Topical calcineurin inhibitors decrease the production of UVB-induced thymine dimers from hairless mouse epidermis

Efficacy and safety of 308-nm Excimer lamp combined with Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment as monotherapy in treating children with limited vitiligo: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combining the 308-nm Excimer lamp with Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment, compared to Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment monotherapy, for treating pediatric vitiligo involving less than 10% of the body surface area.

METHODS

Fifty pediatric patients with vitiligo were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment twice daily and Excimer light at 308-nm twice weekly, while Group B received Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment alone, administered twice daily. Repigmentation percentages were evaluated after 30, 90, and 180 days using the rule of nine.

RESULTS

Group A exhibited a significant improvement in repigmentation, increasing from 10% after one month to 65% after six months. In contrast, Group B observed an increase from 10% to 30% over the same timeframe. The efficacy of the treatment was significantly higher in Group A at both the 3-month and 6-month follow-up points (p-value < .001). Moreover, Group A achieved notably higher repigmentation rates in the face, trunk, and lower limbs.

CONCLUSION

The combination of Tacrolimus and the 308-nm excimer lamp yielded superior repigmentation results compared to Tacrolimus monotherapy in pediatric vitiligo patients. This combined approach may offer an effective new treatment protocol for pediatric vitiligo.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 308-nm excimer laser as monotherapy and combination therapy with topical tacrolimus in the treatment of periocular vitiligo

Vitiligo is an acquired depigmenting disorder in which destruction of skin melanocytes. In recent years, 308-nm excimer laser (308-nm EL) and topical tacrolimus have been extensively used to treat vitiligo. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of combined treatment of 308-nm EL and topical tacrolimus for treating periocular vitiligo compared to 308-nm EL monotherapy. This study is a retrospective observational study, involving 58 Chinese patients of periocular vitiligo, divided into two groups: the control group (28 patients) treated with 308-nm EL; and the experimental group (30 patients) treated with 308-nm EL and topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment. Repigmentation was assessed at four grades. In the control group, there were four patients (14%) with poor repigmentation, eleven patients (39%) with moderate repigmentation, ten patients (36%) with good repigmentation, three patients (11%) with excellent repigmentation. In the experimental group, two patients (7%) experienced poor repigmentation, six patients (20%) experienced moderate repigmentation, fifteen patients (50%) experienced good repigmentation, seven patients (23%) experienced excellent repigmentation. The experimental group efficacy rate (good and excellent repigmentation) was 73.3%, higher than 46.4% for the control group (p=0.037). Our findings suggest that both treatments are safe and the combination of tacrolimus and 308-nm EL is more effective than 308-nm EL alone for periocular vitiligo.

Consensus on the treatment of vitiligo - Brazilian Society of Dermatology

Background

Vitiligo is a muco-cutaneous, autoimmune, localized, or disseminated disease, which manifests through hypochromic or achromic macules, with loss in quality of life. The prevalence of vitiligo in Brazil was determined to be 0.54%. There is no on-label medication for its treatment. To date, no Brazilian consensus on the treatment of vitiligo had been written.

Objectives

The objective of this group of Brazilian dermatologists with experience in the treatment of this disease was to reach a consensus on the clinical and surgical treatment of vitiligo, based on articles with the best scientific evidence.

Methods

Seven dermatologists were invited, and each was assigned two treatment modalities to review. Each treatment (topical, systemic, and phototherapy) was reviewed by three experts. Two experts reviewed the surgical treatment. Subsequently, the coordinator compiled the different versions and drafted a text about each type of treatment. The new version was returned to all experts, who expressed their opinions and made suggestions for clarity. The final text was written by the coordinator and sent to all participants to prepare the final consensus.

Results/Conclusion

The experts defined the following as standard treatments of vitiligo: the use of topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors for localized and unstable cases; corticosteroid minipulse in progressive generalized vitiligo; narrowband UVB phototherapy for extensive forms of the disease. Surgical modalities should be indicated for segmental and stable generalized vitiligo. Topical and systemic anti-JAK drugs are being tested, with promising results.

Treatment Outcomes of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor Therapy for Patients With Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), including tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, have been widely used for the treatment of vitiligo; however, the efficacy of TCI monotherapy is often underestimated.

Objectives

To estimate the treatment responses to both TCI monotherapy and TCI accompanied by phototherapy for vitiligo, based on relevant prospective studies, and to systematically review the mechanism of action of TCIs for vitiligo treatment.

Data Sources

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from the date of database inception to August 6, 2018, was conducted. The main key words used were vitiligo, topical calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and FK506.

