Management of acute variceal bleeding

Portale Hypertension

Während die Pathologie, die zur portalen Hypertension führt, im prähepatischen, hepatischen und posthepatischen venösen Gefäßbett liegen kann, machen die intrahepatischen Erkrankungen mit Abstand den Großteil aus. In unseren Breitengraden ist es die durch Alkoholabusus bedingte ethyltoxische Leberzirrhose, weltweit die durch Infektionen (HCV, HBV) bedingten Zirrhosen. Die chronische Hepatitis C mit ihren Komplikationen (Leberzellversagen, portale Hypertension und hepatozelluläres Karzinom) wird in den kommenden Jahren trotz moderner Therapieverfahren noch an Bedeutung gewinnen.

Management of Cirrhosis and Associated Complications

Liver cirrhosis is the encapsulation or replacement of injured tissue by collagen, resulting in end-stage liver disease and portal hypertension. The consequences of cirrhosis are impaired hepatocyte function, increase intrahepatic circulatory resistance, portal hypertension, and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Complications include encephalopathy, coagulopathy, varices, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, epatorenal syndrome, and hepatopulmonary syndrome. Managing patients with acute or chronic liver failure is challenging, and liver failure may have profound effects on other organ systems. Most therapies are directed at managing the complications and bridging patients to liver transplantation. The clinician must be aware of the pathologic presentations and the appropriate management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies, goals and end points of therapy, and monitoring of therapy. This review focuses on the management of the complications directly associated with liver dysfunction (encephalopathy and coagulopathy) and portal hypertension (varices, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome).

A multicentred clinical comparative study on curative effect and safety of acetic octreotide in treatment of esophageal varices bleeding

AIM: To evaluate curative effect and safety of acetic octreotide in the treatment of esophageal varices blee-ding (EVB) in comparison with octreotide (Sandostatin).

METHODS: EVB patients were randomly and double-blinded assigned into acetic octreotide group (n = 70) and Sandostatin group (n = 66). Both kinds of drugs were dissolved in normal saline and then given to the patients at the rate of 50 mg/h for 48 h. The amount of bleeding and vital signs of all the patients were observed and comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS: The frequencies and amount of hemateme-sis, the excreted frequencies and amount of black feces were significantly different before and after treatment with both kinds of drugs (P <0.05), but there was no marked difference between the two groups (P >0.05). The vital signs such as heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as symptoms of nausea, swirling, heart-throb, sweatiness, and thirst were notably improved after treatment (P <0.05), but there was still no obvious difference between the two groups (P >0.05). Adverse drug reaction was also different between the two groups 1.43% (1.43% vs 1.52%, P >0.05). The total effective rates in acetic octreotide and Sandostatin group were 97.14% and 92.42%, respectively (P >0.05).

CONCLUSION: Acetic octreotide is safe and effective in the treatment of EVB, and its effect is not significan-tly different from Sandostatin's.

Recurrent thrombotic occlusion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt due to activated protein C resistance

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) has successfully been used in the management of refractory variceal bleeding and ascites in patients with portal hypertension. Major drawbacks are the induction of hepatic encephalopathy and shunt dysfunction. We present a 59-year-old woman with alcoholic liver cirrhosis who received a TIPS because of recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices. Stent occlusion occurred 4 mo after placement of the TIPS. Laboratory testing revealed resistance to activated protein C (APC). Combination therapy with low-dose enoxaparin and clopidogrel could not prevent her recurrent stent occlusion. Finally, therapy with high-dose enoxaparin was sufficient to prevent further shunt complications up to now (follow-up period of 1 year). In conclusion, early occlusion of a TIPS warrants testing for thrombophilia. If risk factors are confirmed, anticoagulation should be intensified. There are currently no evidence-based recommendations regarding the best available anticoagulant therapy and surveillance protocol for patients with TIPS.

Clinical predictors of bleeding esophageal varices in the ED

OBJECTIVES

Some authors have found that thrombocytopenia (<118,000/mm3), splenomegaly, and ascites are useful predictors of large esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. We decide to see whether these factors could also be used to predict bleeding esophageal varices in patients known to have chronic liver disease in the ED.

