Could plasma cystatin C be useful as a marker of hemodialysis low molecular weight proteins removal?

Contemporary Biomarkers for Renal Transplantation: A Narrative Overview

Renal transplantation (RT) is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, clinical challenges persist, i.e., early detection of graft dysfunction, timely identification of rejection episodes, personalization of immunosuppressive therapy, and prediction of long-term graft survival. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools to address these challenges and revolutionize RT patient care. Our review synthesizes the existing scientific literature to highlight promising biomarkers, their biological characteristics, and their potential roles in enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Emerging non-invasive biomarkers seemingly provide valuable insights into the immunopathology of nephron injury and allograft rejection. Moreover, we analyzed biomarkers with intra-nephron specificities, i.e., glomerular vs. tubular (proximal vs. distal), which can localize an injury in different nephron areas. Additionally, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential clinical applications of biomarkers in the prediction, detection, differential diagnosis and assessment of post-RT non-surgical allograft complications. Lastly, we focus on the pursuit of immune tolerance biomarkers, which aims to reclassify transplant recipients based on immune risk thresholds, guide personalized immunosuppression strategies, and ultimately identify patients for whom immunosuppression may safely be reduced. Further research, validation, standardization, and prospective studies are necessary to fully harness the clinical utility of RT biomarkers and guide the development of targeted therapies.

Strategies for optimizing urea removal to enable portable kidney dialysis: A reappraisal

BACKGROUND

Portable hemodialysis has the potential to improve health outcomes and quality of life for patients with kidney failure at reduced costs. Urea removal, required for dialysate regeneration, is a central function of any existing/potential portable dialysis device. Urea in the spent dialysate coexists with non-urea uremic toxins, nutrients, and electrolytes, all of which will interfere with the urea removal efficiency, regardless of whether the underlying urea removal mechanism is based on urease conversion, direct urea adsorption, or oxidation. The aim of the current review is to identify the amount of the most prevalent chemicals being removed during a single dialysis session and evaluate the potential benefits of an urea-selective membrane for portable dialysis.

METHODS

We have performed a literature search using Web of Science and PubMed databases to find available articles reporting (or be able to calculate from blood plasma concentration) > 5 mg of individually quantified solutes removed during thrice-weekly hemodialysis sessions. If multiple reports of the same solute were available, the reported values were averaged, and the geometric mean of standard deviations was taken. Further critical literature analysis of reported dialysate regeneration methods was performed using Web of Science and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

On average, 46.0 g uremic retention solutes are removed in a single conventional dialysis session, out of which urea is only 23.6 g. For both urease- and sorbent-based urea removal mechanisms, amino acids, with 7.7 g removal per session, could potentially interfere with urea removal efficiency. Additionally for the oxidation-based urea removal system, plentiful nutrients such as glucose (24.0 g) will interfere with urea removal by competition. Using a nanofiltration membrane between dialysate and oxidation unit with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of ~200 Da, 67.6 g of non-electrolyte species will be removed in a single dialysis session, out of which 44.0 g are non-urea molecules. If the membrane MWCO is further decreased to 120 Da, the mass of non-electrolyte non-urea species will drop to 9.3 g. Reverse osmosis membranes have been shown to be both effective at blocking the transport of non-urea species (creatinine for example with ~90% rejection ratio), and permissive for urea transport (~20% rejection ratio), making them a promising urea selective membrane to increase the efficiency of the oxidative urea removal system.

CONCLUSIONS

Compiled are quantified solute removal amounts greater than 5 mg per session during conventional hemodialysis treatments, to act as a guide for portable dialysis system design. Analysis shows that multiple chemical species in the dialysate interfere with all proposed portable urea removal systems. This suggests the need for an additional protective dialysate loop coupled to urea removal system and an urea-selective membrane.

Levels of cystatin C in low- and high-flux hemodialysis in children with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Cystatin-C (CyC) is a middle molecule that is freely filtered at the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed by the proximal tubules. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum CyC and its reduction ratio as a biomarker for assessing the adequacy of the hemodialysis (HD) sessions in children with end-stage renal disease on maintenance HD. We also compared levels of CyC in patients on low-flux HD (LFH) and high-flux HD (HFH).

METHODS

Forty patients were included in the study and divided into two groups, with one group (16 patients) receiving HFH and the other group receiving LFH (24 patients) (high-flux and low-flux polysulfone filters, respectively). Before and after each dialysis session serum CyC and beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) levels were measured using an ELISA technique, and routine laboratory tests were performed for each patient.

