Regional Citrate Anticoagulation during Hemodialysis

Deciphering simplified regional anticoagulation with citrate in intermittent hemodialysis: a clinical and computational study

Regional citrate anticoagulation use in intermittent hemodialysis is limited by the increased risk of metabolic complications due to faster solute exchanges than with continuous renal replacement therapies. Several simplifications have been proposed. The objective of this study was to validate a mathematical model of hemodialysis anticoagulated with citrate that was then used to evaluate different prescription scenarios on anticoagulant effectiveness (free calcium concentration in dialysis filter) and calcium balance. A study was conducted in hemodialyzed patients with a citrate infusion into the arterial line and a 1.25 mmol/L calcium dialysate. Calcium and citrate concentrations were measured upstream and downstream of the citrate infusion site and in the venous line. The values measured in the venous lines were compared with those predicted by the model using Bland and Altman diagrams. The model was then used with 22 patients to make simulations. The model can predict the concentration of free calcium, bound to citrate or albumin, accurately. Irrespective of the prescription scenario a decrease in free calcium below 0.4 mmol/L was obtained only in a fraction of the dialysis filter. A zero or slightly negative calcium balance was observed, and should be taken into account in case of prolonged use.

Can regional anticoagulation with calcium-free dialysate be extended to maintenance hemodialysis?

BACKGROUND

Regional anticoagulation in hemodialysis avoids the use of heparin, which is responsible for both hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic complications. Typically, blood is decalcified by injecting citrate into the arterial line of the extracorporeal circuit. Calcium-free dialysate improves anticoagulation efficacy but requires injection of a calcium-containing solution into the venous line and strict monitoring of blood calcium levels. Recent improvements have made regional anticoagulation with calcium-free dialysate safer and easier.

OBSERVATIONS

(1) Adjusting the calcium injection rate to ionic dialysance avoids the risk of dyscalcemia, thus making unnecessary the monitoring of blood calcium levels. This adjustment could be carried out automatically by the hemodialysis monitor. (2) As calcium-free dialysate reduces the amount of citrate required, this can be supplied by dialysate obtained from currently available concentrates containing citric acid. This avoids the need for citrate injection and the risk of citrate overload. (3) Calcium-free dialysate no longer needs the dialysate acidification required for avoiding calcium carbonate precipitation in bicarbonate-containing dialysate.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional anticoagulation with calcium-free dialysate enables an acid- and heparin-free procedure that is more biocompatible and environmentally friendly than conventional bicarbonate hemodialysis. The availability of specific acid-free concentrates and adapted hemodialysis monitors is required to extend this procedure to maintenance hemodialysis.

Calcium-Free Dialysate Hemodialysis: A Simplified Approach

Intermittent hemodialysis (HD) in high-bleeding-risk patients presents a challenge as circuit anticoagulation using heparin is contraindicated in such cases. Recently, the use of calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate with calcium supplementation emerged as a viable alternative to heparin-circuit anticoagulation. This is a retrospective, monocentric study to evaluate dialysis efficacy using calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate with calcium reinjection into the venous line in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding. A total of 53 patients were analyzed: 52 had a temporary contraindication to systemic anticoagulation (active bleeding or surgical intervention), and 1 chronic HD patient had prolonged bleeding time due to inoperable arteriovenous fistula stenosis. Only 7 out of 79 dialysis sessions performed were prematurely terminated (vascular access dysfunction). The median dialysis time was 240 min (range: 150-300). The chronic dialysis patient had 108 sessions with no premature termination. Frequent monitoring of ionized calcium was performed throughout the dialysis sessions: levels remained stable at T0 and T + 60 min (1.08 ± 0.08 mmol/L) and slightly increased at the end of the dialysis session (1.19 ± 0.13 mmol/L), remaining within normal limits. Target postfilter ionized calcium <0.4 mmol/L was achieved in all sessions (0.31 ± 0.07 mmol/L). There were no cases of symptomatic hypo-/hypercalcemia and no need for calcium infusion rate adjustment throughout the sessions. Hemodialysis with calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate and calcium reinjection into the venous line is efficient and safe in HD patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation.

