Comparison of cytology and nuclear matrix protein 22 for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer

Urinary markers in the everyday diagnosis of bladder cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) represents the fourth most common neoplasia in men and the ninth most common cancer in women, with a significant morbidity and mortality. Cystoscopy and voided urine cytology (involving the examination of cells in voided urine to detect the presence of cancerous cells) are currently the routine initial investigations in patients with hematuria or other symptoms suggestive of BC. Around 75-85% of the patients are diagnosed as having non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Despite the treatment, these patients have a probability of recurrence at 5 years ranging from 50 to 70% and of progression to muscle invasive disease of 10-15%. Patients with NMIBC must undergo life-long surveillance, consisting of serial cystoscopies, possibly urine cytology and ultrasonography. Cystoscopy is unsuitable for screening because of its invasiveness and costs; serial cystoscopies may cause discomfort and distress to patients. Furthermore, cystoscopy may be inconclusive, falsely positive or negative. Although urine cytology has a reasonable sensitivity for the detection of high-grade BC, it lacks sensitivity to detect low-grade tumors (sensitivity ranging from 4 to 31%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology range from 7 to 100 and from 30 to 70%, respectively. There is a need for new urine biomarkers that may help in BC diagnosis and surveillance. A lot of urinary biomarkers with high sensitivity and/or specificity have been investigated. Although none of these markers have proven to be powerful enough to replace standard cystoscopy, some of them may represent accurate predictors of BC. A review of recent studies is presented.

Nuclear matrix protein-22: a prospective evaluation in a population at risk for bladder cancer. Results from the UroScreen study

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The prognosis of bladder cancer significantly depends on tumour stage and time of diagnosis so early diagnosis is desirable to decrease mortality and treatment costs. The NMP22 test is approved for clinical application by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the US. Previous studies have reported values of 47-100% for sensitivity and 58-91% for specificity with this test, but there is no new data on the predictive value of NMP22 for screening bladder cancer (BC). The most important risk factor for BC is the tobacco consumption but occupational exposure to carcinogenic substances, especially aromatic amines, is regarded as another risk factor. The UroScreen study is a prospective longitudinal study for the early detection of BC. To our knowledge, it is the largest prospective validation study conducted over the longest period of time. The study results led us to conclude that, based on the currently available data, NMP22 should not be regarded as an alternative to endoscopy, and we could not make a general recommendation for screening or follow-up. The UroScreen results indicate that urine-based molecular markers could be a suitable addition to urine cytology and the detection of microhaematuria.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of nuclear matrix protein-22 (NMP22) in bladder cancer (BC) screening, and its effect on variables in a prospective study in a high-risk population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1772 chemical workers (mean age 62 years) exposed to carcinogenic aromatic amines were enrolled in the study. In all, 7091 screening check-ups in 1609 subjects were performed. Urine samples were collected for a quantitative NMP22 immunoassay, urine analysis and creatinine concentration assessment. Cystoscopy and subsequent transurethral resection were performed where there were suspicious findings.

RESULTS

Histopathological analysis found three papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential, five recurrent BCs and 13 primary BCs. Three tumours were at a muscle-invasive stage (pT2, pT3a or pT3b). We found higher NMP22 concentrations (>10 U/mL) in 224 patients, which correctly predicted BC in six cases (sensitivity 97.29%, specificity 28.57%; negative predictive value 99.04%, positive predictive value 12.24%). Gross haematuria affected NMP22 results (odd ratio [OR] 3.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-6.73). Infection also affected NMP22 results (OR 4.13, 95% CI 2.31-7.35). NMP22 was more frequently positive in urine with creatinine concentration >2.5 g/L (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.91-2.86).

CONCLUSIONS

NMP22 outcomes are affected by haematuria, infection and concentrated urine. NMP22 alone cannot be recommended for primary screening in a high-risk population nor as an alternative to cystoscopy during follow-up. A NMP22 test might be a useful adjunct to urine cytology.

Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma from urine

Urine cytology is the most widely used noninvasive test to detect urothelial tumors. However, it is limited by its low sensitivity. On the other hand, cystoscopy is the gold standard procedure to follow patients with a history of bladder cancer but this test is invasive and costly. Therefore, there is a real need to develop new tests that can be used in bladder cancer surveillance. Several soluble and cell-based markers have been developed and most of them improve the sensitivity of cytology but the specificity is invariably decreased. Of the cell-based tests, two obtained Food and Drug Administration approval. ImmunoCyt/uCyt is a fluorescent test that uses three monoclonal antibodies and UroVysion is an in situ hybridization test, which uses four different probes to different chromosomes. Both tests have a high sensitivity to detect cancer cells and can help to predict urothelial cancer recurrence. ImmunoCyt/uCyt is somewhat better at detecting low-grade tumors but UroVysion is not affected by prior BCG treatment. However, both tests use fluorescent dyes, are time-consuming and require trained personnel. Because of their high negative predictive value, both tests may help the urologist to postpone a number of cystoscopies, especially in patients with low-risk urothelial cancer.

Intérêt des marqueurs urinaires dans le diagnostic et le suivi des tumeurs urothéliales de vessie

Urothelial bladder tumours require regular surveillance: cystoscopy associated with urine cytology are reference examinations. Several new markers currently under evaluation or already validated have recently been proposed to replace cytology and potentially reduce or even replace unnecessary cystoscopies. The biological fluid studied for all of these markers is the same as that of urine cytology, i.e. urine. The authors review the results of recent studies on these new urinary markers. The results of these markers demonstrate a better global sensitivity than urine cytology, but often a lower specificity. In the majority of cases, these tests are performed during patient follow-up (NMP22, BTA, CYFRA 21-l., etc.), but do not replace cystoscopy, due to a large number of false-positives. Other techniques, such as FISH, uCyt+ or microsatellites appear to be more promising, especially for the diagnosis of low-grade tumours. The best solution in practice may consist of a combination of several markers to further improve sensitivity and to decrease the false-positive rate responsible for unnecessary cystoscopies.

[Tumor marker tests in bladder cancer]

The gold standard for detecting bladder cancer is cystoscopy which identifies nearly all papillary and sessile lesions. However, it is an invasive procedure causing some discomfort for patients. Urine cytology is the standard non-invasive marker with very high specificity, but unfavourable poor sensitivity for Ta, G1, and T1 bladder tumors. To improve early detection of bladder cancer as well as to monitor treatment response and tumor recurrence, bladder tumor markers are eligible. An ideal bladder cancer test would have the potential to replace or delay cystoscopy in the follow-up of bladder cancer patients. In recent years, the FDA approved non-invasive tumor marker tests ImmunoCyt / uCyt+, BTA TRAK, BTA stat, NMP22, NMP22 BladderChek, and UroVysion have been investigated. The tests demonstrated higher sensitivity for diagnosis of bladder cancer compared to urine cytology. Overall, the mean sensitivity and mean specificity was 64-80% and 71-95% and the mean positive and negative predictive values to detect malignancy were 49-84% and 79-95%, respectively. BTA TRAK, BTA stat, NMP22, and NMP22 BladderChek assays are limited by false-positive results in patients with benign urological diseases such as hematuria, urocystitis, renal calculi or urinary tract infections. Due to low specificity BTA TRAK, BTA stat, NMP22, and NMP22 BladderChek should not be used without first ruling out benign or malignant genitourinary disease other than bladder cancer. With the exception of UroVysion achieving 80% sensitivity and 94% specificity, none of these non-invasive tests revealed a high sensitivity and specificity at the same time, which is a main demand to be made on an ideal tumor marker. Insufficient sensitivity along with limited specificity does not allow replacing cystoscopy in diagnosis of bladder cancer or treatment decisions based on a positive test result.