Study Selection

Of 250 studies initially identified, the full texts of 102 articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 56 studies were identified: 11 studies on the TCI mechanism, 36 studies on TCI monotherapy, 12 studies on TCI plus phototherapy, and 1 study on TCI maintenance therapy.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two reviewers independently extracted data on study design, patients, intervention characteristics, and outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance weighting were performed for the TCI monotherapy and TCI plus phototherapy groups.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were the rates of at least mild (≥25%), at least moderate (≥50%), and marked (≥75%) repigmentation responses to treatment. These rates were calculated by dividing the number of participants in an individual study who showed the corresponding repigmentation by the total number of participants who completed that study.

Results

In the 56 studies included in the analysis, 46 (1499 patients) were selected to evaluate treatment response. For TCI monotherapy, an at least mild response was achieved in 55.0% (95% CI, 42.2%-67.8%) of 560 patients in 21 studies, an at least moderate response in 38.5% (95% CI, 28.2%-48.8%) of 619 patients in 23 studies, and a marked response in 18.1% (95% CI, 13.2%-23.1%) of 520 patients in 19 studies after median treatment duration of 3 months (range, 2-7 months). In the subgroup analyses, face and neck lesions showed an at least mild response in 73.1% (95% CI, 32.6-83.5%) of patients, and a marked response in 35.4% (95% CI, 24.9-46.0%) of patients. For TCI plus phototherapy, an at least mild response to TCI plus phototherapy was achieved in 89.5% (95% CI, 81.1-97.9%) of patients, and a marked response was achieved in 47.5% (95% CI, 30.6-64.4%) of patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The use of TCIs, both as a monotherapy and in combination with phototherapy, should be encouraged in patients with vitiligo.

Medical and Maintenance Treatments for Vitiligo

Medical treatments alone, or in combination with phototherapy, are key approaches for treating nonsegmental vitiligo and, to a lesser extent, segmental vitiligo. The treatments are useful for halting disease progression and have been proven effective for inducing repigmentation and decreasing risk of relapses. Although the treatments have side effects and limitations, vitiligo often induces a marked decrease in quality of life and in most cases the risk:benefit ratio is in favor of an active approach. Systemic and topical agents targeting the pathways involved in loss of melanocytes and in differentiation of melanocyte stem cells should provide more effective approaches in the near future.

Effect of narrow band ultraviolet B phototherapy as monotherapy or combination therapy for vitiligo: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of vitiligo is still one of the most difficult dermatological challenges, although there are many therapeutic options. Narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is considered to be a very important modality for generalized vitiligo.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore whether a combination of NB-UVB and topical agents would be superior to NB-UVB alone for treating vitiligo.

METHODS

We searched the electronic databases such as PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was the proportion of ≥50% repigmentation (a clinical significance), and secondary outcome was the proportion of ≥75% repigmentation (an excellent response).

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 240 patients (413 lesions) were included in this meta-analysis. The study showed no significant difference between NB-UVB combination therapy (NB-UVB and topical calcineurin inhibitor or vitamin D analogs) and NB-UVB monotherapy in the outcomes of ≥50% repigmentation and ≥75% repigmentation. However, lesions located on the face and neck had better results in ≥50% repigmentation (RR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.08-1.81) and ≥75% repigmentation (RR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.10-3.20) with NB-UVB and topical calcineurin inhibitor combination therapy vs. NB-UVB monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis suggested that adding neither topical calcineurin inhibitors nor topical vitamin-D3 analogs on NB-UVB can yield significantly superior outcomes than NB-UVB monotherapy for treatment of vitiligo. However, addition of topical calcineurin inhibitors to NB-UVB may increase treatment outcomes in vitiligo affecting face and neck.

Treatment of Childhood Vitiligo Using Tacrolimus Ointment with Narrowband Ultraviolet B Phototherapy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

A combination of narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) phototherapy plus topical tacrolimus has been used in adult vitiligo but has not yet been explored in children. We therefore sought to highlight the efficacy of this synergistic combination in childhood vitiligo. The objective was to study the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination of NBUVB with topical tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in childhood vitiligo.

METHOD

In this open-label study, 20 children, 4 to 14 years of age, with symmetrical vitiligo lesions were enrolled for 24 weeks. All were instructed to apply tacrolimus ointment 0.03% on a target patch on the left side of the body twice daily and no topical on a target patch on the right side. The whole body was irradiated with NBUVB three times per week. All patients were examined and the same dermatologist photographed lesions to assess for repigmentation at 4-week intervals. Response was noted as the percentage of repigmentation (none, 0%; poor, 1-25%; moderate, 26-50%; good, 51-75%; excellent, >75%).

RESULT

Our study found a statistically significant difference in the mean percentage of repigmentation at 4 and 6 months between combination therapy and NBUVB monotherapy. The mean cumulative dose and average number of exposures for the first clinically visible response were significantly lower with combination therapy. No serious adverse events were noted during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data suggest that a combination of NBUVB phototherapy with topical tacrolimus is a highly effective and promising therapeutic option for vitiligo in children, whose treatment options are very limited, but long-term studies are needed to evaluate the future risk of malignancy.

