Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernioplasty Using Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate versus Sutures

Suturing Versus Adhesion for Mesh Fixation in Ventral Hernia Repair and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is a surgical procedure performed to address various conditions such as hernias, incisional hernias, and complex abdominal wall defects. Mesh fixation plays a crucial role in providing mechanical reinforcement to the weakened abdominal wall during AWR. Traditionally, suturing has been the preferred method for mesh fixation; however, adhesion techniques using tissue adhesives or glues have gained attention as an alternative approach. This systematic review aims to compare suturing and adhesion techniques for mesh fixation in AWR and assess their effectiveness in preventing hernia recurrence. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across relevant databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies that fulfilled the predetermined eligibility criteria were included. The primary outcome measure of interest was hernia recurrence rates. Secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, surgical site infections, patient-reported outcomes, and functional outcomes. A risk of bias assessment was performed for the included studies, and data were synthesized qualitatively. Overall, the results of the included studies suggest that atraumatic mesh fixation with glue may have the potential to reduce chronic groin pain (CGP). However, there were significant variations in patient selection criteria, glue administration techniques, and hernia repair methods among the trials, which limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Additionally, the definitions of CGP and measurement scales for postoperative pain varied across studies, making it challenging to compare outcomes. The limitations of the review include the small sample sizes in some trials, relatively short follow-up durations, and the lack of standardized criteria for assessing variables such as foreign body sensation and groin compliance. Furthermore, the economic implications of using glue fixation compared to traditional suture fixation need to be considered.

Comparison of glue versus suture mesh fixation for primary open inguinal hernia mesh repair by Lichtenstein technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of glue as a mesh fixator in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has gained popularity to reduce recurrence and postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date review to compare glue versus suture fixation in primary open Lichtenstein IHR.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Springer were systematically searched till June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue versus suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR. Primary outcomes were early (at 1 year) and late recurrence (5 years or more). Secondary outcomes were the length of operation, postoperative haematoma and seroma, and chronic pain at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 17 RCTs with 3150 hernias (glue n = 1582, suture n = 1568) were included. Only three studies reported late recurrence. Glue fixation was associated with shorter operative duration (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 4.82, - 3.52; p < 0.001 and a lower incidence of haematoma formation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32, 0.81; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative seroma (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35, 1.49; p = 0.38), chronic pain after 1 year (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73, 1.65; p = 0.65), early recurrence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45, 2.76; p = 0.81, I² = 0%), and late recurrence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.59, 2.59; p = 0.59, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Early and late recurrence were comparable between glue and suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR patients. Glue fixation had shorter operating time and lower haematoma formation than suture fixation. Chronic pain and seroma formation were comparable. More RCTs should report long-term outcomes.

Two Polyurethane Adhesives for PVDF Fixation Show Superior Biocompatibility in a Rat Model

BACKGROUND

The current standard for open and laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia consist of an abdominal wall augmentation by mesh implantation. However, the ideal fixation method of the prothesis material remains under discussion, due to potential complications of conventional fixation methods such as chronic abdominal pain or intestinal obstruction. As the use of adhesive based mesh fixation is an option of growing interest, the aim of this experimental study was to investigate the strength and biocompatibility of two newly developed polyurethane-based adhesives in comparison to a cyanoacrylatic adhesive, which is currently in clinical use.

METHODS

Two experimental polyurethane/urea-based adhesives (Adhesive-A and Adhesive-B) were compared to a conventional cyanoacrylatic adhesive and an untreated control group. Biomechanical testing was carried out using a pull-out test in uniaxial tensile mode, while biocompatibility assessment was performed in a rat model with 40 Sprague-Dawley rats receiving a subcutaneous implanted PVDF mesh fixed by the corresponding adhesive. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis by a Tissue FAXS system examined the tissue integration of the mesh/adhesive combination and characterized the foreign body reaction.

RESULTS

Biomechanical testing of the mesh/adhesive combinations showed a minimal strength of 15.08 N without a significant difference between the groups. Cellular penetration into the mesh/adhesive interface was significantly improved after application of polyurethane adhesives and Adhesive-A showed a significantly lower migration of CD68 positive cells to the adhesive sites compared to cyanoacrylate after 7 days.

CONCLUSION

The developed polyurethane-based adhesives are a promising alternative with sufficient adhesive strength and superior short-term biocompatibility to cyanoacrylate.

Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Network Meta-analysis Comparing Self-Gripping Mesh, Suture Fixation, and Glue Fixation

The most troublesome complications of inguinal hernia repair are recurrent herniation and chronic pain. A multitude of technological products dedicated to abdominal wall surgery, such as self-gripping mesh (SGM) and glue fixation (GF), were introduced in alternative to suture fixation (SF) in the attempt to lower the postoperative complication rates. We conducted an electronic systematic search using MEDLINE databases that compared postoperative pain and short- and long-term surgical complications after SGM or GF and SF in open inguinal hernia repair. Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials totaling 5495 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this network meta-analysis. SGM and GF did not show better outcomes in either short- or long-term complications compared to SF. Patients in the SGM group showed significantly more pain at day 1 compared to those in the GF group (VAS score pain mean difference: - 5.2 Crl - 11.0; - 1.2). The relative risk (RR) of developing a surgical site infection (RR 0.83; Crl 0.50-1.32), hematoma (RR 1.9; Crl 0.35-11.2), and seroma (RR 1.81; Crl 0.54-6.53) was similar in SGM and GF groups. Both the SGM and GF had a significantly shorter operative time mean difference (1.70; Crl - 1.80; 5.3) compared to SF. Chronic pain and hernia recurrence did not statistically differ at 1 year (RR 0.63; Crl 0.36-1.12; RR 1.5; Crl 0.52-4.71, respectively) between SGM and GF. Methods of inguinal hernia repair are evolving, but there remains no superiority in terms of mesh fixation. Ultimately, patient's preference and surgeon's expertise should still lead the choice about the fixation method.

