Time of developing motor deficits before radiotherapy as a new and relevant prognostic factor in metastatic spinal cord compression: final results of a retrospective analysis

Quality of life in patients with malignant spinal cord compression: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an oncological emergency that may result in a devastating combination of malignancy and disability. Existing quality of life (QoL) questionnaires commonly used in MSCC literature (EORTC QLQ-C30, BM-22, Brief Pain Inventory, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes) may not capture all the commonly reported symptoms and lack specificity to MSCC. The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine unmet patient needs and underreported QoL issues and compile a comprehensive list of QoL issues. The secondary objective of this review is to compile all existing QoL tools and questionnaires and determine whether any QoL issues are not addressed in the existing tools currently used in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases between 1946 and February 6, 2023, to compile all QoL issues and existing questionnaires used to assess QoL in patients with MSCC. All study designs were included given that they discussed QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review identified the most frequently discussed QoL issues in the literature studying MSCC. This included direct symptoms of MSCC such as back pain, paralysis, limb weakness/numbness, and urinary/bowel incontinence. Indirect symptoms coming from radiotherapy treatment such as dysphagia, painful swallowing, mouth pain, dry mouth, diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting were also noted. Other symptoms resulting from corticosteroid treatment included difficulty sleeping, blurring of vision, weight gain, and mood disturbance. Patients also experienced psychosocial issues such as anxiety, depression, emotional distress, low self-esteem, concerns about dependence on others, concerns about getting home, and fear about their prognosis and future.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the QoL issues specific to patients with MSCC and QoL tools capturing these issues. Relevance of QoL issues identified in this systematic review must be prospectively validated by patients and healthcare professionals with experience in treating MSCC.

Prognostic Factors of Surgical Complications and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumor

OBJECTIVE

Oncologic treatments increase the incidence of spinal metastases. Surgical treatment of spinal metastases results in a high complication rate, which must set against the expected benefits. The aim of this article was to study the effect of several prognostic factors on surgical complications and survival time using an extended database of patients with spinal metastases.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 337 patients with spinal metastases who were surgically treated between 2008 and 2015. Demographic and clinical features, oncologic histories, surgical interventions, and end results were collected. Descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the cohort of patients. Kaplan-Meier formula and log-rank test were used to examine overall survival times.

RESULTS

Median overall survival time was 222 days (range, 175-274 days). Age, preoperative motor disorders, preoperative Frankel grade categories, Karnofsky performance scale, type of primary tumor, and presence of internal metastasis had a significant negative effect on overall survival. Complications such as bleeding or need for intensive care could be predicted preoperatively based on preoperative performance status, type of primary tumor, affected vertebral levels, and type of surgical interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal metastatic disease is a challenging surgical problem. If the exact prognostic factors are known preoperatively, surgical outcome and overall survival can be predicted more precisely. Our results could provide a basis for a future multicenter prospective study to determine the best treatment protocol for patients with spinal metastases.

Epidural and intramedullary spinal metastasis: clinical features and role of fractionated radiotherapy

Metastases involving the spinal epidural space and cord parenchyma are major sources of neurological impairment and decreased quality of life in cancer patients. Herein we review the clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, importance of early diagnosis and initiation of treatment, and role of fractionated radiotherapy of these disorders.

Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1,043 patients

BACKGROUND

Expected survival is a major factor influencing extent of treatment for symptomatic spinal bone metastases (SBM). Predictive models have been developed, but their use can lead to over- or undertreatment.. The study objective was to identify prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic SBM and to create a validated risk stratification model.

METHODS

All patients who were treated for symptomatic SBM between 2001 and 2010 were included in this single center retrospective study. Medical records were reviewed for type of primary cancer, performance status, presence of visceral, brain and bone metastases, number and location of spinal metastases, and neurological functioning. Performance status was assessed with the Karnofsky performance score and neurological functioning with the Frankel scale. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate log-rank tests, Cox regression models, and Harrell's C statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 1 043 patients were studied. The most prevalent tumors were those of breast (n = 299), lung (n = 250), and prostate (n = 215). Median follow-up duration was 6.6 years, and 6 patients were lost to follow-up. Based on the results of the uni- and multivariate analyses, 4 categories were created. Median survival in category A was 31.2 months (95% CI, 25.2-37.3 months), 15.4 months (95% CI, 11.9-18.2 months) for category B, 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.4 months) for category C, and 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-1.9 months) for category D. Harrell's C statistic was calculated after the model was applied to an external dataset, yielding a result of 0.69.