Comparison of the efficacy of 308-nm excimer lamp monotherapy with topical tacrolimus or clobetasol 17-propionate combination therapies in localized vitiligo

BACKGROUND

In recent years, excimer light treatments have come to the fore in localized vitiligo because of their high efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 308-nm excimer lamp as a monotherapy and its combination with tacrolimus 0.1% or clobetasol 17-propionate 0.05% ointment in localized vitiligo.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including a total of 82 patients who were treated with excimer lamp monotherapy (EL group) (n = 30), excimer lamp + topical tacrolimus (EL + T group) (n = 29), or excimer lamp + topical clobetasol 17-propionate (EL + CS group) (n = 23). We used digital morphometric analysis for the evaluation of repigmentation.

RESULTS

Median healing rate after 24 sessions was significantly higher in EL + T group (69%) than EL (42.5%) and EL + CS (44%) groups (P = 0.008 and P = 0.032). There were not any patients with face lesions in EL + CS group, so when these patients were excluded, EL + T and EL + CS groups had higher healing rates than EL group (P = 0.037 and P = 0.043). It was confirmed that combination with tacrolimus was superior to clobetasol-17 propionate (P = 0.048) with multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

We noted that 308-nm excimer lamp therapy was efficacious; adding topical tacrolimus or topical clobetasol-17 propionate could increase response to treatment.

Systematic review on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) are widely used as an alternative to topical corticosteroids (TCSs) in treating of atopic dermatitis, but their risk versus benefit compared with TCSs remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TCI compared with TCS and emollients.

METHODS

Published meta-analysis, systematic reviews, and individual studies from January 2005 to January 2015 on the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TCI against emollients and TCS were included.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus is comparable to TCS in efficacy, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness. Pimecrolimus has a similar safety profile compared with TCS, emollients, and tacrolimus. It is superior to emollients but inferior to TCS and tacrolimus in efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The association of tacrolimus with malignancy remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to TCS, but its benefits need to be weighed against its still uncertain risk for malignancy. Pimecrolimus is appropriate for mild atopic dermatitis when TCS or tacrolimus is unsuitable.

The efficacy of 308-nm excimer laser/light (EL) and topical agent combination therapy versus EL monotherapy for vitiligo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

BACKGROUND

Combination therapies of excimer laser/light (EL) and various topical agents are widely used in the treatment of vitiligo.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy of EL and topical agent combination therapy versus EL monotherapy for vitiligo.

METHODS

Manual searches of reference lists and computerized searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (from inception through December 15, 2014) were conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of EL alone or in combination with topical agents for vitiligo. The primary outcome was treatment success (≥75% repigmentation), and the secondary outcome was treatment failure (<25% repigmentation); meta-analyses were performed when possible.

RESULTS

We analyzed 8 randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 425 patches/patients. The combination of EL and topical calcineurin inhibitors (4 studies: relative risk 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.91; number needed to treat 4.5, 95% confidence interval 2.9-10) was superior to EL monotherapy for vitiligo. There was insufficient evidence to support beneficial effects of topical vitamin-D3 analogs (3 studies) and corticosteroids (1 study).

LIMITATIONS

These findings are based on small numbers of randomized controlled trials and heterogeneities among included studies are another limitation.

CONCLUSION

Topical calcineurin inhibitors in conjunction with EL are more effective compared with EL monotherapy.