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: A Tale of More Than Two Stories

Calcium is a key clotting factor, and several inorganic molecules that bind to calcium have been found to reduce the clotting propensity of blood. Citrate, a calcium chelator, is used as inhibitor of the coagulation cascade in blood transfusion. Also, it is used as an anaticoagulant during dialysis to maintain patency of the extracorporeal circuit, known as regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). The amount of citrate should be chosen such that ionized calcium concentrations in the extracorporeal circuit are reduced enough to minimize propagation of the coagulation cascade. The dialytic removal of the calcium-citrate complexes combined with reduced ionized calcium concentrations makes necessary calcium supplementation of the blood returning to the patient. This can be achieved in different ways. In classical RCA, citrate and calcium are infused in the afferent and efferent tubing, respectively, whereas the dialysate does not contain calcium. This setup has been shown to be highly efficacious with a very low clotting propensity. Strict monitoring of blood electrolytes is required. Alternatively, the use of a high-calcium dialysate leads to calcium loading, obviating the need for a separate calcium infusion pump. The main advantages are simplified delivery of RCA and less fluctuation of systemic calcium concentrations. Currently, citric acid is sometimes added to the acid concentrate as a replacement for acetic acid. Differences and similarities between RCA and citrate-containing dialysate are discussed. RCA is an excellent alternative to heparin for patients at high risk of bleeding.

Routine online assessment of dialysis dose: Ionic dialysance or UV-absorbance monitoring?

For three-weekly hemodialysis, a single-pool Kt/V target of at least 1.4 together with a minimal dialysis dose Kt at 45 L for men and 40 L for women per each session is currently recommended. Fully automatic online calculation of Kt and Kt/V from conductivity or UV-absorbance measurements in the dialysate is standardly implemented on some hemodialysis monitors and makes it possible to estimate the dialysis dose without the need for blood or dialysate samples. Monitoring the UV-absorbance of the spent dialysate is the most direct method for estimating Kt/V as it does not require an estimate of V. Calculation of ionic dialysance from conductivity measurements is the most direct method for estimating Kt and BSA-scaled dialysis dose. Both ionic dialysance monitoring and UV-absorbance monitoring may help detect a change in urea clearance occurring during the session, but this change must be interpreted differently depending on the monitoring being considered. An abrupt decrease in urea clearance results in a decrease in ionic dialysance but, paradoxically, a sudden increase in estimated urea clearance provided by dialysate UV-absorbance monitoring. Healthcare teams who monitor both ionic dialysance and UV-absorbance in their hemodialysis units must be clearly informed of this difficulty.

Regional Citrate Anticoagulation for Hemodialysis: Calcium-Free Vs. Calcium Containing Dialysate - A Randomized Trial

Background

The majority of citrate protocols for hemodialysis (HD) use calcium (Ca)-free dialysate, a limited number use dialysate with Ca, aiming to simplify the procedure. This randomized clinical study sought to compare the anticoagulant effect of citrate using Ca-free dialysate and dialysate with Ca 1.25 mmol/L.

Methods

Fifty HD procedures (in 5 chronic HD patients treated by chronic citrate anticoagulation) were randomly assigned to Ca-free dialysate (25 procedures) or Ca-1.25 dialysate (25 procedures), both with Mg 0.5 mmol/L, Na 138 mmol/L, and bicarbonate 28 mmol/L. Ca-free HD: 15% Na3 citrate 80 ml/hour was infused into the arterial line, and 1 M CaCl2, 14 ml/hour into the venous line. Ca-1.25 group: 15% Na3 citrate 100 ml/hour, 1 M CaCl2 2–4 ml/hour. Polyflux H dialyzers were used. Antithrombotic effect was assessed visually after HD at 3 points: dialyzer, arterial, and venous bubble traps, using a score of 5 (no clotting) to 1 (total clotting).

