Docetaxel in patients with anthracycline-resistant advanced breast cancer

Pharmacoethnicity of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia: integrated analysis of published phase II and III trials

BACKGROUND

Ethnic differences in drug susceptibility and toxicity are a major concern, not only in drug development but also in the clinical setting. We review the toxicity profiles of docetaxel according to dose and ethnicity.

METHODS

We analyzed phase II and III clinical trials that included a once-every-3-weeks single-agent docetaxel arm. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant variables affecting the reported incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified studies conducted in Asia [odds ratio (OR) 19.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.64-99.0] and docetaxel dose (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) as independent variables for the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant difference in the incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia between Asian and non-Asian clinical studies. Physicians and pharmacists should consider ethnic diversity in docetaxel toxicity when interpreting the results of clinical trials.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination regimen in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

This study was conducted to evaluate the response rate of gemcitabine and cisplatin as second-line combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Thirty-eight eligible women with measurable disease and anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC were enrolled. The chemotherapy treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion over 30 min on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion over 1 h on day 1), which were administered every 21 days. Thirty-seven of 38 (97.4%) of patients were assessable for response. The objective response rate was 42.1% (95% CI, 26.4-57.8%) with 16 partial responses. The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.7-8.1 months) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 9.4-18.4 months), respectively. The most frequent hematologic-related adverse events were grade 3/4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia, observed in 10 patients (27.0%) and 11 (29.7%), respectively. Grade 3 stomatitis was observed in 3 (8.1%) patients. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed in this study. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. In conclusion, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is a safe and tolerable regimen as second-line combination for patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC.

A phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

The efficacy and tolerability of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer was investigated. In addition, the efficacy of a 3-day prophylaxis against cumulative dose-related fluid retention was examined with methylprednisolone 32 mg twice daily for 3 days starting 12 and 3 h before the docetaxel infusion together with oral cetirizine 10 mg 12 and 3 h before start of docetaxel for prevention of acute hypersensitivity reactions. According to the intent to treat-analysis 35% (95%CI: 25; 46) of the 94 patients entered responded to therapy. Their median survival was 12 months (range 0-20 months). The respective response rate for the 87 patients eligible for response evaluation was 37% (95%CI: 27; 48). Their median duration of response was 8 months (range 3-12 months), their median time to progression was 4 months (range 1-12 months). The corresponding response rate in the eligible patient cohort with anthracycline-resistant disease was 28% (95%CI: 15; 45) and increased to 44% (95%CI: 30; 59) in the cohort with non-anthracycline-resistant disease. Patients with visceral metastases responded in 36% and patients with > or = 3 organs involved in 33%. In a retrospective analysis, the 3-day premedication of corticosteroids and antihistamines proved to be as effective as the established but more toxic 5-day regimen in delaying and preventing the occurrence of docetaxel derived toxicities especially the cumulative fluid retention. In conclusion, docetaxel represents one of the most active agents for second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, especially for anthracycline-resistant patients. Due to comparable effectiveness of the 5-day regimen which is widely used by others and the 3-day premedication tested in this trial the latter proved to be more favourable and was therefore recommended for future therapies.

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of tipifarnib in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

This phase I study assessed the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of combined tipifarnib and docetaxel treatment in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The study protocol was sensitive to myelosuppression, as both drugs have been associated with this adverse event. Due to myelosuppression incidence, and in order to determine the MTD of docetaxel, multiple treatment regimens were employed. Tipifarnib was administered orally at 200 or 300 mg, twice daily (BID) for 21 days, 14 days, or 7 days for multiple 21-day cycles; intravenous (i.v.) docetaxel was administered on day 1 of each cycle at 60, 75, or 85 mg/m2.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients entered into the study. For each drug, MTDs were identified (tipifarnib: 300 mg BID for 14 days with 60 mg/m2 docetaxel; tipifarnib: 200 mg BID for 14 days with 75 mg/m2 docetaxel). The major dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, particularly febrile neutropenia (44%). Mutual pharmacokinetic interactions (the effect of docetaxel on tipifarnib pharmacokinetics and the effect of tipifarnib on docetaxel pharmacokinetics) were not evident, as maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) values of both tipifarnib and docetaxel were similar (p > or = 0.43) whether the two drugs were concomitantly administered or not. Seven of 31 evaluable patients (23%) had an objective response, 11 (35%) had stable disease (six > or = 24 weeks), and the overall clinical benefit rate (objective response and/or stable disease > or = 24 weeks) was 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the high incidence of febrile neutropenia necessitated a multiple scheduling adaptation of tipifarnib compared to the original protocol, the apparent lack of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions, the ability to coadminister tipifarnib and docetaxel near single-agent MTDs, and suggestive evidence of efficacy make this drug combination attractive for further examination.

