Long-term results of lamivudine monotherapy in Korean patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: response and relapse rates, and factors related to durability of HBeAg seroconversion

Methodological challenges of performing meta-analyses to compare the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma between chronic hepatitis B treatments

Despite several recent meta-analyses on the topic, the comparative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) remains controversial. The controversy partly results from the arbitrary nature of significance levels leading to contradictory conclusions from very similar datasets. However, the use of observational data, which is prone to both within- and between-study heterogeneity of patient characteristics, also lends additional uncertainty. The asynchronous introduction of ETV and TDF in East Asia, where the majority of these studies have been conducted, further complicates analyses, as does the ensuing difference in follow-up time between ETV and TDF cohorts. Researchers conducting meta-analyses in this area must make many methodological decisions to mitigate bias but are ultimately limited to the methodologies of the included studies. It is therefore important for researchers, as well as the audience of published meta-analyses, to be aware of the quality of observational studies and meta-analyses in terms of patient characteristics, study design and statistical methodologies. In this review, we aim to help clinicians navigate the published meta-analyses on this topic and to provide researchers with recommendations for future work.

Improving the Prediction of Relapse After Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend rules for stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but off-therapy relapse is still high. This study aimed to identify predictors of off-therapy relapse and improve existing stopping rules.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 488 patients with CHB (262 hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and 226 HBeAg-negative) who discontinued NAs. Posttreatment relapse was investigated.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 73.3 months, the cumulative 5-year and 10-year virologic relapse (VR) rates were 73.5% and 76.1%, respectively. In HBeAg-positive patients, end-of-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.42-2.61]) and consolidation duration ≥2 years (HR, 0.31 [95% CI: .17-.58]) were independent predictors of VR. Consolidation ≥2 years and low HBsAg levels (≤560 IU/mL) significantly lowered VR rates. In HBeAg-negative patients, only the HBsAg level (HR, 1.61 [95% CI: 1.24-2.11]) was independently predictive of VR. Cirrhosis was significantly associated with higher VR rates in HBeAg-negative patients with low HBsAg levels (≤800 IU/mL). Combining end-of-therapy HBsAg levels with current stopping rules or consolidation duration further reduced off-therapy relapse, with 2-year VR rates of approximately 15%-25% in HBeAg-positive patients and 35% in HBeAg-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

End-of-therapy HBsAg levels, consolidation duration, and cirrhosis are key determinants of off-therapy relapse. Together with low HBsAg levels, extended consolidation therapy for ≥2 years should be ensured, and cirrhotic patients should continue NAs even if low HBsAg levels are achieved. A combination of these parameters will help identify individuals at low risk of relapse and significantly improve the predictive ability of the existing stopping rules.

Meta-omics characteristics of intestinal microbiota associated to HBeAg seroconversion induced by oral antiviral therapy

Tenofovir and entecavir are currently designated as the preferred oral antiviral drugs for chronic hepatitis B. However, only less than 40% of patients can achieve HBeAg seroconversion. We aim at investigating the role of intestinal microbiome in HBeAg seroconversion induced by oral antiviral therapy and describe multi-omics characteristics of HBeAg seroconversion associated intestinal flora. In this study, we prospectively collected fecal samples at baseline from the patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B who would have oral antiviral therapy. 16S rDNA sequencing and metabolomics were performed. We identified HBeAg seroconversion-related microbial signature and constructed prediction model for HBeAg seroconversion. Thirty-seven of these subjects achieved HBeAg seroconversion within 156 weeks after the initiation of oral antiviral therapy, while 41 subjects remained HBeAg positive even after over 156 weeks of therapy. A computational statistical and machine learning approach allowed us to identify a microbial signature for HBeAg seroconversion. Using random forest method, we further constructed a classifier based on the microbial signature, with area under curve being 0.749 for the test set. Patients who achieved HBeAg seroconversion tended to have lower abundance of certain fecal metabolites such as essential amino acids, and several dipeptides. By analyzing the fecal microbiota from the patients with and without HBeAg seroconversion, we showed intestinal microbiome play a critical role in HBeAg seroconversion induced by oral antiviral therapy. We also identified intestinal microbial signature that is associated with HBeAg seroconversion after oral antiviral therapy.

