Non-invasive fetal RHD exon 7 and exon 10 genotyping using real-time PCR testing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma

Serological and molecular characterisation of the most prevalent weak D variants in Croatian population

INTRODUCTION

Existence of hundreds of RHD gene variants contributes to variable D antigen expression and inconsistencies in reporting the RHD results. The aim of the study was to determine the serological and molecular characteristics of the most prevalent RHD alleles encoding serologically weak D variants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Blood donors (n = 145 924) were typed for D antigen using the direct serologic micromethod. Nonreactive samples were analysed in IAT method with the IgM/IgG anti-D monoclonal blend, and 0,2% (n = 263) confirmed weak D antigen expression. After genomic DNA extraction (Qiaqen, Germany), RHD genotyping was performed using in house reagents and PCR-SSP kits (Inno-Train, Germany).

RESULTS

The prevalence of serologically weak D in blood donor population was 0.2% (n = 263). RHD genotyping confirmed weak D allele in 92.4% and partial D allele in 7.6%. The most common was weak D type 1 (49.7%) followed by weak D type 3 (24.7%) and type 2 (9.5%). Relatively high frequency was detected for weak D type 14 (4.6%) and type 64 (2.3%). In the category of partial D phenotypes, only DVI variant was found. Direct typing has shown great variability in the strength of reactions with different clones of anti-D reagents.

CONCLUSION

Weak D type 1 is the most common weak D variant in Croatian blood donor population. The frequency of D variants and distribution of Rh phenotypes in our study was in concordance with other studies. It has been shown that serological methods and the combination of clones used, cannot distinguish variant D types, which justifies the use of molecular methods.

RHD exon 5, 7 and 10 targeted non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal Rhesus-D (RhD) in selected RhD negative pregnant women in Ethiopia

Background

A majority of non-invasive prenatal screening studies determining fetal RhD status have been tested on Caucasian and Asian populations, but limited or no studies have been conducted on the Ethiopian population. In the current study, we carried non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal RHD genotype in selected RhD negative Ethiopian pregnant women.

Methods

Cell-free DNA was extracted from the plasma samples of 117 RhD pregnant women between 9 and 38 weeks of gestation. Fetal RHD genotypes were detected by targeting exons 5, 7 and 10 of the RHD gene by using real-time PCR assay. RHD genotypic results were confirmed by neonatal cord blood serology.

Results

Fetal RHD genotyping was conclusive in all 117 subjects. RHD genotype was correctly predicted in 115 of 117 cases, thus the test yielded 98.3% accuracy (95%CI: 97.3–99.1%). Among 115 cases, 105 were genotyped as RHD positive and 12 were genotyped as RHD negative. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 99.1% (95% CI: 94.8–99.9%) and 91.7% (95%CI: 61.5–99.7%) respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.9% (95%CI: 99.2–99.9%) and 54.0% (95% CI: 15.2–88.4%) respectively. SRY genotyping results were in complete concordance with fetal sex.

Conclusion

Multi exon targeted non-invasive prenatal screening test for fetal RhD determination exhibited high accuracy and sensitivity. A confirmatory study with a bigger size of study subjects is warranted before enabling clinical implementation.

Confirmed non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal Rh blood group genotyping along with bi-allelic short insertion/deletion polymorphisms as a positive internal control

BACKGROUND

Determination of foetus rhesus blood group at risk of hemolytic disease has potential application for early non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). There are several challenges in developing NIPT rhesus blood group genotyping assays by using cell-free foetal DNA (cff-DNA) in plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women. So, the aim of this study was optimization of Real-time PCR assay for NIPT rhesus genotyping and development of Bi-allelic short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (INDELs) as internal control to optimise and validate rhesus genotyping based on Real-time PCR to avoid false or negative results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

NIPT Rhesus genotyping including RHD (exon 7), RHCc, and RHEe genes were performed by TaqMan Real-time PCR on 104 maternal samples at different gestation ages (12 to ≥40 weeks) from 51 alloimmunized pregnant women. The sensitivity protocol was confirmed with standard DNA samples. Eight selected INDELs were designed and used to detectable cff-DNA in maternal plasma. INDELs frequency and inheritance were determined on 6 family and 61 unrelated individuals. Finally, multiplex Real-time PCR was performed for each sample with INDELs pairs and Rh probes.