Topical tacrolimus for atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) (or atopic eczema) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects children and adults and has an important impact on quality of life. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are the first-line therapy for this condition; however, they can be associated with significant adverse effects when used chronically. Tacrolimus ointment (in its 2 manufactured strengths of 0.1% and 0.03%) might be an alternative treatment. Tacrolimus, together with pimecrolimus, are drugs called topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus for moderate and severe atopic dermatitis compared with other active treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to 3 June 2015: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2015), MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974), LILACS (from 1982), and the Global Resource of Eczema Trials (GREAT database). We searched six trials registers and checked the bibliographies of included studies for further references to relevant trials. We contacted specialists in the field for unpublished data.A separate search for adverse effects of topical tacrolimus was undertaken in MEDLINE and EMBASE on 30 July 2013. We also scrutinised the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) websites for adverse effects information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (both children and adults) using topical tacrolimus at any dose, course duration, and follow-up time compared with other active treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened and examined the full text of selected studies for compliance with eligibility criteria, risk of bias, and data extraction. Our three prespecified primary outcomes were physician's assessment, participant's self-assessment of improvement, and adverse effects. Our secondary outcomes included assessment of improvement of the disease by validated or objective measures, such as SCORAD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis), the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index), and BSA (Body Surface Area) scores.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 studies, with 5885 participants. The variability of drug doses, outcomes, and follow-up periods made it difficult to carry out meta-analyses.A single trial showed that tacrolimus 0.1% was better than low-potency TCS by the physician's assessment (risk ratio (RR) 3.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.14 to 4.45, 1 study, n = 371, moderate-quality evidence). It was also marginally better than low-potency TCS on face and neck areas and moderate-potency TCS on the trunk and extremities by the physician's assessment (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.49, 1 study, n = 972, moderate level of evidence) and for some of the secondary outcomes. Compared with pimecrolimus 1%, people treated with tacrolimus were almost twice as likely to improve by the physician's assessment (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.42, 2 studies, n = 506, moderate quality of evidence). Compared with the lower concentration of 0.03%, the tacrolimus 0.1% formulation reduced the risk of not having an improvement by 18% as evaluated by the physician's assessment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, 6 studies, n = 1640, high-quality evidence). Tacrolimus 0.1% compared with moderate-to-potent TCS showed no difference by the physician's assessment, and 2 secondary outcomes (1 study, 377 participants) and a marginal benefit favouring tacrolimus 0.1% was found by the participant's assessment (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.29, 1 study, n = 974, low quality of evidence) and SCORAD.Based on data from 2 trials, tacrolimus 0.03% was superior to mild TCS for the physician's assessment (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.96 to 3.38, 2 studies, n = 790, moderate-quality evidence) and the participant's self-assessment (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.90, 1 study, n = 416, moderate quality of evidence). One trial showed moderate benefit of tacrolimus 0.03% compared with pimecrolimus 1% on the physician's assessment (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.98, 1 study, n = 139, low-quality evidence), but the effects were equivocal when evaluating BSA. In the comparison of tacrolimus 0.03% with moderate-to-potent corticosteroids, no difference was found in most of the outcomes measured (including physician's and participant's assessment and also for the secondary outcomes), but in two studies, a marginal benefit favouring the corticosteroid group was found for the EASI and BSA scores.Burning was more frequent in those using calcineurin inhibitors than those using corticosteroid tacrolimus 0.03% (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.96 to 3.14, 5 studies, 1883 participants, high-quality evidence), but no difference was found for skin infections. Symptoms observed were mild and transient. The comparison between the two calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus and tacrolimus) showed the same overall incidence of adverse events, but with a small difference in the frequency of local effects.Serious adverse events were rare; occurred in both the tacrolimus and corticosteroid groups; and in most cases, were considered to be unrelated to the treatment. No cases of lymphoma were noted in the included studies nor in the non-comparative studies. Cases were only noted in spontaneous reports, cohorts, and case-control studies. Systemic absorption was rarely detectable, only in low levels, and this decreased with time. Exception is made for diseases with severe barrier defects, such as Netherton's syndrome, lamellar ichthyosis, and a few others, with case reports of a higher absorption. We evaluated clinical trials; case reports; and in vivo, in vitro, and animal studies; and didn't find any evidence that topical tacrolimus could cause skin atrophy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus 0.1% was better than low-potency corticosteroids, pimecrolimus 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03%. Results were equivocal when comparing both dose formulations to moderate-to-potent corticosteroids. Tacrolimus 0.03% was superior to mild corticosteroids and pimecrolimus. Both tacrolimus formulations seemed to be safe, and no evidence was found to support the possible increased risk of malignancies or skin atrophy with their use. The reliability and strength of the evidence was limited by the lack of data; thus, findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. We did not evaluate costs.

The consequences of UV-induced immunosuppression for human health

Exposure to UV radiation can cause suppression of specific immune responses. The pathways leading to the down-regulation are complex, starting from the absorption of UV photons by chromophores in the skin and ending with local and systemic changes in immune mediators, the generation of T and B regulatory cells and inhibition of effector and memory T cell activation. The consequences for human health are thought to be both beneficial and adverse. The former are illustrated by protection against polymorphic light eruption, and possible protection against T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases and asthma. The latter are illustrated by skin cancer, cutaneous lupus erythematosus and infectious diseases including vaccination. Many outstanding questions remain in this rapidly developing and controversial area, not least what advice to give the general public regarding their sun exposure. While considerable advances have been made in the development of strategies that preserve the health benefits of sunlight exposure and decrease its detrimental effects, further research is required before optimal levels of protection are achieved.

Evaluation of cancer risk related to atopic dermatitis and use of topical calcineurin inhibitors

Cases of lymphoma or cutaneous cancer have been observed following use of topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs), but it is unclear whether TCI use increases cancer risk. We used published literature to assess the extent to which atopic dermatitis (AD) or TCI use is associated with lymphoma, melanoma, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We searched the literature and summarized the results of all studies that provided data on the absolute or relative frequency of any malignancy among patients with AD or eczema or among patients using TCIs. The relative risk for all lymphoma in broad populations of AD or eczema ranged from 0·7 to 1·8. Available data on lymphoma following TCI use were inconsistent and insufficient to draw a conclusion about the causal role of TCIs. We found no evidence indicating that melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer is associated with TCI use. A bias analysis showed that cutaneous T-cell lymphomas initially misdiagnosed and treated as AD would lead to overestimation of the association between TCI use and lymphoma. However, there are only sparse data on specific malignancies among TCI-treated patients. The short duration of typical TCI exposure hinders conclusions about longer exposure. There is insufficient evidence in the epidemiological literature to infer whether TCIs do or do not cause malignancy.