Molecular markers in bladder cancer: A critical appraisal

The diagnosis of both primary and recurrent bladder tumors currently relies upon the urine cytology and cystoscopy. Neither of these diagnostic tools is completely accurate. Prognostication of bladder cancer is largely based on pathologic tumor grade and stage. Over the past 2 decades, there is accumulating evidence that like many other cancers, bladder cancer, too, has a distinct molecular signature that separates it from other cancers and normal bladder tissue. Bladder tumors of different grades and stages even possess unique, and specific genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Although recognition of several of these molecular alterations is possible by analyzing tumor tissue, urine, and serum samples, few if any of these "molecular markers" for bladder cancer are widely used in clinical practice. These markers include some that can be applied during the diagnostic work-up of symptoms (e.g., hematuria), those under surveillance for recurrence of superficial disease and forecasting long-term prognosis, or response to chemotherapy. In this review of molecular markers for bladder cancer, effectiveness of markers in each of these categories that are identifiable in the urine of patients with bladder cancer was examined. Many of the diagnostic markers appear to hold an advantage over urine cytology in terms of sensitivity, especially for the detection of low-grade superficial tumors. However, most markers tend to be less specific than cytology, yielding more false-positives. This result is more commonly observed in patients with concurrent bladder inflammation or other benign bladder conditions. Although there are several candidate markers for assessing prognosis or response to chemotherapy, studies of large patient populations are lacking. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are required to determine their accuracy and widespread applicability in guiding treatment of bladder cancer.

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for bladder cancer: a review of the literature

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is the second most common malignancy of the genitourinary tract. Cystoscopy and urine cytology are the traditional most used techniques for diagnosis and surveillance of superficial bladder cancer. Urine cytology is specific for diagnosis of bladder cancer but sensitivity results not high, particularly in low-grade disease. Voided urine can be easily obtained and therefore additional diagnostic urine tests would be ideal for screening or follow-up of transitional cell carcinoma. A number of studies have focused on the evaluation of urinary markers that hold promise as non-invasive adjuncts to conventional diagnostic or surveillance techniques. In this review we discuss several new urinary markers (test for bladder tumor antigen, NMP22, fibrin degradation products, telomerase, fluorescence in situ hybridization test, flow cytometry) and their role in detection and follow-up of bladder cancer. Most of these markers have higher sensitivity than urine cytology, but voided urine cytology has the highest specificity.

ImmunoCyt/uCyt+ improves the sensitivity of urine cytology in patients followed for urothelial carcinoma

ImmunoCyt/uCyt is a fluorescent test combining three monoclonal antibodies. In this study, it has been tested as a complement to cytology in the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. It has been performed simultaneously with standard cytology and cystoscopy on 870 urine analyses from one hospital. In 136 cases, one or more bladder tumors were found. Overall sensitivity of cytology, ImmunoCyt/uCyt and combined analyses reached 29, 74 and 84%, respectively, and overall specificity was 98, 62 and 61%. The negative predictive value of cytology, ImmunoCyt/uCyt and both analyses was 88, 93 and 95%, respectively, and the positive predictive value was 70, 26 and 29%. The sensitivity of cytology for low malignant potential neoplasms, low- and high-grade papillary carcinomas was 6, 18 and 53%, while it reached 71, 79 and 93% when combined with ImmunoCyt/uCyt. The sensitivity of cytology for stages Ta, T1, T2 and over and Tis tumors was 12, 67, 47 and 50%, while it reached 78, 83, 79 and 100% when combined with ImmunoCyt/uCyt. In the absence of tumor on cystoscopy but with positive ImmunoCyt/uCyt, 18% of patients developed a tumor, 2-6 months later. Of the 109 cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy by cytology, a tumor was present in 30 cases and ImmunoCyt/uCyt was positive in 22 (73%) of them. In conclusion, ImmunoCyt/uCyt may be used to postpone cystoscopies in patients followed for bladder cancer and may help to save cytologist and pathologist screening time.