RESULTS

The results showed 100% accuracy rhesus typing for RHD, RHC and RHE assays and 95.7% accuracy for RHc. Also, eight selected INDELs as internal control for NIPT were 100% concordance for typed samples.

CONCLUSION

The Real-time PCR assay is a suitable method with high sensitivity and specificity for rhesus typing as NIPT for prediction of hemolytic disease in foetuses. The INDELs described here are suitable internal control for confirmation of NIPT on cff-DNA.

Prenatal RHD genotyping in Croatia: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES

Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine (CITM) implemented non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping as a request for targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The diagnostic performance of in-house RT-PCR method for fetal RHD genotyping and preliminary results are analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation included results of RHD genotyping for 205 RhD negative pregnant women, 12-36th week of gestation, whose samples were received in period between 2015 and 2020. QIAsymphony SP DSP Virus Midi Kit was used for cffDNA extraction on QIAsymphony SP platform (Qiagen, Germany). Fragments of RHD exons 7 and 10 and later exon 5 were RT-PCR amplified. As internal controls, amplification of SRY gene or RASSF1A fragment and β-actin genes digested with BsTUI were used.

RESULTS

We identified 70.72% (145/205) positive and 28.78% (59/205) negative fetal RHD genotypes. We had one inconclusive result (0.50%) due to the interference of maternal DNA with variant genotype RHD*09.02.00/01/*01N.01. When compared to newborns RhD phenotypes, no false negative and three false positive results (3/199, 1.50%) were observed. The test yielded 100% sensitivity and 95.08% specificity, while diagnostic accuracy was 98.48%. We were able to determine one case of fetal variant genotype RHD*04.04/*01N.01 inherited from the father. The negative and positive predictive test values were 100% and 97.86%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Automated cffDNA extraction and RT-PCR amplification of fetal RHD exons 5,7,10 and fragments of SRY, RASSF1A genes represents highly reliable system for determining fetal RHD status which enables targeted antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. To obtain high specificity of cffDNA extraction, strict and thoroughly cleaning procedures are required.

Two large deletions extending beyond either end of the RHD gene and their red cell phenotypes

Only two partial deletions longer than 655 nucleotides had been reported for the RHD gene, constrained within the gene and causing DEL phenotypes. Using a combination of quantitative PCR and long-range PCR, we examined three distinct deletions affecting parts of the RHD gene in three blood donors. Their RHD nucleotide sequences and exact boundaries of the breakpoint regions were determined. DEL phenotypes were caused by a novel 18.4 kb deletion and a previously published 5.4 kb deletion of the RHD gene; a D-negative phenotype was caused by a novel 7.6 kb deletion. Examination of the deletion-flanking regions suggested microhomology-mediated end-joining, replication slippage, and non-homologous end-joining, respectively, as the most likely mechanisms for the three distinct deletions. We described two new deletions affecting parts of the RHD gene, much longer than any previously reported partial deletion: one was the first deletion observed at the 5' end of the RHD gene extending into the intergenic region, and the other the second deletion observed at its 3' end. Large deletions present at either end are a mechanism for a much reduced RhD protein expression or its complete loss. Exact molecular characterization of such deletions is instrumental for accurate RHD genotyping.

Fetal RHD Genotyping Using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Pregnancy of RhD Negative Women in South of Iran

BACKGROUND

Maternal-fetal RhD antigen incompatibility causes approximately 50% of clinically significant alloimmunization cases. The routine use of prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin has dramatically reduced hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Recently, fetal RHD genotyping in RhD negative pregnant women has been suggested for appropriate use of anti-D immunoglobulin antenatal prophylaxis and decrease unnecessary prenatal interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, in order to develop a reliable and non-invasive method for fetal RHD genotyping, cell free fetal DNA (cffD- NA) was extracted from maternal plasma. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for detection of RHD exons 7, 5, 10 and intron 4 was performed and the results were compared to the serological results of cord blood cells as the gold standard method. SRY gene and hypermethylated Ras-association domain family member 1 (RASSF1A) gene were used to confirm the presence of fetal DNA in male and female fetuses, respectively.

