(S,S)-formoterol increases the production of IL-4 in mast cells and the airways of a murine asthma model

Impact of a Polymer-Based Nanoparticle with Formoterol Drug as Nanocarrier System In Vitro and in an Experimental Asthmatic Model

The implementation of nanotechnology in pulmonary delivery systems might result in better and more specific therapy. Therefore, a nano-sized drug carrier should be toxicologically inert and not induce adverse effects. We aimed to investigate the responses of a polymer nano drug carrier, a lysine poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate nanoparticle (NP) [Lys-p(HEMA)], loaded with formoterol, both in vitro and in vivo in an ovalbumin (OVA) asthma model. The successfully synthesized nanodrug formulation showed an expectedly steady in vitro release profile. There was no sign of in vitro toxicity, and the 16HBE and THP-1 cell lines remained vital after exposure to the nanocarrier, both loaded and unloaded. In an experimental asthma model (Balb/c mice) of ovalbumin sensitization and challenge, the nanocarrier loaded and unloaded with formoterol was tested in a preventive strategy and compared to treatment with the drug in a normal formulation. The airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and pulmonary inflammation in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), both cellular and biochemical, were assessed. The application of formoterol as a regular drug and the unloaded and formoterol-loaded NP in OVA-sensitized mice followed by a saline challenge was not different from the control group. Yet, both the NP formulation and the normal drug application led to a more deteriorated lung function and increased lung inflammation in the OVA-sensitized and -challenged mice, showing that the use of the p(HEMA) nanocarrier loaded with formoterol needs more extensive testing before it can be applied in clinical settings.

Inhalation beta-2-agonists in cardiorespiratory pathology: pro-or anti-inflammatory effects?

Currently, the increase in comorbid pathology, including patients with bronchoobstructive and cardiovascular diseases remains an urgent problem. Therefore, there is a need not only for new approaches in the tactics of management and treatment of patients with combined cardiorespiratory pathology, but also a more complete understanding of the impact of existing bronchodilator therapy on comorbid pathology and the pathophysiological changes taking place in order to create a new approach to the diagnosis and selection of effective and optimal treatment. The article provides a review of the literature on the impact of beta-2-agonists on pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms in patients with bronchial obstruction, including cardiovascular disease.

Long-Acting β2-Agonists in Asthma: Enantioselective Safety Studies are Needed

Long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) such as formoterol and salmeterol are used for prolonged bronchodilatation in asthma, usually in combination with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Unexplained paradoxical asthma exacerbations and deaths have been associated with LABAs, particularly when used without ICS. LABAs clearly demonstrate effective bronchodilatation and steroid-sparing activity, but long-term treatment can lead to tolerance of their bronchodilator effects. There are also concerns with regard to the effects of LABAs on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), where long-term use is associated with increased BHR and loss of bronchoprotection. A complicating factor is that formoterol and salmeterol are both chiral compounds, usually administered as 50:50 racemic (rac-) mixtures of two enantiomers. The chiral nature of these compounds has been largely forgotten in the debate regarding LABA safety and effects on BHR, particularly that (S)-enantiomers of β2-agonists may be deleterious to asthma control. LABAs display enantioselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Biological plausibility of the deleterious effects of β2-agonists (S)-enantiomers is provided by in vitro and in vivo studies from the short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) salbutamol. Supportive clinical findings include the fact that patients in emergency departments who demonstrate a blunted response to salbutamol are more likely to benefit from (R)-salbutamol than rac-salbutamol, and resistance to salbutamol appears to be a contributory mechanism in rapid asthma deaths. More effort should therefore be applied to investigating potential enantiospecific effects of LABAs on safety, specifically bronchoprotection. Safety studies directly assessing the effects of LABA (S)-enantiomers on BHR are long overdue.

Bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetics of (R)-salbutamol and (S)-salbutamol enantiomers in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid and lung tissue of horses

AIMS

Salbutamol is usually administered as a racemic mixture but little is known about the enantioselectivity of salbutamol pharmacokinetics in the lung. This study was designed to investigate enantiomer concentrations in lung tissue after inhaled dosing.

METHODS

Horses (n = 12) received racemic salbutamol 1000 μg via inhalation. Enantioselective ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine salbutamol concentrations in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (PELF) sampled 2, 5, 10 and 15 min after administration, in central lung (endoscopic bronchial biopsy) and peripheral lung (percutaneous pulmonary biopsy) tissues (at 20 and 25 min respectively), and in plasma samples.

