Therapeutic efficacy and safety of one-week intermittent therapy with itraconazole for onychomycosis in a Chinese patient population

Antifungal Selection for the Treatment of Onychomycosis: Patient Considerations and Outcomes

Onychomycosis, a common fungal nail infection, affects >20% of adults over age 60 and >50% of people over age 70. Onychomycosis may cause pain, psychosocial problems, and secondary infections, therefore meriting treatment. This review describes the range of treatment modalities, including FDA-approved systemic drugs and topical therapies. Additionally, new and emerging oral and topical therapies are discussed. We emphasize the importance of tailoring onychomycosis therapy to individual patient characteristics, comorbidities, preferences, extent of nail involvement, and fungal species, such that physicians may optimize treatment outcomes, patient satisfaction, and safety.

Race reporting and representation in onychomycosis clinical trials: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is the most common nail disease seen in clinical practice. Inclusion of diverse groups in onychomycosis clinical trials subjects is necessary to generalise efficacy data.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to systematically review race and ethnicity reporting and representation, as well as, treatment outcomes in onychomycosis clinical trials.

METHODS

A PubMed search for onychomycosis clinical trials was performed in August 2020. Primary clinical trial data were included and post hoc analyses were excluded. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Statistical significance was set at p < .05. Photos in articles were categorised by Fitzpatrick skin type.

RESULTS

Only 32/182 (17.5%) trials reported on race and/or ethnicity and only one trial compared treatment efficacy in different subgroups. Darker skin colours were infrequently depicted in articles. Topical treatment, location with ≥1 US-based site, industry funding type and publication date after 2000 were significantly associated with reporting of racial/ethnic data (p < .05 for all comparisons).

LIMITATIONS

Demographics on excluded subjects and methods of recruitment were not available. Assigning Fitzpatrick skin type is inherently subjective.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights a need for consistent reporting of races and ethnicities of onychomycosis clinical trial participants with subgroup analyses of treatment efficacies.

The safety of oral antifungal treatments for superficial dermatophytosis and onychomycosis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We estimated the absolute risks of treatment termination and incidence of adverse liver outcomes among all commonly used oral antifungal treatments for superficial dermatophytosis and onychomycosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, case series, and cohort studies published before December 31, 2005. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment, and extracted data. Treatment arms with the same regimen in terms of drug, type (continuous or intermittent), and dosage were combined to estimate the risk of an outcome of interest.

RESULTS

We identified 122 studies with approximately 20,000 enrolled patients for planned comparison. The pooled risks (95% confidence intervals) of treatment discontinuation resulting from adverse reactions for continuous therapy were 3.44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.28%-4.61%) for terbinafine 250 mg/day; 1.96% (95% CI, 0.35%-3.57%) for itraconazole 100 mg/day; 4.21% (95% CI, 2.33%-6.09%) for itraconazole 200 mg/day; and 1.51% (95% CI, 0%-4.01%) for fluconazole 50 mg/day. For intermittent therapy, the pooled risks were as follows: pulse terbinafine: 2.09% (95% CI, 0%-4.42%); pulse itraconazole: 2.58% (95% CI, 1.15%-4.01%); intermittent fluconazole 150 mg/week: 1.98% (95% CI, 0.05%-3.92%); and intermittent fluconazole 300 to 450 mg/week: 5.76% (95% CI, 2.42%-9.10%). The risk of liver injury requiring termination of treatment ranged from 0.11% (continuous itraconazole 100 mg/day) to 1.22% (continuous fluconazole 50 mg/day). The risk of having asymptomatic elevation of serum transaminase but not requiring treatment discontinuation was less than 2.0% for all treatment regimens evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Oral antifungal therapy against superficial dermatophytosis and onychomycosis, including intermittent and continuous terbinafine, itraconazole, and fluconazole, was associated with a low incidence of adverse events in an immunocompetent population.