Drug target interaction of tubulin-binding drugs in cancer therapy

Microtubules and their component protein, tubulin, constitute a popular target for the treatment of cancer. Many drugs that are presently used in clinics or in clinical trials and drugs that show promise as anticancer drugs bind to tubulin and microtubules. There are three conventional binding sites on beta-tubulin where many of these drugs bind. The binding properties, conformational changes upon binding, association constants and thermodynamic parameters for the drug-tubulin interaction on these three sites are discussed. The antiproliferative activities of these drugs and the possible correlation with the binding properties are also described.

Clinical experience with docetaxel for Chinese breast cancer patients: Hematological toxicity profiles

BACKGROUND

Asians are generally regarded to tolerate cytotoxic drugs less well than their Caucasian counterpart. A substantial proportion of patients receive suboptimal doses of chemotherapy for fear of severe toxicity. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the adverse events, especially hematological, of docetaxel in Chinese patients with breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients, age ranged from 33 to 70 (median=47) years, were assigned to receive 3 to 6 (median=4) cycles of Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 21 days as neoadjuvant (n=3), adjuvant (n=26), neoadjuvant plus adjuvant (n=3), or active therapy for metastatic or relapsed breast cancer (n=27).

RESULTS

A total of 56 (95%) patients completed the assigned whole regimen and only 3 (5%) patients discontinued due to either poor tolerance to the drug's side effects or worsening of disease leading to death. On average, the received dose intensity (RDI) was 0.86 for docetaxel 100 mg/m2 in this study. Among all the clinical adverse events, hematological toxicities were not excessively higher. Of the total 59 patients, major adverse events of all grades were leukopenia (22%), neutropenia (20%), fever (19%), and febrile neutropenia (14%). Only 12% and 14% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and neutropenia, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In view of the increasing breast cancer incidence and the acceptable toxicity profile of docetaxel among Chinese patients, a dosage of 100 mg/m2 can be recommended for use among Asians.

Sequence effect of docetaxel and carboplatin on toxicity, tumor response and pharmacokinetics in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a phase I study of two sequences

PURPOSE

To investigate sequence effects on toxicity, tumor response and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and carboplatin, together with a determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for each schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 46 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive docetaxel before (schedule A) or after (schedule B) carboplatin. The dose levels studied were [docetaxel (mg/m(2))/carboplatin (mg x min/ml)] 50/5, 60/5, 60/6, 60/7, and 70/6. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 or 4 weeks unless disease progression or undue toxicity occurred.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients, 44 were assessable for toxicity and received a total of 84 cycles. The major dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. When the docetaxel dose was 60 mg/m(2), the carboplatin MTD was deemed to be AUC 7 in both schedules. When the docetaxel dose was escalated to 70 mg/m(2), the carboplatin MTD was reached in schedule A, and the dose-limiting toxicity was not observed in schedule B. Tumor response was observed in 4 of 22 patients (18%) with schedule A and 8 of 19 (42%) with schedule B. Clearances of both drugs were not affected by sequence: 111.2+/-26.8 ml/min and 107.8+/-29.0 ml/min for carboplatin (P=0.69), and 26.7+/-8.3 l/h and 22.8+/-7.0 l/h for docetaxel (P=0.19) in schedules A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin AUC 6 followed by docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) was a favorable regimen for phase II study because of likely lower toxicity and a potentially higher response rate than the reverse sequence schedule. The mechanism of the sequence effects on toxicity and tumor response could not be explained by the pharmacokinetic interactions.