Results

Ca-free group: arterial bubble trap score 4.7 ± 0.5, dialyzer 4.5 ± 0.6, venous bubble trap 4.8 ± 0.6. Ionized calcium (iCa) at dialyzer inlet 0.34 ± 0.17, outlet 0.21 ± 0.06 mmol/L. All HDs were completed successfully. Ca-1.25 group: arterial bubble trap score 4.7 ± 0.5 (NS), dialyzer 2.6 ± 1.04 (p<0.01), venous bubble trap 2.4 ± 0.9 (p<0.01). Volume of clot in venous bubble trap was 1.9 ± 1.8 mL (range 0.5–6 mL). iCa at dialyzer inlet 0.24 ± 0.05 mmol/L (p<0.05), outlet 0.63 ± 0.11 mmol/L (p<0.01). Four of 25 HD procedures (16%) were prematurely terminated due to threatening dialyzer clotting, in 6/25 HD procedures (24%), the venous line was changed (p<0.01).

Conclusion

Citrate anticoagulation with Ca-1.25 dialysate resulted in significantly worse anticoagulation of dialyzer and venous bubble trap compared with Ca-free dialysate, despite higher citrate dose.

Heparin-Free Prolonged Intermittent Hemodialysis Using Calcium-Free Citrate Dialysate in Critically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVES

Critically ill patients who have a high risk of bleeding but require prolonged intermittent dialysis need a heparin-free easy-to-use alternative type of anticoagulation within the dialysis circuit. We assessed the safety and efficiency of heparin-free regional citrate anticoagulation of the dialysis circuit using a calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate, with calcium reinjected according to ionic dialysance.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Critical care units.

PATIENTS

Critically ill patients who required renal replacement therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 101 dialysis sessions were performed in 35 patients (mechanical ventilation n = 78; norepinephrine n = 13). Median duration of dialysis was 294 minutes (interquartile range, 240-300), and median ultrafiltration volume was 2.3 L (1-2.8). Urea and β2-microglobulin reduction rates were 64.5% ± 0.4% and 48% ± 0.13%, respectively. Postfilter ionized calcium was 0.35 ± 0.17 and 0.38 ± 0.14 mmol/L at 1 and 3 hours, respectively, within the extracorporeal circuit. A major clotting event that led to premature termination of the session occurred in only three of 101 sessions. In these three cases, major catheter dysfunction occurred before clotting within the circuit. Prefilter ionized calcium remained within narrow ranges (before/after change +0.07 ± 0.006 mmol/L), and total-to-ionized calcium ratio, a surrogate marker for citratemia, was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis anticoagulation with calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate and calcium reinjection according to ionic dialysance is an easy-to-use, efficient, and inexpensive form of heparin-free regional anticoagulation. It allows prolonged hemodialysis sessions in critically ill patients without the need to systemically monitor ionized calcium. Furthermore, sessions can be safely extended according to the hemodynamic tolerance to ensure an adequate dose of dialysis and a negative water balance, a major point in patients with severe acute kidney disease.

The role of ionized calcium and magnesium in regional citrate anticoagulation and its impact on inflammatory parameters

INTRODUCTION

Regional anticoagulation with citrate has been found to be superior to heparin in terms of biocompatibility, and numerous protocols for regional citrate anticoagulation have been published, while a consensus on the target concentration of ionized calcium (Ca2+) in the extracorporeal circuit has not been reached so far.

METHODS

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the impact of different citrate concentrations on coagulation as well as on complement activation and cytokine secretion and to investigate the impact of ionized magnesium (Mg2+) on these parameters.

RESULTS

We found that citrate effectively reduced coagulation, complement activation, and cytokine secretion in a dose-dependent manner and that a target Ca2+ concentration of 0.2-0.25 mM was required for efficient anticoagulation. Mg2+ triggered complement activation as well as interleukin (IL)-1β secretion in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated whole blood in a dose-dependent manner and independently of Ca2+. Additionally, it was found to reduce activated clotting time (ACT) in samples with low Ca2+ levels, but not at physiological Ca2+.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our data support the notion that regional citrate anticoagulation results in decreased release of inflammatory mediators in the extracorporeal circuit, requiring the depletion of both, Ca2+ and Mg2+.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Hemodialysis: Progress Toward an Optimal Approach

