A comparative study of intraperitoneal carboplatin versus intravenous carboplatin with intravenous cyclophosphamide in both arms as initial chemotherapy for stage III ovarian cancer

Long-Term Treatment Results for Ovarian Tumors with Malignant Effusion in Seven Dogs

Surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy are highly efficacious for treating advanced ovarian cancers in humans, but their efficacy is less known in dogs. We evaluated the long-term treatment outcomes of seven dogs with malignant ovarian tumors with malignant abdominal effusion. Ovariohysterectomies (OVHs) were performed on all dogs; four had ovarian adenocarcinoma (AC) with gross dissemination in the peritoneum (two with pleural effusion), and three had a granulosa cell tumor (GCT) with no gross dissemination in the peritoneal cavity, although one showed pleural effusion. Effusion resolved after the OVH in all dogs. Six dogs (three ACs, three GCTs) received postoperative IV carboplatin therapy. Two dogs with GCT had no postoperative recurrence or metastasis, and one dog with GCT had recurrence 1811 days postoperatively. All dogs with AC developed recurrent effusion 171-584 days postoperatively, which resolved after intracavitary administration of cisplatin or carboplatin, with a subsequent disease-free interval of 155-368 days. Overall survival was longer for dogs with GCTs (822-1840 days) than for those with ACs (617-841 days). These results suggest that dogs with ovarian tumors with malignant effusion can survive relatively long after platinum-based chemotherapy in addition to OVH, with a more favorable prognosis for GCT than AC.

Evaluation of non-completion of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

To identify factors associated with non-completion of intraperitoneal with intravenous chemotherapy [IP/IV] in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

This was an Institutional Review Board approved, retrospective cohort study in women with stage III EOC following optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (<1 cm) followed by IP/IV chemotherapy from 2000–2016. Demographic, surgical, and oncologic variables were collected. Pearson χ² test and 2 sample t-test evaluated for variables associated with IP/IV chemotherapy completion. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 96 women, 71.9% (n=69) completed 6 cycles of IP/IV chemotherapy. The majority had high grade serous histology (n=82; 85.4%) and stage IIIC disease (n=83; 86.5%). Common reasons for IP/IV chemotherapy discontinuation were grade 3–4 gastrointestinal (n=10; 37.0%), neurologic (n=6; 22.2%), hematologic (n=3; 11.1%), renal toxicities (n=3; 11.1%) and port infections (n=3; 11.1%). Incidence of IP port complications was 20.8% (n=20). Port complications (48.0% vs. 11.6%; p<0.001) and hospitalization during chemotherapy (29.6% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001) were more frequent in patients who discontinued IP/IV chemotherapy. Patients who completed IP/IV chemotherapy had higher rates of home discharge following CRS (92.2% vs. 72.0%; p<0.01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (0 vs. 1.0; p=0.04). There was no significant difference in PFS (p=0.51) nor OS (p=0.38) between the cohorts.

Conclusion

In this series, the rate of IP/IV chemotherapy completion is high. Non-home discharge and higher ECOG status following CRS are associated with IP/IV chemotherapy non-completion and should be considered in treatment planning.

Treatment Tolerance and Side Effects of Intraperitoneal Carboplatin and Dose-Dense Intravenous Paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of clinically significant side effects associated with adjuvant intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and intravenous (IV) dose-dense paclitaxel chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with stage II to IV EOC who underwent upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant IP carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks with IV paclitaxel weekly at 80 mg/m² were included. Side effects and the resulting changes in treatment are presented using univariate analysis and compared to major phase III RCTs.

RESULTS

Between March 2013 and October 2015, 49 patients comprising 289 cycles of chemotherapy were included in the analysis; 43 patients (87.8%) completed six cycles of chemotherapy and 38 (77.6%) completed six cycles of IP carboplatin. Treatment was discontinued early due to neuropathy (5/49) and disease progression (1/49). Carboplatin IV was substituted due to port access (3/49) and poor postoperative performance status (3/49). Neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (32.7%). Fourteen patients (28.6%) required red blood cell transfusion. Thrombocytopenia affected nine patients (18.4%). Infection delaying treatment occurred in five patients (10.4%). Gastrointestinal and renal toxicity occurred in four (8.1%) and one patient (2.0%), respectively. Four patients experienced a taxane reaction. No patients experienced ototoxicity, fistula formation, chemotherapy leakage, or severe abdominal pain.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin IP and weekly IV paclitaxel was well-tolerated with a side-effect profile similar to or better than previously published traditional treatment regimens.

Role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer in the platinum-taxane-based era: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Intravenous (IV) chemotherapy has been compared with intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in randomized clinical trials in advanced ovarian cancer (OC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of IV and IP and identify differences in outcomes.

METHODS

The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement was applied. Random-effects models were used. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and the proportion of patients with grade ≥2 acute toxicity.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials representing 2461 patients were identified. The hazard ratio (HR) of PFS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.98; p = 0.01, I² = 24%) in favor of IP chemotherapy. IP chemotherapy was also associated with significant OS improvement compared with IV chemotherapy, with HR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.92; p = 0.003, I² = 0%). Globally, grade ≥2 toxicities were reduced with IV chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows the superiority of IP chemotherapy over IV infusion in terms of clinical outcomes but toxicity rates. Its precise role in the management of advanced OC remains to be determined.

Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in modern ovarian cancer trials: a meta-analysis

Background

Progression-free survival (PFS) has been adopted as the primary endpoint in many randomized controlled trials, and can be determined much earlier than overall survival (OS). We investigated whether PFS is a good surrogate endpoint for OS in trials of first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and whether this relationship has changed with the introduction of new treatment types.