Photocarcinogenicity of selected topically applied dermatological drugs: calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and vitamin D analogs

Topical therapies constitute the mainstay of dermatological treatments for skin disorders, such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, psoriasis, or acne. Since some of these diseases are often chronic, treatment duration may last for years and may even last the patient's entire lifetime. Obviously, such long-term therapy may raise safety concerns, which also include the potential photocarcinogenic effect. Most patients are exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) during leisure, work, vacations, or in tanning beds. Additionally, the patients may receive UVR via UVB phototherapy or psoralens plus UVA radiation (PUVA). The use of immunosuppressant's, such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, has markedly increased. Patients with skin diseases have benefited from both systemic and topical treatment of both new and established drugs. The issue of a black box warning by the US Food and Drug Administration has increased concerns about photocarcinogenesis, which raises the question: "Are these drugs safe?" This review focuses on the mechanism of action and photocarcinogenic potential of commonly used topical treatments, such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and vitamin D analogs.

The efficacy of pimecrolimus 1% cream plus narrow-band ultraviolet B in the treatment of vitiligo: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Recently, narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and topical immunomodulators have been successfully used in the treatment of vitiligo.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the combination of pimecrolimus with NB-UVB accelerates the response time and/or improves the degree of response in patients with vitiligo.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with vitiligo enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The patients were randomized into two groups and treated with NB-UVB plus either pimecrolimus or placebo for 3 months. Tri-weekly radiation was started at 280 mJ/cm(2), with 15% increments for each subsequent treatment until erythema was reported or a maximum of 800 mJ/cm was achieved. At baseline and 6 and 12 weeks after commencement of therapy, vitiliginous patches were measured.

RESULTS

Fifty patients completed the 3-month study. No significant side effects except self-limited erythema and pruritus were observed. After 12 weeks of treatment, repigmentation of the facial lesions was higher in patients treated with combined pimecrolimus and NB-UVB compared with the placebo plus NB-UVB group (64.3 vs 25.1%) (p < 0.05%). There was no statistically significant difference in the repigmentation rate between the two groups on other body areas.

CONCLUSION

On the face, NB-UVB works better if combined with pimecrolimus 1% cream rather than used alone.

Topical tacrolimus has a limited direct effect on ultraviolet B-irradiated keratinocytes: implications for its photocarcinogenic potential

BACKGROUND

Topical tacrolimus has shown remarkable clinical efficacy in treating many dermatoses. Combining ultraviolet (UV) B and tacrolimus is an intriguing therapeutic regimen, especially for treatment of vitiligo, for which combination therapy may show greater clinical efficacy than topical tacrolimus alone. The photocarcinogenic potential of such a regimen is unclear, and conflicting results have been reported by different investigators.

AIM

To clarify this important clinical issue, we investigated the effects of tacrolimus on UVB-irradiated cultured keratinocytes in terms of apoptosis, differentiation, cell-cycle regulation and DNA damage.

METHODS

Cultured keratinocytes were treated with tacrolimus before and after UVB irradiation and the various cellular physiological changes were evaluated using trypan blue exclusion, terminal dUTP nick-end labelling, flow cytometry and Western blotting analyses.

RESULTS

Our results showed that treatment of tacrolimus before or after UVB irradiation had no significant effects on cultured keratinocytes in terms of cell apoptosis, transglutaminase-1, involucrin expression, cell-cycle progression and phospho-H(2)AX compared with UVB irradiation alone.

CONCLUSION

The direct effect of tacrolimus on UVB-irradiated keratinocytes is small, suggesting that clinical regimens combining UVB and tacrolimus also have a limited direct effect on healthy skin compared with UVB irradiation alone.

Role of topical calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis: a review of pathophysiology, safety, and efficacy

Seborrheic dermatitis (SD) is characterized by erythematous pruritic patches and plaques with greasy scale that occur in sebaceous areas. It is common, affecting up to 3% of the population. Past treatments have relied on a wide variety of anti-inflammatory and antifungal agents, but corticosteroids have limited use because of long-term adverse effects. Topical calcineurin inhibitors provide a safe alternative for the treatment of SD, as these drugs block the inflammatory cascade involved in the disease process and pose no risk of skin atrophy. Studies of topical pimecrolimus and tacrolimus in the treatment of SD have found that improvement occurred within 2 weeks, and if SD recurred after stopping treatment, it was significantly less severe. There have been no studies of the comparative efficacy of pimecrolimus versus tacrolimus for the treatment of SD. Common adverse effects of mild burning and irritation have been associated with the use of both of these agents. Safety profile studies are limited to studies of atopic dermatitis, which show no increase in infection rate, photocarcinogenicity, or signs of immunosuppression in patients using topical calcineurin inhibitors for long-term treatment. This article reviews the clinical trials of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus in the treatment of SD, focusing on efficacy and safety.

