In vitro activity of gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Germany

Antimicrobial Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates of Outpatients in Germany, 1999–2000

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae during the winter of 1999-2000 in Germany.

METHODS

Pneumococcal isolates were prospectively collected by 14 different clinical microbiology laboratories. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of penicillin G, erythromycin A, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin, clindamycin, levofloxacin and telithromycin were determined by the broth microdilution method.

RESULTS

Among 328 strains 4.6% were nonsusceptible to penicillin G (intermediate and resistant strains) and 9.5% were resistant to erythromycin A. Analysis of erythromycin-resistant strains for the underlying resistance determinants revealed that 12 (38.7%) belonged to the erm(B) and 19 (61.3%) to the mef(E) type of resistance. Among the macrolide-resistant strains, serotypes 19F (n = 9) and 14 (n = 8) were the predominant types.

CONCLUSIONS

Macrolide resistance in Germany is of growing concern and mainly due to the high prevalence of pneumococci expressing the mef(E) type of resistance.

Gemifloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone approved for treatment of respiratory infections

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the microbiology, pharmacokinetic parameters, drug interactions, and results of the available clinical trials of gemifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1966-September 2003) was searched for primary and review articles. Data from the manufacturer were also included. Key words included adverse effects, clinical trials, drug interactions, gemifloxacin, and pharmacokinetic parameters.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles and product labeling concerning gemifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of CAP and AECB, were included for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Compared with currently available fluoroquinolones, gemifloxacin demonstrated improved in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% eradication 0.03 microg/mL) and similar activity against gram-negative respiratory pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis) and atypical pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin, consistent with other available fluoroquinolones, has insufficient activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to allow clinical use for such infections. Gemifloxacin has adequate bioavailability and a favorable drug interaction profile. Gemifloxacin was comparable to commonly employed nonfluoroquinolone regimens for treatment of CAP and AECB, although the studies were designed to demonstrate equivalence. Gemifloxacin once daily for 5-7 days was well tolerated in controlled and uncontrolled clinical studies. Available clinical data, however, are insufficient to draw clinical or toxicologic distinctions between gemifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemifloxacin may be a suitable choice for empiric treatment of CAP or AECB. However, due to the significant history of fluoroquinolone-induced hepatic failure and dermatologic complications, the use of this drug should be closely monitored.

Serum bactericidal activity of gemifloxacin versus clarithromycin against Streptococcus pneumoniae with different susceptibility to quinolones

The objective of this study was to determine serum bactericidal titers (SBT, the highest dilution of serum showing no growth) and the serum bactericidal activity (SBA, i.e. duration of SBT greater than 1:2) as well as the serum bactericidal rate of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin after single doses in healthy male volunteers against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Strains tested had various degrees of susceptibility to penicillin as well as different susceptibility to quinolones due to a different QRDR mutation pattern (parC, gyrA). Serum samples from volunteers (n = 12) who had received a single oral dose of either 320 mg gemifloxacin or 500 mg clarithromycin in an open-label crossover study were obtained over a 24-hour period. SBA was determined, using the microdilution method. SBA of wildtype strains for gemifloxacin ranged from 8.9 to 15.4 h (mean 12.6 h). For gemifloxacin, 2 strains with solitary gyrA mutation had an SBA from 4.5 to 4.7 h (median 4.5 h). One of the 2 strains with a single QRDR mutation in parC displayed an SBA of 4.5 h, comparable to the gyrA mutation strains, whereas the second strain had a nearly twice as long SBA of 8.9 h. Two strains with two mutations (parC and gyrA) did not display any SBA. For clarithromycin, the duration of SBA ranged from 11.3 to 15.5 h (mean 13.6 h) for 6 of the 12 strains with an MIC < or = 0.06 mg/L (no SBA was found for the remaining strains, with an MIC of 0.25 mg/L or higher). In conclusion, a correlation between individual serum concentrations and SBA was found for both antibiotics.

Microbiology of newer fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory pathogens

Community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and acute sinusitis are among the most common bacterial infections encountered in clinical practice. Pathogens frequently associated with these infections include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Unfortunately, resistance to antimicrobials commonly used for the treatment of these infections is increasing, limiting the clinical efficacy of these agents. Fluoroquinolones offer several advantages over other classes of antimicrobials used for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. In general, fluoroquinolones have excellent in vitro activity against common respiratory pathogens, including some drug-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Microbial resistance to the newer fluoroquinolones is relatively uncommon, currently occurring in approximately 1% of clinical isolates in North America. Fluoroquinolones currently in clinical development may offer additional benefits over the marketed agents because they maintain good potency against isolates of S. pneumoniae displaying resistance to older quinolones (i.e., ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin) and may have a lower potential to engender resistance. This article reviews the in vitro activity of several newer fluoroquinolones, including agents currently in clinical development, against common respiratory pathogens, including antimicrobial-resistant strains. The mechanisms and prevalence of resistance of beta-lactam antimicrobials, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones also are reviewed.