Methods

In a meta-analysis, we identified summary data [hazard ratio (HR) and median time] from published randomized controlled trials. Linear regression was used to assess the association between treatment effects on PFS and OS overall, and for subgroups defined by treatment type, postprogression survival (PPS) and established prognostic factors.

Results

Correlation between HRs for PFS and OS, in 26 trials with 30 treatment comparisons comprising 24,870 patients, was modest (r² = 0.52, weighted by trial sample size). The correlation diminished with recency: preplatinum/paclitaxel era, r²= 0.66; platinum/paclitaxel, r²= 0.44; triplet combinations, r²= 0.22; biologicals, r²= 0.30. The median PPS increased over time for the experimental (P_trend = 0.03) and control arms (P_trend = 0.003). The difference in median PPS between treatment arms strongly correlated with the difference in median OS (r² = 0.83). In trials where the control therapy had median PPS of less than 18 months, correlation between PFS and OS was stronger (r² = 0.64) than where the median PPS was longer (r² = 0.48).

Conclusions

In EOC, correlation in the relative treatment effect between PFS and OS in first-line platinum-based chemotherapy randomized controlled trials is moderate and has weakened with increasing availability of effective salvage therapies.

Clinical studies in CRS and HIPEC: Trials, tribulations, and future directions-A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The field of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has suffered from a lack of clinical trials to validate its expanding use.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate published and ongoing clinical trials seeking to better define role of CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies.

METHODS

Systematic review by PubMed search was performed using terms "Clinical trial," "intraperitoneal chemotherapy," and "HIPEC." ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT registries were searched for active clinical trials. Eligibility included CRS/HIPEC trials investigating adult patient populations from published clinical reports and/or trials currently accruing or at completion.

RESULTS

Thirteen published trials and 57 active clinical trials were included for review.

CONCLUSIONS

Published and ongoing U.S. and international clinical trials for CRS and HIPEC are defining important parameters that include improving patient selection, strategic sequences of treatment, cytoreductive strategies, chemotherapeutics, optimal hyperthermic temperature and timing, and toxicity profiles. Main barriers or limitations to trial development remain patient enrollment, trial design, and oncologic community collaboration. Overall progress is positive with increasing number of clinical trials throughout the world. Collaboration between surgeons and the wider oncologic community will be crucial to validate this important treatment strategy.

Distinct implications of different BRCA mutations: efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, PARP inhibition and clinical outcome in ovarian cancer

Approximately a fifth of ovarian carcinoma (OC) is associated with inherited germline mutations, most commonly in the DNA repair genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA). BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated OCs have historically been described as a single subgroup of OC that displays a distinct set of characteristics termed the "BRCAness" phenotype. The hallmarks of this phenotype are superior clinical outcome and hypersensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, growing evidence suggests that BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated OCs display distinct characteristics, most notably in long-term patient survival. Furthermore, recent data indicate that the site of BRCA1 mutation is important with regard to platinum and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Here, we summarize the body of research describing the BRCAness phenotype and highlight the differential implications of different BRCA mutations with regard to clinicopathologic features, therapy sensitivity and clinical outcome in OC.

Update on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Surgical treatment and chemotherapy administration in women with epithelial ovarian cancer is more controversial today than at any point in the last 3 decades. The use of chemotherapy administered intraperitoneally has been particularly contentious. Three large randomized phase III studies, multiple meta-analyses, and now real-world data have demonstrated substantial outcome benefit for the use of chemotherapy administered intraperitoneally versus intravenously for first-line postoperative treatment of optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, for each of these randomized studies, there was scope to either criticize the design or otherwise refute adoption of this route of administration. As a result, the uptake has been variable in North America, although in Europe it has been practically nonexistent. Reasons for this include unquestionable additional toxicity, more inconvenience, and extra cost. However, 10-year follow up of these studies demonstrates unprecedented survival in the intraperitoneal arm (median survival 110 months in patients with completely debulked stage III), raising the possibility that by combining maximal debulking surgery with postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy it may be possible to bring about a step change in the outcomes for these patients. In this review, we discuss the rationale for administering chemotherapy intraperitoneally, the merits of the main randomized clinical trials, the evidence regarding optimal regimes, issues of toxicity, port considerations, and reasons for lack of universal adoption. We also explore potential clinical and biologic factors that may be useful for patient selection in the future.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the initial management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer tends to be chemosensitive and confine itself to the surface of the peritoneal cavity for much of its natural history. These features have made it an obvious target for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is usually given as an intravenous (IV) infusion repeatedly over five to eight cycles. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is given by infusion of the chemotherapeutic agent directly into the peritoneal cavity. There are biological reasons why this might increase the anticancer effect and reduce some systemic adverse effects in comparison to IV therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if adding a component of the chemotherapy regime into the peritoneal cavity affects overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life (QOL) and toxicity in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Gynaecological Cancer Review Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 2, 2011, MEDLINE (1951 to May 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to May 2011). We updated these searches in February 2007, August 2010, May 2011 and September 2015. In addition, we handsearched and cascade searched the major gynaecological oncology journals up to May 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The analysis was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing women with a new diagnosis of primary epithelial ovarian cancer, of any FIGO stage, following primary cytoreductive surgery. Standard IV chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy that included a component of IP administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data on overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse events and QOL and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes using RevMan software.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised trials studied 2119 women receiving primary treatment for ovarian cancer. We considered six trials to be of high quality. Women were less likely to die if they received an IP component to chemotherapy (eight studies, 2026 women; HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.90). Intraperitoneal component chemotherapy prolonged the disease-free interval (five studies, 1311 women; HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.86). There was greater serious toxicity with regard to gastrointestinal effects, pain, fever and infection but less ototoxicity with the IP than the IV route.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy increases overall survival and progression-free survival from advanced ovarian cancer. The results of this meta-analysis provide the most reliable estimates of the relative survival benefits of IP over IV therapy and should be used as part of the decision making process. However, the potential for catheter related complications and toxicity needs to be considered when deciding on the most appropriate treatment for each individual woman. The optimal dose, timing and mechanism of administration cannot be addressed from this meta-analysis. This needs to be addressed in the next phase of clinical trials.