Pharmacotherapy of onychomycosis

Fungal infections of the nails are frequent in some segments of the population. Dermatophytes, yeasts and moulds are potential pathogens. A series of antifungal treatments are available to the clinician, differing by both their mechanistic nature and mode of administration. The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of each antifungal agent are distinct. This review focuses on the characteristics of amorolfine, bifonazole, ciclopirox, fluconazole, griseofulvin, itraconazole, ketoconazole, ravuconazole, R126638 and terbinafine. Single drug treatments and combined therapies are presented. None of the current drug regimens have demonstrated reliable efficacy against all cases of onychomycosis. Treatment failures, relapses and reinfections remain stubborn problems in the management of onychomycosis.

Cumulative meta-analysis of systemic antifungal agents for the treatment of onychomycosis

BACKGROUND

Onychomycosis is a common nail disease that is often chronic, difficult to eradicate, and has a tendency to recur. The most common oral therapies for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis include terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole.

OBJECTIVES

A cumulative meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for antimycotic agents was performed to determine whether the pooled estimate of the cure rates has remained consistent over the years. Furthermore, for each agent we compared the overall meta-analytical average of both mycological and clinical response rates of RCTs vs. open studies.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to November 2002) for relevant studies evaluating the efficacy of the oral antifungal agents terbinafine, itraconazole (pulse or continuous), fluconazole and griseofulvin for treating dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis. Studies included in this meta-analysis required a standard accepted dosage regimen, treatment duration and follow-up period. To determine the cumulative meta-analytical average, studies were sequentially pooled by adding one study at a time according to the date of publication (i.e. earliest to the most recent).

RESULTS

There were 36 studies included in the analyses. For RCTs the change in efficacy of mycological cure rates from the first trial to the overall cumulative meta-average for each drug comparator is as follows (with 95% confidence interval): terbinafine, 78 +/- 6% (n = 2 studies, 79 patients) to 76 +/- 3% (n = 18 studies, 993 patients) (P = 0.68); itraconazole pulse, 75 +/- 10% (n = 1 study, 20 patients) to 63 +/- 7% (n = 6 studies, 318 patients) (P = 0.25); itraconazole continuous, 63 +/- 5% (n = 1 study, 84 patients) to 59 +/- 5% (n = 7 studies, 1131 patients) (P = 0.47); fluconazole, 53 +/- 6% (n = 1 study, 72 patients) to 48 +/- 5% (n = 3 studies, 131 patients) (P = 0.50); and griseofulvin, 55 +/- 8% (n = 2 studies, 109 patients) to 60 +/- 6% (n = 3 studies, 167 patients) (P = 0.41). The cumulative meta-analytical average of mycological cure rates when comparing RCTs vs. open studies was: terbinafine, 76 +/- 3% (n = 18 studies, 993 patients) vs. 83 +/- 12% (n = 2 studies, 391 patients) (P = 0.0028); itraconazole pulse, 63 +/- 7% (n = 6 studies, 318 patients) vs. 84 +/- 9% (n = 3 studies, 194 patients) (P = 0.0001); and fluconazole, 48 +/- 5% (n = 3 studies, 131 patients) vs. 79 +/- 3% (n = 3 studies, 208 patients) (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative meta-analysis of cure rates for RCTs suggests that over time, as new RCTs have been conducted, the efficacy rates have remained consistent. The efficacy rates of open studies are substantially higher compared with RCTs and may therefore overestimate cure rates.

Onychomycosis: quality of studies

OBJECTIVE

The quality of original clinical trial publications pertaining to the use of oral antifungal agents to treat onychomycosis was evaluated using predetermined criteria.

METHODS

The list of studies included in this analysis was determined by conducting a search in Medline. For each clinical trial, two independent reviewers each determined a composite score by evaluating a list of criteria that were felt to represent a good study, for example, randomization and blinding, prior sample size calculated, and treatment regimen clearly explained. A citation count was performed to determine whether higher-quality papers were cited more often than lower-quality papers.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included in this quality analysis of study design. Of these, 27 were considered to be "high quality" (score greater than or equal to 11 out of 20). A significant correlation coefficient of 0.997 was found between the two reviewers (P < 0.00001). Higher-quality papers were cited significantly more often than lower-quality papers (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The scale that we use to evaluate the quality of onychomycosis studies has high interrater reliability. According to this scale, many published studies (18 out of 45) pertaining to treatments for onychomycosis do not meet the criteria required to be considered "high quality."

Comparison of efficacy criteria across onychomycosis trials: need for standardization

BACKGROUND

The last 10 years have seen a substantial increase in the number of studies reporting the efficacy of the various antifungal agents used to treat onychomycosis.

AIM

To examine the definitions of efficacy parameters reported in clinical studies on the treatment of onychomycosis and discuss the importance of standardized reporting.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2001) for studies in which oral treatments, griseofulvin, ketoconazole, terbinafine (continuous and pulse), itraconazole (continuous and pulse), and fluconazole, were used to treat dermatophyte onychomycosis.

RESULTS

Mycologic cure was predominantly defined as negative microscopy and culture. Unlike mycologic cure, clinical parameters (e.g. clinical response, clinical cure) were variably defined. Subjective terms, such as "cure" or "markedly improved," were used; although these terms appear to be explicit, what is considered to be "cured" or "markedly improved" by one evaluator may not be by another. Also, infected nails were clinically evaluated to determine the response to treatment. Studies measured the distance between the proximal nail fold and a notch in the nail plate, at the junction between the diseased and normal-appearing nail, or in some cases estimated the diseased nail plate involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of the literature on systemic agents used to treat onychomycosis shows that standard and explicit definitions are required for the accurate comparison of the effectiveness of the various therapies.

Itraconazole and fluconazole and certain rare, serious adverse events

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine rates of drug-induced, rare, serious adverse events affecting the liver, kidneys, skin, or blood, occurring within 45 days of completing a prescription or refill for itraconazole or fluconazole.

DESIGN

Population-based follow-up study

SETTING

United Kingdom-based General Practice Research Database.

PATIENTS

Total of 54,803 users of either fluconazole or itraconazole.

MAIN RESULTS

Four patients were identified with illnesses for which a drug-induced etiology could not be ruled out; one with an elevated liver function test while taking itraconazole, one with thrombocytopenia, one with neutropenia, and one with an abnormal liver function test just after receiving fluconazole. For itraconazole the rate was 3.2/100,000 prescriptions (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-17.9) for serious, adverse liver events; for fluconazole 2.8/100,000 prescriptions (95% CI 0.8-10.3) for serious, adverse blood events and 1.4/100,000 prescriptions (95% CI 0.25-8.2) for serious, adverse liver events.

CONCLUSION

Itraconazole and fluconazole do not commonly cause rare, serious adverse events affecting the liver, kidneys, skin, or blood.

Pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents in onychomycoses

Onychomycosis is caused by infection by fungi, mainly dermatophytes and nondermatophyte yeasts or moulds; it affects the fingernails and, more frequently, the toenails. Dermatophytes are responsible for about 90 to 95% of fungal infections. Trichophyton rubrum is the most common dermatophyte; Candida albicans is the major nondermatophyte yeast. Although topical therapy of onchomycosis does not lead to systemic adverse effects or interactions with concomitantly taken drugs, it does not provide high cure rates and requires complete compliance from the patient. At present there are 3 oral antifungal medications that are generally used for the short term treatment of onychomycosis: itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole. The persistence of these active drugs in nails allows weekly administration, reduced treatment or a pulse regimen. Good clinical and mycological efficacies are obtained with itraconazole 100 to 200 mg daily, terbinafine 250mg daily for 3 months, or fluconazole 150 mg weekly for at least 6 months. Itraconazole is a synthetic triazole with a broad spectrum of action. It is well absorbed when administered orally and can be detected in nails 1 to 2 weeks after the start of therapy. The nail : plasma ratio stabilises at around 1 by week 18 of treatment. Itraconazole is still detectable in nails 27 weeks after stopping administration. Nail concentrations are higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for most dermatophytes and Candida species from the first month of treatment. The elimination half-life of itraconazole from nails is long, ranging from 32 to 147 days. Terbinafine is a synthetic allylamine that is effective against dermatophytes. Terbinafine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and the time to reach effective concentrations in nail is 1 to 2 weeks. The half-life is from 24 to 156 days, explaining the observed persistence of terbinafine in nails for longer than 252 days. Fluconazole is a bis-triazole broad spectrum antifungal with high oral bioavailability. The uptake of fluconazole by nail increases with the length of treatment, and nail : plasma ratios are generally 1.5 to 2 at steady state. Fluconazole concentrations exceed the MIC for Candida species soon after the start of treatment. Fluconazole concentrations fall slowly after the drug is stopped, with a half-life of 50 to 87 days, and fluconazole is still detectable in nails 5 months after the end of treatment. All these drugs are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and may increase the plasma concentrations of concomitantly used drugs. Itraconazole inhibits CYP3A4. Fluconazole inhibits CYP3A4, but to a lesser degree than itraconazole, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Terbinafine inhibits CYP2D6.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ciclopirox nail lacquer solution 8% and the new oral antifungal agents used to treat dermatophyte toe onychomycosis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Recently a novel topical nail lacquer, ciclopirox solution 8%, has been approved for the treatment of onychomycosis.

OBJECTIVE

This was undertaken to determine the most cost-effective treatment for the treatment of dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toes in the United States in 2000.

METHODS

The nature of the problem was defined. The drug comparators were ciclopirox nail lacquer, terbinafine, itraconazole (pulse), itraconazole (continuous), fluconazole, and griseofulvin. A decision analytic model that reflected the manner in which pedal tinea unguium is managed was produced. Studies that have evaluated the efficacy of the nail lacquer and the oral antifungal agents for this indication were identified. Appropriate studies were used in a meta-analysis to determine the mycologic and clinical response rates when the drug comparators are used for the treatment for toe dermatophyte onychomycosis. For each drug comparator a cost of regimen analysis was carried out. This is the sum of the drug acquisition cost, the cost of medical management, and the cost of managing adverse effects. Next, the expected cost of management was calculated, disease free days were determined, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

For each comparator the meta-analytic average mycologic cure (MC) rate and clinical response (CR) rates were: ciclopirox nail lacquer (MC: 52.6 +/- 4.2%, CR: 52.4 +/- 9.0%), griseofulvin (MC: 41.1 +/- 20.4%, CR: 33.7 +/- 14.1%), itraconazole (continuous) (MC: 66.3 +/- 4.2%, CR: 70.3 +/- 4.2%), itraconazole (pulse) (MC: 70.8 +/- 5.7%, CR: 73.6 +/- 4.6%), terbinafine (MC: 77.2 +/- 4.0%, CR: 75.3 +/- 2.9%), and fluconazole (MC: 65.6 +/- 7.1%, CR: 66.5 +/- 11.7%). The cost of regimen for the drug comparators was: ciclopirox nail lacquer $325.2, griseofulvin $1413.1, itraconazole (continuous) $1410.2, itraconazole (pulse) $811.7, terbinafine $890.1, and fluconazole $966.8. The cost/mycologic cure rate and expected cost/expected symptom free day were, ciclopirox nail lacquer ($618.2, 1.69), griseofulvin $3438.2, 5.3), itraconazole (continuous) ($2126.9, 3.52), itraconazole (pulse) ($1146.4, 2.01), terbinafine ($1153.0, 2.14), and fluconazole ($1473.7, 2.10). The relative cost-effectiveness was ciclopirox nail lacquer 1.00, itraconazole (pulse) 1.19, fluconazole 1.24, terbinafine 1.27, itraconazole (continuous) 2.08, and griseofulvin 3.13. Sensitivity analysis indicated that ciclopirox nail lacquer was a cost effective alternative compared with the oral regimens of terbinafine, itraconazole (continuous), and griseofulvin when clinical response rate was used as the primary efficacy parameter.