RESULTS

Pre-dialytic levels of CyC were significantly lower in the patients receiving HFH than in those receiving LFH (7.33 ± 1.35 vs. 9.73 ± 0.93, respectively; p < 0.0001). In the HFH group, post-dialytic levels of serum CyC were significantly lower than pre-dialytic levels (4.49 ± 0.71 vs. 7.33 ± 1.35, respectively; p < 0.0001). The reduction ratio (RR) of CyC was significantly higher in the HFH group than in the LFH group (38.2 ± 3.91 vs. -6.49 ± 5.05, respectively; p < 0.0001). Serum CyC level significantly correlated with B2M, urea and creatinine levels in both the LFH and HFH groups, whereas its RR significantly correlated with the RRs of urea, creatinine, and B2M in the HFH group.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study emphasize the role of CyC as a good marker for assessing the adequacy of HD sessions in children on HFH and show that the CyC RR may be used as an index of middle-molecule toxin clearance following HFH sessions.

Cystatin C: An alternative dialysis adequacy marker in high flux hemodialysis

The conventional, low flux (LF) dialyzer allows the removal of small molecular solutes like urea and creatinine. High flux (HF) dialyzers allow the effective removal of middle molecules (MM) as well, and are associated with reduced hemodialysis-related morbidity and mortality. Cystatin C has attractive characteristics as a representative MM. The aim of this study was to determine cystatin C reduction ratio (CysCRR) in both LF and HF groups and to compare it with other markers of dialysis adequacy. Thirty-seven patients were subjected to both LF and HF hemodialysis 2 weeks apart. Serum urea, creatinine and cystatin C were measured pre- and post-dialysis. Cystatin C was measured by latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetry. Urea and creatinine reduction ratios were 72.3 ± 14.7% and 62.5 ± 13%, respectively in the LF group. The CysCRR was −9.7 ± 6.7% and 29.2 ± 11% in LF and HF hemodialysis, respectively. The statistically significant decrease in CysCRR in the HF group shows the effective clearance of MM by HF dialyzers. Hence, CysCRR could be applied to measure the MM clearance in HF hemodialysis. This study highlights the significance of cystatin C as an important dialysis adequacy marker replacing the conventional markers such as urea and creatinine in HF hemodialysis. Among the middle molecules cystatin C scores over beta-2 microglobulin.

Comparison of cystatin C and Beta-2-microglobulin kinetics in children on maintenance hemodialysis

Middle-molecules (MM) are not monitored in children on hemodialysis (HD), but are accumulated and increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Molecular properties of Cystatin C (CyC), 13 kDa, potentially make it a preferred MM marker over Beta-2-Microglobulin (B2M), 12 kDa. We compared CyC and B2M kinetics to investigate if CyC can be used as preferred MM marker. CyC (mg/L) and B2M (μg/mL) were measured in 21 low-flux HD sessions in seven children. Blood samples were taken at HD start (pre), 1 and 2 hours into HD and at end of HD (post) for all sessions and 60 minutes after the first HD (Eq). PreCyC (9.85 ± 2.15) did not differ (P > 0.05) from postCyC (10.04 ± 2.83). PostB2M (38.87 ± 7.12) was higher (P < 0.05) than preHD B2M (33.27 ± 7.41). There was no change in CyC at 1 and 2 hours into HD, while B2M progressively increased. CyC or B2M changes did not significantly correlate with spKt/V (2.09 ± 0.86), ultrafiltration (4.61 ± 1.98%) or HD duration (218 ± 20 minutes). EqCyC was not different from postCyC (11.07 ± 3.14 vs. 10.71 ± 2.85, P > 0.05), while EqB2M was lower than postB2M (36.48 ± 7.68 vs. 41.09 ± 8.99, P < 0.05). MMs as represented by B2M and CyC are elevated in children on standard HD. Intensified HD modalities would be needed for their removal. B2M is affected by the dialytic process with a rise during HD independent of ultrafiltration and decrease 1 hour after, while CyC remains unchanged. We suggest that CyC be used as preferred marker of MM removal and as a marker of adequacy of intensified HD regimens.

Removal and rebound kinetics of cystatin C in high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cystatin C is a 13.3 kD middle molecule of similar size to β2-microglobulin and a marker of GFR in CKD. This study aimed to determine cystatin C kinetics in hemodialysis to understand whether blood concentrations may predict residual renal function and middle-molecule clearance.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Cystatin C removal and rebound kinetics were studied in 24 patients on high-flux hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration. To determine whether cystatin C concentrations are predictable, an iterative two-pool mathematical model was applied.

