Community Genetic Services in Latin America and Regional Network of Medical Genetics

[Medical genetics services in VenezuelaServiços de genética médica na Venezuela]

Objetivo.

Caracterizar los servicios de genética médica de Venezuela con el fin de conocer la distribución de sus recursos, servicios, tecnologías y formación profesional.

Métodos.

Se realizó una investigación descriptiva, de tipo documental, entre febrero y noviembre de 2016 de los servicios de genética, mediante la revisión de fuentes documentales primarias y el uso de una ficha de recolección de datos en las instituciones de investigación para información referente a disponibilidad de recursos humanos, servicios de atención y diagnóstico, así como formación profesional, y la base de datos de la Sociedad Venezolana de Genética Humana, que permitió identificar los recursos humanos en centros de genética. El criterio de inclusión fue instituciones con recursos humanos formados en genética.

Resultados.

Los criterios fueron cumplidos por cuatro instituciones de investigación, siete universidades y cuatro hospitales, todos del sector público. En estas instituciones trabajan 124 profesionales, 56 son médicos y 68 se desempeñan en el área de laboratorio. Sesenta y dos por ciento de los profesionales pertenecen a las instituciones de investigación; estas cuentan con servicios de atención clínico, diagnóstico molecular, bioquímico y, con menos frecuencia, los análisis citogenéticos, prenatales y forenses. Cinco regiones del país tienen entre dos y cuatro médicos genetistas por millón de habitantes. El 96% de los profesionales de laboratorio se localizan en dos regiones (Capital y Zuliana), cinco regiones carecen de ellos. Las instituciones de investigación han formado en genética el 40% de los recursos humanos actuales del país.

Conclusiones.

Los servicios de genética presentan gran variabilidad de opciones diagnósticas, un acceso limitado y grandes aportes en formación profesional; se requieren políticas coordinadas que los integre y disminuya las brechas.

Synthesis, convergence, and differences in the entangled histories of cytogenetics in medicine: A comparative study of Canada and Mexico

Most historians of science and medicine agree that medical interest in genetics intensified after 1930, and interest in the relationship of radiation damage and genetics continued and expanded after World War II. Moreover, they maintain that the synthesis and convergence of human genetics and cytological techniques in European centers resulted in their dissemination to centers in the United States, resulting in a new field of expertise focused on medicine and clinical research, known as cytogenetics. In this article, we broaden the scope of the inquiry by showing how the early histories of cytogenetics in Canada and Mexico unfolded against strikingly different backgrounds in clinical research and the delivery of health care. We thus argue that the field of cytogenetics did not emerge in a straightforward manner and develop in the same way in all countries. The article provides a brief background to the history of human cytogenetics, and then outlines key developments related to the early adoption of cytogenetics in Canada and Mexico. Conclusions are then drawn using comparisons of the different ways in which local determinants affected adoption. We then propose directions for future study focused on the ways in which circuits of practices, collaborative research, and transfers of knowledge have shaped how cytogenetics has come to be organised in medicine around the world.

Clinical Cancer Genetics Disparities among Latinos

The three major hereditary cancer syndromes in Latinos (Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Lynch Syndrome) have been shown to exhibit geographic disparities by country of origin suggesting admixture-based disparities. A solid infrastructure of clinical genetics geared towards diagnosis and prevention could aid in reducing the mortality of these cancer syndromes in Latinos. Currently, clinical cancer genetic services in Latin America are scarce. Moreover, limited studies have investigated the mutational spectrum of these cancer syndromes in Latinos resulting in gaps in personalized medicine affecting diagnosis, treatment and prevention. The following commentary discusses available genotype and clinical information on hereditary cancer in Latinos and highlights the limited access for cancer genetic services in Latin America including barriers to genetic testing and alternatives for providing better access to genetic services. In this review, we discuss the status of clinical genetic cancer services for both US Latinos and those Latinos living in Latin America.

Alterations and chromosomal variants in the Ecuadorian population

Medical genetics is a field marked by fast progress. Even though it was at one point confined to a group of relatively rare diseases, today it has become a central component in the understanding of disorders and it is the subject of interest for all medical specialties. This paper, shares data on the chromosomal alterations and variations that have been diagnosed in Ecuadorian patients since 1998. A total of 2,636 individual cases have been analyzed by G-banding technique until February 2012. The present work shows this collection of data and the important findings that have appeared throughout these years in hopes that it can contribute to have a deeper understanding of the incidence of chromosomal aberrations and alterations in the Ecuadorian population.

Genetic testing and services in Argentina

Argentina is a middle-income country with a population of 40 million people. The structure of morbidity and mortality approaches that of more developed nations, with congenital and genetic disorders contributing significantly to ill health. The health delivery system is mixed, with public, social security, and private sectors which together spend close to 10 % of the GNP. Health subsectors are decentralized at provincial and municipality levels, where health planning and financing occurs, leading to fragmentation, inefficiency, and inequities. There are about 41 clinical genetic units in major medical centers in large cities, staffed by about 120 clinical geneticists, although only a few units are fully comprehensive genetic centers. Duplications, deficiencies, and poor regionalization and coordination affect health care delivery in general and in genetics. Funding for genetic services is limited due to poor understanding and lack of political will on the part of health authorities. Recently, however, there have been some interesting initiatives by national and provincial ministries of health to improve genetic services delivery by increasing coordination and regionalization. At the same time, training in genetics of health professionals is occurring, particularly in primary health care, and registries of congenital defects are being put in place. These developments are occurring in conjunction with a new awareness by health authorities of the importance of genetics in health care and research, a heightened activism of patient organizations demanding services for neglected conditions, as well as of women movements for the right to safe abortion.

Genetic Services in Latin America

This special issue of Community Genetics reviews some of the most important developments in medical genetics in key countries of Latin America. Contributions to this issue were prepared for a special consultation of the World Health Organization held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, on June 19, 2003. Latin America is a region of medium- to low-income countries characterized by socioeconomic problems, with large segments of the population living in poverty and extreme disparities in the distribution of wealth. A rise in chronic diseases typical of the processes of industrialization and urbanization coexists with the persistence of nutritional and infectious diseases characteristic of poverty and underdevelopment. Over the last 2 decades of the 20th century, birth defects and genetic disorders have increased their share of morbidity and mortality, and tertiary-care-based genetic services have developed in urban areas. Although privatization of health care is eroding the public sector, the public institutions continue to be the main providers of genetic services for the bulk of the population and the leaders in research. The development of clinical genetics in the region is concentrated in tertiary-care centers in large cities, although a recent trend began extending genetic services to the community.