Molecular analysis of pancreatic juice: a helpful tool to differentiate benign and malignant pancreatic tumors?

Detection of K-ras gene mutations in feces by magnetic nanoprobe in patients with pancreatic cancer: A preliminary study

The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of detecting K-ras mutation by using magnetic nanoparticles in fecal samples of patients with pancreatic cancer at different stages. The novel methodology of K-ras mutation detection was compared to the existing methodology of cancer antigen (CA)19-9 examination. Patients with pancreatic cancer (n=88), pancreatic benign diseases who displayed chronic pancreatitis (n=35), pancreatic mucinous cyst neoplasms (n=10) and pancreatic serous cyst (n=9) admitted to the Department of Surgery, Jiaxing Second Hospital were enrolled in the present study. Fecal samples were collected from all patients, DNA was extracted and magnetic nanoprobe was then used to detect K-ras mutation. The results obtained using the novel magnetic nanoprobe detection technique showed a K-ras mutation rate of 81.8% (72/88) in the patients with pancreatic cancer and 18.5% (10/54) in patients with pancreatic benign diseases. In patients with pancreatic cancer, the K-ras mutation rate was comparable in stages I + IIA and IIB + III + IV (78.9 vs. 84.0%; P>0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of K-ras mutation for detection of pancreatic cancer was 81.8 and 81.5%, respectively. Sixty-eight pancreatic cancer patients had >37 U/ml CA99 with a sensitivity and specificity for pancreatic cancer detection of 77.3 and 77.8%, which was not significantly lower than detection by the fecal K-ras mutations (P>0.05). Combinational detection of fecal K-ras mutations and serum CA19-9 significantly increased the sensitivity regarding pancreatic cancer detection to 97.7% (P<0.05), while the specificity was not enhanced (80.9%; P>0.05) compared with fecal K-ras mutations or CA19-9 alone. The findings showed that the magnetic nanoprobe is able to detect fecal K-ras mutations in different stages of pancreatic cancer, with comparable sensitivity and specificity to CA19-9 examination for differentiating pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, combined detection of CA19-9 and K-ras mutations has enhanced sensitivity compared with CA19-9 alone.

Prognostic and predictive markers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is characterized by a poor prognosis and a low median survival, despite improvements observed for many other solid tumours. Intensive research efforts have been undertaken during the last decades to discover new prognostic and treatment predictive biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The mainstay of medical treatment for the disease has been the well-tolerated nucleoside analogue, gemcitabine. The only targeted agent currently used in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients is the epithelial growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine. Recently, treatment regimens such as a combination of fluorouracil-leucovorin-irinotecan-oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and the combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine have been introduced for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Although these treatment regimens significantly improve survival of patients, there are no good predictive biomarkers available that can be used to identify who would benefit most from them. Therefore, the search for predictive biomarkers that would facilitate personalization of chemotherapy is highly relevant.

Clinicopathological Significance of CDKN2A Promoter Hypermethylation Frequency with Pancreatic Cancer

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients is very poor, with a 5-year survival of less than 6%. Previous studies demonstrated that the loss of function of CDKN2A is mainly caused by the hypermethylation of CDKN2A gene promoter; however, whether or not it is associated with the incidence of pancreatic cancer still remains unclear. In this study, we systematically reviewed the association between CDKN2A promoter methylation and pancreatic cancer using meta-analysis methods. The pooled data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2. Fourteen studies eligible studies, including 418 pancreatic cancer, 155 pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs) and 45 chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients were analyzed. We observed that the frequency of CDKN2A methylation was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer patients than in normal healthy controls, the pooled OR = 17.19, 95% CI = 8.72–33.86, P < 0.00001. The frequency of CDKN2A methylation was also significantly higher in PanINs patients than that in normal individual controls, OR = 12.35, 95% CI = 1.70–89.89, P = 0.01. In addition, CDKN2A methylation was associated with worse survival in pancreatic cancer, HR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.37–14.53, P = 0.01. The results strongly suggest that CDKN2A methylation is correlated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. CDKN2A methylation plays a critical role in pancreatic carcinogenesis and may serve as a prognostic marker.

Biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: promising new markers and options beyond CA 19-9

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma accounts for nearly 90-95% of exocrine malignant tumors of the pancreas. Traditionally, overexpressed proteins/epitopes such as CA 19-9, CA-50, CEA, and many others were being used as pancreatic cancer tumor markers. The main utility of these biomarkers was in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer as well as to assess response to chemotherapy and to determine prognosis and to predict tumor recurrence. However, these markers had significant limitations such as lack of sensitivity, false-negative results in certain blood groups, as well as false-positive elevation in the presence of obstructive jaundice. To circumvent these limitations, an extraordinary amount of research is being performed to identify an accurate tumor marker or a panel of markers that could aid in the management of the pancreatic cancer. Although this research has identified a large number and different variety of biomarkers, few hold future promise as a preferred marker for pancreatic cancer. This review provides an insight into exciting new areas of pancreatic biomarker research such as salivary, pancreatic juice, and stool markers that can be used as a noninvasive test to identify pancreatic cancer. This manuscript also provides a discussion on newer biomarkers, the role of microRNAs, and pancreatic cancer proteomics, which have the potential to identify a preferred tumor marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This review further elaborates on important genetic changes associated with the development and progression of pancreatic cancer that holds the key for the identification of a sensitive biomarker and which could also serve as a therapeutic target.

Molecular markers in pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents a fatal neoplasia with a high mortality rate. Effective early detection methods are needed since this is the best way to cure this disease. During the last several years, many investigations focused on determining relevant biomarkers that may be present during early stages of pancreatic tumor development. Although several biomarkers have been proposed for pancreatic cancer detection, the clinical applicability has been confusing. Currently, although CA19-9 is one test used, the sensitivity and specificity for the disease are less than optimal. Here, we review several new potential serum, plasma and stool markers that are currently under evaluation. Although these have not been sufficiently validated for routine clinical use, these markers could prove valuable with further investigations. We keep the hope that a combination of some of these novel biomarkers can be a useful tool for early PDAC diagnosis before image techniques and/or patient's symptoms reveal disease in an incurable state.

Genomic instability at both the base pair level and the chromosomal level is detectable in earliest PanIN lesions in tissues of chronic pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a predisposing disease for pancreatic carcinoma (PC), however, precise molecular mechanisms of cancer development in the background of CP are ill defined.

METHODS

A total of 443 laser-microdissected pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs), acinar-ductal metaplasia (ADM), and normal ducts from 21 patients with CP were analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and immunohistochemical protein expression of p53, p16, and DPC4. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias were analyzed for mutations in p53, p16, and Ki-ras genes by ABI sequencing. Aneuploidy was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes for chromosomes 3, 7, 8, and 17.

RESULTS

Loss of heterozygosity rate in PanIN-1 and ADM was between 1.7% (p53) and 5.8% (p16). In PanIN-3, p53 protein overexpression and loss of expression for p16 and DPC4 protein were seen. Heterozygous mutations of p53 and p16 without LOH were found in PanIN-1A and ADM, whereas homozygous mutations were found in PanIN-3. Aneuploidy increased from PanIN-1A to PanIN-3. Ki-ras mutations were discovered first in PanIN-1.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterozygous mutations of p53- and p16 genes together with chromosomal instability occur early in CP and are clonally expanded, but final inactivation mostly by LOH happens later in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Determination of aneuploidy in pancreatic juice may be of value for early detection and risk assessment in patients with long-standing CP.

Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most difficult malignancies to diagnose and treat. The aim of this article is to review how tumor markers can aid the diagnosis and management of patients with this malignancy. The most widely used and best validated marker for pancreatic cancer is CA 19-9. Inadequate sensitivity and specificity limit the use of CA 19-9 in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In non-jaundiced patients, however, CA 19-9 may complement other diagnostic procedures. In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, presurgical and postresection CA 19-9 levels correlate with overall survival. In advanced disease, elevated pretreatment levels of CA 19-9 are associated with adverse patient outcome and thus may be combined with other factors for risk stratification. Most, but not all, reports indicate that serial levels of CA 19-9 correlate with response to systemic therapy. Use of CA 19-9 kinetics in conjunction with imaging is therefore recommended in monitoring therapy. Although several potential serum and tissue markers for pancreatic cancer are currently undergoing evaluation, none are sufficiently validated for routine clinical use. CA 19-9 thus remains the serum pancreatic cancer marker against which new markers for this malignancy should be judged.

Molecular markers of pancreatic cancer: development and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer remains poor, mainly because of its aggressive biological behaviour and late clinical diagnosis, which precludes the application of appropriate curative therapies. Therefore, one of the major goals in clinical pancreatology is to find molecular markers, specific and sensitive enough to make an early and correct diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, before it has disseminated and become untreatable.

OBJECTIVE

This overview article explores the potential utility of current molecular markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

There is a wide array of serum-based and tissue-based markers for pancreatic cancer. Serum-based molecular markers include CA 19-9, CA 125, M2-PK and secreted proteins. A tissue can be used to test genetic mutations such as K-ras, inactivation of tumour suppressor genes (e.g. p16, p53), mucins, telomerase activity, growth factors, DNA methylation, and global gene expression of cDNA microarrays, mitochondrial mutations and proteomics. None of these markers is currently useful for the detection of early pancreatic cancer. In clinical practice, the most commonly accepted use of CA 19-9 is to assess the prognosis and monitor the response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Many molecular markers have been proposed for the early diagnosis of PC, but most are not ready to be included as part of the routine diagnostic algorithm because they still lack sensitivity, specificity or reproducibility. CA 19-9 remains the most useful molecular marker for the diagnosis and follow-up of clinically and radiological evident pancreatic cancer.

Progress in molecular biological diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma by detection in pancreatic juice

The early diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma is very difficult, although molecular biological diagnosis by detection in pancreatic juice has promise. This article reviews progress in this area that includes analysis of oncogenes (k-ras), tumor suppressor gene (p53), telomerase activity and proteomes in human pancreatic juice.

Molecular genetics of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas show characteristic clinicopathological and molecular pathobiological features which are distinct from those of conventional ductal adenocarcinomas. Alterations of KRAS, AKT/PKB, CDKN2A, TP53, SMAD4, STK11/LKB1, and DUSP6, and other molecular alterations, including global expression studies as well as their clinical implications, are discussed.

Telomeres rather than telomerase a key target for anti-cancer therapy?

It was in the 1930s that telomeres (from the Greek telos = end and meros = part) were first recognized as essential structures at the ends of the chromosomes and were shown to be important for chromosomal stability (Muller HJ: The remaking of chromosomes. The Collecting Net-Woods Hole 1938: 13: 181-198, McClintock B, The stability of broken ends of chromosomes in Zea mays. Genetics 1041: 26: 234-282). However, it was only in 1978 that the first telomeric sequence was identified -- in the protocoa Tetrahymena, a single cell organism that at a certain stage of development has many identical minichromosomes with twice as many telomeres (Blackburn EH and Gall JG. A tandemly repeated sequence at the termini of the extrachromosomal ribosomal RNA genes in Tetrahymena. J. Mol. Biol. 1978: 120: 33-53.). Today we know that telomeres form specialized, three-dimensional DNA-protein structures and fulfil important capping functions. Besides, telomeric DNA is essential as ''access DNA'' for those cells that are not able to counteract loss of DNA during replication because they do not express telomerase, the enzyme responsible for telomere length maintenance. Since telomerase is mostly found in tumor cells and inhibition correlates with telomere shortening and finally growth inhibition, telomerase and lately also the telomeres themselves have become attractive targets for anti-cancer therapy. This review aims to critically throw light on different therapeutical approaches and comes to the conclusion that telomeres may be the better targets for cancer therapeutics.