METHODS

A case record review was done of all patients admitted to the ED of Changi General Hospital with upper gastrointestinal bleeding from esophageal varices from October 1999 to April 2004. The criteria of thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, and ascites were applied retrospectively to these patients to see how accurately they performed in predicting bleeding esophageal varices.

RESULTS

Only 55% of patients had thrombocytopenia, whereas 45% had splenomegaly, and 27.5% had ascites. Combining thrombocytopenia with the presence of either ascites or splenomegaly did not improve the yield (only 40%), and only 6 patients had all 3 criteria. Twelve patients with bleeding varices did not have any of the criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, or ascites is an unreliable predictor of bleeding esophageal varices. Urgent or emergent endoscopy is still advocated to accurately diagnose bleeding esophageal varices.

Radiofrequency ablation for hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis: a pilot study

Radiofrequency ablation is a relatively new technique used for local ablation of unresectable tumors. We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for hypersplenism and its effect on liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Nine consecutive patients with hypersplenism due to cirrhotic portal hypertension underwent radiofrequency ablation in enlarged spleens. The ablation was performed either intraoperatively or percutaneously. Patients are followed up for over 12 months. After treatment, between 20% and 43% of spleen volume was ablated, and spleen volume increased by 4%-10.2%. White blood cell count, platelet count, liver function, and hepatic artery blood flow showed significant improvement after 1-year follow-up. Splenic vein and portal vein blood flow were significantly reduced. Only minor complications including hydrothorax (three of nine patients) and mild abdominal pain (four of nine patients) were observed. No mortality or other morbidity occurred. Radiofrequency ablation is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive approach for the management of splenomegaly and hypersplenism in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Increased hepatic artery blood flow may be responsible for sustained improvement of liver condition. Radiofrequency ablation may be used as a bridging therapy for cirrhotic patients waiting for liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation as ultimate tool to treat portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is a complication of liver cirrhosis that may itself cause complications such as variceal bleeding, ascites and hepatorenal syndrome. There are several options for symptomatic treatment including drug therapy, endoscopy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and various surgical procedures, notably liver transplantation, the only causal treatment. The indication for liver transplantation has to be defined carefully. Progression of the primary disease, evaluation of comorbidity and overall prognosis have to be considered. Conservative symptomatic treatment is used for bridging purposes until liver transplantation can be provided to cure portal hypertension and the underlying primary disease. Careful timing of the transplantation is necessary as well as reorganization of the waiting lists by introducing new priority systems as the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) in order to reduce mortality. Furthermore, living donor liver transplantation and split liver transplantation are methods to enlarge the donor pool, and thus accessibility of transplantation to a greater number of patients. This review evaluates the indication of liver transplantation in the treatment of portal hypertension.

Effects of different operations on cirrhotic portal hypertensive liver in rats

AIM: To evaluate respectively the effects of portaazygous disconnection (PAD), mesocaval shunt (MCS) and distal splenocaval shunt (DSCS) on the portasytemic shunting (PSS), hepatic function (HF), hepatic mitochondrial respiratory function (HMRF) and its ultrastructure, anti-oxidation ability (HAOA) and lipoperoxide (LPO), so as to provide theoretical basis to select a suitable operation.

METHODS: Using the cirrhotic portal hypertensive model induced by CCl₄/ethanol in Wristar rats, we investigated PSS, HF, HMRF and its HAOA and LPO during three wks after MCS, DSCS and PAD.

RESULTS: After MCS, the PSS were further increased, HF, HMRF and HAOA were significantly decreased, and LPO increased. Hepatic mitochondrial ultrastructure showed severely damaged. Only a little improvement was found on the third wk. After DSCS and PAD, above mentioned indexes were less influenced, and they were restored a little more quickly in DSCS groups than that in PAD groups. During the first postoperative wk, the PAD group showed the highest mortality.

CONCLUSION: DSCS may be a desirable operation among the three kinds of operation.