Meta-analysis of postoperative pain using non-sutured or sutured single-layer open mesh repair for inguinal hernia

Background

Chronic postoperative pain occurs in up to 21·7 per cent of patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair. Several mesh fixation techniques using glue or self‐gripping meshes have been developed to reduce postoperative pain. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to evaluate RCTs comparing adhesional/self‐gripping and sutured single‐layer open mesh fixations in the repair of inguinal herniation, with postoperative pain as endpoint.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically for RCTs according to the PRISMA guidelines; the study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42017056373). Different fixation methods were analysed. The primary outcome, chronic pain, was defined as a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of at least 3 at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were mean VAS score at 1 week and at 1 month after surgery.

Results

Twenty‐three studies including 5190 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Adhesional (self‐adhering or glued) or self‐gripping fixation methods were associated with a significantly lower VAS score at 1 week (mean difference –0·49, 95 per cent c.i. ‐0·81 to –0·17; P = 0·003) and at 1 month (mean difference –0·31, –0·58 to –0·04; P = 0·02) after surgery than suture fixation, but the incidence of chronic pain after 12 months was similar in the two groups (odds ratio 0·70, 95 per cent c.i. 0·30 to 1·66). Differences in recurrences and complications between groups did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

There was no difference in the incidence of chronic pain 12 months after different mesh repair fixation techniques despite significant reductions in short‐term postoperative pain favouring a non‐sutured technique. There were no differences in recurrence rates or in rates of other complications at 1 year.

Factors predicting chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a regression analysis of randomized trial comparing three different meshes with three fixation methods (FinnMesh Study)

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain after inguinal hernioplasty is the foremost side-effect up to 10-30% of patients. Mesh fixation may influence on the incidence of chronic pain after open anterior mesh repairs.

METHODS

Some 625 patients who underwent open anterior mesh repairs were randomized to receive one of the three meshes and fixations: cyanoacrylate glue with low-weight polypropylene mesh (n = 216), non-absorbable sutures with partially absorbable mesh (n = 207) or self-gripping polyesther mesh (n = 202). Factors related to chronic pain (visual analogue scores; VAS ≥ 30, range 0-100) at 1 year postoperatively were analyzed using logistic regression method. A second analysis using telephone interview and patient records was performed 2 years after the index surgery.

RESULTS

At index operation, all patient characteristics were similar in the three study groups. After 1 year, chronic inguinal pain was found in 52 patients and after 2 years in only 16 patients with no difference between the study groups. During 2 years' follow-up, three (0.48%) patients with recurrences and five (0.8%) patients with chronic pain were re-operated. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that only new recurrent hernias and high pain scores at day 7 were predictive factors for longstanding groin pain (p = 0.001). Type of mesh or fixation, gender, pre-operative VAS, age, body mass index or duration of operation did not predict chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

Only the presence of recurrent hernia and early severe pain after index operation seemed to predict longstanding inguinal pain.

A meta-analysis of randomized control trials assessing mesh fixation with glue versus suture in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The use of glue to fix mesh instead of sutures in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair has been accepted worldwide, with the increasing worries about postoperative chronic groin pain and recurrence. The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify which mesh fixation method was more suitable in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

Articles published up to July 2017 were searched using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue versus suture mesh fixation in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair were included in the review. The quality assessment and data extraction of included studies were applied by 2 independent authors. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs with 2375 patients were eligible for inclusion. Eight trials compared synthetic glue with suture fixation and 5 compared biological glue with suture fixation. The results showed that there was a lower incidence of early chronic pain (subgroup analysis, biological glue versus sutures, odds ratio (OR) = 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.19-0.90; P = .03), and hematoma (subgroup analysis, synthetic glue versus sutures, OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03) in the glue fixation group. Suture mesh fixation method cost more time in operation than glue (mean difference = -4.60, 95% CI -7.60 to -1.60; P = .003). There was no evidence of an increase in chronic pain or recurrence rates with glue fixation method in the long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh fixation with glue compared with sutures in Lichtenstein repair inguinal hernia is faster and less painful, without an increasing in terms of recurrence rates in the long term.

International guidelines for groin hernia management

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, more than 20 million patients undergo groin hernia repair annually. The many different approaches, treatment indications and a significant array of techniques for groin hernia repair warrant guidelines to standardize care, minimize complications, and improve results. The main goal of these guidelines is to improve patient outcomes, specifically to decrease recurrence rates and reduce chronic pain, the most frequent problems following groin hernia repair. They have been endorsed by all five continental hernia societies, the International Endo Hernia Society and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

