Medical therapy versus antireflux surgery in Barrett's esophagus: what is the best therapeutic approach?

Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus

With the increase in the rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States and the Western world matched with the high morbidity and mortality of esophagectomy, there is an increasing need for new and effective techniques to treat and prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma. A wide variety of endoscopic mucosal ablative techniques have been developed for early esophageal neoplasia. However, long-term control of neoplasic risk has not been demonstrated. Most studies show that specialized intestinal metaplasia may persist underneath neo-squamous mucosa, posing a risk for subsequent neoplastic progression. In this article we review current published literature on endoscopic therapies for the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Long-term clinical and pathologic response of Barrett's esophagus after antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

The impact of antireflux surgery on outcome in Barrett's esophagus, in particular its effect on both the regression of metaplasia and the progression of metaplasia through dysplasia to adenocarcinoma, remains unclear. This long-term follow-up study evaluated clinical, endoscopic, histopathologic, and physiologic parameters in patients with Barrett's esophagus who underwent antireflux surgery in a specialist unit.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2001, 58 patients with Barrett's esophagus (49 long-segment and 9 short-segment) underwent a Rossetti-Nissen fundoplication, 32 via open procedure and 26 laparoscopically. Symptomatic follow-up with a detailed questionnaire was available in 58 (100%) and follow-up endoscopy and histology in 57 (98%) patients, and 41 patients (71%) underwent preoperative and postoperative 24-hour pH monitoring.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 59 months, 52 patients (90%) had excellent symptom control, whereas 6 patients (10%) had significant recurrent symptoms and were on regular proton pump inhibitor medication. Seventeen of 41 patients having preoperative and postoperative pH monitoring (41%) had a persistent increase of acid reflux above normal. Thirty-five percent (20 of 57) of patients showed either partial or complete regression of Barrett's epithelium. Six of 8 patients with preoperative low-grade dysplasia showed evidence of regression. Dysplasia developed after surgery in 2 patients, and 2 patients developed adenocarcinoma at 4 and 7 years after surgery. All 4 of these patients had abnormal postoperative acid scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Nissen fundoplication provides excellent long-lasting relief of symptoms in patients with Barrett's esophagus and may promote regression of metaplasia and dysplasia. Control of symptoms does not concord fully with abolition of acid reflux. Progression of Barrett's to dysplasia and tumor was only evident in patients with abnormal postoperative acid scores, suggesting that pH monitoring has an important role in the follow-up of surgically treated patients.

A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) are controversial. We conducted a critical review of the literature in BE to provide guidance on clinically relevant issues.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of 18 participants evaluated the strength and the grade of evidence for 42 statements pertaining to the diagnosis, screening, surveillance, and treatment of BE. Each member anonymously voted to accept or reject statements based on the strength of evidence and his own expert opinion.

RESULTS

There was strong consensus on most statements for acceptance or rejection. Members rejected statements that screening for BE has been shown to improve mortality from adenocarcinoma or to be cost-effective. Contrary to published clinical guidelines, they did not feel that screening should be recommended for adults over age 50, regardless of age or duration of heartburn. Members were divided on whether surveillance prolongs survival, although the majority agreed that it detects curable neoplasia and can be cost-effective in selected patients. The majority did not feel that acid-reduction therapy reduces the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma but did agree that nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with a cancer risk reduction and are of promising (but unproven) value. Participants rejected the notion that mucosal ablation with acid suppression prevents adenocarcinoma in BE but agreed that this may be an appropriate strategy in a subgroup of patients with high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this review of BE, the opinions of workshop members on issues pertaining to screening and surveillance are at variance with published clinical guidelines.