Aboral pouch with preserved duodenal passage--new reconstruction method after total gastrectomy

Comparing aboral versus oral pouch with preserved duodenal passage after total gastrectomy: does the position of the gastric substitute reservoir count?

BACKGROUND

Total gastrectomy results in a significant weight loss, different postgastrectomy symptoms, and a reduction in quality of life. Elaborate surgical reconstruction methods are evaluated to improve results. The present study compares two types of reconstructions--an aboral pouch with preserved duodenal passage and an oral pouch with preserved duodenal passage--differing only in the site of the pouch.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients entered the study. Primary outcome measures--body weight, body mass index, and quality of life, and secondary outcome measures--serum nutritional parameters, scintigraphic small-intestinal passage, and lipid and carbohydrate absorption were measured 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in anthropometric parameters or in quality of life between the groups. Regarding the secondary outcome measures, albumin levels were higher in the oral pouch group, while protein and immunoglobulin-A levels were higher in the aboral pouch group.

CONCLUSION

The site of the reservoir does not significantly influence the outcome after total gastrectomy and reconstruction with a preserved duodenal passage.

Comparative study on three types of alimentary reconstruction after total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

More than 70 alimentary reconstruction procedures after total gastrectomy have been proposed to reduce the postoperative syndromes such as dumping syndrome, reflux esophagitis, and malnutrition. However, the optimal alimentary reconstruction method is still a matter of debate. The aim of the current study was to investigate the rationality of different alimentary tract reconstruction methods after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy.

METHODS

Three types of digestive reconstruction methods were performed after total gastrectomy in 285 cases of gastric malignancy from May 1996 to December 2006, including Orr-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction (Orr-type), P-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction (P-type), and Moynihan-type reconstruction (Moynihan-type) methods. The operative time, early postoperative complications and mortality, food intake, alimentary symptoms, Visick scores, nutritional status at 1 and 3years after surgery, and cumulative survival at 1, 3, and 5years were comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the three methods in early postoperative complications and mortality, postoperative food intake and nutritional status (hemoglobin, total proteins and albumin), and incidence of diarrhea and dumping syndrome at 1 and 3years (p > 0.05). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rate were 75.30%, 39.86%, and 21.48%, respectively, without significant differences among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, the average operative time used in the Orr-type reconstruction method (2.9 +/- 0.1h) was comparatively shorter than that used in the P-type (3.4 +/- 0.2h) and the Moynihan-type (3.2 +/- 0.1h). The incidences of reflux esophagitis after the gastric reconstruction with the Moynihan-type method at 1 and 3years (72% and 65%) were significantly higher than that with the Orr-type (3% and 0%) and P-type (5% and 0%; p < 0.01). Constituent ratio of Visick scores I-II of the Moynihan-type method at 1 and 3years (54% and 73%) were smaller than that of the Orr-type (94% and 96%) and the P-type (93% and 96%) methods (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Orr-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction method can avoid reflux esophagitis, and the procedure is simpler than the other two methods. Therefore, Orr-type Roux-en-Y reconstruction can be recommended as an adoptable method of digestive reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

[Searching for the optimal reconstructive methods following total gastrectomy]

Three prospective randomised studies and a clinical experiment were performed to study postoperative weight, body mass index, nutritional and immunological laboratory parameters, gut motility, lipid and carbohydrate absorption, quality of life and gastrointestinal hormone production after total gastrectomy with different reconstructions. The first trial compared Roux-en-Y to a newly introduced aboral pouch construction, while the second study compared these two methods and the aboral pouch reconstruction with a preserved duodenal passage version. Improved lipid absorption and quality of life was detected for the aboral pouch reconstruction. In addition to these, the duodenal passage preserving version resulted in a better iron metabolism, too. The third study compared the aboral pouch to conventional oral pouch, both with duodenal passage preserving versions. No significant difference was detected between these two groups. In the fourth study, a clinical experiment was performed examining pre- and postprandial glucose, insulin, cholecystokinin and somatostatin levels in patients recruited from the first two randomised trials. Significant differences were demonstrated between the various reconstruction types: the duodenal passage preserving reconstruction provided close to physiological cholecystokinin and somatostatin productions, while with duodenal exclusion these levels were abnormally raised.

Postprandial gastrointestinal hormone production is different, depending on the type of reconstruction following total gastrectomy

OBJECTIVES

The present study examines the differences in gastrointestinal hormone production at 3 different reconstruction types after total gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND DATA

Total gastrectomy causes significant weight loss, mainly due to a reduced caloric intake probably because of a lack of initiative to eat or early satiety during meals. Behind this phenomenon a disturbed gastrointestinal hormone production can be presumed.

METHODS

Patients participating in a randomized study were recruited for the clinical experiment. Seven patients with simple Roux-en-Y reconstruction, 11 with aboral pouch (AP) construction, and 10 with aboral pouch with preserved duodenal passage (APwPDP) reconstruction, as well as 6 healthy volunteers were examined. Blood samples were taken 5 minutes before and 15, 30, and 60 minutes after ingestion of a liquid test meal. Plasma concentrations for insulin, cholecystokinin, and somatostatin were determined by radioimmunoassay analysis.

RESULTS

Postprandial hyperglycemia was observed in patients after total gastrectomy most prominently in groups with duodenal exclusion (Roux-en-Y and AP) compared with healthy controls. Postprandial insulin curves reached significantly higher levels in all operated groups compared with controls, however, with no difference according to reconstruction type. Significantly higher cholecystokinin levels and higher integrated production of cholecystokinin were observed in Roux-en-Y and AP groups compared with APwPDP and control. Postprandial somatostatin levels were significantly different between the 4 groups, and highest levels and integrated secretions were reached in AP group, lowest in APwPDP and normal groups.

CONCLUSION

A disturbed glucose homeostasis was observed in gastrectomized patients most prominently in the Roux-en-Y group. Also, cholecystokinin and somatostatin response differed significantly in favor of duodenal passage preservation after total gastrectomy. Cholecystokinin levels close to physiologic found at APwPDP reconstruction may contribute to a physiologic satiation in reconstructions with preserved duodenal passage after total gastrectomy.

Techniques of reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Jejunal pouch formation and restoration of duodenal transit have been suggested for reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Opinions about the clinical value vary.

METHODS

The literature was searched for prospective randomized trials comparing reconstructive procedures after total gastrectomy for malignancy. Reports with at least an English or German abstract were included. Immediate results were evaluated in terms of postoperative deaths and complications. Long-term outcome was analysed using trends in bodyweight and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 19 randomized trials including 866 patients was identified. The operative risk of total gastrectomy was low, with a median mortality rate of 0 (range 0-22) per cent, irrespective of the method of reconstruction. Neither gastric substitution nor restoration of duodenal transit was associated with significant procedure-related complications. Results for specific reconstructions varied considerably within and between individual trials. Jejunal pouch reconstruction, but not restoration of duodenal passage, was associated with improved food intake and a tendency for weight gain in the early postoperative months. A favourable perception of quality of life persisted in the long term in some studies.

CONCLUSION

Preservation of duodenal transit offers little clinical benefit. Construction of a small-bowel reservoir after total gastrectomy should be considered to improve early postoperative eating capacity, bodyweight and quality of life.