Usefulness of fluorescence in situ hybridization for the diagnosis of Turner mosaic fetuses with small ring X chromosomes

Analysis of marker or complex chromosomal rearrangements present in pre- and post-natal karyotypes utilizing a combination of G-banding, spectral karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization

The significance of complex chromosomal rearrangements presents a diagnostic dilemma. In the past, the use of G-banding coupled with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been the standard approach. The recent development of spectral karyotyping (SKY) and multicolor FISH (M-FISH) has resulted in an increased accuracy of identification of marker or other complex chromosomal rearrangements. However, owing to the additional cost and time associated with SKY or M-FISH, and the restricted availability of such imaging facilities in many centers, it is not feasible to perform these procedures routinely on every sample. In addition, the identification of an aberration by SKY or M-FISH will often require confirmation by FISH. A practical approach is needed to take advantage of the complementary strengths of each method. In our center we utilize an algorithm that dictates the use of routine G-banding for the initial preliminary evaluation of a patient, followed by SKY characterization if marker chromosomes or complex translocations are detected by the G-banding analysis. According to this algorithm, FISH is used to verify the results once the origin of the abnormal chromosome has been determined by SKY. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm, we have analyzed both amniocyte and lymphocyte slides, using a combination of G-banding, SKY, and FISH. Our results confirm that an algorithm which selectively uses SKY or M-FISH will provide an efficient and improved method for pre- and post-natal chromosomal analysis.

French multi-centric study of 2000 amniotic fluid interphase FISH analyses from high-risk pregnancies and review of the literature

This prospective and multi-centric study confirms the accuracy and the limitations of interphase FISH and shows that any cytogenetics laboratory can perform this technique. With regard to the technical approach, we think that slides must be examined by two investigators, because the scoring may be subjective. The main problem with the AneuVysion kit concerns the alpha satellite probes, and especially the chromosome 18 probe, which is sometimes very difficult to interpret because of the high variability of the size of the spots, and this may lead to false negative and uninformative cases. The best solution would be to replace these probes by locus-specific probes. Concerning clinical management, we offer interphase FISH only in very high-risk pregnancies or/and at late gestational age because of the cost of the test. We think that an aberrant FISH result can be used for a clinical decision when it is associated with a corresponding abnormal ultrasound scan. In other cases, most of the time, we prefer to wait for the standard karyotype.