CONCLUSION

Assessing patients according to the presented model results in 4 categories with significantly different survival times.

The role of radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

Radiotherapy alone is the most common treatment for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy is generally indicated only in 10-15% of MESCC cases. Chemotherapy has an unclear role and may be considered for selected patients with hematological or germ-cell malignancies. If radiotherapy alone is given, it is important to select the appropriate regimen. Similar functional outcomes can be achieved with short-course radiotherapy regimens and longer-course radiotherapy regimens. Longer-course radiotherapy is associated with better local control of MESCC than short-course radiotherapy. Patients with a more favorable survival prognosis (expected survival of ≥6 months) should receive longer-course radiotherapy, as they may live long enough to develop a recurrence of MESCC. Patients with an expected survival of <6 months should be considered for short-course radiotherapy. A recurrence of MESCC in the previously irradiated region after short-course radiotherapy may be treated with another short-course of radiotherapy. After primary administration of longer-course radiotherapy, decompressive surgery should be performed if indicated. Alternatively, re-irradiation can be performed using high-precision techniques to reduce the cumulative dose received by the spinal cord. Larger prospective trials are required to better define the appropriate treatment for the individual patient.

Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease: what are the options, indications, and outcomes?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the options, indications, and outcomes for conventional radiotherapy and radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease.

METHODS

Three research questions were determined through a consensus among a multidisciplinary panel of spine oncology experts. A systematic review of the literature was conducted regarding radiotherapy and radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Evidence Based Medicine Database, and a review of bibliographies of reviewed articles.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1. What are the clinical outcomes of the current indications for conventional radiotherapy alone and stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease? 2. What are the current dose recommendations and fractionation schedules for conventional spine radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease? 3. What are the current known patterns of failure and complications after conventional spine radiation and stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic spine disease?

RESULTS

For conventional radiotherapy, the initial literature search yielded a total of 531 potentially relevant abstracts. Each of these abstracts was reviewed for relevance, and 62 were selected for in-depth review. Forty-nine studies met all the inclusion criteria. References from the articles included in the analysis and review articles were also examined for potential inclusion in the study. For conventional radiotherapy, 3 randomized trials (high-quality evidence), 4 prospective studies (moderate-quality evidence), and over 40 nonprospective data sets (low- or very-low-quality evidence) that included over 5000 patients in the literature were included in this review. Drawing from the same databases, a systematic search for radiosurgery yielded 195 abstracts, of which 29 met all inclusion criteria. They all represented single-institution reports (low- or very-low-quality data). No randomized data are available for spine radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

A systematic review of the available evidence suggests that conventional radiotherapy is safe and effective with good symptomatic response and local control, particularly for radiosensitive histologies. A strong recommendation can be made with moderate quality evidence that conventional fractionated radiotherapy is an appropriate initial therapy option for patients with spine metastases in cases in which no relative contraindication exists. A systematic review of the available evidence suggests that radiosurgery is safe and provides an incremental benefit over conventional radiotherapy with more durable symptomatic response and local control independent of histology, even in the setting of prior fractionated radiotherapy. A strong recommendation can be made with low-quality evidence that radiosurgery should be considered over conventional fractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of solid tumor spine metastases in the setting of oligometastatic disease and/or radioresistant histology.

Spinal reirradiation after short-course RT for metastatic spinal cord compression

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of reirradiation (re-RT) for in-field recurrence of metastatic spinal cord compression after primary RT with 1 x 8 Gy or 5 x 4 Gy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 62 patients, treated with 1 x 8 Gy (n = 34) or 5 x 4 Gy (n = 28) between January 1995 and August 2003, received re-RT for in-field recurrence of metastatic spinal cord compression. The median time to recurrence was 6 months (range, 2-40 months). Re-RT was performed with 1 x 8 Gy (after 1 x 8 Gy or 5 x 4 Gy, n = 34), 5 x 3 Gy (after 1 x 8 Gy or 5 x 4 Gy, n = 15), or 5 x 4 Gy (after 1 x 8 Gy, n = 13). The cumulative biologically effective dose (primary RT plus re-RT) was 80-100 Gy2. The median follow-up after re-RT was 8 months (range, 2-42 months). Motor function was evaluated up to 6 months after re-RT.

