV1020 was also tested in an in vivo pleura-based cancer model established by injecting 1 x 10(7) A549 cells into the thoracic cavity of nude rats. Intrapleural treatments (1 x 10(7) viral particles) were given 3 hours or 3 days after tumor injection to model treatment of microscopic or macroscopic disease (n = 8-9/group). Tumor burden was assessed at 5 weeks. NV1020 infection and dissemination within the thoracic cavity was determined by means of immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In vitro, at multiplicities of infection (viral particles per tumor cell) of 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0, cell killing of A549 by NV1020 was 66%, 90%, and 97%, respectively, at 7 days after infection. Viral burst occurred by day 2. Intrapleural treatment was effective for both the microscopic (P <.001) and macroscopic (P <.05) in vivo tumor models. Virus was detectable by means of immunohistochemistry in tumors but not in adjacent normal intrathoracic tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

NV1020 is not only highly cytotoxic to the human lung cancer line A549 in vitro but can be delivered in a clinically relevant fashion to safely and effectively treat pleura-based tumor in vivo in a rat model.

Intratumoral cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy: opportunities for nonsystemic preoperative drug delivery

The recent literature documents the growing interest in local intratumoral chemotherapy as well as systemic preoperative chemotherapy with evidence for improved outcomes using these therapeutic modalities. Nevertheless, with few exceptions, the conventional wisdom and standard of care for clinical and surgical oncology remains surgery followed by radiation and/or systemic chemotherapy, as deemed appropriate based on clinical findings. This, in spite of the fact that the toxicity of conventional systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy affords limited effectiveness and frequently compromises the quality of life for patients. Indeed, with systemic chemotherapy, the oncologist (and the patient) often walks a fine line between attempting tumour remission with prolonged survival and damaging the patient's vital functions to the point of death. In this context, it has probably been obvious for more than 100 years, due in part to the pioneering work of Ehrlich (1878), that targeted or localized drug delivery should be a major goal of chemotherapy. However, there is still only limited clinical use of nonsystemic intratumoral chemotherapy for even those high mortality cancers which are characterized by well defined primary lesions i.e. breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, and skin. There has been a proliferation of intratumoral chemotherapy and immunotherapy research during the past two to three years. It is therefore the objective of this review to focus much more attention upon intratumoral therapeutic concepts which could limit adverse systemic events and which might combine clinically feasible methods for localized preoperative chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy with surgery. Since our review of intratumoral chemoimmunotherapy almost 20 years ago (McLaughlin & Goldberg 1983), there have been few comprehensive reviews of this field; only one of broad scope (Brincker 1993), three devoted specifically to gliomas (Tomita 1991; Walter et al. 1995; Haroun & Brem 2000), one on hepatomas (Venook 2000), one concerning veterinary applications (Theon 1998), and one older review of dermatological applications (Goette 1981). However, none have shed light on practical opportunities for combining intratumoral therapy with subsequent surgical resection. Given the state-of-the-art in clinical and surgical oncology, and the advances that have been made in intratumoral drug delivery, minimally invasive tumour access i.e. fine needle biopsy, new drugs and drug delivery systems, and preoperative chemotherapy, it is timely to present a review of studies which may suggest future opportunities for safer, more effective, and clinically practical non-systemic therapy.

Combination chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural effusions from non-small cell lung cancer : cisplatin, ifosfamide, and irinotecan with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support

OBJECTIVES

Malignant pleural effusions develop frequently in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the prognosis for these patients is very poor. We evaluated the role of systemic chemotherapy for patients with malignant pleural effusions from NSCLC.

METHODS

We analyzed 34 patients who were found to have malignant pleural effusions in the course of diagnosis of 118 patients enrolled in three consecutive clinical trials on advanced NSCLC assessing combination chemotherapy of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and irinotecan with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The objective response in the malignant pleural effusion was evaluated by CT scans every course with the response criteria of the Japan Lung Cancer Society.

RESULTS

All patients had adenocarcinoma. The pleural effusion showed a complete response in 13 patients, a partial response in 7 patients, and no response in 14 patients. In the assessment of the efficacy of the treatment for the measurable primary or metastatic lesions, there was a partial response in 25 patients, no change in 8 patients, and progressive disease in 1 patient. The response rate in pleural effusions was 58.8%, and overall response in mensurable lesions was 73.5%. The median time to response and duration of response for pleural effusions were 54 days and 151 days, respectively. The median survival time and 1-year survival rates were 362 days and 48.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the response rate and survival data in this retrospective study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural effusions from NSCLC.