Topical tacrolimus in combination with simulated solar radiation does not enhance photocarcinogenesis in hairless mice

Numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of topical tacrolimus ointment in atopic dermatitis. However, there is a concern that local immunosuppression by calcineurin inhibitors may enhance dermal photocarcinogenesis and carcinogenesis. Therefore, we investigated the influence of topical tacrolimus ointment on squamous cell carcinoma formation in hairless female C3.Cg/TifBomTac immunocompetent mice exposed to solar simulated radiation (SSR). In a first experiment, mice (n = 200) had tacrolimus applied on their dorsal skin three times weekly followed by SSR (2, 4 or 6 standard erythema doses, SED) 3-4 h later. Tacrolimus did not reduce the time to tumor development and in the group receiving 4 SED it even had a protective effect (156 days vs 170 days, P = 0.008). In a second experiment, mice (n = 50) were irradiated with 6 SED three times weekly for 3 months and subsequently treated five times weekly with topical tacrolimus to mimic the use of tacrolimus on sun-damaged skin. The median time to the first skin tumor was 234 days in SSR + tacrolimus group compared with 227 days in the only SSR-irradiated group (P = 0.160). In a third experiment, mice (n = 25) had tacrolimus applied on their dorsal skin every day for 1 month, thereafter the group was irradiated with 4 SED three times weekly. The median time to the first skin tumor was 142 days in tacrolimus + SSR group compared with 156 days in the only SSR-irradiated group from experiment 1 (P = 0.363). We conclude that tacrolimus ointment does not accelerate photocarcinogenesis or induce any dermal carcinogenicity in hairless mice.

Tacrolimus ointment neither blocks ultraviolet B nor affects expression of thymine dimers and p53 in human skin

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data with regard to the interaction between ultraviolet (UV) radiation and topical calcineurin inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate (1) the UV transmission through tacrolimus ointment and (2) the impact of topical exposure to tacrolimus on the protein expression of thymine dimers (TD) and p53 in human skin.

METHODS

Spectrophotometric measurements (290-400 nm) of tacrolimus ointment and the vehicle were performed. Eight subjects were treated with tacrolimus ointment and the vehicle thrice daily over a 3-day period on the back. Pre-treated sites and one control site were exposed to two minimal erythema doses UVB. Skin biopsies were taken 1h and 24h after irradiation. Immunohistochemical procedures were used for the detection of TD and p53.

RESULTS

Mean UV transmission was over 94% and did not significantly differ between tacrolimus ointment and the vehicle. Immunohistological examinations of TD and p53 expression did not demonstrate significant differences between irradiated sites, irradiated plus vehicle treated sites, and irradiated plus tacrolimus treated sites both 1h and 24h post-irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that tacrolimus ointment hardly has UV blocking capacities and does not significantly interfere with development and/or removal of local DNA damage in human skin.

Topical calcineurin inhibitors in pediatric atopic dermatitis: a critical analysis of current issues

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common disease in children. Despite good skin care and trigger avoidance, many children with AD require pharmacologic treatment to manage their disease. In recent years, topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) have been used as an alternative to topical corticosteroids to treat some children with AD. However, revisions to the US labeling for TCIs (i.e. a boxed warning and a medication guide) have generated concern among pediatricians regarding TCI safety and raised questions about the appropriate use of TCIs in the pediatric population. Data from several well designed studies support the efficacy of TCIs in the treatment of AD. Safety concerns arise from a small number of reported malignancies, animal toxicology studies, and the potential adverse effects (including immunosuppression and risk of lymphoma) observed in patients who received systemically administered calcineurin inhibitors for suppression of solid-organ transplant rejection. Several factors indicate that these effects do not occur with topical administration: (i) systemic levels following topical administration are at least 10-fold lower than with oral administration; (ii) the small number of lymphomas reported to date in persons exposed to TCI use are not consistent with the types seen in transplant patients or other immunosuppressed patients; and (iii) no adverse effects on the immune system (as assessed by measures including vaccination response and skin delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction) have been observed in clinical trials of TCIs in children with AD. Overall, TCIs have an established safety and efficacy profile as long-term maintenance therapy in children with AD.

Narrow-band UVB phototherapy combined with tacrolimus ointment in vitiligo: a review of 110 patients

BACKGROUND

Narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy and topical tacrolimus are included among the most innovative approaches to vitiligo.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of combined treatment with NB-UVB and topical tacrolimus in vitiligo.