Feasibility of a modified outpatient regimen of intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer patients: a GEICO study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and reasons for early discontinuation of a modified outpatient intraperitoneal/intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Between February 2006 and November 2008, 51 consecutive patients from Institutions of the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Group (GEICO) were treated with a modified outpatient IP chemotherapy regimen. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m over 3 hours on day 1, followed by IP cisplatin 100 mg/m (or 75 mg/m according to the principal investigator's criteria) on day 2. On day 8, patients received IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m. To homogenize the IP administration and supportive measures, a GEICO guideline for IP chemotherapy was established. Patients were treated with the intention to receive 6 courses of chemotherapy every 21 days.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 49 years (range, 36-75 years), and most of them had papillary serous ovarian cancer (78%), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC (76%). Thirty-nine patients completed 4 or more IP cycles, and 28 (61%) completed all 6 IP cycles. Twenty-two patients discontinued the IP/IV treatment, mainly because of chemotherapy toxicity (10 patients) and catheter-related complications (5 patients). The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (14 patients; 30%) and gastrointestinal events (12 patients; 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

The GEICO outpatient modified regimen resulted in a lesser toxicity and a greater rate of treatment completion than previously reported. The accurate selection of patients and the administration following well-defined guidelines can increase the feasibility of IP chemotherapy administration.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the initial management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer tends to be chemosensitive and confine itself to the surface of the peritoneal cavity for much of its natural history. These features have made it an obvious target for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is usually given as an intravenous (IV) infusion repeatedly over five to eight cycles. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is given by infusion of the chemotherapeutic agent directly into the peritoneal cavity. There are biological reasons why this might increase the anticancer effect and reduce some systemic adverse effects in comparison to IV therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if adding a component of the chemotherapy regime into the peritoneal cavity affects overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life (QOL) and toxicity in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Gynaecological Cancer Review Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 2, 2011, MEDLINE (1951 to May 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to May 2011). We updated these searches in February 2007, August 2010 and May 2011. In addition, we handsearched and cascade searched the major gynaecological oncology journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The analysis was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing women with a new diagnosis of primary epithelial ovarian cancer, of any FIGO stage, following primary cytoreductive surgery. Standard IV chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy that included a component of IP administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data on overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse events and QOL and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes using RevMan software.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised trials studied 2119 women receiving primary treatment for ovarian cancer. We considered six trials to be of high quality. Women were less likely to die if they received an IP component to chemotherapy (eight studies, 2026 women; HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.90). Intraperitoneal component chemotherapy prolonged the disease-free interval (five studies, 1311 women; HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.86). There was greater serious toxicity with regard to gastrointestinal effects, pain, fever and infection but less ototoxicity with the IP than the IV route.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy increases overall survival and progression-free survival from advanced ovarian cancer. The results of this meta-analysis provide the most reliable estimates of the relative survival benefits of IP over IV therapy and should be used as part of the decision making process. However, the potential for catheter related complications and toxicity needs to be considered when deciding on the most appropriate treatment for each individual woman. The optimal dose, timing and mechanism of administration cannot be addressed from this meta-analysis. This needs to be addressed in the next phase of clinical trials.

CA125 regression in ovarian cancer patients treated with intravenous versus intraperitoneal platinum-based chemotherapy: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVE

CA125 is a non-specific marker of peritoneal irritation which has the potential for false elevation during intraperitoneal treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify the rate of CA125 regression during intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

METHODS

GOG 114, a randomized control trial evaluating IP and IV treatment, includes an intensive CA125 measurement schema with weekly CA125 levels until ≤ 35 units/ml for both IP- and IV-treated patients. Rate of CA125 normalization, median CA125 values for each treatment cycle, as well as clinical and pathologic features were compared between the treatment groups. Baseline CA125 levels and rate of CA125 decline were evaluated with respect to overall survival.

RESULTS

CA125 data were available for 223 patients who received IV cisplatin/paclitaxel and for 231 patients who received IV carboplatin followed by IP cisplatin/paclitaxel. Standard prognostic criteria and baseline CA125 values were similar between the treatment groups. For treatment cycles in which IP-treatment was administered, there was no statistically significant difference in CA125 levels between IV- and IP-treated patients. The rate of CA125 normalization was similar between IV- and IP-treated patients (p=0.55). Patients with low pre-chemotherapy CA125 levels which rapidly declined during treatment demonstrated a survival advantage (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in CA125 decline was identified between IP- and IV-treated patients undergoing a weekly CA125 monitoring schedule. This data supports the utilization of standard CA125 response criteria in the therapeutic monitoring for patients receiving IP treatment.

