Controversies and Issues in Hemodiafiltration Therapy

Evaluation of Hygiene and Safety Controls for On-Line Paired Hemodiafiltration (PHF)

Background

On-line hemodiafiltration is gaining popularity due to increasing evidence of clinical benefits however it also requires strict attention to hygiene and safety as notable quantities of liquid are reinfused into the patient. Although most centers are improving their attention to water quality, a frequent concern is the inadvertent or accidental contamination of water and whether the redundant safety controls are sufficient to protect the patient. In the present study, in order to simulate a worst-case safety condition, we tested in vitro the reliability of paired hemodiafiltration – (PHF), under low, moderate and high bacterial contamination of the water supply. Tests were performed using various bacterial concentrations (range 85–2000 cfu/mL) of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Samples were analyzed from different sites throughout the entire on-line hemodiafiltration circuit for bacteria endotoxin, fungus and ability to stimulate whole blood production of TNF α.

Results

In the in vitro contamination study, with the three bacterial concentrations tested at various points of the circuit, bacteria were below the level of detection and endotoxins were < 0.01 UE/mL. Addition of dialysate samples taken after the first stage of microfiltration, as well as after the first and second stage of ultrafiltration and incubated with whole blood were not associated with stimulated production of TNFα.

Conclusions

PHF appeared to be a safe and feasible method for on-line hemodiafiltration even in the unforeseen presence of bacterial contamination of the feed water or water distribution system.

Dialysis patients and cardiovascular problems: can technology solve the complex equation?

Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis present higher mortality rates compared with the general population. Once patients are on hemodialysis, the risk of cardiovascular death is approximately 30-times higher than the general population, and still remains 10- to 20-times higher after stratification for age, gender and presence of diabetes. Approximately half of patient deaths on dialysis are attributed to cardiovascular causes, including coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease and heart failure. The cardiovascular burden of the hemodialysis patient arises from three different sources: risks inherent to the patient and the uremic syndrome, traditional risk factors and risk factors related to the dialysis therapy. Based on these considerations and the fact that several aspects of the dialysis procedure can cause either a cardiovascular burden or modify the burden already present, new technologies should be directed towards the approach of a possible 'cardioprotective dialysis therapy'. This approach may significantly contribute new techniques and new dialysis machines. Born to make dialysis easy and safe, the new machines feature several options that make monitoring and online hemodiafiltration a simple routine. These and other features could make dialysis better tolerated and more efficient in protecting from fatal cardiovascular events.

Overview of clinical studies in hemodiafiltration: what do we need now ?

Despite several technical advances in dialysis treatment modalities and a better patient care management including correction of anemia, suppression of secondary hyperparathyroidism, lipid and oxidative stress profiles improvement, the morbidity and the mortality of dialysis patients still remain still elevated. Recent prospective interventional trials in hemodialysis (HEMO study and 4D study) were not very conclusive in showing any significant improvement in dialysis patient outcomes. High-efficiency convective therapies, such as online hemodiafiltration (HDF), are claimed to be superior to conventional diffusive hemodialysis (HD) in improving the dialysis efficacy and in reducing intradialytic morbidity and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. The aim of this report was, first, to review the evidence-based facts tending to prove the superiority of HDF vs. HD in terms of efficacy and tolerance, and, second, to analyze the needs to prove the clinical superiority of HDF in terms of reducing morbidity and all-cause mortality of dialysis patients. A systematic review of studies comparing HDF and HD has been performed in the microbiological safety of online production, the solute removal capacity of small and medium-size uremic toxins, and its implication in the reduction of the bioactive dialysis system vs. patient interaction. Major planned randomized international studies comparing HDF and HD in terms of morbidity and mortality have been reviewed. To conclude, it is thought that these long-term prospective randomized trials will clarify on a scientific evidence-based level the putative beneficial role of high-efficiency HDF modalities on dialysis patient outcomes.

Clinical effects of online dialysate and infusion fluids

Online hemodiafiltration appears to be the most effective technique of renal replacement therapy in many respects. Removal of small and high-molecular weight substances is enhanced. Modern technology ensures a safe, online production of reinfusion fluids. Nonetheless, stringent maintenance rules are required for the production of sterile and nonpyrogenic-dialysate solutions. In this review, we will critically review the state of the art of the clinical effects derived from the use of ultrapure dialysate and the online production of dialysate fluids in high-flux hemodiafiltration.

Dialysis Patients and Cardiovascular Problems: Can Technology Help Solve the Complex Equation?

Patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) present higher mortality rates compared with the general population. Once patients are on HD, the risk of cardiovascular death is approximately 30 times higher than in the general population and remains 10-20 times higher after stratification for age, gender, and the presence of diabetes. About half the deaths of patients on dialysis are attributed to cardiovascular causes including coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and heart failure. The cardiovascular burden of the HD patient arises from three different sources: risks inherent to the patient and the uremic syndrome, traditional risk factors, and risk factors related to the dialysis therapy. Based on these considerations and the fact that several aspects of the dialysis procedure can either add to the cardiovascular burden or modify the existing burden, new technologies should be directed towards the approach of a potential 'cardioprotective dialysis therapy'; such an approach may be facilitated by the application of new techniques and advanced dialysis machines. Created to make dialysis easy and safe, new machines feature several options that make patient monitoring and online hemodiafiltration therapy routine procedures. These and other features will possibly make dialysis better tolerated and more efficient in protecting patients from undesirable or potentially fatal cardiovascular events.