METHODS

After informed consent, adult patients with chronic (> 1-year duration) stable vitiligo refractory to conventional treatments were enrolled in an open-labelled prospective study. Treatment regimen consists of once-daily application, in the evening, of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment to the lesions of the face, or tacrolimus 0.1% ointment to the vitiligous patches located on other areas. Concomitant NB-UVB phototherapy was performed twice weekly for 16 weeks.

RESULTS

Study population included 110 patients (mean age, 42) with a total of 403 lesions. Within the treatment period, variable repigmentation was evident on more than 70% of lesions. Clinical response (repigmentation more than 50%) was observed in 42% of lesions. Response was strictly dependent on the site, being more frequent for face lesions (73%), followed by limbs (68%) and trunk (53.5%). The therapeutic effect on the extremities and genital areas was quite disappointing. Treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data suggest that the combination of topical tacrolimus with NB-UVB phototherapy can represent an alternative highly effective approach to refractory vitiligo located on the face, trunk and limbs. Long-term safety data and randomized controlled trials on a large number of patients are required.

The safety of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a review

Tacrolimus ointment is a topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) that was developed specifically for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). It is one of the most extensively tested dermatological products, with more than 19 000 patients (including approximately 7600 children) having participated in the tacrolimus ointment clinical development programme. Recent regulatory reviews have focused on the potential risk of malignancy with TCIs, based on their mode of action and the effects of systemic tacrolimus when given to transplant recipients. Studies have shown, however, that the systemic absorption of tacrolimus when applied topically is very low, with blood concentrations being below the level of quantification in most patients. Moreover, TCIs are not associated with a decrease in immunocompetence in the skin and there is no increase in the incidence of infections with long-term treatment. More than 5.4 million prescriptions for tacrolimus ointment have been issued worldwide, with no evidence of an increased risk of malignancy in adults or children compared with the general population. Similarly, epidemiological studies have failed to demonstrate an increased incidence of skin cancer in patients using TCIs. The most common adverse events (AEs) that occur with tacrolimus ointment treatment are transient application-site reactions, such as burning or pruritus. These complications are related to disease severity, and decrease in frequency over time as AD improves. The incidence of nonapplication-site AEs does not increase with long-term treatment, and most such events occurring in clinical trials were considered to be unrelated to therapy. Although it is important that clinicians are aware of the recent changes in product labelling, extensive clinical trials continue to show that tacrolimus ointment is well tolerated, and is generally an effective therapy for suitable patients with AD.

Lack of Association between Exposure to Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors and Skin Cancer in Adults

BACKGROUND

Two topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) are available for the treatment of atopic dermatitis and there has been concern that their use could be associated with an increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine if TCI exposure is associated with an increased risk of NMSC in adults.

METHODS

A case-control study using a questionnaire mailed to 5,000 adults with dermatitis.

RESULTS

We received responses from 70.7% of those surveyed by mail. Overall, 25.7% reported exposure to TCI. TCI exposure was 14.4% for the cases and 30.7% for the controls. Our primary analysis was a comparison between those with NMSC and those without. The unadjusted odds ratio was 0.38 (0.31-0.47) and the adjusted (age, gender, previous NMSC, history of atopic dermatitis) was 0.54 (0.41-0.69). The odds ratio of association for NMSC decreased as the number of tubes used and the potency of the agent increased.

CONCLUSION

This early study shows that TCI use is not associated with an increased risk of NMSC in adults.

Cancer concerns with topical immunomodulators in atopic dermatitis: overview of data and recommendations to clinicians

The topical immunomodulators tacrolimus and pimecrolimus were approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in 2000 and 2001, respectively. However, on 20 January 2006, the US FDA approved a 'black box' warning for these agents because of concerns regarding a possible link to development of malignancy. These concerns were based upon the known mechanism of action of this drug class, the results of animal studies, and case reports. This article provides an overview of the data that led to the approval by the FDA of a 'black box' warning and concludes that physicians, patients, and caregivers should feel confident about using tacrolimus and pimecrolimus for atopic dermatitis so long as they follow the FDA guidelines.

Safety of topical calcineurin inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: evaluation of the evidence

Topical calcineurin inhibitors (pimecrolimus, Elidel, East Hanover, NJ; and tacrolimus, Protopic, Tokyo, Japan) have been approved for the use in atopic dermatitis since the year 2000. These compounds represent a relatively safe class of topical anti-inflammatory, nonsteroidal therapy. However, in January of 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning on these compounds about possible concerns of increased long-term malignancy risk due to systemic immunosuppression. To date, studies from clinical trials, systemic absorption, and post-marketing surveillance show no evidence for this systemic immunosuppression or increased risk for any malignancy.