CONCLUSION

Ciclopirox nail lacquer solution 8% is a recent addition to the armamentarium of therapies available to the physician and patient for the treatment of onychomycosis. The nail lacquer is a cost effective agent compared with the oral antifungal therapies, terbinafine, itraconazole, fluconazole, and griseofulvin.

Itraconazole

Itraconazole is a broad spectrum triazole antifungal agent. It has favourable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles and is available as both oral and i.v. formulations. Over the last two decades, clinical and animal infection studies have demonstrated the efficacy of itraconazole in a wide range of superficial fungal infections including difficult-to-treat dermatophytoses and onychomycoses. Furthermore, shortened treatment regimens have proven to be effective, ranging from 1-day treatment for vaginal candidosis to 1-week pulse therapy per month, for 2-4 months, in onychomycosis and follicular dermatophytosis. Clinical experience with itraconazole in the treatment of deep mycoses is less comprehensive. However, results in systemic candidosis, sporotrichosis, blastomycosis, paracoccidioiodomycosis, certain types of histoplasmosis and aspergillosis are extremely encouraging. Itraconazole is less effective in the treatment of chromomycosis and coccidioidomycosis. Nevertheless, considering the refractory nature of these diseases, itraconazole has proven to be a valuable addition to the antifungal drugs currently available for treatment. Itraconazole has been well-tolerated with doses of up to 400 mg/day being generally free of serious adverse effects. However, a potential for drug interactions exists, mediated through the cytochrome P450 enzyme 3A4 system, which should be considered when itraconazole is used as part of a multi-drug regimen.

A risk-benefit assessment of the newer oral antifungal agents used to treat onychomycosis

The newer antifungal agents itraconazole, terbinafine and fluconazole have become available to treat onychomycosis over the last 10 years. During this time period these agents have superseded griseofulvin as the agent of choice for onychomycosis. Unlike griseofulvin, the new agents have a broad spectrum of action that includes dermatophytes, Candida species and nondermatophyte moulds. Each of the 3 oral antifungal agents, terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole, is effective against dermatophytes with relatively fewer data being available for the treatment of Candida species and nondermatophyte moulds. Itraconazole is effective against Candida onychomycosis. Terbinafine may be more effective against C. parapsilosis compared with C. albicans; furthermore with Candida species a higher dose of terbinafine or a longer duration of therapy may be required compared with the regimen for dermatophytes. The least amount of experience in treating onychomycosis is with fluconazole. Griseofulvin is not effective against Candida species or the nondermatophyte moulds. The main use of griseo-fulvin currently is to treat tinea capitis. Ketoconazole may be used by some to treat tinea versicolor with the dosage regimens being short and requiring the use of only a few doses. The preferred regimens for the 3 oral antimycotic agents are as follows: itraconazole - pulse therapy with the drug being administered for 1 week with 3 weeks off treatment between successive pulses; terbinafine - continuous once daily therapy; and fluconazole - once weekly treatment. The regimen for the treatment of dermatophyte onychomycosis is: itraconazole - 200mg twice daily for I week per month x 3 pulses; terbinafine - 250 mg/day for 12 weeks; or, fluconazole - 150 mg/wk until the abnormal-appearing nail plate has grown out, typically over a period of 9 to 18 months. For the 3 oral antifungal agents the more common adverse reactions pertain to the following systems, gastrointestinal (for example, nausea, gastrointestinal distress, diarrhoea, abdominal pain), cutaneous eruption, and CNS (for example, headache and malaise). Each of the new antifungal agents is more cost-effective than griseofulvin for the treatment of onychomycosis and is associated with high compliance, in part because of the shorter duration of therapy. The newer antifungal agents are generally well tolerated with drug interactions that are usually predictable.