METHODS

An expert group of international surgeons (the HerniaSurge Group) and one anesthesiologist pain expert was formed. The group consisted of members from all continents with specific experience in hernia-related research. Care was taken to include surgeons who perform different types of repair and had preferably performed research on groin hernia surgery. During the Group's first meeting, evidence-based medicine (EBM) training occurred and 166 key questions (KQ) were formulated. EBM rules were followed in complete literature searches (including a complete search by The Dutch Cochrane database) to January 1, 2015 and to July 1, 2015 for level 1 publications. The articles were scored by teams of two or three according to Oxford, SIGN and Grade methodologies. During five 2-day meetings, results were discussed with the working group members leading to 136 statements and 88 recommendations. Recommendations were graded as "strong" (recommendations) or "weak" (suggestions) and by consensus in some cases upgraded. In the Results and summary section below, the term "should" refers to a recommendation. The AGREE II instrument was used to validate the guidelines. An external review was performed by three international experts. They recommended the guidelines with high scores. The risk factors for inguinal hernia (IH) include: family history, previous contra-lateral hernia, male gender, age, abnormal collagen metabolism, prostatectomy, and low body mass index. Peri-operative risk factors for recurrence include poor surgical techniques, low surgical volumes, surgical inexperience and local anesthesia. These should be considered when treating IH patients. IH diagnosis can be confirmed by physical examination alone in the vast majority of patients with appropriate signs and symptoms. Rarely, ultrasound is necessary. Less commonly still, a dynamic MRI or CT scan or herniography may be needed. The EHS classification system is suggested to stratify IH patients for tailored treatment, research and audit. Symptomatic groin hernias should be treated surgically. Asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic male IH patients may be managed with "watchful waiting" since their risk of hernia-related emergencies is low. The majority of these individuals will eventually require surgery; therefore, surgical risks and the watchful waiting strategy should be discussed with patients. Surgical treatment should be tailored to the surgeon's expertise, patient- and hernia-related characteristics and local/national resources. Furthermore, patient health-related, life style and social factors should all influence the shared decision-making process leading up to hernia management. Mesh repair is recommended as first choice, either by an open procedure or a laparo-endoscopic repair technique. One standard repair technique for all groin hernias does not exist. It is recommended that surgeons/surgical services provide both anterior and posterior approach options. Lichtenstein and laparo-endoscopic repair are best evaluated. Many other techniques need further evaluation. Provided that resources and expertise are available, laparo-endoscopic techniques have faster recovery times, lower chronic pain risk and are cost effective. There is discussion concerning laparo-endoscopic management of potential bilateral hernias (occult hernia issue). After patient consent, during TAPP, the contra-lateral side should be inspected. This is not suggested during unilateral TEP repair. After appropriate discussions with patients concerning results tissue repair (first choice is the Shouldice technique) can be offered. Day surgery is recommended for the majority of groin hernia repair provided aftercare is organized. Surgeons should be aware of the intrinsic characteristics of the meshes they use. Use of so-called low-weight mesh may have slight short-term benefits like reduced postoperative pain and shorter convalescence, but are not associated with better longer-term outcomes like recurrence and chronic pain. Mesh selection on weight alone is not recommended. The incidence of erosion seems higher with plug versus flat mesh. It is suggested not to use plug repair techniques. The use of other implants to replace the standard flat mesh in the Lichtenstein technique is currently not recommended. In almost all cases, mesh fixation in TEP is unnecessary. In both TEP and TAPP it is recommended to fix mesh in M3 hernias (large medial) to reduce recurrence risk. Antibiotic prophylaxis in average-risk patients in low-risk environments is not recommended in open surgery. In laparo-endoscopic repair it is never recommended. Local anesthesia in open repair has many advantages, and its use is recommended provided the surgeon is experienced in this technique. General anesthesia is suggested over regional in patients aged 65 and older as it might be associated with fewer complications like myocardial infarction, pneumonia and thromboembolism. Perioperative field blocks and/or subfascial/subcutaneous infiltrations are recommended in all cases of open repair. Patients are recommended to resume normal activities without restrictions as soon as they feel comfortable. Provided expertise is available, it is suggested that women with groin hernias undergo laparo-endoscopic repair in order to decrease the risk of chronic pain and avoid missing a femoral hernia. Watchful waiting is suggested in pregnant women as groin swelling most often consists of self-limited round ligament varicosities. Timely mesh repair by a laparo-endoscopic approach is suggested for femoral hernias provided expertise is available. All complications of groin hernia management are discussed in an extensive chapter on the topic. Overall, the incidence of clinically significant chronic pain is in the 10-12% range, decreasing over time. Debilitating chronic pain affecting normal daily activities or work ranges from 0.5 to 6%. Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is defined as bothersome moderate pain impacting daily activities lasting at least 3 months postoperatively and decreasing over time. CPIP risk factors include: young age, female gender, high preoperative pain, early high postoperative pain, recurrent hernia and open repair. For CPIP the focus should be on nerve recognition in open surgery and, in selected cases, prophylactic pragmatic nerve resection (planned resection is not suggested). It is suggested that CPIP management be performed by multi-disciplinary teams. It is also suggested that CPIP be managed by a combination of pharmacological and interventional measures and, if this is unsuccessful, followed by, in selected cases (triple) neurectomy and (in selected cases) mesh removal. For recurrent hernia after anterior repair, posterior repair is recommended. If recurrence occurs after a posterior repair, an anterior repair is recommended. After a failed anterior and posterior approach, management by a specialist hernia surgeon is recommended. Risk factors for hernia incarceration/strangulation include: female gender, femoral hernia and a history of hospitalization related to groin hernia. It is suggested that treatment of emergencies be tailored according to patient- and hernia-related factors, local expertise and resources. Learning curves vary between different techniques. Probably about 100 supervised laparo-endoscopic repairs are needed to achieve the same results as open mesh surgery like Lichtenstein. It is suggested that case load per surgeon is more important than center volume. It is recommended that minimum requirements be developed to certify individuals as expert hernia surgeon. The same is true for the designation "Hernia Center". From a cost-effectiveness perspective, day-case laparoscopic IH repair with minimal use of disposables is recommended. The development and implementation of national groin hernia registries in every country (or region, in the case of small country populations) is suggested. They should include patient follow-up data and account for local healthcare structures. A dissemination and implementation plan of the guidelines will be developed by global (HerniaSurge), regional (international societies) and local (national chapters) initiatives through internet websites, social media and smartphone apps. An overarching plan to improve access to safe IH surgery in low-resource settings (LRSs) is needed. It is suggested that this plan contains simple guidelines and a sustainability strategy, independent of international aid. It is suggested that in LRSs the focus be on performing high-volume Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia using low-cost mesh. Three chapters discuss future research, guidelines for general practitioners and guidelines for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The HerniaSurge Group has developed these extensive and inclusive guidelines for the management of adult groin hernia patients. It is hoped that they will lead to better outcomes for groin hernia patients wherever they live. More knowledge, better training, national audit and specialization in groin hernia management will standardize care for these patients, lead to more effective and efficient healthcare and provide direction for future research.

Tackers versus glue mesh fixation: an objective assessment of postoperative acute and chronic pain using inflammatory markers

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic hernioplasty has become a popular choice for inguinal hernia repair since its advent in 1990s. Postoperative pain is an undesirable clinical outcome impairing daily activity of 22.5% of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative acute and chronic pain via inflammatory markers as an objective assessment following tacks or glue mesh fixation in TEP repair.

METHODS

Sixty-six (66) patients with unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia were randomized into 34 patients in the tacker and 32 patients in cyanoacrylate glue mesh fixation in TEP repair. The extent of surgical trauma was evaluated by measuring inflammatory markers of C-reactive protein, white blood cell count at 48 h, and ESR at 3 months postoperatively. Postoperative acute and chronic pain was assessed by recording the visual analogue scale scores and surgical complications were recorded over 3 months of the study period.