Phase ii/iii study of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: ncic ctg ov.21

Three large randomized clinical trials have shown a survival benefit in women with stage iii epithelial ovarian cancer (eoc) who receive intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy after optimal primary debulking surgery. The most recent Gynecologic Oncology Group study, gog 172, showed an improvement in median overall survival of approximately 17 months. That result led to a U.S. National Cancer Institute (nci) clinical announcement recommending that IP chemotherapy be considered for this group of women with eoc. However, IP chemotherapy is associated with increased toxicity, and rates for completion of treatment are low (42% in gog 172). The optimal IP regimen and duration of treatment has yet to be defined. Women undergoing chemotherapy before optimal debulking surgery were not included in the studies or in the nci clinical announcement. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group has developed a protocol for a randomized phase ii/iii study which will examine whether IP platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy benefits women who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before optimal surgical debulking. To address whether the less systemically toxic carboplatin can be substituted for cisplatin IP, the first phase of the study will have 3 arms: 1 intravenous-only, and 2 IP-containing regimens. At the end of the first stage, and provided that IP therapy is feasible to administer in this patient population, one of the IP regimens, either IP carboplatin or IP cisplatin, will proceed into a phase iii comparison with the intravenous arm. This exciting new study has gathered international support.

Current and future directions of clinical trials for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The management of ovarian cancer includes a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The majority of clinical trials have historically addressed questions pertaining to the selection, dosing, and schedule of chemotherapy agents.

METHODS

In this report, a comprehensive review of the major clinical trials in ovarian cancer is performed. The increasing data and clinical experience in the management of ovarian cancer, as it sets the stage for currently active protocols and future clinical trial design, are emphasized.

RESULTS

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is the primary intravenous treatment strategy in the front-line setting. Recent data show an improvement in overall survival for intravenous dose-dense treatment. Multiple randomized controlled trials support the use of intraperitoneal treatment. For recurrent disease, a growing number of new agents including targeted therapeutics are now available. Increasingly, surgical approach, biologic targets, and quality of life endpoints are included in clinical trial design.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the last several decades, clinical trials have defined the current therapeutic approach for ovarian cancer. Paclitaxel with a platinum-based agent is currently the preferred front-line therapy, with encouraging data to support either dose-dense or intraperitoneal drug delivery. Future trials will determine the role of biologic agents and vaccine therapies, as well as their impact on quality of life.

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the first-cycle maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and then assess the feasibility of this dose over multiple cycles.

METHODS

Beginning at an intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin dose area under the curve (AUC) of 5 and a fixed intravenous dose of 175mg/m(2) paclitaxel, patients were entered on a dose-escalating phase evaluating first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After estimating the MTD, cohorts of 20 patients were then entered in an expanded phase to evaluate DLT over four cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were entered on the dose-escalating phase. A first-cycle MTD of carboplatin at AUC 8 was tolerated although thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting over multiple cycles. An additional 69 patients were treated in expanded cohorts. Only 5/90 (5.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of a port problem. Four-cycle DLT required de-escalation to a carboplatin AUC of 6, and even at that dose, there were 14 dose-limiting toxic effects in 40 patients (35%). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were due to neutropenia, and 6 were due to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Six cycles of therapy were completed in 75% of eligible patients, but dose adjustments were required.

CONCLUSIONS

The first-cycle MTD did not predict the tolerability of this regimen over multiple cycles. Using an IP carboplatin dose of AUC 6 in combination with paclitaxel, the regimen can be administered with a high completion rate over multiple cycles. Because neutropenia is a frequent DLT, the addition of hematopoietic growth factors may permit a high completion rate while maintaining this dose.

First-line systemic treatment of ovarian cancer: a critical review of available evidence and expectations for future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a prevalent gynecologic malignancy whose prognosis in most cases remains poor despite advances in therapy. In this article, we critically review the available clinical evidence for the choice of first-line chemotherapy in EOC and discuss promising therapeutic strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 25 years, first-line chemotherapy regimens and the indication of systemic treatment for early-stage disease have been better established. Significant progress has been made in the treatment of advanced EOC with the optimization of the carboplatin plus paclitaxel regimen and the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for selected patients. Targeted therapies may be approved for EOC in the near future and this would bring more specific treatments and improve outcomes for patients. Validated biomolecular signatures to better define prognosis and to predict response to therapeutic agents are still lacking.

SUMMARY

The standard first-line chemotherapy in EOC is based on the doublet carboplatin plus paclitaxel. It may be possible to improve the efficacy of treatment by means of a more intensive dose-dense regimen or by the intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapy. Significant improvements in the treatment of EOC are expected from the development of antiangiogenic and other targeted agents and from better patient selection.

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Why the Fuzz?

Objectives:

Critical evaluation of the benefits of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy.

Methods:

Critical review of the literature in support of the administration of chemotherapy via the IP route.

Results:

The 3 largest randomized phase III trials conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group and published over a 10-year period clearly demonstrated a 19% to 25% reduction in risk of death for patients treated with IP chemotherapy compared with intravenous chemotherapy.

Conclusion:

Despite the differences in the treatment arms and in the drugs used, and whether the explanation lies on the local effect of the drugs on the intraperitoneal tumors or is related to the reservoir effect of the drugs stored in the peritoneal cavity, remains to be determined, but the explanation for the effect cannot refute the benefit observed in the improvement in overall survival.

CD44-targeted microparticles for delivery of cisplatin to peritoneal metastases

Intraperitoneal (ip) chemotherapy increases the survival of optimally debulked patients with ovarian cancer due to direct access of the drug to tumor nodules growing on the peritoneal surface. CD44 is overexpressed in many ovarian cancers. To further improve efficacy, we sought to develop a cisplatin-loaded microparticle that would target to CD44 on cancer cells when injected ip. Hyplat microparticles were produced by cross-linking hyaluronan via its carboxylate groups with cisplatin at a high temperature. Hyplat particles had an average diameter of 580 nm, and cisplatin was incorporated with an efficiency of approximately 50%. Drug release varied with chloride concentration but not pH. Flow cytometric analysis and confocal microscopy confirmed that CD44 positive cells (OV2008, A2780) internalized Hyplat more efficiently than CD44 negative cells (UCI101); uptake was compromised by knocking down CD44 expression. Clearance of Hyplat from the mouse peritoneum was reduced by 7-fold and tumor uptake was increased by 2- to 3-fold in CD44-positive but not CD44-negative tumor models compared to that attained with free cisplatin. Hyplat was more effective than cisplatin at slowing the growth of intraperitoneally inoculated A2780 ovarian cancer cells and improving survival thus demonstrating the potential of Hyplat to enhance the efficacy of ip chemotherapy.