Dynamic profile of the HBeAg-anti-HBe system in acute and chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A clinical-laboratory approach

Wild-type HBV infection is followed by the blood expression of its widely known serological markers of infection, and designated as, hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and its antibody (anti-HBs), anti-HBc antibodies (IgM/IgG), and hepatitis B virus 'e' antigen (HBeAg) and its antibody (anti-HBe). These markers are detected as the infection develops and its kinetic behavior serves as a basis for monitoring the disorder and for diagnosing the clinical form or infection phase. Among these, the HBeAg-anti-HBe system markers demonstrate a dynamic profile whose interpretation, both in the acute or chronic HBV infection context, can offer greater difficulty to the health professionals, due to its particularities. This review offers a revisit to the markers dynamics of this system in the acute and chronic HBV infection and to the clinical and laboratory significance of its expression in these two clinical contexts.

Predictors of sustained virologic response after discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analog treatment for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to identify the predictors for relapse after discontinuation of oral nucleos(t)ide analog treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients who were receiving long-term, regular antiviral therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs, and subsequently achieved the discontinuation criteria from the Asia-Pacific guideline. After they voluntarily discontinued the drug therapy, data were prospectively collected to observe the potential virologic relapse, and the parameters that predicted recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, and were included in this study. Twenty-eight patients relapsed, and the accumulative recurrence rates at the 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-ups were 13.85%, 32.31%, and 49.23%, respectively. There was no difference in the accumulative recurrence rate 12 months after discontinuation among patients who were positive or negative for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) before they received the medication. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the time to complete response, age at discontinuation, and HBsAg levels at discontinuation affected the rate of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who received orally administrated nucleos(t)ide analogs, serum levels of HBsAg, age at discontinuation, and the time to complete response might be used as a guide to discontinue treatment. Among younger patients, those with low serum HBsAg levels, and those with an earlier complete response, the risk of relapse is lower and discontinuation is much safer.

Update on hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) leads to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and/or chronic liver failure. Despite extensive research, the immunopathogenesis is not completely understood. Viral persistence and clinical outcomes following HBV infection depend on viral factors and host factors; including genetic factors that determine a host’s immune mechanisms. The primary goal of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is to eradicate HBV or to at least maintain suppression of HBV replication. Despite recent advances in anti-viral agents for chronic HBV infection, complete eradication of the virus has been difficult to achieve. Agents for the treatment of CHB are divided mainly into two groups: immunomodulating agents and antiviral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Although NAs are safe, effective and easily administered orally, their long-term use poses the risk of drug resistance. Currently, international evidence-based guidelines have been developed to support physicians in managing CHB patients. However, treatment of patients with drug resistance is still challenging, as only a few classes of anti-HBV drugs are available and cross-resistance between drugs can occur. In addition, as the currently available genotypic test for detection of drug resistance still has limitations in identifying the different substitutions present in the same viral genome, the development of a new virologic test to overcome this limitation is necessary. Among the predictive factors associated with response to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) therapy, hepatitis B surface antigen quantification is considered to be a surrogate marker for monitoring response to PEG-IFN. Current practice guidelines stress the importance of profound and durable HBV viral suppression in the treatment of CHB patients. To this end, it is essential to choose a potent antiviral drug with a low risk of resistance for initial treatment of CHB to achieve sustained virological response. This review highlights recent advances in the understanding of the immunopathogenesis of HBV and currently available and developing treatment strategies against HBV infection.

Relapse rates in chronic hepatitis B naïve patients after discontinuation of antiviral therapy with entecavir

Registration studies show entecavir (ETV) to be effective and safe in NUC-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B, but relapse rates after treatment discontinuation have not been well established. Relapse rates and predictors of relapse were evaluated in naïve HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients treated with ETV. Treatment duration was defined according to international guidelines. Virological relapse was defined as reappearance in serum of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to >2000 IU/mL after discontinuation of treatment. A hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients were treated for a median 181 weeks. 61% were HBeAg positive, 23% had cirrhosis, and mean HBV DNA level was 6.88 ± 1.74 log10 IU/mL. Ninety-two per cent became HBV DNA negative; 71% of HBeAg+ve patients became HBeAg negative and 68% anti-HBe positive; 14% became HBsAg negative and 13% anti-HBs positive. At the end of the study, 36 patients discontinued treatment: one due to breakthrough associated with resistant variants and 35 (20%) due to sustained virological response; 33 of these patients developed HBeAg seroconversion and 18 HBsAg seroconversion. Median off-treatment time was 69 weeks. Nine patients (26%), all HBeAg positive at baseline, developed virological relapse after a median 48 weeks off-treatment, 3 of them showed HBeAg reversion and 4 lost anti-HBe. No patient with HBsAg seroconversion relapsed. HBeAg clearance after week 48 of treatment was associated with an increase risk of relapse. After ETV discontinuation, HBsAg seroconversion was maintained in 100% of the patients, HBeAg seroconversion maintained in 90%, and virological relapse rate was 24%.