RESULTS

After re-RT, 25 patients (40%) showed improvement of motor function, 28 (45%) had no change, and 9 (15%) had deterioration. Of the 16 previously nonambulatory patients, 6 (38%) regained the ability to walk. No second in-field recurrence in the same spinal region was observed after re-RT. The outcome was not significantly influenced by the radiation schedule. Radiation myelopathy was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal re-RT with 1 x 8 Gy, 5 x 3 Gy, or 5 x 4 Gy for in-field recurrence of metastatic spinal cord compression appears safe and effective. Myelopathy seems unlikely, if the cumulative biologically effective dose is < or = 100 Gy2.

Comparison of 1 x 8 Gy and 10 x 3 Gy for functional outcome in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

PURPOSE

Since life expectancy is markedly reduced in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), a short and effective radiation schedule is desired. This study investigates a reduction of the overall treatment time to only one day by comparing 1 x 8 Gy to the multi-fractionated 10 x 3 Gy for functional outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data of 204 patients, treated for MSCC with either 1 x 8 Gy (n = 96) or 10 x 3 Gy (n = 108), were analyzed retrospectively. Motor function and ambulatory status were evaluated before and up to 24 weeks after RT. A multivariate analysis (nominal regression) was performed including radiation schedule, performance status, age, irradiated vertebra, and relevant prognostic factors (histology, ambulatory status, time of developing motor deficits). Improvement of motor deficits was selected as basic category and compared with no change and deterioration.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed no significant difference between the schedules for post-treatment motor function and ambulatory rates. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant effect on functional outcome for the prognostic factors, but not for the radiation schedule (p = 0.853 for no change, p = 0.237 for deterioration).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest the two fractionation schedules to be comparably effective for functional outcome. Thus, 1 x 8 Gy should be considered for patients with a poor survival prognosis.

Cancer rehabilitation: does it make a difference?

Cancer is a significant cause of physical and cognitive disability. The concept of cancer rehabilitation was developed in the 1970s; it was a concept that led to funding support and to significant contributions to symptom management. A recent trend has been an increase in the number of cancer diagnoses and an increase in cancer survival rate. This suggests that more persons with cancer are living longer despite cancer-caused impairments. Interdisciplinary cancer rehabilitation programs are designed to help cancer patients achieve maximal functional ability and adapt to disabilities resulting from cancer or its treatments. Currently, there are few cancer rehabilitation programs in the United States. Information about the role of rehabilitation nursing in cancer patient care is scarce. The purposes of this article were to review the history of cancer rehabilitation; review functional outcomes that have been reported in current research; and identify the multiple, complex challenges that illustrate the role of a cancer rehabilitation clinical nurse specialist in the rehabilitation of cancer patients.

Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of motor dysfunction due to metastatic spinal cord compression: comparison of three different fractionation schedules

PURPOSE

The optimum fractionation schedule for radiotherapy (RT) of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is still debated in the literature. Several reports have compared different fractionation schedules for pain relief. To our knowledge, this retrospective analysis is the first to compare three different schedules for functional outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For posttreatment functional and ambulatory outcome, three schedules, 30 Gy in 10 fractions (n = 93), 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 80), and 40 Gy in 20 fractions (n = 74), were compared. Motor function was evaluated by a 6-point scale before and at the end of RT and 3, 6, and 12 months later. A multivariate analysis was performed for functional outcome, including fractionation schedule and the three relevant prognostic factors (primary tumor type, time of developing motor deficits before RT, and ambulatory status).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed for posttreatment motor function or ambulatory rates among the three schedules. According to the multivariate analysis, the radiation schedule had no significant impact on functional outcome (p = 0.223) in contrast to the three prognostic factors (p <0.001, p <0.001, and p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The three fractionation schedules were comparable for functional outcome. The least time-consuming schedule (30 Gy in 10 fractions) should be considered for patients with a markedly reduced life expectancy.