RESULTS

Mean ± 95% confidence interval (CI) yield of PELF was 57 ± 10 mg. Initial mean ± 95%CI (R)- and (S)-salbutamol PELF concentrations were 389 ± 189 ng g^-1 and 378 ± 177 ng g^-1 respectively, and both reduced approximately 50% by 15 min. Mean ± 95%CI central lung levels of drug were higher than peripheral lung tissue for both (R)-salbutamol (875 ± 945 vs. 49.5 ± 12 ng g^-1 ) and (S)-salbutamol (877 ± 955 vs. 50.9 ± 12 ng g^-1 ) respectively. There was no evidence of enantioselectivity in PELF or central lung but minor (~2%) enantioselectivity was observed in the peripheral lung. Enantioselectivity was clearly evident in plasma with (S):(R) ratio of 1.25 and 1.14 for both area under the concentration-time curve (0-25 min) and C_max respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PELF sampling in horses offers sufficient yield allowing direct detection of drug and, combined with tissue sampling, is a valuable model to investigate bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetics. Salbutamol did not demonstrate enantioselectivity in PELF or central lung tissue uptake following acute dosing, however, enantioselective plasma concentrations were demonstrated, with minor enantioselectivity in the peripheral lung.

Evaluation of the effects of the R- and S-enantiomers of salbutamol on equine isolated bronchi

BACKGROUND

Equine obstructive pulmonary disease, also known as heaves or recurrent airway obstruction (RAO) is a common equine pulmonary disease with some similarities to human asthma and COPD, which represents a major cause of morbidity and loss of lung performance. Salbutamol has been widely used for the treatment of human airway diseases and has usually been prepared as the racemic form of the drug. However, recently the R-enantiomer of salbutamol has been introduced into clinical practice in the treatment of asthma in humans and this has been suggested to be an improvement on the racemic form of the drug; therefore thus the S-enantiomer has been demonstrated to have adverse effects in the lung and thus using the R-enantiomer may improve the therapeutic ratio. However, little is known about the properties of the R- and S-enantiomers of salbutamol in equine airways and the present study has evaluated the relaxant effects of racemic β(2)-agonists in comparison with the R- and S-enantiomers in isolated equine isolated bronchi, as well as the bronchoprotective effects of these drugs on cholinergic and histaminergic pathway.

METHODS

We have studied the effects of the R- and S-enantiomers of salbutamol on bronchi isolated from RAO-affected or unaffected horses. The first study assayed the relaxant effects of R- and S-salbutamol on isolated bronchial rings contracted with carbachol or histamine at a sub-maximal concentration (EC70). A second study evaluated the effects of R- and S-salbutamol on semi-logarithmic cumulative concentration-response curves induced by carbachol or histamine. Specific software was used to calculate statistical significance and the appropriate sigmoidal curve-fitting model.

RESULTS

Neither enantiomers of salbutamol caused a relaxant effect on the sub-maximal plateau contractile effects of carbachol; in fact, both R- and S-salbutamol induced a slight, but significant contraction (P ≤ 0.05) compared to the controls. In contrast, R-salbutamol induced a significant relaxation of bronchi pre-contracted with histamine (RAO-unaffected: 92.06% ± 2.00; RAO-affected 100.20 ± 3.99; P ≤ 0.01). S-salbutamol induced a weak relaxation (RAO-unaffected: 15.81% ± 5.65; RAO-affected 12.36 ± 5.15) when compared to that induced by papaverine. The incubation with either R- or S-salbutamol shifted rightward (P ≤ 0.001) the carbachol contraction curve in RAO-unaffected bronchi, but not in RAO-affected bronchi, compared to control tissues. R-salbutamol induced a reduction in E(max) values (C: 9.07 gr ± 0.68; R-salb.: 6.36 gr ± 0.21; P ≤ 0.01) in normal bronchi. On the contrary it reduced the histamine potency in RAO-affected bronchi (EC50 7.10 μM ± 0.35, P < 0.001). The incubation with S-salbutamol shifted leftward the histamine concentration curve in both normal bronchi (C: 7.00 μM ± 0.29; S-salb.: 2.25 μM ± 0.19; P ≤ 0.001) and bronchi from RAO-affected horses (C: 2.80 μM ± 0.26; S-salb.: 1.50 μM ± 0.80; P ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our studies have demonstrated that S-salbutamol elicited a modest increase in contraction of equine airway smooth muscle induced by carbachol and induced a significant hyperresponsiveness to histamine. These results confirm the ability of the S-enantiomer of salbutamol to potentiate the contractile effect of certain spasmogens on airway smooth muscle. Such an adverse effect would be determined in the airways of horses with RAO and suggest that if salbutamol is to be used in the treatment of symptoms of RAO in horses, the R-enantiomer, rather than the racemic mixture should be considered.