RESULTS

The median CRP and WBC levels at postoperative 48 h in both groups raised significantly from the baseline values (p < 0.05), however, did not differ significantly between the two study groups at 48 h (p > 0.05). The median ESR level increased significantly at 3 months postoperatively from baseline in the glue mesh fixation group only (p < 0.05), however, did not differ significantly between the two study groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference for VAS scores at all timelines between the tacker and glue mesh fixation group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Cyanoacrylate glue mesh fixation technique as an alternative method to mechanical fixation in TEP repair is comparable to tacker and can be considered to be safe and feasible.

Host tissue response by the expression of collagen to cyanoacrylate adhesives used in implant fixation for abdominal hernia repair

The less traumatic use of surgical adhesives rather than sutures for mesh fixation in hernia repair has started to gain popularity because they induce less host tissue damage and provoke less postoperative pain. This study examines the host tissue response to a new cyanoacrylate (CA) adhesive (n-octyl, OCA). Partial defects (3 × 5 cm) created in the rabbit anterior abdominal wall were repaired by mesh fixation using OCA, Glubran2^®(n-butyl-CA), Ifabond^®(n-hexyl-CA) or sutures. Samples were obtained at 14/90 days for morphology, collagens qRT-PCR/immunofluorescence and biomechanical studies. All meshes were successfully fixed. Seroma was detected mainly in the Glubran group at 14 days. Meshes fixed using all methods showed good host tissue incorporation. No signs of degradation of any of the adhesives were observed. At 14 days, collagen 1 and 3 mRNA expression levels were greater in the suture and OCA groups, and lower in Ifabond, with levels varying significantly in the latter group with respect to the others. By 90 days, expression levels had fallen in all groups, except for collagen 3 mRNA in Ifabond. Collagen I and III protein expression was marked in the suture and OCA groups at 90 days, but lower in Ifabond at both time points. Tensile strengths were similar across groups. Our findings indicate the similar behavior of the adhesives to sutures in terms of good tissue incorporation of the meshes and optimal repair zone strength. The lower seroma rate and similar collagenization to controls induced by OCA suggests its improved behavior over the other two glues. This article deals with a preclinical study to examine different aspects of the repair process in the host of three alkyl cyanoacrylates (n-butyl (GLUBRAN 2), n-hexyl (IFABOND), and n-octyl cyanoacrylate (EVOBOND)) compared to sutures (control), in the fixation of surgical meshes for hernia repair. It goes into detail about collagen deposition in the repair zone at short and medium term. The results obtained demonstrate lower seroma rate and similar collagenization to sutures induced by the n-octyl suggesting better behavior than the other two cyanoacrylates.

Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with glue or sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most likely reason for delay in resuming normal activities after groin hernia repair. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the use of glue to fix the mesh instead of sutures reduced acute postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair. Secondary objectives were to compare postoperative complications, chronic pain and early recurrence rates during 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Some 370 patients who underwent Lichtenstein hernia repair were randomized to receive either glue (Histoacryl®) or non-absorbable polypropylene sutures for fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh. Postoperative complications, pain and recurrence were evaluated by an independent blinded observer.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain at 8 h, 24 h, 7 days and 30 days was less when glue was used instead of sutures for all measures (P < 0·001). The operation was significantly quicker using glue (mean(s.d.) 35·3(8·7) min versus 39·9(11·1) min for sutures; P < 0·001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative complications, chronic pain and early recurrence at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Atraumatic mesh fixation with glue was quicker and resulted in less acute postoperative pain than sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Registration number: NCT02632097 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain following mesh-based inguinal hernia repair is frequently reported, and has a significant impact on quality of life. Whether mesh fixation with glue can reduce chronic pain without increasing the recurrence rate is still controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether tissue adhesives can reduce postoperative complications, especially chronic pain, with no increase in recurrence rate, compared with sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein hernia repair.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases with no language restrictions: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; issue 4, 2016) in the Cochrane Library (searched 11 May 2016), MEDLINE Ovid (1986 to 11 May 2016), Embase Ovid (1986 to 11 May 2016), Science Citation Index (Web of Science) (1986 to 11 May 2016), CBM (Chinese Biomedical Database), CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), VIP (a full-text database in China), Wanfang databases. We also checked reference lists of identified papers (included studies and relevant reviews).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Cluster-RCTs were also eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data and assessed the risk of bias independently. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials with a total of 1932 participants were included in this review. The overall postoperative chronic pain in the glue group was reduced by 37% (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.91; 10 studies, 1418 participants, low-quality evidence) compared with the suture group. However, the results changed when we conducted subgroup analysis with regard to the type of mesh. Subgroup analysis of included studies using lightweight mesh showed the reduction of chronic pain was less profound and insignificant (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.17). Subgroup analysis of included studies using heavyweight mesh resulted in a significant benefit from the fixation with glue (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.82).Hernia recurrence was similar between the two groups (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.28; 12 studies, 1932 participants, low-quality evidence). Fixation with glue was superior to suture regarding duration of the operation (MD -3.13, 95% CI -4.48 to -1.78; 9 studies, 1790 participants, low-quality evidence); haematoma (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.86; 10 studies, 1384 participants, moderate-quality evidence); and recovery time to daily activities (MD -1.26, 95% CI -1.89 to -0.63; 3 studies, 403 participants, low-quality evidence).We also investigated adverse events. There were no significant differences between the two groups. For superficial wound infection pooled analyses showed OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.37 to 4.11; 7 studies, 763 participants (low-quality evidence); for mesh/deep infection OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.16 to 2.83; 8 studies, 1393 participants (low-quality evidence). Furthermore, we investigated seroma (a postoperative swelling caused by fluid) (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.33); and persisting numbness (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14).Finally, six trials involving 1009 participants reported postoperative length of stay, resulting in non-significant difference between the two groups (MD -0.12, 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.10)Due to the lack of data, it was impossible to draw any distinction between synthetic glue and biological glue.Eight out of 12 trials showed high risk of bias in at least one of the investigated domains. Two studies were quasi-randomised controlled trials and the allocation sequence of one trial was not concealed. Nearly half of the included trials either did not provide adequate information or had high risk of bias regarding blinding processes. The risk of bias for incomplete outcome data of all the included studies varied from low to high risk of bias. Two trials did not report on some important outcomes. One study was funded by the manufacturer producing the fibrin sealant. Therefore, according to the 'Summary of findings' tables, the quality of the evidence (GRADE) for the outcomes is moderate to low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the short-term results, glue may reduce postoperative chronic pain and not simultaneously increase the recurrence rate, compared with sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein hernia repair. Glue may therefore be a sensible alternative to suture for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein repair. Larger trials with longer follow-up and high quality are warranted. The difference between synthetic glue and biological glue should also be assessed in the future.

Usage of a self-adhesive mesh in TAPP hernia repair: A prospective study based on Herniamed Register

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide in general surgery. The transabdominal laparoscopic (TAPP) approach in the therapy of inguinal hernia seems to be a suitable alternative to classical open inguinal hernia repair mainly in the hands of an experienced surgeon. TAPP repair offers the possibility of gentle dissection with implantation of the mesh and the possibility of non-invasive fixation of the implanted mesh.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data analysis encompassed all patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery at our Surgical Department within the period from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2014 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The standard surgical technique was used. Data were entered and subsequently analysed on the Herniamed platform. Herniamed is an Internet-based register in German and English, and includes all data of outpatient and hospitalised patients who underwent surgery for some type of hernia. All relevant patient data are collected via Internet.

RESULTS

There were 241 patients enrolled in the group and there were 396 inguinal hernias repaired in total. Standard long-term follow-up after 12 months was evaluated in 205 patients (85.06%), and in the rest of the patients during the closing of the study, but at least 6 months after operation. The mean follow-up was at 19.69 months. At the 1-year assessment, mild discomfort was reported in the groin in 10 patients (4.88%) [1-3 on the visual analogue scale (VAS)]. Post-operative pain lasting over 12 months in the groin of moderate degree (4-6 VAS) was reported in two cases (0.97%). There was no recurrence and no chronic post-operative pain of severe degree reported.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the TAPP technique with the implantation of a self-fixation mesh is fast, effective, reliable and economically advantageous method in experienced hands and, according to our results, reduces the occurrence of post-herniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) and has a low recurrence rate.

Is It Possible to Eliminate Sutures in Open (Lichtenstein Technique) and Laparoscopic (Totally Extraperitoneal Endoscopic) Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Randomized Controlled Trial With Tissue Adhesive (n-Hexyl-α-Cyanoacrylate)

Background. The morbidity linked to the use of sutures in inguinal hernioplasty is well known. Tissue adhesives may be an alternative, so as to be able to improve levels of postoperative comfort, but clinical experience using them is limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of cyanoacrylate as a substitute for sutures in the treatment of inguinal hernias. Patients. Randomized clinical trial in abdominal wall unit. A total of 208 patients were operated upon for inguinal hernias of which 102 were unilateral hernias via open surgery using the Lichtenstein technique, randomized to receive prolene sutures (n = 52) or n-hexyl-α-cyanoacrylate glue (n = 50) and 106 were patients with bilateral inguinal hernias operated upon via totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy and randomized to receive either tackers (n = 54) or glue (n = 52). Main Outcome Measures. The primary endpoints were pain and recurrence. Secondary endpoints were operating time, postoperative morbidity, pain, and analgesic consumption. Results. No morbidity associated with the use of the glue existed. The use of glue significantly reduced the mean of surgical time (12 minutes in open surgery, 13 minutes in laparoscopic surgery), pain, and analgesics consumption, both via the open and laparoscopic approaches ( P < .001). After 1 year the adhesive did not change the recurrence rate in either of the approaches. The economic analysis shows potential yearly savings of 123 916.3 Euros. Conclusions. Substituting sutures with glue ( n-hexyl-α-cyanoacrylate) in open or laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty is safe with less postoperative pain and the same possibilities of recurrence.

Use of human fibrin glue (Tisseel) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TISTA): a randomized controlled trial (NCT01641718)

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. This procedure is increasingly performed with endoscopic techniques (laparoscopy). Many surgeons prefer to cover the hernia gap with a mesh to prevent recurrence. The mesh must be fixed tightly, but without tension. During laparoscopic surgery, the mesh is generally fixed with staples or tissue glue. However, staples often cause pain at the staple sites, and they can cause scarring of the abdominal wall, which can lead to chronic pain. We designed a trial that aims to determine whether mesh fixation with glue might cause less postoperative pain than fixation with staples during a transabdominal preperitoneal patch plastic repair.

METHODS/DESIGN

The TISTA trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial with a two-by-two parallel design. All patients and outcome-assessors will be blinded to treatment allocations. For eligibility, patients must be male, ≥18 years old, and scheduled for laparoscopic repair of a primary inguinal hernia. One group comprises patients with a unilateral inguinal hernia that will be randomized to receive mesh fixation with either tissue glue or staples. The second group comprises patients with bilateral inguinal hernias. They will be randomized to receive mesh fixation with tissue glue either on the right or the left side and with staples on the other side. The primary endpoint will be pain under physical stress, measured at 24 h after surgery. Pain will be rated by the patient based on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, where 10 equals the worst pain imaginable. A total of 82 patients will be recruited (58 patients with unilateral inguinal hernias and 24 patients with bilateral hernias). This number is estimated to provide 90% power for detecting a pain reduction of one point on a numeric rating scale, with a standard deviation of one.

DISCUSSION

Patients with bilateral hernias will receive two meshes, one fixed with glue, and the other fixed with staples. This design will eliminate the inter-individual bias inherent in comparing pain measurements between two groups of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01641718.

Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients

PURPOSE

In 2009, the European Hernia Society published the EHS Guidelines for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernia in Adult Patients. The Guidelines contain recommendations for the treatment of inguinal hernia from diagnosis till aftercare. The guidelines expired January 1, 2012. To keep them updated, a revision of the guidelines was planned including new level 1 evidence.

METHODS

The original Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine ranking was used. All relevant level 1A and level 1B literature from May 2008 to June 2010 was searched (Medline and Cochrane) by the Working Group members. All chapters were attributed to the two responsible authors in the initial guidelines document. One new chapter on fixation techniques was added. The quality was assessed by the Working Group members during a 2-day meeting and the data were analysed, especially with respect to any change in the level and/or text of any of the conclusions or recommendations of the initial guidelines. In the end, all relevant references published until January 1, 2013 were included. The final text was approved by all Working Group members.

RESULTS

For the following topics, the conclusions and/or recommendations have been changed: indications for treatment, treatment of inguinal hernia, day surgery, antibiotic prophylaxis, training, postoperative pain control and chronic pain. The addendum contains all current level 1 conclusions, Grade A recommendations and new Grade B recommendations based on new level 1 evidence (with the changes in bold).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that the Working Group responsible for it tried to represent most kinds of surgeons treating inguinal hernias, such general guidelines inevitably must be fitted to the daily practice of every individual surgeon treating his/her patients. There is no doubt that the future of guideline implementation will strongly depend on the development of easy to use decision support algorithms tailored to the individual patient and on evaluating the effect of guideline implementation on surgical outcome. At the 35th International Congress of the EHS in Gdansk, Poland (May 12-15, 2013), it was decided that the EHS, IEHS and EAES will collaborate from now on with the final goal to publish new joint guidelines, most likely in 2015.

Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this article was to compare the outcomes of self-gripping mesh (GM) with sutured mesh (SM) in open inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were taken to compare the outcomes of GM and SM in open inguinal hernia repair.

RESULTS

A total of 1,353 patients in 6 randomized controlled trials and 2 observational studies were reviewed (666 patients in GM group; 687 patients in SM group). The 2 groups did not significantly differ in chronic groin pain (P = .23) or recurrence (P = .59). The operating time was significantly shorter in GM group (P < .00001). There was no significant difference in infection (P = .18), seromas (P = .35), hematomas (P = .87), or discomfort (P = .58) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The data showed that GM was equivalent to SM in open inguinal hernia repair. However, this new mesh still needs to be confirmed in large, multi-center, well-designed randomized controlled trials.

A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

The technique for fixation of mesh has been attributed to adverse patient and surgical outcomes. Although this has been the subject of vigorous debate in laparoscopic hernia repair, the several methods of fixation in open, anterior inguinal hernia repair have seldom been reviewed. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether there is any difference in patient-based (recurrence, post-operative pain, SSI, quality of life) or surgical outcomes (operative time, length of operative stay) with different fixation methods in open anterior inguinal hernioplasty.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomised clinical trials assessing more than one method of mesh fixation (or fixation versus no fixation) of mesh in adults (>18 years) in open, anterior inguinal hernia repair, with a minimum of 6-month follow-up and including at least one of the primary outcome measures (recurrence, chronic pain, surgical site infection) were included in the review. Secondary outcomes analysed included post-operative pain (within the first week), quality of life, operative time and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Twelve randomised clinical trials, which included 1,992 primary inguinal hernia repairs, were eligible for inclusion. Four studies compared n-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate (NB2C) glues to sutures, two compared self-fixing meshes to sutures, four compared fibrin sealant to sutures, one compared tacks to sutures, and one compared absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures. The majority of the trials were rated as low or very low-quality studies. There was no significant difference in recurrence or surgical site infection rates between fixation methods. There was significant heterogeneity in the measurement of chronic pain. Three trials reported significantly lower rates of chronic pain with fibrin sealant or glue fixation compared to sutures. A further three studies reported lower pain rates within the first week with non-suture fixation techniques compared to suture fixation. A significant reduction in operative time, ranging form 6 to 17.9 min with non-suture fixation, was reported in five of the studies. Although infrequently measured, there were no significant differences in length of hospital stay or quality of life between fixation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to promote fibrin sealant, self-fixing meshes or NB2C glues ahead of suture fixation. However, these products have been shown to be at least substantially equivalent, and moderate-quality RCTs have suggested that both fibrin sealant and NB2C glues may have a beneficial effect on reducing immediate post-operative pain and chronic pain in at-risk populations, such as younger active patients. It will ultimately be up to surgeons and health-care policy makers to decide whether based on the limited evidence these products represent a worthwhile cost for their patients.

Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair

Background

Chronic pain remains a frequent complication after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. As a consequence, mesh fixation using glue instead of sutures has become popular. This meta-analysis aimed to clarify which fixation technique is to be preferred for elective Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Articles published between January 1990 and April 2012 were searched for in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue and sutured mesh fixation in elective Lichtenstein repair for unilateral inguinal hernia were included. The quality of the RCTs and the potential risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results

Of 254 papers found in the initial search, a meta-analysis was conducted of seven RCTs comprising 1185 patients. With the use of glue mesh fixation, the duration of operation was shorter (mean difference −2·57 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) –4·88 to −0·26) min; P = 0·03), patients had lower visual analogue scores for postoperative pain (mean difference −0·75 (−1·18 to −0·33); P = 0·001), early chronic pain occurred less often (risk ratio 0·52, 95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 0·87; P = 0·01), and time to return to daily activities was shorter (mean difference −1·17 (−2·30 to −0·03) days; P = 0·04). The hernia recurrence rate did not differ significantly.

Conclusion

Elective Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia using glue mesh fixation compared with sutures is faster and less painful, with comparable hernia recurrence rates.

Biomechanical properties of (semi-) synthetic glues for mesh fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

In endoscopic inguinal hernia repair, the use of fibrin glues for mesh fixation instead of staples and sutures can demonstrably reduce postoperative morbidity without increasing the recurrence rate. Various fibrin glues differ in terms of their mesh fixation strength. As an alternative to fibrin glue, there is an increasing trend toward using synthetic glues for mesh fixation in both open and endoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. To date, no studies have been conducted comparing the fixation strength of (semi-) synthetic glues with that of fibrin glues. Here, using a biomechanical model, we compared the adhesive strength of two glues (BioGlue and Glubran) used in surgery with a fibrin glue.

METHODS

We used light-weight polypropylene meshes (TiMesh light). In each case, the biomechanical stability of five meshes in each group was tested with 2 ml fibrin glue (Evicel), 2 ml BioGlue or 2 ml Glubran (cyanoacrylate). The defect in the muscle tissue used was 4.5 cm in diameter for a mesh size of 10 × 15 cm. Measurements were taken using a standardized stamp penetration test while aiming not to remain under a minimum fixation strength of 32 N.