RESULTS

Out of 48 fetuses between 8 and 32 weeks (wks) of gestational age (GA), we correctly diagnosed 45 cases (93.75%) of RHD positive fetuses and 2 cases (4.16%) of the RHD negative one. Exon 7 was amplified in one sample, while three other RHD gene sequences were not detected; the sample was classified as inconclusive, and the RhD serology result after birth showed that the fetus was RhD-negative.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed high accuracy of the qPCR method using cffDNA for fetal RHD genotyping and implicate on the efficiency of this technique to predict the competence of anti-D immunoglobulin administration.

Fetal RHD Genotyping from Circulating Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Plasma of Rh Negative Pregnant Women in Iran

The prenatal determination of the fetal Rh genotype could lead to a substantial reduction in the use of anti-D immunoglobulin and prevention of unnecessary exposure of pregnant women carrying RhD negative fetus. The aim of this study was fetal RHD genotyping through the analysis of cffDNA in plasma samples of RhD negative pregnant women by real-time PCR technique. In this experiment, 30 plasma samples were collected from RhD negative pregnant women. DNA were extracted and real-time PCR reactions were done by specific primers for RHD, SRY and beta-globin (GLO) genes. The Rh phenotypes of mothers and their babies were determined by agglutination method and specific anti-serums. From the 30 maternal plasma samples considered for SRY genotyping, 16 samples revealed the presence of the SRY gene. Regarding the fetal RHD genotyping, 26 samples were positive for RhD and 4 samples were negative. In all cases, the predicted RhD and SRY genotypes were in concordance with the serologically determined phenotypes. The sensitivity, specificity and precision of the fetal RHD and SRY genotyping test were calculated 100 % (p value <0.0005; K = 100 %). The present study confirms the precision of fetal RHD and SRY genotyping in maternal plasma by real-time PCR technique. This method helps RhD negative pregnant women about the appropriate use of anti-D immunoglobulin and also on the management and prevention of HDFN. However, superior and confirmatory studies are recommended before fetal RHD genotyping by real-time PCR is introduced as a non-invasive prenatal screening test.

Two unusual cases of haemoglobin Bart's hydrops fetalis due to uniparental disomy or non-paternity

The authors present 2 unusual cases of haemoglobin (Hb) Bart's hydrops fetalis and highlight the problem of a screening system for α-thalassaemia which focuses on maternal and paternal mean corpuscular volume (MCV) alone. Normal paternal MCV may not preclude fetal Hb Bart's disease because of the rare occurrence of maternal uniparental disomy or non-paternity. During a mid-trimester anomaly scan, with fetal cardiomegaly or hydrops in a woman with low MCV but normal paternal MCV, obstetricians should remain alert for fetal Hb Bart's disease. This is very important and relevant for national screening systems in South-East Asia, where a routine mid-trimester scan may not be available. A routine mid-trimester anomaly scan should therefore be implemented and in high prevalence areas, sonographers should be sensitive to the cardio-thoracic ratio even if screening shows that pregnancy is unlikely to be at risk.

Development and validation of multiplex real-time PCR assay for noninvasive prenatal assessment of fetal RhD status and fetal sex in maternal plasma

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive prenatal detection of RhD status and fetal sex is becoming part of daily practice in clinical laboratories. We evaluated a high throughput procedure for automated DNA extraction and developed a multiplex real-time PCR (rt-PCR) for the simultaneous detection of three fetal loci in a single reaction to assess fetal sex and RhD status in maternal plasma.

METHODS

An automated DNA extraction method was evaluated together with a new multiplex rt-PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of exons 5 and 7 of the RHD gene together with the Y chromosome marker DYS14 in maternal plasma. The test was evaluated on 60 samples of known fetal genotype obtained from RhD-negative pregnant women before being applied prospectively on 158 consecutive clinical cases. Results were compared with newborn phenotypes.