Drug delivery systems for intraperitoneal therapy

Disorders associated with the peritoneal cavity include peritoneal adhesions and intraperitoneal (IP) malignancies. To prevent peritoneal adhesions, physical barrier devices are used to prevent organs from contacting other structures in the abdomen and forming adhesions, or pharmacological agents that interfere with adhesion formation are administered intraperitoneally. IP malignancies are other disorders confined to the peritoneal cavity, which are treated by combination of surgical removal and chemotherapy of the residual tumor. IP drug delivery helps in the regional therapy of these disorders by providing relatively high concentration and longer half-life of a drug in the peritoneal cavity. Various studies suggest that IP delivery of anti-neoplastic agents is a promising approach for malignancies in the peritoneal cavity compared to the systemic administration. However, IP drug delivery faces several challenges, such as premature clearance of a small molecular weight drug from the peritoneal cavity, lack of target specificity, and poor drug penetration into the target tissues. Previous studies have proposed the use of micro/nanoparticles and/or hydrogel-based systems for prolonging the drug residence time in the peritoneal cavity. This commentary discusses the currently used IP drug delivery systems either clinically or experimentally and the remaining challenges in IP drug delivery for future development.

From randomized trial to practice: single institution experience using the GOG 172 i.p. chemotherapy regimen for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to evaluate completion rates and toxic effects of an i.p. chemotherapy regimen in a cross-section of nonselected patients with ovarian cancer (OC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients with stage IIIC OC consecutively operated at our institution from January 2006 to December 2007 were prospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients with stage IIIC OC optimally debulked were evaluated for this study. An i.p. port was primarily placed in 53 of 89 (60%), and i.p. chemotherapy was recommended in 55 patients. Reasons for not recommending i.p. chemotherapy in patients optimally debulked included postoperative complications (n = 7: 8%), poor nutritional/functional status (n = 5: 6%), and extensive surgery including bowel resection (n = 9: 10%). Thirty-three patients (33/55: 60%) recommended to receive i.p. chemotherapy-initiated i.p. treatment. Fifty-two percent of those beginning i.p. therapy (17/33) received three or more cycles with 36% (12/33) successfully completing six cycles. Reasons for discontinuation included grade 3-4 nephrotoxicity in 3 of 21 (14%), febrile neutropenia/sepsis in 3 of 21 (14%), port infection or malfunction in 8 of 21 (38%).

CONCLUSIONS

The i.p. chemotherapy regimen used in a consecutive cohort of patients carries could be completed in only a small percentage of patients. Less toxic regimens with higher acceptability should be considered.

New therapeutic agents in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite advances in management over recent years, epithelial ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy. Methods of early detection, as well as improved therapeutic options, are urgently needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Currently, a number of targeted therapies, including vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors and folate receptor inhibitors look promising in this arena and this article will review a number of these drugs and the evidence pertaining to their use.

SUMMARY

Much further research is required to define if, when and how best to integrate these novel therapies, and also to define associated biomarkers that predict toxicity and select patients most likely to derive benefit. Individualized therapy is not an impossible dream, but there is still a long way to go.

Evaluation of an intraperitoneal chemotherapy program implemented at the Princess Margaret Hospital for patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

A prospective evaluation of an ambulatory intraperitoneal (IP) /intravenous (IV) chemotherapy regimen for women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).

METHODS

Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) (option for 75 mg/m(2)) IP combined with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) IV (3 h infusion) administered every 21 days was adopted by our institution as a single day, outpatient regimen for women with stage III EOC who had undergone optimal cytoreductive (<or=1 cm) surgery. A prospective database including patient characteristics, toxicity (graded as per CTCAE-v 3.0) and time spent in the outpatient unit was established to follow patients receiving IP chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between December 2005 and June 2008, 47 patients, median age 50 years (range 25-75) received a total of 238 cycles of IP/IV chemotherapy. The median number of cycles was 6 (range 1-6). 81% of patients (n=33) completed 6 planned cycles of treatment. Seven patients discontinued IP chemotherapy early due to catheter related complications (3) and chemotherapy toxicity (4). The most common grade 3 adverse events were abdominal pain (15%), nausea (15%), vomiting (13%), fatigue (11%) and peripherally neuropathy (9%). Residual peripheral neuropathy was reported at last follow up in 11 patients (grade 3 in 2). The median time spent in the chemotherapy unit was 7 h (range 6.5 to 9) per cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) IP combined with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) IV every 21 days is well tolerated and can be administered in an ambulatory chemotherapy unit. This regimen is convenient for patients and potentially more cost effective than other published IP cisplatin-based regimens.

