25 mg or 50 mg of oral methotrexate followed by vaginal misoprostol 7 days after for early abortion: a randomized trial

Randomized comparison of second trimester pregnancy termination utilizing saline moistened or dry misoprostol

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized prospective study was to compare efficacy and side effects of saline moistened misoprostol with dry misoprostol, administered 800 mug intravaginally every 6 h up to a maximum of 3 doses in 24 h for second trimester pregnancy termination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 81 women seeking termination of second trimester pregnancy (55 fetal death, 17 fetal structural anomaly, 5 chromosomal abnormality, 4 other reasons) were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: (1) intravaginal non-moistened (dry) misoprostol in group A (n = 40) or (2) misoprostol moistened with 3 ml of saline in group B (n = 41).

RESULTS

All of the patients in either group aborted within 48 h (100% success rate). Delivery was achieved in a median (interquartile range) of 13 (40) h with the group A protocol and 12 (36) h with the group B protocol (P = 0.652). Delivery with first dose, delivery within 12 h and delivery within 24 h were similar (P > 0.05) in group B (34.1, 87.5 and 60%, respectively) and group A (25, 82.9, 46.3, respectively). Both treatment regimens were tolerable and with similar side effects.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol moistened with saline was not more effective than dry misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination.

Alternatives to mifepristone for early medical abortion

OBJECTIVE

To review published reports of first-trimester medical abortion regimens that do not include mifepristone.

METHODS

Reports listed in Pubmed and Medline on prospective and controlled trials of the efficacy of misoprostol, alone or associated with methotrexate, for first-trimester abortion were analyzed if they included more than 100 participants and were published since 1990.

RESULTS

The efficacy of regimens using misoprostol alone ranged from 84% to 96%, and when misoprostol was used with methotrexate the efficacy ranged from 70% to 97%. Efficacy rates were influenced by follow-up interval. Treatment for infection, bleeding, and incomplete abortion were infrequent with both methods (0.3%-5%).

CONCLUSION

Alone or in combination with methotrexate, misoprostol is an efficacious alternative to mifepristone for the medical termination of pregnancy.

Use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology

Misoprostol is prostaglandin E1 analogous and marketed for prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease. However, it has been used widely in obstetrics and gynecology practice because of its effectiveness, low cost, stability in light and hot climate conditions, and ease of administration compared with its licensed counterparts--dinoprostone and gemeprost. A large number of studies have shown that misoprostol is effective in first and second trimester abortion, late pregnancy labor induction, and third stage of labor management (misoprostol has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for these indications). Because misoprostol is not registered for such use, it has not undergone the extensive testing for appropriate dosage and safety required for registration. Serious complications such as teratogenesis after failed abortions and uterine rupture during second trimester abortions and third trimester labor induction have been reported as the result of increasingly wide use of misoprostol in obstetric and gynecology practice. There is an urgent need to evaluate all the available data and organize a large randomized trial to determine the safety of its use in obstetric and gynecology practice.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will be able to identify the various uses of misoprostol, to describe the potential complications of misoprostol use and its teratogenic effects, to compare the various routes of administration, and to define the appropriate dose.

Management of side effects and complications in medical abortion

Side effects are an expected part of medical abortion; some, such as pain and bleeding, result from the abortion process itself and are generally managed with orally administered analgesics and counseling. True medication side effects most commonly include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and warmth or chills. Complications of medical abortion usually represent an extreme or severe side effect. Large series have reported transfusion rates of <1%. Because of the infrequency of uterine instrumentation, postabortal endometritis appears to be rare with medical abortion. As with early surgical abortion, the clinician must remain aware of the possibility for ectopic pregnancy. Overall approximately 2% to 10% of patients will require surgical intervention for control of bleeding, resolution of incomplete expulsion, or termination of a continuing pregnancy. Understanding the types of side effects and complications that can occur will enable the clinician to counsel patients properly as well as to understand when medical intervention is necessary during the medical abortion process.

Alternatives to mifepristone regimens for medical abortion

Alternatives to regimens with mifepristone and a prostaglandin analog for medical abortion emerged because of the need for accessible, effective, and safe options in areas of the world where mifepristone was unavailable. Studies of oral or intramuscular methotrexate combined with misoprostol have demonstrated complete abortion rates in the same range as mifepristone regimens at </=49 days' gestation. The overall abortion process with methotrexate and misoprostol takes longer, however, with 20% to 30% of women requiring from 1 to 5 weeks for the abortion to occur. Multiple investigators have confirmed the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of various methotrexate and misoprostol regimens. Recent reports suggest that misoprostol alone may have similar efficacy, but with significantly higher rates of side effects. Randomized trials are needed to directly compare the clinical efficacies and acceptabilities of available medical abortion regimens.

Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the acceptability of suction curettage abortion with that of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in American women.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a prospective, serially enrolled, cohort analysis. The study population consisted of 152 subjects receiving mifepristone and misoprostol and 174 subjects undergoing suction curettage abortion aged > or =18 years with intrauterine pregnancies of up to 63 days' estimated gestation. Questionnaires regarding expectations and experiences were administered before the abortion and at the 2-week follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Subjects undergoing medical abortions reported significantly greater satisfaction than those undergoing surgical abortions (mean rank, 121 vs 149; P <.01) but were no more likely to recommend the method they had just experienced to a friend (97% vs 93.3%). If a future abortion was required, however, 41.7% of subjects undergoing surgical abortions indicated they would opt for a medical abortion, whereas only 8.6% of subjects receiving medical abortions would choose a surgical abortion (P <.001). Failure of the abortion decreased satisfaction in the medical group and increased the likelihood of choosing a surgical abortion for a subsequent procedure (P <.001). Surgical subjects who experienced more anxiety than expected during the abortion were more likely to choose a medical procedure for a subsequent abortion (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

Women receiving mifepristone and misoprostol were more satisfied with their method and more likely to choose the same method again than were subjects undergoing surgical abortion. Failure of a medical abortion and increased anxiety during surgical abortion were associated with preference for the alternative technique in a future procedure.