RESULTS

Automated DNA extraction allowed successful analysis of all samples. DYS14 was detected in 118 cases (male fetuses) and both RHD exon 5 and 7 were detected in 148 samples. In 70 samples neither RHD exon 5 nor RHD exon 7 were detected (RhD-negative fetuses). Absence of all three sequences (female RhD-negative fetuses) was assessed in 33 samples. All prenatal results were in concordance with postnatal RhD status and fetal sex without false- positive or -negative results.

CONCLUSION

The automated DNA extraction procedure coupled with a novel multiplex rt-PCR assay proved accurate, efficient and reliable allowing rapid and high throughput noninvasive determination of fetal sex and RhD status in clinical samples.

A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales

BACKGROUND

Postnatal and antenatal anti-D prophylaxis have dramatically reduced maternal sensitisations and cases of rhesus disease in babies born to women with RhD negative blood group. Recent scientific advances mean that non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), based on the presence of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, could be used to target prophylaxis on "at risk" pregnancies where the fetus is RhD positive. This paper provides the first assessment of cost-effectiveness of NIPD-targeted prophylaxis compared to current policies.

METHODS

We conducted an economic analysis of NIPD implementation in England and Wales. Two scenarios were considered. Scenario 1 assumed that NIPD will be only used to target antenatal prophylaxis with serology tests continuing to direct post-delivery prophylaxis. In Scenario 2, NIPD would also displace postnatal serology testing if an RhD negative fetus was identified. Costs were estimated from the provider's perspective for both scenarios together with a threshold royalty fee per test. Incremental costs were compared with clinical implications.

RESULTS

The basic cost of an NIPD in-house test is £16.25 per sample (excluding royalty fee). The two-dose antenatal prophylaxis policy recommended by NICE is estimated to cost the NHS £3.37 million each year. The estimated threshold royalty fee is £2.18 and £8.83 for Scenarios 1 and 2 respectively. At a £2.00 royalty fee, mass NIPD testing would produce no saving for Scenario 1 and £507,154 per annum for Scenario 2. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that, at a test sensitivity of 99.7% and this royalty fee, NIPD testing in Scenario 2 will generate one additional sensitisation for every £9,190 saved. If a single-dose prophylaxis policy were implemented nationally, as recently recommended by NICE, Scenario 2 savings would fall.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, NIPD testing to target anti-D prophylaxis is unlikely to be sufficiently cost-effective to warrant its large scale introduction in England and Wales. Only minor savings are calculated and, balanced against this, the predicted increase in maternal sensitisations may be unacceptably high. Reliability of NIPD assays still needs to be demonstrated rigorously in different ethnic minority populations. First trimester testing is unlikely to alter this picture significantly although other emerging technologies may.

Feasibility of fetal-derived hypermethylated RASSF1A sequence quantification in maternal plasma--next step toward reliable non-invasive prenatal diagnostics

We determined the feasibility of universal fetal marker detection in maternal circulation. Using real-time PCR, we compared the levels of fetal (SRY and hypermethylated RASSF1A) and total (GLO gene and total RASSF1A) extracellular DNA and fractions of extracellular fetal DNA (SRY/GLO vs. hypermethylated RASSF1A/total RASSF1A) in maternal circulation. Sensitivity and specificity reached 100% as the fetal-specific hypermethylated RASSF1A sequence was detected in all 151 examined plasma samples derived from 70 normal pregnancies with a singleton male (n=51) or female (n=19) fetus sampled throughout gestation and absent in non-pregnant individuals (n=29). A strong positive correlation was observed between fetal-derived hypermethylated RASSF1A and SRY (ρ=0.66, P<0.001), total RASSF1A and GLO (ρ=0.65,P<0.001), SRY/GLO vs. hypermethylated RASSF1A/total RASSF1A ratio (ρ=0.62, P<0.001) in maternal plasma. The results indicate that a universal fetal marker could be useful not only for the confirmation of the presence of fetal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma but could enable quantification of cell-free fetal DNA in pregnancy associated disorders, independently of the sex of the fetus.

Comparison of PCR methods for detecting fetal RhDin maternal plasma

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to establish the method yielding the highest sensitivity routinely used to determine fetal RhD type and gender from maternal cell-free plasma DNA in different periods of gestation.