RESULTS

Cystatin C was cleared effectively, although less than β2-microglobulin (reduction ratios ± SD are 39% ± 11 and 51% ± 11). Cystatin C rebounded to 95% ± 5% of predialysis concentration by 12 hours postdialysis. The two-pool kinetic model showed excellent goodness of fit. Modeled extracellular cystatin C pool volume is smaller than that predicted, comprising 25.5% ± 9.2 of total body water. Iterated parameters, including nonrenal clearance, showed wide interindividual variation. Modeled nonrenal clearance was substantially higher than renal clearance in this population at 25.1 ± 6.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) body surface area.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma cystatin C levels may be used to measure middle-molecule clearance. Levels rebound substantially postdialysis and plateau in the interdialytic period. At low GFR, nonrenal clearance predominates over renal clearance, and its interindividual variation will limit use of cystatin C to predict residual renal function in advanced kidney disease.

Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins

An updated review of the existing knowledge regarding uremic toxins facilitates the design of experimental studies. We performed a literature search and found 621 articles about uremic toxicity published after a 2003 review of this topic. Eighty-seven records provided serum or blood measurements of one or more solutes in patients with CKD. These records described 32 previously known uremic toxins and 56 newly reported solutes. The articles most frequently reported concentrations of β2-microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, homocysteine, uric acid, and parathyroid hormone. We found most solutes (59%) in only one report. Compared with previous results, more recent articles reported higher uremic concentrations of many solutes, including carboxymethyllysine, cystatin C, and parathyroid hormone. However, five solutes had uremic concentrations less than 10% of the originally reported values. Furthermore, the uremic concentrations of four solutes did not exceed their respective normal concentrations, although they had been previously described as uremic retention solutes. In summary, this review extends the classification of uremic retention solutes and their normal and uremic concentrations, and it should aid the design of experiments to study the biologic effects of these solutes in CKD.

Application of cystatin C reduction ratio to high-flux hemodialysis as an alternative indicator of the clearance of middle molecules

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although high-flux (HF) dialyzers with enhanced membrane permeability are widely used in current hemodialysis (HD) practice, urea kinetic modeling is still being applied to indicate the adequacy of both low-flux (LF) and HF HD. In comparison with urea (molecular weight, 60 Da) and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)MG, 12 kDa), cystatin C (CyC, 13 kDa) is a larger molecule that has attractive features as a marker for assessing solute clearance. We postulated that CyC might be an alternative for indicating the clearance of middle molecules (MMs), especially with HF HD.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients were divided into LF and HF groups. Using single pool urea kinetic modeling, the urea reduction ratio (URR) and equilibrated Kt/V(urea) (eKt/V(urea)) were calculated. The serum CyC concentrations were measured using particle-enhanced immunonephelometry. As indices of the middle molecular clearance, the reduction ratios of beta(2)MG and CyC were calculated.

RESULTS

The beta(2)MG reduction ratio (beta(2)MGRR) and CyC reduction ratio (CyCRR) were higher in the HF group compared to the LF group. However, the URR and eKt/Vurea did not differ between the two groups. The CyCRR was significantly correlated with the eKt/V(urea) and beta(2)MGRR (r = 0.47 and 0.69, respectively, both p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the LF dialyzer, the HF dialyzer removed CyC and beta(2)MG more efficiently. Unlike the beta(2)MGRR, the CyCRR was correlated with the eKt/V(urea) and beta(2)MGRR. This study suggests a role for the CyCRR as an alternative indicator of the removal of MMs.

Effect of hemodialysis on circulating cystatin c levels in patients with end stage renal disease

Plasma cystatin C is an emerging parameter to assess kidney function. Its utility in assessing the adequacy of hemodialysis in patients with end-stage-renal disease has however not been established with certainty. This study was therefore carried out to assess the usefulness of serum cystatin C estimation in patients undergoing low flux membrane hemodialysis. Serum creatinine and cystatin C were estimated in 20 patients before and after undergoing hemodialysis. The mean serum creatinine decreased from a pre-dialysis value of 7.72 mg/dL to a post-dialysis value of 2.90 mg/dL. On the contrary, the mean serum cystatin C levels were found to increase from a pre-dialysis value of 5.97 mg/L to a post-dialysis value of 8.25 mg/L. Therefore, serum cystatin C cannot be used to monitor dialysis adequacy. It however, serves as a surrogate marker of the inadequacy of low flux membrane bicarbonate hemodialysis in clearing low molecular weight proteins from the circulation.

