Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

Evaluation of Phase II Trial Design in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated how well phase II trials in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (LAMPC) meet current recommendations for trial design.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of phase II first-line treatment trial for LAMPC. We assessed baseline characteristics, type of comparison, and primary end point to examine adherence to the National Cancer Institute recommendations for trial design.

RESULTS

We identified 148 studies (180 treatment arms, 7505 participants). Forty-seven (32%) studies adhered to none of the 5 evaluated National Cancer Institute recommendations, 62 (42%) followed 1, 31 (21%) followed 2, and 8 (5%) followed 3 recommendations. Studies varied with respect to the proportion of patients with good performance status (range, 0%-80%) and locally advanced disease (range, 14%-100%). Eighty-two (55%) studies concluded that investigational agents should progress to phase III testing; of these, 24 (16%) had documented phase III trials. Three (8%) phase III trials demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements for investigational agents. One of 38 phase II trials that investigated biological investigational agents was enriched for a biomarker.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase II trials do not conform well to current recommendations for trial design in LAMPC.

Gemcitabine (GEM), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Folinic Acid (FA) in Patients with Different Gastroenteric Malignancies

This phase II clinical trial was performed in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, toxicity and anti-tumor activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) designed on a specific translational basis. Every 4 weeks, 44 patients with various gastroenteric malignancies, 29 of whom had pancreas carcinoma, received a short intravenous (i.v.) infusion of FA (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2) on days 1-5, and GEM 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 16. Our results suggest that, although this treatment leads to hematological and gastroenteric toxicity, it is very active in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. We therefore believe that an improved version would merit further investigation in larger scale trials.

Heart Rate Variability and Baroreflex Sensitivity during Fosinopril, Irbesartan and Atenolol Therapy in Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of long-term therapy with fosinopril, irbesartan and atenolol on the autonomic control of the cardiovascular system in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 58 patients (mean age 38 +/- 10 years) with never-treated mild hypertension with no evidence of target organ damage. The study was single blind. Patients were assigned to receive fosinopril 10-20 mg/day, irbesartan 150-300 mg/day or atenolol 50-100 mg/day for 14 weeks. Dosage was titrated to reach an average office blood pressure (BP) of <140/90mm Hg. Before therapy all patients underwent a 24-hour Holter ECG to evaluate heart rate variability (HRV) through nonlinear methods, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and measurement of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using a Portaprés device; all measurements were repeated after therapy.

RESULTS

All three therapies significantly and equally decreased BP, both office (systolic/diastolic blood pressure 152 +/- 11/97 +/- 7mm Hg vs 129 +/- 7/85 +/- 4mm Hg after fosinopril, 151 +/- 11/97 +/- 6mm Hg vs 133 +/- 9/87 +/- 8mm Hg after irbesartan, 149 +/- 13/96 +/- 9mm Hg vs 132 +/- 9/87 +/- 7mm Hg after atenolol; p < 0.001) and ABPM values. HRV calculated with nonlinear methods and BRS were significantly increased after atenolol whereas no significant change was found in the fosinopril and irbesartan treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All three therapies significantly and similarly reduced BP without modifying heart rate, except for atenolol, which significantly decreased it. Although angiotensin directly increases sympathetic tone, neither fosinopril nor irbesartan modified cardiovascular autonomic function; this is likely to be connected to the fairly good basal autonomic function of the population evaluated. Atenolol is associated with a significant increase in HRV and BRS probably through an improvement of parasympathetic tone.

Long-Term Relapse-Free Survival by Interdisciplinary Collaboration in a Patient with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (UICC IV)

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic outlook for patients suffering from pancreatic cancer is generally poor. Particularly in cases of advanced and metastatic disease, long-term relapse-free survival may be achieved only in a few cases.

CASE REPORT

A 45-year-old patient presented with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Liver metastases had been intra-operatively confirmed by histology. Prior to initiating treatment, a portacath was surgically implanted. Subsequently, the patient received a weekly dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine combined with 2,000 mg/m(2) high-dose 5-fluorouracil as a 24-hour infusion for palliative treatment. As the patient was suffering from a stenosis of the ductus hepaticus communis, an endoprosthesis was primarily implanted. After 18 applications of chemotherapy during which only low toxic side effects such as nausea, vomiting and alopecia (NCI-CTC grade 1) presented, a partial remission of the primary tumor was observed. In the course of chemotherapy treatment, the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 tumor marker value normalized. Thus, the interdisciplinary tumor board of the University of Erlangen decided to perform a laparoscopy to evaluate the status of liver metastases after palliative chemotherapy treatment. Subsequently, the primary tumor could be completely resected (pT2, pN0, pM0, L0, V0, G2, R0); liver metastases were not observed. Eight years after the initial diagnosis, the patient is relapse-free, professionally fully integrated and presents with an excellent performance status.

CONCLUSION

Patients suffering from metastatic pancreatic cancer may benefit from treatment combinations with palliative intent. In singular cases, patients may even have a curative treatment option, provided a close interdisciplinary collaboration exists.

Gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine (2 ,2 -difluorodeoxycytidine) is a deoxycytidine-analog antimetabolite with broad activity against a variety of solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies. It was approved as standard of care in patients with pancreatic cancer one decade ago, based primarily on improvement in clinical benefit response such as pain reduction, improvement in Karnofsky performance status and increase in body weight. This article gives an overview of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine, highlights the clinical activity of gemcitabine and summarizes the treatment options in metastatic pancreatic cancer with focus on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The emerging role of combinations of gemcitabine with novel targeted agents, including small-molecule inhibitors and other investigational drugs, is also discussed.

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Single-agent gemcitabine was established as standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after a superior clinical benefit response was demonstrated in a randomized study comparing it to 5-fluorouracil (FU). Until recently, many subsequent randomized trials of newer, often gemcitabine-based combinations have not been able to show improved survival over gemcitabine. Combination gemcitabine and capecitabine is likely to become the preferred standard treatment, at least in the UK, on the basis of the positive interim results of the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) randomized study of chemotherapy with this combination. At present, there is no standard second-line treatment for patients who have become refractory to gemcitabine, although a recently reported study has suggested that oxaliplatin with FU and leucovorin is superior to best supportive care in these patients. This article will review and discuss the clinical trials of chemotherapy for this disease, including the more recent trials, which have included the novel targeted agents.

Phase I-II trial of weekly gemcitabine plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is a dismal disease. Few drugs, including gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), have notable antitumor effects against advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU and the efficacy and toxicity profile of weekly gemcitabine plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin in advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with histo-/cytologically confirmed, advanced pancreatic cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of a 30-min infusion of gemcitabine (800 mg/m2), followed by a 24-h infusion of 5-FU and leucovorin (300 mg/m2) at day 1, day 8 and day 15 every 28 days, and was termed the GemFL24 regimen. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 1600, 2000, to 2600 mg/m2 in the phase I study, and fixed MTD for subsequent enrolled patients.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled in the phase I study, and 24 in phase II. The MTD of 5-FU was 2000 mg/m2, with major dose-limiting toxicities being febrile neutropenia and delayed recovery from neutropenia. The dose intensity of gemcitabine of the 35 patients with 5-FU dosage set at MTD was 593 mg/m2 per week. In the entire series of 42 patients, myelosuppression was the main toxicity, with grade 3 neutropenia in eight patients, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in six. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall and clinical benefit response rates were 22% and 46%, respectively; with median progression-free and overall survival of 4.1 and 6.9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The GemFL24 regimen is a feasible and moderately active treatment with manageable toxicities for advanced pancreatic cancer, and could be a basis for further combination with other anticancer drugs.

N/A

N/A