METHODS

Plasma DNA concentrations were measured from 46 pregnant women in different gestational periods and tested for RhD using three different PCR methods on exon 7: Thermal Cycler, Taqman method on LightCycler, and melting curve analysis on LightCycler. In addition, fetal gender was determined by PCR. Cell-free plasma DNA was measured in 100 healthy volunteers as a reference group.

RESULTS

The mean value of cell-free plasma DNA in the reference group was 10.9 pg/microL mean, (standard deviation (SD): 3.66) in 50 healthy women and 12.7 pg/microL (SD: 8.2) in 50 healthy men. In the first trimester of pregnancy cell-free plasma DNA was 14.9 pg/microL mean, (SD: 4.2), in the second trimester 15.4 pg/microL mean, (SD: 4.96), and the maximum was achieved in the third trimester of pregnancy 15.6 pg/microl mean, (SD: 6.49). TaqMan probes had the same accuracy, when compared with Thermal Cycler technology (46 samples, 6 failures). Using real-time PCR with melting curve analysis 12 of 17 samples were correctly tested. Gender determination was correctly in 41 of 46 samples.

CONCLUSION

RhD determinations with TaqMan and Thermal Cycler technology are useful methods for fetal RhD prediction. To increase the accuracy of RhD determination it is necessary to test on other exons in addition.

Assessment of the female fetal DNA concentration in the plasma of the pregnant women as preeclampsia indicator--preliminary report

OBJECTIVES

This research was designed to analyze the presence of fetal female DNA, expressed in copy number, in the plasma of the pregnant woman with preeclampsia-complicated pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four pregnant women with female fetuses identified by means of ultrasound scanning were enrolled in this pilot study. The study group consisted of 12 pregnant women with symptoms of preeclampsia, with 12 healthy women, matched for gestational age, as controls.

RESULTS

Mean DNA number of genomic equivalents per reaction in the group was 201 geq/PCR (from 44.9 to 375) and increased over time after onset of PE, which was the reason for pregnancy termination. In the group of women with preeclampsia, a notably higher DNA copy number in comparison to the control group was noted (p=0.0003 U Mann-Whitney test).

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot study presented in this work confirms that also in the case of preeclampsia-complicated pregnancy with female fetuses it is possible to implement the method of fetal DNA quantification. Use of the presented methods confirms that in severe preeclampsia-complicated pregnancies an increase of the number of DNA genomic equivalents per reaction in comparison to the control group is observed. Due to the small study group further research on the described issue is vital, but this study proves that it is also feasible among women carrying female fetuses.

Potential markers of preeclampsia--a review

Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and fetal/neonatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. The early identification of patients with an increased risk for preeclampsia is therefore one of the most important goals in obstetrics. The availability of highly sensitive and specific physiologic and biochemical markers would allow not only the detection of patients at risk but also permit a close surveillance, an exact diagnosis, timely intervention (e.g. lung maturation), as well as simplified recruitment for future studies looking at therapeutic medications and additional prospective markers. Today, several markers may offer the potential to be used, most likely in a combinatory analysis, as predictors or diagnostic tools. We present here the current knowledge on the biology of preeclampsia and review several biochemical markers which may be used to monitor preeclampsia in a future, that, we hope, is not to distant from today.

Non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping via real-time PCR of foetal DNA from Chinese RhD-negative maternal plasma