Efficacy assessment of sustained intraperitoneal paclitaxel therapy in a murine model of ovarian cancer using bioluminescent imaging

We evaluated the pre-clinical efficacy of a novel intraperitoneal (i.p.) sustained-release paclitaxel formulation (PTX(ePC)) using bioluminescent imaging (BLI) in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Human ovarian carcinoma cells stably expressing the firefly luciferase gene (SKOV3(Luc)) were injected i.p. into SCID mice. Tumour growth was evaluated during sustained or intermittent courses of i.p. treatment with paclitaxel (PTX). In vitro bioluminescence strongly correlated with cell survival and cytotoxicity. Bioluminescent imaging detected tumours before their macroscopic appearance and strongly correlated with tumour weight and survival. As compared with intermittent therapy with Taxol, sustained PTX(ePC) therapy resulted in significant reduction of tumour proliferation, weight and BLI signal intensity, enhanced apoptosis and increased survival times. Our results demonstrate that BLI is a useful tool in the pre-clinical evaluation of therapeutic interventions for ovarian cancer. Moreover, these results provide evidence of enhanced therapeutic efficacy with the sustained PTX(ePC) implant system, which could potentially translate into successful clinical outcomes.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: the con view

OBJECTIVES

In this paper we wish to present the reasons why i.p. chemotherapy cannot be accepted as standard of care for first-line systemic treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

The recent literature on i.p. chemotherapy is critically reviewed. All possible arguments against i.p. chemotherapy are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with a higher toxicity rate than i.v. chemotherapy. For this reason, none of the regimens investigated in the three Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) studies can be used as standard treatment outside clinical protocols. The trials on i.p. chemotherapy have suggested a survival difference. However, in the two most recent trials, i.p. chemotherapy or not was not the only research question because different schedules and dosages were used. In addition, the significance of the most recent GOG 172 study was only weak (p = .03), and the result was nonsignificant for progression-free survival. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be used only in the context of properly designed clinical trials. These trials must either assess i.p. therapy in comparison with the standard treatment or address the issue of route of administration for equivalent dosages and schedules of the same drugs, and not a mosaic of these questions. In addition, these trials should investigate i.p. regimens that are less toxic than the regimens used in the three GOG trials, and which can be combined with molecular targeted therapies.

Different tissue distribution of paclitaxel with intravenous and intraperitoneal administration

PURPOSE

Paclitaxel is considered to be suitable for disseminated cancer in the peritoneal cavity because of its high molecular weight and lipophilic characteristics. However, the difference in pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel after intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intravenous (i.v.) administration is not fully defined. Here, we investigated the tissue concentration of paclitaxel in various organs at various time points after i.p. or i.v. administration.

METHODS

Paclitaxel (5 mg/kg) was administrated in an ear vein or in the abdominal cavity of rabbits. At 0.5, 6, 24, and 48 h after administration, the rabbits were sacrificed, and organs as well as peripheral blood were harvested. The serum and tissue concentrations of paclitaxel were measured by HPLC procedure.

RESULT

The concentration of paclitaxel was high in the i.v. group at 0.5 h, whereas it was significantly higher in the i.p. group at 6 and 24 h. The AUC (area under the curve) was markedly higher in the omentum, mesenteric lymph nodes as well as ovary and stomach in the i.p. group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with i.v. administration, paclitaxel concentration was maintained at a high level in the whole body by i.p. administration. Repeated i.p. paclitaxel can produce more marked clinical effects than i.v. administration for metastatic lymph nodes and primary lesions as well as peritoneal dissemination.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy: standard of care for patients with minimal residual stage III ovarian cancer?

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancer in most of the Western world, and long-term survival remains poor despite good initial response to systemic therapy after debulking surgery. Even after complete pathological response, the risk of recurrence in the first few years is substantial. The peritoneum is the predominant site of failure and the disease remains confined to the peritoneal cavity for much of its course. Efforts to improve clinical outcomes in this group of patients included investigation of intraperitoneal administration of active agents to expose the low-volume postoperative residual disease in the peritoneum to high concentrations of these drugs. In spite of three National Cancer Institute-sponsored randomized trials demonstrating clinical benefit with intraperitoneal therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the fact remains that it is not uniformly accepted by the gynecologic oncology community in the USA and is rarely used by clinicians in Europe. Intraperitoneal regimens are perceived to be too toxic for administration, although most of the toxicity is reversible. In this article we discuss the available evidence for intraperitoneal chemotherapy, challenges facing the gynecologic oncology community to make this modality more widely acceptable, the selection of patients most likely to tolerate intraperitoneal therapy and ongoing research in this field.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: an update

Based on the poor 5-year survival rates for advanced ovarian cancer, novel therapies are needed. Because ovarian cancer largely is confined to the peritoneal cavity for much of its natural history, the intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy is a biologically rationale and novel approach to the delivery of chemotherapy. Interest in intraperitoneal therapy as first-line therapy has been rekindled by three large randomized clinical trials, which have demonstrated improved median overall survival rates. This article reviews these trials and addresses areas of concern and the need for additional trials.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature

The use of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been advocated in different settings of patients with ovarian cancer. Cisplatin is the drug of choice because of its high response rate and minimal local toxicity. This treatment can be given to women with small residual disease after second look, with surgically assessed complete response rates of approximately 30%, and with a prolonged survival in small subset of patients. However, the use of IP chemotherapy as consolidation treatment of pathologically complete responders after first-line systemic chemotherapy has not been definitively evaluated in a phase III trial. There is much debate in the literature both for and against the use of IP chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. The recent Cochrane meta-analyses of eight randomized trials enrolling 1819 patients has shown that first-line IP chemotherapy improves progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with minimal residual disease after initial surgery. However, the potential for catheter-related complications, abdominal pain with infusion, and toxicities needs to be taken into consideration for decision making in each individual woman. Rectosigmoidal surgery can be associated with gross contamination of the operative field, and in this case, the catheter placement should not be performed during primary surgery but should be delayed to 3 weeks later. Patients should be provided with information on the survival and toxicity for both IP and systemic treatments, as well as practical information about the administration of each regimen, so that they may be involved in the decision-making process.

