Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Aneuploidies Using Multiplex Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction

Chromosomal Microarrays for the Prenatal Detection of Microdeletions and Microduplications

Chromosomal microarray analysis has replaced conventional G-banded karyotype in prenatal diagnosis as the first-tier test for the cytogenetic detection of copy number imbalances in fetuses with/without major structural abnormalities. This article reviews the basic technology of microarray; the value and clinical significance of the detection of microdeletions, microduplications, and other copy number variants; as well as the importance of genetic counseling for prenatal diagnosis. It also discusses the current status of noninvasive screening for some of these microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

Molecular detection of trisomy 21 by bicolor competitive fluorescent PCR

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reliable and specific method for rapid prenatal diagnosis of Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome).

METHODS

We established a dual color competitive fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to measure the gene dosage of Down syndrome critical region (DSCR), a single copy sequence in chromosome 21. Another unique single copy sequence located on chromosome 2 (USC2) but not glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was chose as reference gene.

RESULTS

The DSCR3/USC2 ratio of peripheral blood in trisomy 21 syndrome patients to normal subjects was 1.41∼1.74 to 0.93∼1.15, respectively (p < 0.01). Dual color competitive fluorescent PCR technique effectively differentiates the normal subjects from the Down syndrome patients. Next, according to the dual color competitive fluorescence quantitative PCR, among the 46 pregnant women, 3 cases were Down syndrome and 43 cases were normal, and these were confirmed by cytogenetic karyotype analysis.

CONCLUSION

This indicated that the new technique may be a reliable and specific method for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of Trisomy 21.

Toward optimal detection of the common prenatal aneuploidies by quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction: comparison of two commercial assays

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate and compare the performance of the recently released Aneufast™ v2 (MolgentixSL) and QST*RplusV2 commercial assays (Gen-Probe), both designed for the quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of the common aneuploidies during pregnancy.

METHODS

A series of 160 consecutive fetal samples referred for rapid aneuploidy detection testing and an additional 25 samples enriched for the presence of an abnormality were selected for comparison.

RESULTS

To confidently rule out a chromosome abnormality, a second round of short tandem repeat typing was required for 14.1% (26) and 9.7% (18) of the specimens analyzed with Aneufast v2 and QST*RplusV2, respectively. Reflex testing was required for 7.6% (14) and 5.9% (11) of the specimens analyzed with respective assays to confidently rule out an autosomal trisomy. For the sex chromosomes, the difference in the amount of follow-up testing is greater between the assays, as a result of the inclusion in the initial PCR of the TAF9L paralogous marker in the QST*RplusV2 assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, both assays performed similarly in the detection of aneuploidies. In this sample set, the QST*RplusV2 kit required less frequent reflex testing, which translates into shorter turnaround time and cost savings. The incorporation of the TAF9L paralogous sequence in the initial PCR is advantageous for diagnostic use.

Rapid methods for targeted prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies

Improvements in non-invasive screening methods for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and other aneuploidies during the first and second trimester of pregnancy have radically changed the indications for prenatal diagnosis over the last decade. Consequently, there was a need for rapid tests for the detection of common chromosome aneuploidies resulting in the development of molecular methods for the rapid, targeted detection of (an)euploidies of the chromosomes 13, 18, 21 and the sex chromosomes. The analysis of large series of prenatal samples has shown that such tests can detect the great majority of chromosome abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis. This resulted in lively discussions on whether conventional karyotyping should remain the standard method for the majority of prenatal cases or can be replaced by rapid tests only. This review gives an overview of different aspects of the three most common tests for rapid, targeted prenatal detection of (an)euploidies, i.e. interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (iFISH), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience

BACKGROUND

Despite being deliberately targeted to common chromosome aneuploidies, the rapid quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) tests can detect the majority of chromosome abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis. The main advantages of this assay are low cost, speed and automation allowing large-scale application.

METHODS

We developed a QF-PCR test that was applied on 43 000 clinical samples reporting results in 24 h. Most common indications were biochemical risk (32%) and advanced maternal age (30%). Samples were also tested by cytogenetic analysis and the results compared.

RESULTS

Aneuploidies involving chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X and Y were detected with 100% specificity. Several cases of partial trisomies and mosaicism were also identified. Overall 95% of clinically relevant abnormalities were readily detected and termination of affected pregnancies could be performed without waiting for the cytogenetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the possibility of reducing the load of prenatal cytogenetic tests if the pregnancies are carefully monitored by non-invasive screening. In case of abnormal QF-PCR results, medical action can be taken within few hours from sampling. In cases of negative QF-PCR results, cytogenetic analyses might only be performed for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. In countries where large-scale cytogenetic tests are not available, QF-PCR may be used as the only prenatal diagnostic procedure.

Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis

Cytogenetic analysis is an important component of prenatal diagnosis. The ability to rapidly detect aneuploidy and identify small structural abnormalities of fetal chromosomes has been greatly enhanced by the use of molecular cytogenetic technologies. In this review, we will present some of the molecular cytogenetic techniques available to the clinical cytogenetics laboratory. These include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). The benefits and limitations of each technology will be discussed in the context of prenatal diagnosis.

Practical application of fluorescent quantitative PCR on Trisomy 21 in Chinese Han population

OBJECTIVE

To apply the fluorescent quantitative PCR method on the detection of Trisomy 21 by D21S11 locus and make a foundation for rapid prenatal diagnosis of Trisomy 21.

METHODS

About 409 controls (39 amniotic fluid samples and 370 peripheral blood samples) and 35 patients (4 amniotic fluid samples and 31 peripheral blood samples) with Trisomy 21 were tested using fluorescent quantitative PCR by amplification of DNA fragment on D21S11 STR locus. The results were compared with conventional cytogenetic analysis to confirm the utility of this method. And the allele frequency distributions of D21S11 STR locus were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 95% reference interval of fluorescent intensity ratios of peak heights of PCR products amplified from two alleles on D21S11 locus ranged from 0.84 to 1.42 (1.13 +/- 0.29) in heterozygous controls. About 19 out of 35 patients showed a "diallelic" pattern and their height ratio of fluorescent peaks of PCR products amplified from two alleles in patients with "diallelic" patterns were all outside of the 95% reference range of controls. The PCR products of DNA from 12 patients presented the third allele. No sample with the "monoallelic" pattern was found. Four chimeras diagnosed by cytogenetic method could not be diagnosed by this method. There were 17 and 11 alleles found in controls and patients, respectively. About 343 out of 409 controls were heterozygous and the heterozygosity was 83.86%. We did not find any significant differences in the frequency distributions of alleles on D21S11 locus between controls and patients. But there were significant differences in the frequency distributions of alleles on D21S11 locus between controls and patients. But there were significant differences in the frequency distributions of alleles on D21S11 locus among different populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction method was rapid, accurate, and only small amount of starting material was needed, it could be applied in rapid prenatal diagnosis of Trisomy 21. D21S11 was a good marker with high heterozygosity for the screening of Trisomy 21. And the frequency distributions of alleles on D21S11 locus were significantly related to ethnic background.