Normal Functional Protein S Activity Does Not Exclude Protein S Deficiency

Thrombophilia Screening: Not So Straightforward

Although inherited thrombophilias are lifelong risk factors for a first thrombotic episode, progression to thrombosis is multifactorial and not all individuals with inherited thrombophilia develop thrombosis in their lifetimes. Consequently, indiscriminate screening in patients with idiopathic thrombosis is not recommended, since presence of a thrombophilia does not necessarily predict recurrence or influence management, and testing should be selective. It follows that a decision to undertake laboratory detection of thrombophilia should be aligned with a concerted effort to identify any significant abnormalities, because it will inform patient management. Deficiencies of antithrombin and protein C are rare and usually determined using phenotypic assays assessing biological activities, whereas protein S deficiency (also rare) is commonly detected with antigenic assays for the free form of protein S since available activity assays are considered to lack specificity. In each case, no single phenotypic assay is capable of detecting every deficiency, because the various mutations express different molecular characteristics, rendering thrombophilia screening repertoires employing one assay per potential deficiency, of limited effectiveness. Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is more common than discrete deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S and also often detected initially with phenotypic assays; however, some centres perform only genetic analysis for factor V Leiden, as this is responsible for most cases of hereditary APCR, accepting that acquired APCR and rare F5 mutations conferring APCR will go undetected if only factor V Leiden is evaluated. All phenotypic assays have interferences and limitations, which must be factored into decisions about if, and when, to test, and be given consideration in the laboratory during assay performance and interpretation. This review looks in detail at performance and limitations of routine phenotypic thrombophilia assays.

In vitro diagnostics for the medical dermatologist. Part II: Hypercoagulability tests

The skin often provides initial clues of hypercoagulability with features such as livedo reticularis, livedo racemosa, retiform purpura, necrosis, and ulcerations. Because these cutaneous manifestations are nonspecific, laboratory testing is often needed to evaluate for underlying causes of hypercoagulability. Importantly, these disorders are reported to be the most common mimicker, resulting in an erroneous diagnosis of pyoderma gangrenosum. Understanding inherent properties of, and indications for, available tests is necessary for appropriate ordering and interpretation of results. Additionally, ordering of these tests in an indiscriminate manner may lead to inaccurate results, complicating the interpretation and approach to management. This second article in this continuing medical education series summarizes information on methodology, test characteristics, and limitations of several in vitro laboratory tests used for the work up of hypercoagulability and vasculopathic disease as it pertains to dermatologic disease.

Plasma phenotypes of protein S Lys196Glu and protein C Lys193del variants prevalent among young Japanese women

Protein S Tokushima (p.Lys196Glu) and two protein C gene variants (p.Arg189Trp, p.Lys193del) are hereditary thrombophilia in Japanese and Chinese populations, respectively; however, their diagnosis by plasma analyses is difficult because of the type II deficiency phenotype. Three gene variant genotypes were examined in young Japanese women (n = 231). Plasma total protein S activity and total protein S antigen levels were measured using a total protein S assay system, protein C and protein S activities by clot-based methods, and protein C and free protein S antigen levels by latex agglutination methods. protein S Tokushima (p.Lys196Glu) and protein C p.Lys193del variants were prevalent among participants with allele frequencies of 1.08 and 0.86%, respectively, whereas any carrier of protein C p.Arg189Trp variant was not identified. The plasma phenotype of the type II deficiency of protein S Tokushima heterozygotes was demonstrated by decreased total protein S activity with a normal total protein S antigen level; however, the protein C activities of protein C p.Lys193del heterozygotes were within reference intervals, whereas their protein C antigen levels were elevated. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the total protein S activity/total protein S antigen ratio for identifying protein S Tokushima heterozygotes with that of the clot-based protein S activity/free protein S antigen ratio and found that sensitivity and specificity of 100% each was only achieved by the former. Protein S Tokushima and protein C p.Lys193del are prevalent among young Japanese women, and a plasma analysis using the total protein S assay system is more accurate than the clot-based protein S activity/free protein S antigen ratio for diagnosing protein S Tokushima carriers.

Evaluation of the plasma protein S dynamics during pregnancy using a total protein S assay: Protein S-specific activity decreased from the second trimester

AIM

The relationship between congenital protein S (PS) deficiency and complications during pregnancy remains unclear, partly due to the difficulty of precisely evaluating the PS level with conventional assays and the physiological decrease of PS during pregnancy. A new PS assay was developed to measure the total PS antigen and activity quantitatively and calculate PS-specific activity. This study aimed to evaluate the plasma PS dynamics during pregnancy using the new PS assay and establish the reference interval for pregnant women.

METHODS

A total of 253 pregnant women without a personal or family history of thromboembolism were recruited. Blood samples were obtained in the first, second and third trimesters and at one month post-partum. The total PS antigen, activity, and PS-specific activity were studied. Results were analyzed by the repeated measures single-factor anovas followed by a post-hoc test using Excel Statistics.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation (IU/mL) of the total PS antigen levels in the first, second and third trimesters and 1 month post-partum were 0.67 ± 0.12, 0.67 ± 0.09, 0.68 ± 0.11 and 0.92 ± 0.13, respectively. The total PS activity (IU/mL) in the first, second and third trimesters and 1 month post-partum were 0.69 ± 0.14, 0.59 ± 0.10, 0.58 ± 0.12 and 0.87 ± 0.15, respectively. The PS-specific activity was within the normal range of nonpregnant women in the first trimester (1.02 ± 0.10) but decreased in the second and third trimesters (0.88 ± 0.09 and 0.85 ± 0.09, respectively) before increasing in the post-partum period (0.94 ± 0.08).

CONCLUSION

The total PS antigen and activity decrease throughout pregnancy, while the PS-specific activity decreases in the second and third trimesters.

Protein S abnormalities: a diagnostic nightmare

Heterozygous deficiency of Protein S (PS) increases the risk for developing thrombosis. Many acquired conditions alter plasma PS levels. These complex interactions of PS in plasma make it imperative that clinical PS assay limitations are understood so that the assays are reliable, reproducible and specific to diagnose true genetic abnormalities based on plasma phenotype alone. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of PS deficiency is difficult and complicated. Three basic assays can be utilized for assessing PS in plasma: PS activity assay, Free PS antigen assay, and Total PS antigen assay. This article will review these clinical assays and their associated problems. We also discuss the confounding and interfering factors that make it difficult to obtain an accurate diagnosis of PS deficiency.