BACKGROUND

A majority of studies predicting the foetal RhD blood group in free foetal DNA from RhD-negative maternal plasma have been conducted in Caucasian populations, whereas limited data have been accumulated for Asian populations. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of prenatal genotyping of RHD in RhD-negative Chinese pregnant women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell-free plasma DNA was extracted from 78 RhD-negative Chinese women carrying a singleton foetus (gestation between 14 and 40 weeks). Foetal DNA was confirmed by testing SRY or nine different polymorphic STR loci in the maternal plasma and buffy coat. Foetal RHD exons 5, 7 and 10 and intron 4 were successfully amplified with RQ-PCR. The RHD1227A allele was examined in all RhD-positive individuals. The foetal RHD genotyping results were compared with the infant cord blood serological analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 78 specimens, RHD genotyping results of 70 cases were in complete concordance with serological results from foetal umbilical cord blood. Sixty of these cases were identified as RhD-positive, and 10 cases were typed as RhD-negative. In addition, five cases were 'false-positives', while three cases were considered inconclusive. The detection rate was 89.7% (70/78). In four of the five 'false-positive' cases, the RhDel phenotype was assessed by detecting the RHD1227A allele. Thus, this method yielded a 94.9% (74/78) accuracy rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The correct foetal RhD phenotype may be accurately predicted from RhD-negative maternal plasma in Chinese subjects. The RHD1227A allele proved to be an important genetic marker in the RhDel Chinese population.

The SAFE project: towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

After the revolutionary detection of ffDNA (free fetal DNA) in maternal circulation by real-time PCR in 1997 and advances in molecular techniques, NIPD (non-invasive prenatal diagnosis) is now a clinical reality. Non-invasive diagnosis using ffDNA has been implemented, allowing the detection of paternally inherited alleles, sex-linked conditions and some single-gene disorders and is a viable indicator of predisposition to certain obstetric complications [e.g. PET (pre-eclampsia)]. To date, the major use of ffDNA genotyping in the clinic has been for the non-invasive detection of the pregnancies that are at risk of HDFN (haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn). This has seen numerous clinical services arising across Europe and many large-scale NIPD genotyping studies taking place using maternal plasma. Because of the interest in performing NIPD and the speed at which the research in this area was developing, the SAFE (Special Non-Invasive Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Evaluation) NoE (Network of Excellence) was founded. The SAFE project was set up to implement routine, cost-effective NIPD and neonatal screening through the creation of long-term partnerships within and beyond the European Community and has played a major role in the standardization of non-invasive RHD genotyping. Other research using ffDNA has focused on the amount of ffDNA present in the maternal circulation, with a view to pre-empting various complications of pregnancy. One of the key areas of interest in the non-invasive arena is the prenatal detection of aneuploid pregnancies, particularly Down's syndrome. Owing to the high maternal DNA background, detection of ffDNA from maternal plasma is very difficult; consequently, research in this area is now more focused on ffRNA to produce new biomarkers.

Prenatal diagnosis: update on invasive versus noninvasive fetal diagnostic testing from maternal blood

The modern obstetrics care includes noninvasive prenatal diagnosis testing such as first trimester screening performed between 11 and 14 weeks' gestation and second trimester screening performed between 15 and 20 weeks. In these screening tests, biochemical markers are measured in the maternal blood with or without ultrasound for fetal nuchal translucency with reported accuracy of up to 90%. Invasive procedures, including amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling, are used to achieve over 99% accuracy. During these procedures direct fetal material is examined and, therefore, these tests are highly accurate with the caveat of a small risk for pregnancy loss. Much research now focuses on other noninvasive highly accurate and risk-free tests that will identify fetal material in the maternal blood. Fetal cells and fetal DNA/RNA provide fetal information but are hard to find in an overwhelming background of maternal cells and in the absence of specific fetal cell markers. The most experience has been accumulated with fetal rhesus and fetal sex determination from maternal blood, with an accuracy of up to 100% by using gene sequences that are absent from maternal blood. Although not clinically applicable yet, fetal cells, fetal DNA/RNA and fetal proteomics in combination with cutting edge technology are described to prenatally diagnose aneuploidies and single-gene disorders.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies

Articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic (NIPD) tests for RHD genotyping using fetal material extracted from maternal blood have been published steadily for over a decade. Health care providers in Europe have started to use this technology for management of the small number of sensitised pregnancies (ca. 220-600 per annum in the Netherlands, Germany, France and the UK). Scientists and clinicians are also advocating widespread implementation for the far larger number of non-sensitised RhD-negative pregnancies (ca. 34,000-125,000 per annum in the same countries). Large-scale, prospective trials are only now underway. Estimates of the technical performance of these tests are currently based on results from small-scale studies, together with formal meta-analysis. The issue of early assessment of test performance is one faced by many new genetic tests. As part of a wider study we have investigated the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in publications and produced guidelines for future studies. A systematic search of the literature identified 27 papers which met predefined inclusion criteria. All 27 papers were, first, assessed against an international quality (STARD) checklist for reporting of diagnostic accuracy and, second, against our own in-house NIPD proforma to assess the implications of the quality of reporting specifically for the RhD NIPD test. Authors were found to generally present an optimistic view of NIPD, bearing in mind weaknesses identified in reporting and conduct of their studies and the analysis of results, as evidenced by the low STARD scores. The NIPD proforma identified that specific biases were potentially introduced through selective population sampling and/or failure to report the make-up of the population tested, omission of inconclusive results, inconsistencies in the handling of repeat results on a sample, and lack of adequate controls. These factors would inevitably affect the validity of diagnostic accuracy as reported in individual publications, as well as any subsequent meta-analyses. Together, published reports to date may provide a biased picture of the actual potential of NIPD testing for fetal RHD genotyping. Generalisation of the available evidence on diagnostic accuracy, especially to large-scale implementation of NIPD testing of non-sensitised women, will also require that decision makers consider further aspects such as test reliability and cost of routine testing in clinical practice. It is recommended that all studies of diagnostic accuracy of NIPD tests adhere to the STARD quality checklist in order to improve reporting, thereby, minimising bias and increasing the comparability of studies. Researchers should also consider specific shortcomings for NIPD and avoid selective participant sampling; report population characteristics; report handling of replicate sampling as well as their failure rates; and include controls for genotypes tested in the study. Furthermore, meta-analyses should consider the quality, as well as the sample size, of NIPD studies in their analysis. Larger trials, required to produce results that are valid and meaningful for clinical practice, must also adhere to these reporting standards.

Improvement in fetal DNA extraction from maternal plasma. Evaluation of the NucliSens Magnetic Extraction system and the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit in comparison with the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal diagnostic assays have been developed using free fetal DNA circulating in the maternal blood of pregnant women. Efficient DNA extraction is crucial for a robust analysis. To improve fetal DNA yield, we tested two manual extraction methods--the NucliSens Magnetic Extraction (NMAG) system and the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit (QDSP)--against our current standard method, the widely used QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (QDNA).

METHODS

The fetal DNA yield of the two extraction systems was evaluated using the RHD exon 7 as target in DNA extracts of 75 plasma samples from pregnant RhD-negative women, known to have given birth to RhD-positive infanto. The total DNA yield was evaluated in 23 samples, targeting GAPDH.

RESULTS

The fetal DNA yield was improved by a mean factor of 1.7 using the NMAG system, and improved by a mean factor of 1.5 using the QDSP. The total DNA yield was improved by a mean factor of 2.3 using the NMAG system, and by a mean factor of 1.3 using the QDSP.

CONCLUSION

Both extraction systems tested were superior to our standard with regard to DNA yield. This improvement may have a great impact on the success of genotyping in early pregnancy.

Polymerase-chain-reaction-based detection of fetal rhesus D and Y-chromosome-specific DNA in the whole blood of pregnant women during different trimesters of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether or not a noninvasive procedure utilizing maternal peripheral blood as the source of DNA and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) could be used to detect fetal rhesus D (RhD) status as well as fetal gender during different gestational stages of pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Maternal blood samples were obtained from 54 RhD-negative pregnant women during the first trimester (6-13 weeks, n = 14), second trimester (14-26 weeks, n = 26) and third trimester (27-40 weeks, n = 14). Genomic DNA was extracted from the whole blood and analyzed by seminested and nested PCR for detection of DNA sequences corresponding to RhD (n = 54) and Y chromosome (n = 48) using RhD and Y-chromosome-specific oligonucleotide primers, respectively. The seminested/nested PCR results were compared with the RhD status and gender of the babies after delivery.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of seminested PCR for detection of fetal RhD positivity in whole blood of pregnant women were 81 and 100%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of nested PCR for detection of male fetuses, using Y-chromosome-specific DNA as a marker, were 96 and 91%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the PCR results with samples obtained from women at different gestational stages of pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Seminested and nested PCRs for detection of fetal RhD and gender status, respectively, by using the blood of pregnant women during different gestational stages of pregnancy, are reliable noninvasive procedures with high sensitivity and specificity.