Topical pimecrolimus for skin disease other than atopic dermatitis

Pimecrolimus is an ascomycin macrolactam. It is a specific calcineurin inhibitor that allows topical application. The highly lipophilic nature of this compound reduces the risk of systemic absorption through normal and inflammed skin. Pimecrolimus shows activity not only against T-cell activation, but also against mast cells and pruritus. Pimecrolimus 1% cream is approved for atopic dermatitis, and also has a great potential in other inflammatory skin diseases. Clinical trials have been performed in contact- and seborrhoeic dermatitis, genital lichen sclerosus, intertriginous psoriasis and cutaneous lupus erythematosus. In other diseases, the available data are limited to small case series, or individual cases of graft-versus-host disease or Netherton's disease. Although the use of calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of vitiligo is promising, detailed studies with pimecrolimus and ultraviolet-irradiation are necessary and there is a need for prospective randomised, double-blind controlled trials.

Production and clearance of cyclobutane dipyrimidine dimers in UV-irradiated skin pretreated with 1% pimecrolimus or 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide creams in normal and atopic patients

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet (UV)-induced pyrimidine dimers are an early step in skin carcinogenesis, which is accelerated in the setting of long-term immunosuppression with systemic calcineurin inhibitors. It is not known whether topical application of calcineurin inhibitors exposes to a similar risk.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the formation and clearance of UV-induced dipyrimidine dimers in human epidermis treated with topical pimecrolimus as compared to topical steroid, vehicle and untreated control.

METHODS

Pretreated buttock skin of 20 human volunteers with (10) or without (10) atopic dermatitis was exposed to two minimal erythema doses (MED) of simulated solar radiation. DNA was extracted from epidermis 1 and 24 h postirradiation. Pyrimidine dimers were visualized by immuno slot blots and quantified by chemoluminescence image analysis.

RESULTS

One-hour postirradiation, pimecrolimus-treated epidermis contains less DNA damage as compared to untreated control, but there were no statistically significant differences between pimecrolimus, triamcinolone acetonide and vehicle. Dimer levels at 24 h postirradiation showed no significant differences between different treatments.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pimecrolimus cream, triamcinolone acetonide cream and vehicle is not associated with increased epidermal DNA damage at 1 and 24 h post-UV exposure.

Successful Treatment of Nodular Actinic Reticuloid with Tacrolimus Ointment

Actinic reticuloid (AR) is the severest clinical variant of chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) and describes a persistent photoinduced skin disorder often associated with delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Histopathologically, AR resembles pseudolymphoma and may also show features of cutaneous lymphoma. In contrast to other UV-induced skin diseases, AR patients show persistent photosensitivity to UV radiation and visible light parallel to permanent changes of skin texture with infiltrated papules and thickened plaques. Therapeutically, CAD is a problematic condition. Daily application of sun protection has to be combined with local or systemic immunosuppression. However, various therapeutic approaches including systemic corticosteroids and other systemic immunosuppressive agents are limited by severe side effects. Tacrolimus, a Streptomyces-derived immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotic and inhibitor of calcineurin, has been proven successful in various inflammatory skin diseases including atopic eczema, allergic contact dermatitis and photodermatoses without undesired side effects. We present a case of severe recalcitrant and nodular chronic actinic dermatitis responding to topically applied tacrolimus (Protopic). To avoid further relapses we continued this therapy twice a day over a period of 2 years.

Use of the 308-nm excimer laser for psoriasis and vitiligo

The 308-nm excimer laser represents the latest advance in the concept of selective phototherapy. It emits a wavelength in the UV-B spectrum and thus shares the same indications as conventional phototherapy. Like other laser devices, the 308-nm excimer laser emits a monochromatic and coherent beam of light, can selectively treat a lesion while sparing surrounding healthy skin, and can deliver high fluencies. Clinicians have taken advantage of these properties to treat dermatologic disorders since 1997, with psoriasis and vitiligo attracting most attention. Initially, high fluencies (minimal erythemal dose, 8-16) were used, with excellent clinical results, to treat psoriasis vulgaris. The significance of side effects and the potential long-term carcinogenic risk associated with such fluencies have resulted in medium doses (about 3 minimal erythemal dose) being recommended, however. Interestingly, taking advantage of the selectivity of the laser, newer treatment protocols adapt the dose to the lesion and not to the minimal erythemal dose, as is the case for conventional phototherapies. Many prospective study series have also shown the efficacy and the good tolerance of the 308-nm excimer laser in the treatment of localized vitiligo. Induced rates of repigmentation seem to be higher than with narrowband UV-B. Moreover, the selectivity of the treatment prevents irradiation of healthy skin and limits unsightly tanning of surrounding skin. Aesthetically pleasing results are usually not achieved in extremities and bony prominences, which are not good indications for this technique. Combining the 308-nm excimer laser with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment has provided very interesting results, which need to be confirmed in larger series. The absence of actual data concerning the long-term risk for skin cancer after this treatment means that it should be considered with caution. Combination with topical steroids appears to be synergistic and potentially reduces long-term side effects; again, prospective data are lacking.