Tumor markers in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer. A systematic review

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed the available evidence, and obtained and compared summary estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of cytology and the urine based markers bladder tumor antigen, BTA stat (Polymedco, Redmond, Washington), BTA TRAK (Polymedco), NMP22 (Matritech, Cambridge, Massachusetts), telomerase and fibrin degradation product in detecting primary bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies on the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer published from 1990 through November 2001 in English and German were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE data bases. In our research we included studies that evaluated 1 or more of the markers, used cystoscopy as the reference standard and allowed the construction of a 2 x 2 contingency table for a per patient analysis. The data plus items on study and clinical characteristics were extracted by 2 observers. Sensitivity and specificity for each marker were estimated using a bivariate random effect meta-analysis. A multivariable analysis was performed to explain study variation.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies were included in our review. Only 2 studies were available on fibrin degradation product, hence a meta-analysis was not possible. Cytology had the best specificity at 94% (95% CI: 90% to 96%). This figure was significantly better than that of the other markers except for telomerase (specificity 86% [71% to 94%]). Telomerase had the best sensitivity (75% [71% to 79%]) but it was not significantly better than that of BTA stat (70% [66% to 74%]). Case control designs yielded lower values for sensitivity for the tumor markers cytology, bladder tumor antigen and BTA stat.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytology has the best specificity and telomerase the best sensitivity. However, none of the markers studied here is sensitive enough to be recommended for daily routine.

New aspect of photodynamic diagnosis of bladder tumors: fluorescence cytology

OBJECTIVES

To establish a new diagnostic method for the detection and follow-up of bladder cancer that combines the principles of photodynamic diagnosis and urinary cytology.

METHODS

We investigated 46 patients scheduled for transurethral resection of a bladder tumor immediately before the resection was carried out. After intravesical instillation of either 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or hypericin, urinary cytology specimens were obtained. Induced fluorescence of urothelial cells was detected by fluorescence microscopy. The results were compared with the conventional cytologic and histologic findings.

RESULTS

In the 46 patients, 42 cases of urothelial carcinoma and 4 cases of nonspecific inflammation were diagnosed. Of the 42 patients with cancer, 19 had Stage Ta, 9 had T1, 3 had carcinoma in situ, and 11 had invasive bladder cancer. The grading was G1 in 17 patients, G2 in 6 patients, and G3 in 19 patients. In 38 cases we instilled ALA and in 8 hypericin. All 4 patients diagnosed with nonspecific inflammation had received ALA. We detected ALA-induced fluorescence in 34 of 38 cases. One of the four histologically negative cases had a false-positive finding and 1 case of urothelial carcinoma did not show fluorescence. After instillation of hypericin we could detect induced fluorescence in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our first results suggest that fluorescence cytology is more sensitive than other noninvasive tests. After additional investigation, it may become a valuable diagnostic method and may reduce the number of cystoscopies in the follow-up of bladder tumors.

Recent clinical trials in superficial bladder cancer

The present review addresses literature regarding the management of superficial bladder cancer published since March 2000. There is no definitive winner among urinary markers of bladder cancer, because they lack specificity or are insufficiently tested. Pathologists continue in their efforts to improve prediction of evolution of superficial bladder cancer to recurrent or infiltrative disease. A few studies have confirmed the value of previously described prognostic factors for recurrence and progression, and have added some refinements. Transurethral resection is not as complete as was believed. Fluorescence detection of flat bladder carcinoma has been demonstrated to improve diagnosis and treatment. The necessity to perform a repeat transurethral resection in high-grade superficial bladder cancer became evident. Identification of the working mechanisms of bacille Calmette-Guérin on superficial bladder cancer remains an important objective, and may help to improve treatment schedules and avoid the morbidity associated with bacille Calmette-Guérin administration. Patients who are at high risk may benefit from long-term maintenance bacille Calmette-Guérin therapy. Valrubicin and keyhole limpet haemocyanin appear to be promising agents in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer.