Sirolimus-Induced Acneiform Eruption

Acneiform Eruptions Possibly Triggered by Clarithromycin During Sirolimus Treatment

Acneiform eruption is the recognized dermatological side effect of sirolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, although the pathophysiological mechanisms and dose dependency of this side effect remain unclear. This case report describes a case of a 40-year-old Japanese woman treated with systemic sirolimus who developed acneiform eruptions following the administration of clarithromycin. The acneiform eruption resolved after discontinuation of sirolimus and relapsed with the resumption. Since sirolimus and clarithromycin have a potential drug-drug interaction mediated by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), this case suggests that the acneiform eruption developed in association with elevated blood levels of sirolimus. We conclude that clinicians should be aware of the possibility of developing acneiform eruption during sirolimus treatment, especially when administered with medications that inhibit CYP3A.

Review and Management of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients with Immune Disorders

Immune disorders are associated with acne or acneiform lesions secondary to the occurrence of acne vulgaris or acneiform eruptions arising as a result of immunosuppressive medication or infection. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of acne and acneiform eruptions that can arise in the immunosuppressed host. Tips for differentiating between various acneiform entities are discussed, as well as a brief overview of treatment considerations.

Drug-induced skin reactions: a pathologist viewpoint

Cutaneous drug reactions are common adverse effects that occur in about 2-3% of the hospitalized patients. They have both immunologic and non-immunologic underlying mechanisms. These reactions are clinically and histologically similar to dermatoses. Their significant clinical indicators include: history of drug intake, atypical clinical features and improvement after cessation of the offending drugs. Their diagnostic histological clues include the presence of mixed histological patterns, apoptotic keratinocytes, eosinophils (dermis and epidermis), papillary dermal edema and extravasations of erythrocytes. However, no single clinical or histological feature is specific of drug eruptions. This work attempts to classify the histomorphologic reactions to various drugs in defined categories for assistance in morphologic diagnosis.

A review of cutaneous drug eruptions

Cutaneous drug eruptions can range from an asymptomatic rash to a life-threatening emergency. Because of the high frequency, morbidity, and potential mortality associated with drug eruptions, patients with possible drug reactions should promptly be recognized, worked up, and treated. Drug reactions are common in the elderly population due to age-related alterations in metabolism, excretion of medications, and polypharmacy. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of drug eruptions that providers commonly encounter in the care of the geriatric population. An algorithm for an approach to patients with a suspected drug eruption is presented.

Mucocutaneous disorders in renal transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy: a prospective, case-control study

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus (SRL) has some dermatologic complications including acneiform eruptions, edema, aphthous ulceration, and onychopathy. However, controlled studies reporting the prevalence and clinical characteristics of mucocutaneous disorders are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and clinical spectrum of mucocutaneous disorders in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) receiving SRL and to compare the findings with those in RTRs not receiving SRL.

METHODS

Fifty RTRs (35 men, 15 women; mean age, 34.6 ± 11.6 yr) receiving SRL, 50 RTRs (36 men, 14 women; mean age, 34.4 ± 11.3 yr) not on SRL were screened for mucocutaneous disorders.

RESULTS

In RTRs receiving SRL, skin infection (78%) was the most common dermatologic disorder followed by facial hyperpigmentation (50%) and acneiform eruption (46%). Herpes simplex virus infections (14%) and seborrheic dermatitis (38%) were significantly more common in RTRs on SRL (p < 0.05); the frequencies of edema, aphthous ulceration, acne, and longitudinal nail ridging were similar in both groups (p > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS

This study had a small sample size. The investigator was not blinded to immunosuppressive treatment protocols.

CONCLUSION

Renal transplant recipients receiving SRL are more likely to develop seborrheic dermatitis and herpes simplex virus infections than those not taking SRL. Whereas, they are not more prone to edema, aphthous ulceration, acne, or longitudinal nail ridging.

Nonneoplastic mucocutaneous lesions in organ transplant recipients

Nonneoplastic mucocutaneous lesions are frequent in organ transplant recipients. Many of them are caused by a direct toxicity of immunosuppressive drugs, in particular glucocorticoids and cyclosporine. The effects of these agents are dose- and time-dependent. Glucocorticoids can cause acne, Cushingoid appearance, irregular purpuric areas, friable skin, and wide and violaceous stripes. Cyclosporine can cause hypertrichosis, pilosebaceous lesions, and gum hypertrophy. Patients with esthetic changes may show poor adherence to treatment with these immunosuppressive agents that may lead to progressive graft dysfunction. Apart from this direct toxicity, vigorous immunosuppression may render the transplant recipients more susceptible to mucocutaneous infections. Fungal infection, viral warts, and bacterial folliculitis are the most frequent types of mucocutaneous infection. Some fungal infections, such as oral candidiasis and pityriasis versicolor, are relatively trivial, but other mycotic infections can cause severe or disfigurating lesions. Among viral infections, warts and condylomata caused by human papilloma virus are frequent and may favor the development of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Bacterial infections are usually trivial in the early period after transplantation, being represented almost exclusively by folliculitis. However, subcutaneous infections may cause a necrotizing fasciculitis which is a life-threatening disorder, usually sustained by polymicrobial pathogens.

Cutaneous reactions related to systemic immunomodulators and targeted therapeutics

The arrival of targeted therapeutics into the oncology clinic, while enthusiastically anticipated, introduced the oncologist to dermatologic events that can pose challenging management issues. The dermatologic effects of these targeted agents appear to be more frequent than those with cytotoxic therapy and are not uniform; that is, different agents have distinct dermatologic toxicities. Interestingly, dermatologic toxicity may correlate with antitumor activity with some of these targeted agents. The correlation of rash with response and survival in particular mandates the development of effective and appropriate management strategies. The nature and challenges of the dermatologic events observed to date with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs will be addressed in this review.

Coronary Stents, Hypersensitivity Reactions, and the Kounis Syndrome

The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) for the treatment of coronary stenosis has increased sharply and now accounts for more than 75% of all coronary stents utilized. However, concern has been increasing that DES could be associated with stent thrombosis, paradoxical coronary vasoconstriction, and hypersensitivity reactions. Components of currently used DES have been reported to induce, either separately or synergistically, hypersensitivity reactions and possibly lead to cardiac events. DES-activated intracoronary mast cells could release histamine, arachidonic acid metabolites, proteolytic enzymes, as well as a variety of cytokines, chemokines, and platelet-activating factor (PAF) leading to local inflammation and thrombosis. These events may be more common than suspected because it is hard to document them, unless they become systemic, in which case they manifest themselves as the "Kounis syndrome," characterized by the concurrence of acute coronary events with hypersensitivity reactions. Recognition of this problem may lead to better vigilance, as well as new DES with mast cell blocking molecules that may also be disease modifying.

Angioedema in Renal Transplant Recipients on Sirolimus

BACKGROUND

Most drug-associated angioedemas are induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recently, the responsibility of immunosuppressive agents given to transplant recipients in the development of angioedema has been discussed.

OBJECTIVE

To describe, in detail, angioedema episodes in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) on sirolimus.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study in a university hospital. Eighty consecutive RTRs on sirolimus were studied.

RESULTS

Angioedema without urticaria occurred a mean of 5 times in 12/80 (15%) RTRs taking sirolimus. It was predominantly located on the face (83%), with mucous membrane involvement in 7 (58%) patients, and was life threatening in 1. Another putative cofactor for angioedema without urticaria was identified in 9 (75%) patients: drugs (n=8), food allergy or physical activity (n=3). Tacrolimus intake was significantly associated with sirolimus-associated angioedema.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested a causal relationship between sirolimus and angioedema in RTRs.