When to stop nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment for chronic hepatitis B? Durability of antiviral response

Introduction of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) for oral antiviral therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Although current international guidelines for the management of CHB provide information regarding when to begin the antiviral therapy with NAs, there is no clear consensus on when to stop the treatment, especially for those who respond to the therapy. Hepatitis B surface antigen loss has been regarded as an ideal endpoint of oral antiviral therapy with NAs, however since this is rarely achieved, practical endpoints have been suggested by the international guidelines. Despite the stopping rules recommended by the international guidelines, whether oral antiviral therapy with NAs can be safely discontinued is of major concern. While attention has been drawn to whether antiviral treatment with NAs can be a finite therapy, there is lack of sufficient data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs. Based on the available evidences, current guidelines for stopping NA therapy seems to be inadequate in terms of off-treatment durability, with relapse rates of more than 40% for both hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. Therefore, further studies are required to accumulate data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs, and future studies are warranted to identify adequate predictive markers that could provide supplementary information to guide the timing of stopping NA therapy.

Current role of Lamivudine regarding therapeutic response and resistance in children with chronic hepatitis B

PURPOSE

To identify the predictive factors of long-term therapeutic response or resistance to lamivudine treatment in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

Eighty one children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis B were included, who received lamivudine treatment for at least 6 months. Their condition was monitored for at least 12 months (12-88 months) thereafter. Twenty one (25.9%) were preschool children (age≤6). For patients who had developed HBeAg seroconversion or breakthrough, univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the effects of age, gender, pretreatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and hepatitis B virus DNA levels.

RESULTS

HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 49 (60.5%) of the 81 patients after the initiation of the lamivudine therapy. In 65 patients whom were monitored for over 24 months, the seroconversion rate was significantly higher in younger patients (p=0.040), especially in those patients of preschool age (age≤6, p=0.031). The seroconversion rate was significantly higher in higher pretreatment ALT (p=0.003). The breakthrough occurred in 21 (25.9%) of the 81. The breakthrough rate was lower in younger aged patients (age≤6), and with higher pretreatment ALT levels, but no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Younger age is a good predictor of HBeAg seroconversion in children with long-term lamivudine treatment as well as high pretreatment ALT levels.

Low incidence of hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in patients treated with oral nucleos(t)ides in routine practice

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment end-point of therapy for patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) includes HBeAg seroconversion, which ranges from 15% to 22% after 1 year of oral nucleos(t)ides according to clinical trials. Our goal was to determine the incidence and predictors of HBeAg seroconversion in such patients in routine clinical practice because they may differ than reported rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 333 consecutive treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive patients who were treated for CHB between 1/2000 and 6/2010 at three gastroenterology and liver clinics in the USA. Primary study end-point was HBeAg seroconversion-loss of HBeAg and antibody to HBeAg (anti-HBe) development.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were Asian (96%). Median treatment duration prior to HBeAg seroconversion was 50 (range 26-52) weeks. Of the 333 study patients, 25% received lamivudine, 16% adefovir, 51% entecavir, and 8% tenofovir. HBeAg seroconversion at month 12 was 8.2%. On multivariate analysis inclusive of age, gender, and antiviral agents, independent predictors for HBeAg seroconversion at month 12 were hepatitis B virus DNA < 7.5 log10  IU/mL (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.59 [1.04-6.44]), P = 0.041) and alanine transaminase (ALT) > 1.5 × upper normal limit (HR = 2.86 [1.05-7.81], P = 0.040), but not the choice of nucleos(t)ides.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBeAg seroconversion rate seen in clinical settings for oral nucleos(t)ides appears much lower than those reported in pivotal trials, especially in patients with lower ALT and higher HBV DNA levels. HBeAg-positive patients should be counseled about the high possibility of the long treatment duration required to achieve recommended treatment end-points.

Should lamivudine monotherapy be stopped or continued in patients infected with hepatitis B with favorable responses after more than 5 years of treatment?