How I manage donors and patients with a weak D phenotype

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the adoption of molecular blood-group typing, the considerable heterogeneity of the serologic entities weak D and DEL at the molecular level has come to light. I offer an approach to the management of donors and patients expressing D antigen weakly and carrying any of the various molecular types of weak D and DEL.

RECENT FINDINGS

More than 50 distinct weak D alleles have been described. An internet-based survey of anti-D immunizations occurring in D-positive transfusion recipients reveals that no allo-anti-D has been observed in patients carrying prevalent weak D types. Allo-immunizations are documented for weak D types 4.2 (also known as DAR), 11 and 15. Anti-D immunizations have been reported in D-negative persons transfused with weak D and DEL red blood cells.

SUMMARY

Patients carrying any of the prevalent weak D types 1, 2, 3 or 4.1 are not prone to allo-anti-D immunization and may safely be transfused with D-positive red blood cells. Pregnant women with these weak D types need not receive RhIg. We should pay attention to weak D- or DEL-positive blood units that are labelled D-negative. The clinical benefit of removing DEL blood units from our supply of D-negative red blood cell units should be determined.

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal blood--a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the reported diagnostic accuracy, the validity, and the current limitations of fetal Rh genotyping from peripheral maternal blood based on the existing English-written publications.

STUDY DESIGN

A search of the English literature describing fetal RhD determination from maternal blood was conducted. From each study, we determined the number of samples tested, fetal RhD genotype, the source of the fetal DNA (maternal plasma, serum, or fetal cells), gestational age, and confirmation of fetal Rh type. The presence of alloimmunization and exclusions of tested samples were noted. For the meta-analysis we calculated composite estimates using 2 random effects models, weighted GLM and Bayesian. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 37 English-written publications that included 44 protocols reporting noninvasive Rh genotyping using fetal DNA obtained from maternal blood on a total of 3261 samples. A total of 183 (183/3261, 5.6%) samples were excluded from the meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic accuracy after exclusions was 94.8%. The gestational ages ranged between 8 and 42 weeks gestation. Maternal serum and plasma were found to be the best source for accurate diagnosis of fetal RhD type in 394/410 (96.1%) and 2293/2377 (96.5%), respectively. There were 719/783 (91.8%) alloimmunized patients that were correctly diagnosed. There were 16 studies that reported 100% diagnostic accuracy in their fetal RhD genotyping.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh determination using maternal peripheral blood is 94.8%. Its use can be applicable to Rh prophylaxis and to the management of Rh alloimmunized pregnancies. Improvements of the technique and further study of structure and rearrangements of the RhD gene may improve accuracy of testing and enable large-scale, risk-free fetal RhD genotyping using maternal blood.

Real-time PCR for prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases

The provision of prenatal diagnosis requires the highest standards in laboratory practice to ensure an accurate result. In preimplantation genetic diagnosis protocols additionally have to address the need to achieve an accurate result from 1 to 2 cells within a limited time. Emerging protocols of "non-invasive" prenatal diagnosis, which are based on analysis of free fetal DNA in the circulation of the pregnant mother, also have to achieve a result from a limited quantity of fetal DNA against a high background of maternal free DNA. Real-time PCR uses fluorescent probes or dyes and dedicated instruments to monitor the accumulation of amplicons produced throughout the progress of a PCR reaction. Real-time PCR can be used for quantitative or qualitative evaluation of PCR products and is ideally suited for analysis of nucleotide sequence variations (point mutations) and gene dosage changes (locus deletions or insertions/duplications) that cause human monogenic diseases. Real-time PCR offers a means for more rapid and potentially higher throughput assays, without compromising accuracy and has several advantages over end-point PCR analysis, including the elimination of post-PCR processing steps and a wide dynamic range of detection with a high degree of sensitivity. This review will focus on real-time PCR protocols that are suitable for genotyping monogenic diseases with particular emphasis on applications to prenatal diagnosis, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis.