Successful thrombolytic treatment of intracranial carotid occlusion due to dissection

Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial artery dissection: a single-center case series and a review of literature

Efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to intracranial artery dissection (IAD) are currently not established. We aimed to present a single-center experience on IAD-related AIS treated by IVT. We selected all consecutive patients with IAD-related AIS treated by IVT from a prospectively constructed single-center acute stroke registry from 2003 to 2017. We reviewed demographical, clinical and neuroimaging data and recorded hemorrhagic complications, mortality within 7 days and modified Rankin Scale at 3-months. Out of 181 AISs related to cervicocephalic dissections, 10 (5.5%) were due to IAD and five of these patients received IVT. Among these five patients, median age was 62 years; hypertension and dyslipidemia were the most frequent vascular risk factors. IAD locations were distal internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (M1), anterior cerebral artery (A2), and, in two cases, the basilar artery. All anterior circulation IADs were occlusive or subocclusive, while the two basilar artery IADs caused arterial stenosis. After IVT, there were no subarachnoid or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages. One patient had an asymptomatic hemorrhagic infarct type 1. Two patients died within 7 days from ischemic mass effect. The other three patients had favorable clinical outcomes at 3-months. In this small single-center case series of IAD-related AIS, thrombolysis seemed relatively safe. However, IVT efficacy and the likelihood of arterial recanalization are still uncertain in this context. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of IVT in these patients.

Clinical and Radiological Difficulties to Detect Isolated MCA Dissection before Intravenous tPA Therapy

A 64-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital 48 minutes after sudden onset of dysphasia and right hemiplegia. Head computed tomography revealed small infarcts in the left putamen and 4-dimensional computed tomography angiography depicted high-degree stenosis in the left middle cerebral artery and delayed filling of the contrast media in the left middle cerebral artery territory. The patient underwent intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment. On day 5 of hospitalization, the patient underwent conventional cerebral angiography, revealing internal carotid artery to middle cerebral artery dissection. Fortunately, subarachnoid hemorrhage as an adverse effect did not occur, although iv-tPA was administered without detecting middle cerebral artery dissection.

Endovascular Management vs Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke Secondary to Carotid Artery Dissection: Local Experience and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the endovascular management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) related to carotid artery dissection (CAD).

OBJECTIVE

To report our interventional experience in AIS from CAD and to compare it with conservative treatment of CAD with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) via systematic review.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of consecutive high-grade steno-occlusive CAD with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) >5 and ≤12 hours of last seen normal from 2 tertiary centers. A systematic review for studies on IVT in the setting of CAD via PubMed was performed for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 1112 patients treated with endovascular interventions within the study period, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 52.0 ± 10.9 years, 76% were male, NIHSS was 17.4 ± 5.8, 52% received IVT before intervention, and 90% had tandem occlusions. Mean time from last-known-normal to puncture was 4.8 ± 2.1 hours and procedure length 1.8 ± 1.0 hours. Stents were used in 52% of cases, and reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia 2b-3) achieved in 95%. No parenchymal hemorrhages were observed and 71% achieved good outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale 0-2). The literature review identified 8 studies concerning thrombolysis in the CAD setting fitting inclusion criteria (n = 133). Our endovascular experience compared with the pooled IVT reports indicated that, despite presenting with higher NIHSS (17 vs 14; P = .04) and experiencing a longer time to definitive therapy (287 vs 162 minutes; P < .01), patients treated intra-arterially had similar rates of symptomatic cerebral/European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study-parenchymal hematoma 2 hemorrhage (0% vs 6%; P = .43) and good outcomes (71% vs 52%; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence that the endovascular management of AIS in the setting of CAD is a feasible, safe, and promising strategy.

Safety and Functional Outcome of Thrombolysis in Dissection-Related Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose—

The safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection (CAD) are controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to pool all individual patient data and provide a valid estimate of safety and outcome of thrombolysis in CAD.

Methods—

We performed a systematic literature search on intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis in CAD. We calculated the rates of pooled symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality and indirectly compared them with matched controls from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke–International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. We applied multivariate regression models to identify predictors of excellent (modified Rankin Scale=0 to 1) and favorable (modified Rankin Scale=0 to 2) outcome.

Results—

We obtained individual patient data of 180 patients from 14 retrospective series and 22 case reports. Patients were predominantly female (68%), with a mean±SD age of 46±11 years. Most patients presented with severe stroke (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score=16). Treatment was intravenous thrombolysis in 67% and intra-arterial thrombolysis in 33%. Median follow-up was 3 months. The pooled symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.3 to 7.2). Overall mortality was 8.1% (95% CI, 4.9 to 13.2), and 41.0% (95% CI, 31.4 to 51.4) had an excellent outcome. Stroke severity was a strong predictor of outcome. Overlapping confidence intervals of end points indicated no relevant differences with matched controls from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke–International Stroke Thrombolysis Register.

Conclusions—

Safety and outcome of thrombolysis in patients with CAD-related stroke appear similar to those for stroke from all causes. Based on our findings, thrombolysis should not be withheld in patients with CAD.

Evaluation and management for carotid dissection in patients presenting after choking or strangulation

BACKGROUND

Carotid dissection (CD) is often overlooked as a concern in strangulation and choking cases. When the diagnosis is considered, the question remains what is the best means of evaluation, and which imaging study should be obtained.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature for evaluation of choking- and strangulation-related injuries and their association with CD.

DISCUSSION

This article will review the literature on blunt carotid injuries, with particular attention to subjects with choking and strangulation mechanisms of injury, and will include important physical findings, when and which radiographic evaluations are indicated, and treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, CD can occur after strangulation and choking. When suspected, evaluation should include imaging studies including computed tomography angiography.

Spontaneous Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Treated by Intra-arterial Thrombolysis and Superficial Temporal Artery-Middle Cerebral Artery Anastomosis in the Acute Stage-Case Report-

A 22-year-old man presented with sudden onset of right retro-orbital headache followed by left hemiparesis. Right carotid angiography demonstrated almost total occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and severe stenosis of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), presumably caused by arterial dissection. Local arterial injection of urokinase was performed 2 hours after onset. The ICA became patent, but the M2 portion of the MCA was still occluded, and the left hemiparesis did not improve. Superficial temporal artery-MCA anastomosis was immediately performed. The left hemiparesis disappeared completely 6 days after this procedure. Angiography 2 weeks after the onset revealed occlusion of the ICA, and maintenance of blood flow to the right cerebral hemisphere via the anastomosis. Magnetic resonance imaging showed small infarcts in the right cerebral cortex. Repeat angiography after 5 months showed recanalization of the right ICA and the right MCA. Combination of thrombolytic therapy and bypass surgery may be a useful treatment option for patients with sudden occlusion of the intracranial artery caused by dissection.