Cystatin C as a filtration marker--haemodialysis patients expose its strengths and limitations

OBJECTIVE

The reliability of serum cystatin C (s-Cys) as a filtration marker depends on the intra- and inter-individual variation and influence of non-renal factors of its production rate (Cys(pr)), non-renal clearance (CL(nr)) and sieving coefficient (S). Haemodialysis patients with no residual renal function would be the best population in which to investigate these variables, which otherwise require reliable GFR measurements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-nine haemodialysis (HD) patients with negligible residual renal function (Group 1) were investigated and compared with 55 HD patients with varying degrees of residual renal function (Group 2) and 923 non-dialysis patients (Group 3). The equation eGFR = Cys(pr)/s-Cys-CL(nr) was used to analyse the turnover and variation of cystatin C.

RESULTS

A formula for estimating GFR, eGFR = 99/s-Cys-14.1, calculated from Group 3, was shown to fit the HD patients. The measured s-Cys in Group 1 was 6.9+/-0.9 and 6.4+/-1.1 mg/L in Group 2. The calculated 95% confidence interval of eGFR of +/-(30-40) % increased sharply below GFR 20 mL/min/1.73 m(2), which means that s-Cys cannot be used for calculating low GFR, including the residual GFR of dialysis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicotine users in Group 1 had significantly higher s-Cys than non-users (7.5+/-0.9 mg/L compared to 6.7+/-0.8; p = 0.0008), which may be a factor to include in the eGFR formulae. However, s-Cys was independent of non-renal factors such as sex, age, LBM, body weight, malnutrition and CRP and also of changes in CRP.

Different elimination patterns of beta-trace protein, beta2-microglobulin and cystatin C in haemodialysis, haemodiafiltration and haemofiltration

OBJECTIVE

Low molecular mass proteins (LMMP) are putative uraemic toxins, but their elimination is negligible in standard haemodialysis (HD). In this study, we used beta(2)-microglobulin, cystatin C and beta-trace protein, which differ in molecular mass and charge, to characterize the elimination patterns of three different dialysis modalities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plasma samples were obtained at the start, 30 min after the start, at the end of the dialysis treatment and 30 min after termination of the dialysis session. Seventeen patients were treated with low-flux HD, 13 with post-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) and 8 with pre-dilution haemofiltration (HF). The changes in concentrations of the three LMMPs were monitored and expressed as percentages of the concentrations at the start of treatments.

RESULTS

Conventional HD with low-flux membranes showed a high elimination of small molecules (urea and creatinine), but did not reduce the levels of the three LMMPs studied. During HDF and HF, there was a significant decrease in the plasma levels of cystatin C (to 28 % and 44 %, respectively) (p<0.001) and of beta(2)-microglobulin (to 23 % and 33 %, respectively) (p<0.001). However, the level of beta-trace protein was significantly reduced (to 65 %) only after HDF.

CONCLUSIONS

The three dialysis modalities showed significantly different elimination patterns for the LMMPs studied. Elimination of beta-trace protein was lower than those of cystatin C and beta(2)-microglobulin both in HDF and HF. beta-trace protein was only moderately eliminated by HDF and not at all by HF, and may be a useful marker in the evaluation of different convective therapies.

Cystatin C in critically ill patients treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Assessment of residual renal function in critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is difficult. Cystatin C (CysC) is a low-molecular-weight protein (13.3 kDa) removed from the body by glomerular filtration. Its serum concentration has been advocated for assessment of renal function in patients with kidney disease. To investigate whether the removal of CysC by CVVH is likely to influence its serum concentration, concentrations of CysC were measured in 3 consecutive samples in 18 patients with oliguric ARF treated with CVVH (2 L/hr). Samples were taken from the afferent and efferent blood lines and from the ultrafiltrate line. Concentrations of CysC did not change during the time interval studied. The mean serum concentrations of CysC were 2.25+/-0.45 mg/L in the afferent and 2.19+/-0.56 mg/L in the efferent samples (NS); ultrafiltrate concentrations of CysC were 1.01+/-0.45 mg/L. The sieving coefficient of CysC was 0.52+/-0.20; the clearance of CysC was 17.3+/-6.6 mL/min; and the quantity of CysC removed averaged 2.13 mg/hr. During CVVH (2 L/hr), the quantity of CysC removed is less than 30% of its production and no rapid changes in its serum concentration are observed. Therefore, CVVH (2 L/hr) is unlikely to influence serum concentrations of CysC significantly, which suggests that it can be used to monitor residual renal function during CVVH.