Regarding the limited evidence for determining the optimal duration of antiviral treatment for hepatitis B, the long-term outcome of patients with favorable responses to over 5 years of lamivudine monotherapy was investigated. Two hundred seventy-one patients who had received lamivudine for at least 5 years were enrolled. Ultimately, 72 patients without YMDD mutations and showing hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels <2.5 pg/ml after 5 years of treatment were analyzed. Mean treatment duration with lamivudine was 9.1 ± 2.6 years. During the treatment, HBeAg and HBsAg loss/seroconversion rates were 95 and 6.9%, respectively. Decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed in 2.8 and 6.9% of patients, respectively. Old age and cirrhosis were risk factors for HCC development. Finally, 11.1% of patients developed YMDD mutations after 8.3 ± 2.4 years of treatment. There was no hepatic decompensation among the patients who developed delayed YMDD mutations. Sixteen patients who achieved a complete response stopped lamivudine and four patients showed relapses 10.3 ± 8.5 months after stopping lamivudine. Relapsed patients had more cirrhotic livers and higher rates of HBeAg positivity at 5 years than patients who maintained complete response. The present study suggests that patients who do not develop YMDD mutations over 5 years of treatment with lamivudine may continue lamivudine monotherapy until the loss of HBsAg. However, even for the patients showing favorable response over 5 years of treatment, those in older ages, with cirrhosis or who show poor HBeAg responses should be on careful monitoring to detect the development of viral mutations, relapse and even HCC.

Assessing long-term treatment efficacy in chronic hepatitis B and C: between evidence and common sense

Chronic infection with the hepatitis B and C virus represents a major health problem worldwide, as it is estimated that roughly 400 and 200 million people respectively, are infected by each virus. By definition, any antiviral therapy that claims to be effective should have as its ultimate efficacy end point an improvement in patients' survival, or at least a reduction in the development rates of liver-related complications. However, this is extremely complicated to prove as the natural course of both viral diseases is extremely slow, requiring decades to evolve in cirrhosis and even more years to lead to liver complications. For this reason, clinicians and health authorities have relied on so called surrogate end points to assess the efficacy of any therapeutic intervention for viral hepatitis. Obviously, this allows for standardization in study designs that ultimately translates into an accelerated time frame for therapeutic drugs as well as healthcare innovations to enter the viral hepatitis clinical practice. However, it also calls for demonstration that surrogate end points in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B or C are good and reliable markers of long-term efficacy.

Durability of viral response after off-treatment in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B

AIM: To evaluate the durability in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued antiviral treatment.

METHODS: A total of 48 HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients who were administered nucleoside analogues and maintained virological response for ≥ 6 mo [hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA < 300 copies/mL and HBeAg seroconversion] before cessation of treatment were enrolled between February 2007 and January 2010. The criteria for the cessation of the antiviral treatment were defined as follows: (1) achievement of virological response; and (2) duration of consolidation therapy (≥ 6 mo). After treatment cessation, the patients were followed up at 3-6 mo intervals. The primary endpoint was serologic and virologic recurrence rates after withdrawal of antiviral treatment. Serologic recurrence was defined as reappearance of HBeAg positivity after HBeAg seroconversion. Virologic recurrence was defined as an increase in HBV-DNA level > 10⁴ copies/mL after HBeAg seroconversion with previously undetectable HBV-DNA level.

RESULTS: During the median follow-up period of 18.2 mo (range: 5.1-47.5 mo) after cessation of antiviral treatment, the cumulative serological recurrence rate was 15 % at 12 mo. The median duration between the cessation of antiviral treatment and serologic recurrence was 7.2 mo (range: 1.2-10.9 mo). Of the 48 patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis, 20 (41.6%) showed virological recurrence. The cumulative virologic recurrence rates at 12 mo after discontinuing the antiviral agent were 41%. The median duration between off-treatment and virologic recurrence was 7.6 mo (range: 4.3-27.1 mo). The mean age of the virological recurrence group was older than that of the non-recurrence group (46.7 ± 12.1 years vs 38.8 ± 12.7 years, respectively; P = 0.022). Age (> 40 years) and the duration of consolidation treatment (≥ 15 mo) were significant predictive factors for offtreatment durability in the multivariate analysis [P = 0.049, relative risk (RR) 0.31, 95% CI (0.096-0.998) and P = 0.005, RR 11.29, 95% CI (2.054-65.12), respectively]. Patients with age (≤ 40 years) who received consolidation treatment (≥ 15 mo) significantly showed durability in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients (P = 0.014). These results suggest that additional treatment for more than 15 mo after HBeAg seroconversion in patients who are ≤ 40 years old may be beneficial in providing a sustained virological response.

CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that HBeAg seroconversion is an imperfect end point in antiviral treatment. Long-term consolidation treatment (≥ 15 mo) in younger patients is important for producing better prognosis in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B.

Defining virologic relapse in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Different definitions of virologic relapse (VR) are being used. One way of defining VR is "reappearance of HBV DNA in the serum," while another definition is an "increase in HBV DNA level greater than 1 log in two determinations at least 4 weeks apart." The aim of this study was to see the effectiveness of these two definitions

METHODS

Forty-five HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with a virologic response [negative PCR (<12 IU/ml)] who had discontinued therapy were analyzed retrospectively for VR, HBeAg reversion and biochemical flare.

RESULTS

HBV DNA reappeared in the serum (≥12 IU/ml) of all 45 patients (100%). An increase in HBV DNA level greater than 1 log in two determinations at least 4 weeks apart was identified in 20 of 25 patients (80%). Biochemical flare and HBeAg reversion were observed in 18 (40%) and 14 (31%) patients, respectively. Peak off-therapy HBV DNA level was significantly associated with biochemical flare (r=0.758, P<0.001) and HBeAg reversion (r=0.645, P<0.001). Two patients with high initial off-therapy HBV DNA levels (≥4.0 log(10) IU/ml) were reassessed at 4 weeks, and both experienced a biochemical flare and HBeAg reversion. Two patients had an increase in HBV DNA level greater than 1 log at a very low level (1 log to 2 or 3 log), but did not experience biochemical flare or HBeAg reversion during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Reappearance of HBV DNA was universal when sensitive HBV DNA assay was used. Waiting 4 weeks to confirm VR may be harmful for patients with a high HBV DNA level, and was ineffective to indicate re-therapy for patients with increase in HBV DNA at a very low level. There is a need for improved and standardized definitions of VR.

Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion: a critical event in chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

Replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the primary driver of disease progression and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but other factors, such as hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, also influence disease course. The importance of HBeAg seroconversion is underscored by current CHB treatment guidelines that recommend limiting the duration of antiviral therapy in HBeAg-positive patients who achieve seroconversion.

AIMS

A 2-day meeting of leading hepatologists with extensive experience managing patients with CHB in the Asia-Pacific region was held with the overall goals of reviewing and evaluating (1) available data on the relationship between HBeAg seroconversion and clinical outcomes for patients with HBeAg-positive CHB, and (2) the ways in which seroconversion should influence patient management.

CONCLUSIONS

It was agreed that HBeAg seroconversion is an important serologic end point for patients with CHB and that achieving this goal should be an important consideration in treatment selection. Patients with HBeAg-positive CHB should consider pegylated interferon if they are aged < 40 years (especially women), have lower HBV DNA levels, can afford this treatment, and have a lifestyle that would support adherence to injection therapy. Alternatively, nucleos(t)ide analogs are recommended in patients with alanine aminotransferase levels ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal, HBV DNA levels < 9 log(10) IU/ml, and compensated CHB. Entecavir, telbivudine, and tenofovir may be used as first-line therapy; they can be administered as a finite therapeutic course in HBeAg-positive patients who seroconvert. Telbivudine and tenofovir should be considered in women of child-bearing potential.

Nucleos(t)ide analogues only induce temporary hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in most patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Inconsistencies in results and guideline recommendations regarding the durability of nucleos(t)ide analogue-induced hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion require clarification. We studied the long-term durability of nucleos(t)ide analogue-induced HBeAg seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

METHODS

We performed a single-center cohort study of 132 HBeAg-positive patients who had received nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy.