Why i.p. therapy cannot yet be considered as a standard of care for the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review

A National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical announcement recommended i.p. therapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer. Its basis was a summary of eight randomised controlled trials and two systematic reviews, which appear to indicate benefit of i.p. therapy. However, the systematic reviews that inform the recommendations have been inappropriately presented and interpreted. The systematic reviews inappropriately pooled results from 'confounded' trials in which different drugs and different doses of drugs were given in the control and i.p. treatment arms. Therefore, it is not possible to assess which component of treatment is responsible for improving outcome. In addition, none of the trials use a control arm of the internationally accepted standard of care. Using just the unconfounded trials, indirect comparisons show that the magnitude of benefit observed when i.p. regimens are compared with older i.v. regimens [hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.92, P = 0.006] is smaller than the magnitude of benefit achieved with modern day standard of i.v. treatment compared with the same i.v. regimen used as control in the unconfounded i.p. trials (HR for OS 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.80, P < 0.001). A further difficulty is that the reviews cannot recommend an i.p. regimen for standard use. Drug-related toxicity and catheter complications that occur with i.p. therapy are considerable. The NCI recommendations have major implications for the treatment of women with ovarian cancer and for the next generation of clinical trials. We do not believe that the body of evidence currently available supports the recommendation that i.p. therapy should form part of routine care. The choice of treatment of women with newly diagnosed, optimally debulked, ovarian cancer, where therapy has the best chance of influencing OS, is too important to be left with this uncertainty. A clinical trial that investigates a practical and acceptable regimen which gives some or all chemotherapy by the i.p. route and compares this with standard i.v. chemotherapy should be a priority for those who wish to promote its use.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a review of complications and completion rates

OBJECTIVE

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy has a clear survival advantage in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, but the high rate of complications has discouraged widespread acceptance. The purpose of this study was to review the completion rate of patients receiving i.p. chemotherapy as first line treatment at a single institution and determine what factors prohibit completion of therapy.

METHODS

Patients receiving i.p. chemotherapy from 1993 to 2006 were identified by hospital registries for a retrospective review. Charts were abstracted for patient demographics, clinical and pathologic findings, surgical intervention, treatment modalities, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were identified who received front line treatment with i.p. chemotherapy. All patients received a platinum and taxane agent. Port placement (single lumen, venous access device) was completed at time of cytoreductive surgery (33%, n=27) or by mini-laparotomy (67%, n=56). Fifty patients (60%) completed a minimum of 6 cycles of treatment with a mean of 5 cycles. Eleven patients (13%) discontinued treatment due to catheter-related complications including infection (n=4), access difficulties (n=3), grade 4 abdominal pain (n=1), port leaking (n=1), and development of a peritoneal-vaginal fistula (n=1). Sixteen patients (19%) did not complete i.p. treatment because of chemotherapy-related toxicity. The remaining six patients did not complete chemotherapy due to disease progression or other reasons unrelated to modality of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Few catheter-related complications were encountered in a review of front-line i.p. chemotherapy administration at a single institution using a single lumen venous access device. The majority of failures were due to persistent grade 3-4 chemotherapy toxicity. i.p. chemotherapy can be safely administered by a dedicated health-care team committed to i.p. chemotherapy as a front-line treatment.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among cancers of the female reproductive tract. Most women present with regionally advanced intraperitoneal disease with superficial spread of tumor along the peritoneal surfaces. Distant metastasis rarely occurs until late in the disease process; however, long-term survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy allows higher concentration and prolonged half-life of chemotherapy within the peritoneal cavity compared with intravenous administration, while therapeutic intravenous concentrations are obtained. Three large randomized Phase III trials and a meta-analysis have firmly established the superiority of combination intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy compared with intravenous chemotherapy alone in women with optimally debulked advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In January of 2006, the National Cancer Institute issued a clinical alert recommending that these women receive a combination of intravenous and intraperitoneal chemotherapy; however, resistance to adopt this as a new standard of care results from concerns regarding toxicity and lack of experience with intraperitoneal catheters. Here we review the largest trials of combination intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy, address the concerns regarding intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and provide further resources for implementing intraperitoneal chemotherapy into practice.

Effects of carrier on disposition and antitumor activity of intraperitoneal Paclitaxel

PURPOSE

The rationale for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is to expose peritoneal tumors to high drug concentrations. While multiple phase III trials have established the significant survival advantage by adding IP therapy to intravenous therapy in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients, the use of IP chemotherapy is limited by the complications associated with indwelling catheters and by the local chemotherapy-related toxicity. The present study evaluated the effects of drug carrier on the disposition and efficacy of IP paclitaxel, for identifying strategies for further development of IP treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three paclitaxel formulations, i.e., Cremophor micelles, Cremophor-free paclitaxel-loaded gelatin nanoparticles and polymeric microparticles, were evaluated for peritoneal targeting advantage and antitumor activity in mice after IP injection. Whole body autoradiography and scanning electron microscopy were used to visualize the spatial drug distribution in tissues. A kinetic model, depicting the multiple processes involved in the peritoneal-to-plasma transfer of paclitaxel and its carriers, was established to determine the mechanisms by which a drug carrier alters the peritoneal targeting advantage.

RESULTS

Autoradiographic results indicated that IP injection yielded much higher paclitaxel concentrations in intestinal tissues relative to intravenous injection. Compared to the Cremophor and nanoparticle formulations, the microparticles showed slower drug clearance from the peritoneal cavity, slower absorption into the systemic circulation, longer residence time, 10- to 45-times greater peritoneal targeting advantage and approximately 2-times longer increase in survival time (p < 0.01 for all parameters).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate the important roles of drug carrier in determining the peritoneal targeting advantage and antitumor activity of IP treatment.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a review of the evidence and standards for the delivery of care

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy as part of primary treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and to develop standards of care within the context of current clinical practice.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert panel, convened to develop standards on the use of IP chemotherapy, searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to December 2006 for randomized trials or published standards on the efficacy and/or delivery of IP chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eight randomized trials comparing IP chemotherapy versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy were identified. Three trials reported statistically significant improvements in median survival of 8.0, 11.0, and 15.9 months with cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy. In one trial, the 15.9-month improvement in median overall survival (RR=0.75, 95% CI=0.58-0.97) represented a 25% reduction in the risk of death with IP chemotherapy. Severe adverse events and catheter-related complications were often dose limiting with IP chemotherapy. Using a consensus-based approach with a nationally representative panel, multidisciplinary care standards were developed to review medical and surgical criteria, the practice setting, volume requirements, and the institutional criteria required to safely deliver IP chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The survival benefits with cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy may represent a significant improvement in the outlook for select patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The delivery of IP chemotherapy is more challenging than the IV route; however, severe adverse events and catheter-related complications may be offset through research defining the optimum treatment regimen, and the standardization of care. System-wide standards for the delivery of IP chemotherapy in Canada for patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer are offered.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review with metaanalyses

Because women with advanced ovarian cancer have poor outcomes, it is imperative to continue exploring for novel therapies. The opportunity for intraperitoneal treatment, especially in the subgroup of patients with minimal residual disease, in which the intraperitoneal approach may have a biologic rationale for benefit over and above the standard intravenous route, needs to be explored to the fullest extent. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to January 2006 for randomized trials that compared first-line intraperitoneal-containing chemotherapy with first-line intravenous chemotherapy in the treatment of women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Seven randomized, controlled trials were identified, including 3 large Phase III trials and 4 smaller randomized trials. The 3 large Phase III trials detected statistically significant overall survival benefits with intraperitoneal cisplatin-containing chemotherapy compared with intravenous chemotherapy alone. The improvements in survival were 8 months, 11 months, and 16 months, respectively. Pooled analysis from 6 of the 7 randomized trials confirmed the survival effect with intraperitoneal chemotherapy compared with intravenous chemotherapy alone (relative risk, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.95). Severe adverse events and catheter-related complications with intraperitoneal chemotherapy were significantly more common and often were dose-limiting. The results from this review indicated that cisplatin-containing intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be offered to patients on the basis of significant improvements in overall survival. The appropriate clinical and institutional multidisciplinary facilities are needed for the safe delivery of this treatment in optimally debulked patients. Further research is needed concerning specific aspects of the treatment, such as optimal agent, dose, and scheduling.

Principles and practice of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been studied for years to improve the survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Recently, the result of Gynecologic Oncology Group 172 trial comparing IP versus intravenous administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy was published, demonstrating the improvement of survival benefit in favor of the IP arm. This trial is the third trial that showed a survival benefit on IP chemotherapy. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Gynecologic Oncology Group have done a meta-analysis on the results of these three US trials and other phase III trials of IP versus intravenous chemotherapy, and significant improvement of survival was shown with IP therapy. Based on this meta-analysis, NCI has released a clinical announcement encouraging the gynecological oncology community to consider IP chemotherapy as the standard treatment for optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer patients. However, there still are controversial issues regarding the use of IP chemotherapy. It is important to understand how IP chemotherapy works to solve those issues in the future. In this review article, we discuss the principles and clinical aspects of IP chemotherapy and also discuss the current problems and future perspectives in IP chemotherapy.

Historical progress in the initial management of ovarian cancer: intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Despite measured improvement in survival with the introduction of the platinates and taxanes in treatment of advanced ovarian cancer, little additional progress has been made with conventional cytotoxic agents. Recently, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) published data from a study evaluating the merits of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in women with advanced, optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer. They documented a significant advantage in progression-free and overall survival for the experimental regimen, a combination of intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel, compared with standard intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. The intraperitoneal regimen was substantially more toxic and was associated with reduced short-term quality of life. The GOG trial joins six other published phase III trials since 1994 comparing intravenous with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. A recent meta-analysis suggests a 21% reduction in the hazard for progression (four studies) and death (seven studies). Reluctance to adopt a new standard of care is rooted in toxicity concerns. Further evaluation is warranted to clarify unanswered questions regarding administration schedule, agents, techniques, number of courses, and patient eligibility for intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Current and Future Directions of Clinical Trials for Ovarian Cancer

Background

The management of ovarian cancer includes a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The majority of clinical trials have historically addressed questions pertaining to the selection, dosing, and schedule of chemotherapy agents.

Methods

In this report, a comprehensive review of the major clinical trials in ovarian cancer is performed. The increasing data and clinical experience in the management of ovarian cancer, as it sets the stage for currently active protocols and future clinical trial design, are emphasized.

Results

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is the primary intravenous treatment strategy in the front-line setting. Recent data show an improvement in overall survival for intravenous dose-dense treatment. Multiple randomized controlled trials support the use of intraperitoneal treatment. For recurrent disease, a growing number of new agents including targeted therapeutics are now available. Increasingly, surgical approach, biologic targets, and quality of life endpoints are included in clinical trial design.

Conclusions

Over the last several decades, clinical trials have defined the current therapeutic approach for ovarian cancer. Paclitaxel with a platinum-based agent is currently the preferred front-line therapy, with encouraging data to support either dose-dense or intraperitoneal drug delivery. Future trials will determine the role of biologic agents and vaccine therapies, as well as their impact on quality of life.