Effects of formoterol on contraction and Ca2+ signaling of mouse airway smooth muscle cells

Formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-receptor agonist, is used to relieve bronchial constriction. However, formoterol is often a racemic formulation, and contains both (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomers. Because the activity of each isomer is poorly defined, the mechanisms by which formoterol relaxes smooth muscle cells (SMCs) of intrapulmonary airways are not well understood. Consequently, we compared the effects of (S,S)-, (R,R)-, and racemic formoterol, as well as (R)-albuterol, on the contraction and Ca(2+) signaling of airway SMCs in mouse lung slices with phase-contrast and confocal microscopy. Small airways were contracted with methacholine and the associated SMCs displayed sustained Ca(2+) oscillations and an increase in Ca(2+) sensitivity. These contracted airways displayed a substantial, concentration-dependent relaxation in response to (R,R)-formoterol. Racemic formoterol had a similar potency as (R,R)-formoterol for relaxing airways. By contrast, (S,S)-formoterol only induced a small relaxation. In conjunction with relaxation, (R,R)- and racemic formoterol stopped and decreased the methacholine-induced Ca(2+) oscillations and Ca(2+) sensitivity of the SMCs, respectively, whereas (S,S)-formoterol only decreased the Ca(2+) sensitivity. In these studies, (R,R)- and racemic formoterol had a similar, but much greater, potency than (R)-albuterol for relaxing mice airways. This action was quickly initiated at high concentrations by decreasing the frequency of Ca(2+) oscillations, but was more usually mediated at lower concentrations by decreasing the Ca(2+) sensitivity of the SMCs.

(R)-albuterol decreases immune responses: role of activated T cells

Racemic albuterol is an equimolar mixture of two isomers, (R) and (S). Whether (R) and (S) isomers and the combination of both exert different effects in immune activation is not well defined. We analyzed the effects of (R+S)-albuterol, (R)-albuterol and (S)-albuterol in a murine model of allergic pulmonary inflammation and in activated T cells. Mice (C57BL/6) sensitized and aerosol challenged with the allergen ovalbumin (OVA) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were treated with (R)-albuterol, (S)-albuterol or (R+S)-albuterol. Following administration of (R)-albuterol, allergen induced bronchoalveolar lavage eosinophils and IgE showed a decrease, albeit not significantly by ANOVA. As T cells are important in allergic inflammation, we asked whether (R+S), (R) or (S)-albuterol might differ in effects on T cells and on the activity of the inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB. In activated T cells, (R)-albuterol administration decreased levels of inflammatory cytokines and NF-κB activity. These studies suggest that (R)-albuterol decreases cytokine secretion and NF-κB activity in T cells.

Role of arformoterol in the management of COPD

Formoterol is a beta2-agonist that has both short and long acting bronchodilator effects. Beta2-agonists used as bronchodilators have been synthesized as racemates that comprise (R,R) and (S,S)-enantiomers. Compounds that are beta2-selective derive their bronchodilator effect from an interaction between the (R,R)-enantiomer and the beta2-adrenoceptor. Arformoterol is the (R,R)-enantiomer and is distinguished from the more commonly used racemic (RR/S,S)-diasteriomer of formoterol. Overall literature on the use of arformoterol in COPD is very preliminary. There is some in vitro data that demonstrate significant bronchodilation and inhibition of inflammation with arformoterol, and these effects may be more pronounced than those caused by racemic formoterol. There are limited clinical trial data that demonstrate that arformoterol produces significant improvement in lung function in COPD; however, many of the subjects involved had marked baseline airway reversibility. Arformoterol has been very well tolerated in clinical trials and could potentially be used only once every 24 hours (due to its prolonged effect). It can only be given in nebulized form. Arformoterol can potentially be given with other inhaled medications.

Beta2-agonists and bronchial hyperresponsiveness

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a characteristic feature of asthma, and individuals with this disease respond to a range of physiological and chemical insults that are otherwise innocuous to healthy subjects, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are characteristic of the asthma phenotype. BHR can be increased following exposure to environmental allergens in suitably sensitized individuals, pollutants, and certain viruses and can also be exacerbated by exposure to certain drugs, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and beta-blockers. Although beta2-agonists administered acutely remain the treatment for the symptoms of asthma, paradoxically, regular treatment with these drugs can result in an increase in BHR, and this has been suggested to contribute to the increase in asthma morbidity and mortality that has been reported by numerous investigators. This article highlights our current understanding of this phenomenon and examines the potential mechanisms responsible for this effect.