RESULTS

During a median treatment duration of 26 months (range, 16-43 mo), HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 46 of 132 subjects (35%). Forty-two subjects (91%) had follow-up evaluation after HBeAg seroconversion. During a median follow-up period of 59 months (range, 28-103 mo) after HBeAg seroconversion, 13 of 42 patients (31%) showed a durable remission (defined as HBeAg negative and HBV-DNA level<10,000 copies/mL). Overall, 33 of 42 subjects (79%) continued therapy after HBeAg seroconversion; of these, 22 (67%) showed serologic and/or virologic recurrence. Nine of 42 subjects (21%) discontinued therapy after HBeAg seroconversion and at least 6 months of consolidation therapy. Only 2 patients showed a durable response in the absence of therapy. Disease recurrence in patients who continued therapy after HBeAg seroconversion was preceded by the development of resistance (80% of these patients); resistance only occurred in subjects given lamivudine monotherapy. In contrast, recurrence after treatment discontinuation or noncompliance was observed in all patients given nucleos(t)ide analogues.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction of HBeAg seroconversion by nucleos(t)ide analogues is temporary in most patients with chronic HBV infection. Long-term continuation of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment, irrespective of the occurrence of HBeAg seroconversion, appears to be necessary.

Extended lamivudine consolidation therapy in hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients improves sustained hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion

OBJECTIVES

Longer lamivudine (LAM) consolidation therapy after hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion has been demonstrated to reduce the cumulative relapse rate. However, the optimal interval of LAM consolidation therapy remains controversial. We evaluated the post-treatment durability of LAM-induced HBeAg seroconversion and the length of LAM consolidation therapy required to maintain sustained HBeAg seroconversion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 401 naive HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who were treated with LAM 100 mg daily for at least 24 weeks (range 24-258 weeks). Among them, 124 patients who achieved a complete response (HBeAg seroconversion, alanine aminotransferase normalization, hepatitis B virus DNA < 200 copies/ml) at the end of LAM therapy were followed up for at least 48 weeks (range 48-350 weeks).

RESULTS

Of the 124 complete responders, 42 (33.87%) achieved a sustained response (persistent response >or= 48 weeks). However, the cumulative relapse rates at 48 and 96 weeks post-treatment were 54.03% and 68.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed pretreatment age <or= 34 years [hazard ratio (HR) 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-3.62; p < 0.001] and LAM consolidation therapy >or= 48 weeks (HR 2.44; 95% CI 1.35-4.40; p = 0.003) to be independent factors for predicting a sustained response.

CONCLUSIONS

LAM-induced HBeAg seroconversion is not durable in Taiwan. However, a duration of LAM consolidation therapy > 48 weeks may be favorable for maintaining durable HBeAg seroconversion.

Lamivudine maintenance beyond one year after HBeAg seroconversion is a major factor for sustained virologic response in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

The reported durability of virologic response after successful lamivudine monotherapy is variable, and the question remains as to whether virologic responses can be maintained over an extended follow-up period. The aim of this study was to investigate posttreatment durability, the optimal duration of additional treatment after HBeAg clearance or seroconversion, and determinants for sustained virologic response (SVR) following lamivudine monotherapy in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB). From January 1999 to August 2004, 178 Korean patients with HBeAg-positive CHB were treated with lamivudine and achieved complete responses, defined as a loss of serum HBeAg and hepatitis B virus DNA, and alanine aminotransferase normalization. The mean duration of lamivudine monotherapy was 26 months (range, 12-77). SVR was maintained in 138 patients (77.5%). Host and viral factors were compared between 138 patients with SVR and 40 patients whose response was not sustained. The cumulative relapse rates increased from 15.9% at 1 year to 30.2% at 5 years, with a mean time to relapse after cessation of lamivudine of 12 months (range, 7-42). Most relapses occurred within 2 years after discontinuation of lamivudine (33/40, 82.5%). On multivariate analysis, age <or=40 years and additional treatment for more than 12 months after HBeAg clearance or seroconversion were independent factors for SVR.

CONCLUSION

The lamivudine-induced virologic response was durable in patients under 40 years old and those receiving lamivudine for more than 12 months after HBeAg clearance or seroconversion. Age and additional treatment were major predictive factors for SVR.

Durability of antiviral response in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients who maintained virologic response for one year after lamivudine discontinuation

The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term relapse rate and associated risk factors in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who had maintained virologic response (VR) for 1 year after lamivudine (LMV) discontinuation. We enrolled 55 treatment-naive HBeAg-positive CHB patients who achieved and maintained VR until 1 year after LMV discontinuation. Delayed relapse was defined as an elevation of HBV DNA after sustained VR for 1 year. During follow-up, 16 of 55 patients (29%) showed delayed relapse. Beginning 1 year after LMV discontinuation, the cumulative rates of relapse after 2 and 4 years were 29 and 44%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.029) and >2,000 copies/ml HBV DNA 3 months after LMV discontinuation (P = 0.047) were significant predictors of delayed relapse. Delayed relapse is not infrequent, even in patients who maintain VR for 1 year after LMV discontinuation. Therefore, LMV maintenance therapy might be considered in HBeAg-positive CHB patients who achieve VR.

HBeAg seroconversion as an important end point in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

During the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the loss of serum hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and the development of anti-HBe antibodies (HBeAg seroconversion) mark a transition from the immune-active phase of disease to the inactive carrier state. This review examines the evidence from natural history and cohort studies on the relationship between HBeAg seroconversion and disease progression. The role of HBeAg seroconversion as an important milestone in the management of HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), as well as the advantages and disadvantages of administering a finite course of therapy for HBeAg-positive CHB, is also discussed. The evidence from natural history and cohort studies indicates that spontaneous or treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion is associated with lower rates of disease progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, a potential of hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion, and improved survival rates. Updated guidelines developed by major liver associations recommend stopping oral therapy for HBeAg-positive patients who achieve sustained HBeAg seroconversion with polymerase chain reaction-undetectable HBV-DNA on two separate occasions for 6 or more months apart, taking into consideration the individual's clinical and virologic response to therapy, as well as the severity of liver disease. Thus, early induction of HBeAg seroconversion with interferon-based therapy or oral nucleos(t)ide analogues has important clinical and socioeconomic implications for the management of CHB.

[Virologic response to adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy is not durable in HBeAg-positive, lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients]

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

It has been shown that adefovir dipivoxil is an effective antiviral agent in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), not only in wild-type hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but also in lamivudine-resistant (LAMV-R) cases. However, little is known about the durability of the virologic response to adefovir in LAMV-R CHB patients.

METHODS

Fifteen HBV e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive, LAMV-R CHB patients showed a virologic response to adefovir monotherapy. These patients received additional adefovir for at least a further 12 months. The virologic relapse rate after discontinuation of adefovir was evaluated. In addition, predictive factors associated with virologic relapse were investigated.

RESULTS

The median level of serum HBV DNA before adefovir administration was 7,457,840 IU/mL (range 107,920-99,524,960 IU/mL). The median duration of adefovir treatment was 30 months (range 14-46 months). During a median follow-up period of 14 months after discontinuation of adefovir, the 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month cumulative relapse rates were 26.7%, 53.3%, 73.3%, 80%, and 80%, respectively. High pretreatment HBV DNA levels were found to be the only factor that was predictive of off-therapy relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the adefovir-monotherapy-induced virologic response is not durable in most patients with LAMV-R HBeAg-positive CHB, especially in those with a high pretreatment HBV DNA level.

Pretreatment alanine transaminase level may not be the most important predictor of HBeAg loss in the older patient

BACKGROUND

Elevated pretreatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) over two times the upper limit of normal reference range has been accepted as a marker for predicting HBeAg loss and an indicator for initiating antiviral therapy. Recently, several opinions argued that in patients aged over 40 years, the treatment should be started if they have elevated serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA without elevated ALT. However, initiating treatment in these patients might be argued against by the concept that the rate of HBeAg loss depends on the pretreatment ALT.

AIM

This study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of pretreatment ALT in predicting HBeAg loss in patients aged over 40 years under lamivudine treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 820 HBeAg-positive patients treated with lamivudine. The patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at or after initiating the lamivudine treatment and patients with evident liver cirrhosis were excluded. Three hundred fifty-five patients met the criteria and were divided into two groups: </=40 years of age (Group 1) and >40 years of age (Group 2).

RESULTS

Analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test showed that the cumulative rate of HBeAg loss was not different in the two groups. Multivariate modelling indicated that an elevated pretreatment ALT level was a predictor of HBeAg loss in Group 1 (P<0.05), whereas it failed to act as a predictor in Group 2.

CONCLUSION

Antiviral therapy might not need to be deferred until the ALT level increases in order to enhance the chance of HbeAg loss in HBV DNA-(+) patients aged over 40 years.

[Is it possible to stop nucleos(t)ide analogue based therapy in chronic hepatitis B?]

Nucleos(t)ide analogues are very efficient in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. In the HBe antigen positive patients, the HBe seroconversion rates range from 12 to 22% after one year of treatment. When HBe seroconversion occure, it is possible to stop the treatment with analogue but only in non cirrhotic patients. If the treatment with analogue is continued for at least 6 months after confirmed HBeAg seroconversion, the HBe seroconversion is durable in 70-90% of patients. The follow up should be done during years. Stopping the treatment is more problematic in HBe antigen negative patients. A virological relapse occur in 44 to 80% of cases and a biochemical relapse occur in 30 to 70% of cases. Stopping the treatment with an analogue in this population should be considered only in a prospective study with careful monitoring and with a long term follow up.

Recent data on treatment of chronic hepatitis B with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Forty years ago in 1967, Professor Blumberg discovered the Australian Antigen, later known as the hepatitis B surface antigen, and was awarded the Nobel Prize. This discovery enables the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and defines its epidemiology. Viral hepatitis B infection affects global health situation, and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is particularly serious in the Asia-Pacific region. HBV vaccines created the first breakthrough in HBV prevention. Through universal HBV vaccination program for the newborns, promoted since the mid-1980s, the main route that perpetuates chronic infection from mother to child is curbed. Most children and young adults now have immunity against HBV infection. The next breakthrough comes with therapy for CHB. This prevents progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Standard interferon therapy with modest efficacy has been largely replaced by therapy with nuclos(t)ide analogues or pegylated interferons alfa-2a and -2b. Lamivudine was approved by the FDA USA in 1998, followed by adefovir dipivoxil in 2002, entecavir in 2005, and telbivudine in 2006. Clevudine, tenofovir, and many promising candidates are in different stages of development and clinical trial. This paper critically reviews recent data published or presented since the APASL Consensus and Guideline Update of 2005. Clinical efficacy mostly in patients with raised serum alanine aminotransferase will be analyzed.

Evolution of viral load and changes of polymerase and precore/core promoter sequences in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus during adefovir therapy

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has demonstrated clinical activity against both wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). We analyzed the evolution of viral load and the changes of polymerase and precore/core promoter sequences in lamivudine-resistant virus during ADV therapy. The authors studied 14 patients who had breakthrough hepatitis after lamivudine therapy. Serial sera were obtained prior to adefovir administration and at 3, 6 and 12 months after ADV therapy. Nucleotide sequences of polymerase and the precore/core promoter from the hepatitis B virus were analyzed. The median serum HBV DNA decrease with adefovir treatment was 4.35 log(10) copies/mL at 12 months. Tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutants were found in 12 patients among the 14 patients with lamivudine resistance. The YMDD mutant viruses reversed to the wild-type in 6 patients out of the 12 patients after 3-6 months of ADV after discontinuing lamivudine therapy. In the analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the precore/core promoter gene, core promoter mutants in 12 patients were replaced by wild-type virus in three patients (25%), while precore mutants in four patients were replaced by the wild-type in three patients (75%). The results demonstrate the patterns of polymerase and precore/core promoter mutations in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B viruses and the reversion from the mutant to the wild-type in some patients. In addition, despite several mutations in the polymerase during ADV therapy, ADV effectively suppressed HBV replication without the emergence of resistant viral mutants.

Pre- and post-treatment predictors of the early achievement of HBeAg loss in lamivudine-resistant patients receiving adefovir therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study investigated the clinical variables that predict hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss in lamivudine-resistant patients receiving adefovir therapy.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive HBeAg-positive patients treated with adefovir for at least 12 months were enrolled in this study. All had serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels over twice the upper limit of normal (ULN) as a result of lamivudine resistance. Predictors of HBeAg loss after switching from lamivudine to adefovir were examined.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 18 (32.1%) of 56 patients showed a loss of HBeAg. The estimated rates of HBeAg loss at 6, 12, and 18 months were 11.5%, 26.8%, and 42.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that pretreatment ALT levels >10 x ULN (P = 0.029), a viral load at 3 months of therapy (P = 0.017), and viral decline by >3 log(10) from baseline at 3 months (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the loss of HBeAg within 12 months of therapy. With multivariate analysis using the stepwise logistic regression model, pretreatment ALT > 10 x ULN (odds ratio [OR], 4.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-19.44; P = 0.044) and viral suppression >3 log(10) at 3 months (OR, 10.39; 95% CI, 1.86-58.07; P = 0.008) were identified as the two independent predictors of HBeAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment ALT levels and the initial pattern of post-treatment viral decline are the strongest predictors of the early achievement of HBeAg loss following treatment with adefovir in lamivudine-resistant patients. These results may provide useful information for the optimal timing of adefovir rescue as well as for better monitoring after treatment.