RESULTS

Using Evicel for mesh fixation, an adhesive strength of 64.3 N was achieved. This was significantly greater than that obtained in the absence of fixation (2.9 N, p < 0.001) and higher than the requisite value of 32 N. Using Glubran, it was possible once again to significantly improve the adhesive strength (105.4 N, p = 0.008). The use of BioGlue improved the adhesive strength to 131.7 N, but not significantly so compared with Glubran (p = 0.110).

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of adhesive strength, (semi-) synthetic glues can be used for mesh fixation instead of fibrin glue and even achieve significantly better adhesive strength than fibrin glue. However, further clinical studies are needed to identify the role of (semi-) synthetic glues compared with fibrin glues in endoscopic inguinal hernia surgery.

The Glubran 2 glue for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein's hernia repair: a double-blind randomized study

Introduction

With an average incidence rate of 11%, chronic pain is considered the most serious complication of inguinal hernioplasty after surgical site infection. One of the proposed solutions to this problem is to use tissue adhesive for mesh fixation, which helps prevent nerve and tissue damage.

Aim

The goal of this study was to compare mesh fixation with the use of sutures vs. adhesive in Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair in a randomized, double-blind one-center study.

Material and methods

The study group consisted of 41 males with primary inguinal hernia undergoing Lichtenstein's repair (20 – adhesive; 21 – suture) and remaining in follow-up from July 2008 to November 2010. Randomization took place during the operation. The follow-up was performed by one surgeon (blinded) according to a pre-agreed schedule; the end-of-study unblinding was performed during the last follow-up visit, usually 16 months postoperatively.

Results

In 1 patient from the “adhesive” group, a recurrence was observed one year after the initial repair. The early postoperative pain was less intense in this group. In later postoperative periods the method of mesh fixation had no influence on the pain experienced by the patient. Other complications were not correlated with the method of mesh fixation.

Conclusions

In this randomized, one-center double-blind clinical study of males with primary inguinal hernia it has been show during follow-up that the use of Glubran 2 cyanoacrylate adhesive for mesh implant fixation yields similar recurrence and chronic pain rates as the classical suture technique. In the early postoperative period, the pain reported by these patients was relatively weaker; patients undergoing adhesive mesh fixation experienced a quicker return to daily household activities.

Efficiency and safety of mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using n-butyl cyanoacrylate: long-term biocompatibility in over 1,300 mesh fixations

Introduction

In adult patients, most inguinal hernias are treated by implanting a prosthetic mesh. To prevent mesh dislocation and thus recurrence, different types of fixation have been proposed. In contrast to penetrating fixation known to cause acute chronic pain, adhesive fixation is becoming increasingly popular as it reduces markedly the risk of injury and chronic pain. Apart from the biological sealants (e.g., fibrin glue), surgical adhesives include a group of synthetic glues and genetically engineered protein glues. For example, cyanoacrylate is used in various medical and veterinary indications due to its fast action, excellent bonding strength and low price.

Objective

The main objective of this paper was to communicate positive results obtained using n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue to fix prosthetic meshes in over 1,300 TAPP repairs of primary and recurrent inguinal hernias. The secondary objective was to highlight the rationale (e.g., safety) for using non-fibrin based glue in this type of procedure.

Method

We present the in vitro and in vivo data necessary for the approval of n-butyl cyanoacrylate Histoacryl^® glue. We use an equivalent glue, Glubran-2^®, to fix prosthetic meshes in 1,336 laparoscopic TAPP repairs.

Results

Standardized tests to detect sensitization, irritation, genotoxicity or systemic toxicity demonstrated the safety and biocompatibility of Histoacryl^®, which met all requirements, including those of ISO 10993. Histological long-term studies in rabbits yielded results comparable to routine suture fixations, with full integration of the mesh into the abdominal wall. The clinical results showed the following advantages: fast application of the glue, reduced postoperative pain, 0.0% infection rate, continuously low recurrence rate and shorter hospital stay. No adverse effects and no complaints were recorded.

Conclusion

The experimental and clinical data demonstrate the safe use and the excellent cost-benefit ratio of n-butyl cyanoacrylate compared with other techniques of mesh fixation.

Randomized clinical trial of tissue glue versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in local anaesthetic Lichtenstein hernia repair

Background

Chronic pain may be a long-term problem related to mesh fixation and operative trauma after Lichtenstein hernioplasty. The aim of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of tissue cyanoacrylate glue versus absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

Methods

Lichtenstein hernioplasty was performed under local anaesthesia as a day-case operation in one of three hospitals. The patients were randomized to receive either absorbable polyglycolic acid 3/0 sutures (Dexon®; 151 hernias) or 1 ml butyl-2-cyanoacrylate tissue glue (Glubran®; 151 hernias) for fixation of lightweight mesh (Optilene®). Wound complications, pain, discomfort and recurrence were identified at 1 and 7 days, 1 month and 1 year after surgery.

Results

A total of 302 patients were included in the study. The mean(s.d.) duration of operation was 34(12) min in the glue group and 36(13) min in the suture group (P = 0·113). The need for analgesics was similar during the first 24 h after surgery. Five wound infections (3·4 per cent) were detected in the glue group and two (1·4 per cent) in the suture group (P = 0·448). The recurrence rate at 1 year was 1·4 per cent in each group (P = 1·000). The rates of foreign body sensation, acute and chronic pain were similar in the two groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that the type of mesh fixation did not predict chronic pain 1 year after surgery.

Conclusion

Mesh fixation without sutures in Lichtenstein hernioplasty was feasible without compromising postoperative outcome. Registration number: NCT00659542 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

N-butyl cyanoacrylate versus conventional suturing for fixation of meshes in an incisional hernia model

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain and related complications reported after the use of perforating fixation devices in hernia surgery have led to the use of tissue sealants. Fibrin sealant is a feasible option for mesh fixation; however data on cyanoacrylate glues are limited.

METHODS

32 Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into two groups and a 1.5 cm abdominal wall defect was created on each animal. The lesions were then repaired with 2 × 2 cm polypropylene meshes, fixed with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate in the first group and with polypropylene sutures in the second group. The rats were sacrificed on the 21st and 42nd days. The presence of infection, recurrence, and abdominal adhesions were evaluated, followed by biomechanical testing and histological examination.

RESULTS

No mesh infection or hernia recurrences were recorded. There was no statistically significant difference between neither the adhesion scores nor the mean broken pressure of the two groups. Cyanoacrylate sealing was found equivalent to suturing in terms of tissue ingrowth, fibrosis, inflammatory infiltration, abscess formation, and necrosis. Furthermore, cyanoacrylate resulted in less foreign body reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh fixation by cyanoacrylate may be considered as an alternative to suture fixation.

Postoperative outcomes associated with topical skin adhesives among women having hysterectomies

BACKGROUND

Multiple options are available for closure of hysterectomy incisions. This study compared postoperative clinical and economic outcomes using topical skin adhesive (2-octyl cyanoacrylate; OCA) vs. conventional skin closure in women undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

METHODS

A multi-hospital administrative database was used to identify women discharged in 2005 who had undergone total abdominal hysterectomy. Patients, classified by skin closure as suture (n = 21,201), staples (n = 23,441), OCA (n = 880), or staples + OCA (n = 489), were compared on length of inpatient stay (LOS), total inpatient cost, and non-prophylactic antibiotic treatment after day four.

RESULTS

The unadjusted mean LOS was 3.9, 4.5, 3.7, and 5.2 days for suture, staples, OCA, and staples + OCA, respectively; and the percentages of patients having antibiotic treatment were 12.93, 17.51, 11.14, and 23.72. There were overall differences in adjusted mean LOS, mean total cost, and antibiotic treatment (p < 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons indicated no difference between sutures and OCA, whereas the outcomes for each of the non-staple groups were more favorable than those for the staple group (p < 0.01). Results were similar in adjusted comparisons, with pairwise comparisons between OCA and staples at or near the threshold for significance.

CONCLUSIONS

2-octyl cyanoacrylate appears to be a safe and cost-effective alternative to topical sutures for patients having total abdominal hysterectomy. There were less favorable outcomes in groups receiving staples.

Cyanoacrylate surgical glue as an alternative to suture threads for mesh fixation in hernia repair

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of synthetic glues has become an established practice in several areas of surgical treatment. For example, they are used in open and laparoscopic surgery and in digestive tract endoscopy, interventional radiology, and vascular neuroradiology. The experiments in this study were aimed at elucidating that suture-based permanent mesh fixation can be replaced by fixation with N-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran2) for surgical repair of abdominal wall hernias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 25 Wistar rats, two hernia defects (1.5 cm in diameter) per animal were created bilaterally in the midline of the abdominal wall. The peritoneum was spared. The lesions were left untreated for 10 d to achieve a chronic condition. Then the defects were covered with TiMESH extralight (2 × 2 cm) and fixed by 30 μL of Glubran2 or traditional suture. The time points of sacrifice were 17 and 28 d, 3, 4, and 5 mo. At autopsy, histology and immunohistochemistry were performed to evaluate the inflammatory response and the presence of apoptotic cells respectively.

RESULTS

Mesh fixation was excellent in all samples at each time point. At application sites, the inflammatory reaction was mild with a small number of macrophages and vascularized connective tissue presence around glue and mesh threads. Glue residues were observed in histologic sections at each time point. No presence of apoptotic cells was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that Glubran2 can effectively replace traditional suture in mesh fixation without affecting tissue healing and determining a physiological inflammatory reaction at the abdominal wall site.

Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems

BACKGROUND

Various systems exist for prosthesis fixation in hernia repair. These techniques vary in terms of postoperative complications and pain. This study compares prosthesis fixation techniques employed in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty using a visual analog scale (VAS) to quantify postoperative pain.

METHODS

Patients (n = 600) underwent TAPP inguinal hernia repair in a randomized prospective study. Prostheses were fixed with Protak (Tyco, Norwalk, Conn), (Group A; n = 150), EndoANCHOR (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio) (Group B; n = 150), EMS (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.) (Group C; n = 150), or Tissucol (Baxter Healthcare, Milan, Italy) (Group D; n = 150). Patients were interviewed up to 1 month post-intervention. Post-operative pain was evaluated on a 0- to 10-point VAS (0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain). Morbidity, length of stay, return to work and recurrence were also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 803 hernias were treated: 397 patients (66.2%) had unilateral hernias and 203 (33.8%) had bilateral hernias. In total, 96 (12%) hernias were recurrences and 707 (88%) were primary. Postoperative pain ranged from VAS1 to VAS2 (mild pain) between 12 hours and 72 hours with Tissucol (Group D), and it was higher in Groups A-C: Maxima ranged from VAS4 (moderate pain) with EMS to VAS7 (severe pain) with Protak at 48-hour follow-up. Significant differences in length of stay occurred, no recurrence or conversion rates were observed among groups, and morbidity was generally lower with Tissucol. Patients in Group D (Tissucol) also returned to work sooner than did Groups A-C (Protak, EndoANCHOR, and EMS).

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in postoperative pain among different laparoscopic TAPP prosthesis fixation methods. The use of the biocompatible fibrin sealant Tissucol seems to reduce significantly postoperative pain, complications, and resumption to work times compared with other systems.

Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Tissue sealants have been proposed as an alternative to permanent fixation devices in hernia repair with the aim of reducing perforation-associated complications and chronic pain. Sealants can be divided into three main categories: synthetic glues (e.g., cyanoacrylate based), biologic products (e.g., fibrin sealant), and genetically engineered polymer protein glues. The beneficial effects of fibrin sealant have been reported in both experimental and clinical hernia repair. However, data on cyanoacrylate glues for mesh sealing are limited.

METHODS

In 20 Sprague-Dawley rats, two hernia defects (1.5 cm in diameter) per animal were created bilaterally in the midline of the abdominal wall. The peritoneum was spared. The lesions were left untreated for 10 days to achieve a chronic condition. Defects then were covered with TI-Mesh xl (2 x 2 cm), which was glued with Glubran-II. The time points of sacrifice were 17 days, 28 days, and 3 months. At autopsy, meshes were biomechanically tested, and histology was performed.

RESULTS

Tissue integration of the meshes was impaired at all time points by impenetrable glue plaques. At application sites, the elasticity of the abdominal wall was significantly reduced because of nonresorbed, rigid glue residues.

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh fixation by Glubran-II impairs tissue integration, elicits inflammation, and unfavorably alters the biomechanics of macroporous mesh and the abdominal wall.