Front-Line Chemotherapy with Docetaxel and Gemcitabine Administered Every Two Weeks in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Phase II Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the docetaxel-gemcitabine combination administered every 2 weeks in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with MBC received docetaxel 65 mg/m2 as front-line chemotherapy intravenously over 1 h followed by gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on days 1 and 14. Cycles were repeated every 28 days without prophylactic growth factor support. Twenty-eight (54%) patients had previously received chemotherapy as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. Thirty-six (69%) patients had visceral disease including 20 (38%) with liver metastases. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 45 for response.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete response occurred in 7 (13%) patients and partial response in 24 (46%) for an overall response rate of 59% (95% CI: 46.3-73.0%). The response rate was 68% for the 28 patients who had previously received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 67% for the 36 patients with visceral metastases. The median duration of response was 6.1 months and the median time to disease progression 10.9 months. A total of 254 cycles were administered with dose reduction in 26 (10%) cycles and no lethal toxicity. Grade III-IV neutropenia occurred in 17 (33%) patients and thrombocytopenia in 3 (6%). Febrile neutropenia developed in 3 (6%) patients. Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild.

CONCLUSION

The docetaxel-gemcitabine combination is an active and well-tolerated front-line treatment for patients with MBC. This regimen represents a suitable option especially for women relapsing after anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Recombinant antibodies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer

The advent of recombinant antibody technology led to an enormous revival in the use of antibodies as diagnostic and therapeutic tools for fighting cancer. This review provides a brief historical sketch of the development of recombinant antibodies for the diagnosis and immunotherapy of cancer and summarizes the most significant clinical data for the best established reagents to date. It also discusses clinically relevant aspects of the use of recombinant antibodies in cancer patients.

Novel association with gemcitabine and docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines: Results of a multicenter phase II study1 1On behalf of Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale

The goals of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the gemcitabine/docetaxel combination in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines. Fifty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed or relapsed after anthracycline-based chemotherapy entered the study and were evaluable. Patients received gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (80 mg/m(2) day 8), every 3 weeks. The regimen was generally well tolerated with good feasibility. A complete response occurred in six patients (9.4%) and partial response in 23 (43.4%) for an overall response rate of 53% (95% confidence interval, 38.9% to 66.7%). Median survival rate was 70%; and the duration of response, time to progression, and overall survival were 6, 7.5, and 16.5 months, respectively. We conclude that the gemcitabine/docetaxel combination constitutes a manageable and tolerable combination as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer and may represent a valid treatment option in patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

Prediction of response to docetaxel by CYP3A4 mRNA expression in breast cancer tissues

We studied the relationship between response of breast cancer to docetaxel (DOC) or cylophosphamide + epirubucin (CE) treatment and CYP3A4 mRNA expression in breast tumors. CYP3A4 inactivates DOC but not E, which is a predominant effector in CE treatment. Twenty patients with locally advanced breast tumors and 18 patients with locally recurrent tumors underwent tumor biopsy before chemotherapy, and CYP3A4 mRNA expression levels in tumor tissues were assayed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Twenty-three patients were treated with DOC (60 mg/m(2) q3w) and 15 patients were treated with CE (C 600 mg/m(2) and E 60 mg/m(2) q3w). Patients with low CYP3A4 mRNA levels (n = 14) exhibited a significantly (p < 0.01) higher response rate (71%) to DOC treatment than those (n = 9) with high CYP3A4 mRNA levels (response rate, 11%). Positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of CYP3A4 mRNA levels in the prediction of response to DOC were 71, 89, and 78%, respectively. However, no significant association was observed between CYP3A4 mRNA expression and response to CE treatment. These results suggest that intratumoral CYP3A4 mRNA levels might be useful as a predictor of response to DOC treatment, but not to CE treatment, in breast cancer patients. The increased inactivation of DOC by CYP3A4 in tumor tissues may play some role in the acquisition of resistance to DOC.