Appropriate anticoagulation for hemodialysis (HD) requires a subtle balance between under- and over-heparinization to prevent extracorporeal circuit (ECC) clotting and bleeding, respectively. We discuss five key issues relating to anticoagulation therapy for chronic HD in adults following a review of relevant literature published since 2002: (i) options for standardization of anticoagulation in HD settings. The major nephrology societies have issued low evidence level recommendations on this subject. Interventional studies have generally investigated novel low-molecular weight heparins and provided data on safety of dosing regimens that cannot readily be extrapolated to clinical practice; (ii) identification of clinical and biological parameters to aid individualization of anticoagulation treatment. We find that use of clinical and biological monitoring of anticoagulation during HD sessions is currently not clearly defined in routine clinical practice; (iii) role of ECC elements (dialysis membrane and blood lines), dialysis modalities, and blood flow in clotting development; (iv) options to reduce or suppress systemic heparinization during HD sessions. Alternative strategies have been investigated, especially when the routine mode of anticoagulation was not suitable in patients at high risk of bleeding or was contraindicated; (v) optimization of anticoagulation therapy for the individual patient. We conclude by proposing a standardized approach to deliver anticoagulation treatment for HD based on an individualized prescription prepared according to the patient's profile and needs.

Physiological monitoring and control in hemodialysis: state of the art and outlook

Medical devices for monitoring and feedback control of physiological parameters of the dialysis patient were introduced in the early 1990s. They have a wide range of applications, aiming at increasing the safety and ensuring the efficiency of the treatment, and at an improved restoration of physiological conditions, leading to an overall reduction in morbidity and mortality. Such devices include sensors for the measurement of temperature, optical parameters and sound speed in blood, and electrical characteristics of the human body, and other parameters. Essential for the development of these devices is a detailed understanding of the pathophysiological background of a therapeutical problem. There is still a large potential to introduce new devices for further therapy improvement and automation. Also, the size of the hemodialysis market appears attractive; however, a new product has to meet several specific requirements in order to also become commercially successful. This review describes the therapeutic and technical principles of several available devices, reports on concepts for possible future devices, and presents a short overview on the market environment.

A target-oriented algorithm for citrate-calcium anticoagulation in clinical practice

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Because of a high monitoring demand and an ensuing need for automation of regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), a new semi-automated target-oriented algorithm was developed. The aim of this study was the evaluation of its functionality and safety.

METHODS

Fourteen haemodialysis patients were treated 5 times consecutively with RCA. Samples were drawn pre- and post-infusion once per hour. Electrolytes, blood cell counts, acid-base and coagulation parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean ionized calcium (Ca(2+)) values pre-filter were 0.23 and 0.33 mmol/l in the 0.2 and 0.3 mmol/l target groups, respectively. Extraction ratios for citrate and total calcium through the dialysis filter were constant during the entire treatment (83 and 68%, respectively). Citrate accumulation was avoided.

CONCLUSION

The new algorithm enables safe and accurate RCA. By regulating Ca(2+) pre-filter using the target-oriented algorithm, the degree of anticoagulation may be easily controlled.

Citrate anticoagulation using ACD solution A during long-term haemodialysis

AIM

Haemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation in patients with contraindications for heparin is increasingly performed in the USA and Europe. Most published protocols use trisodium citrate, which is not readily available nor is it licensed in Australia. We established a protocol for citrate-anticoagulation in haemodialysis using acid citrate dextrose solution A (ACDA), which is approved for apheresis procedures in Australia. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of this protocol for routine use in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Systemic and post-filter blood ionized calcium, serum sodium and bicarbonate and dialyzer clotting score were analyzed prospectively in 14 patients undergoing 150 consecutive haemodialysis treatments with citrate anticoagulation using calcium-free dialysate. A simple algorithm allowed the attending nurse to adjust citrate infusion (to maintain post-filter ionized calcium at 0.2-0.3 mmol/L) and i.v. calcium substitution. Scheduled dialysis time was 4 h, and point-of-care monitoring of blood ionized calcium during dialysis was done at 0, 15, 60, 120 and 240 min.

RESULTS

ACDA infusion rates of 300 mL/h were used in the first 52 treatments, but resulted in high dialyzer clotting score and 6% of treatments were discontinued due to complete clotting. Thereafter, ACDA infusion rate was increased to 350 mL/h, with all 98 subsequent treatments completed successfully. Ionized calcium levels were stable during all procedures with post-dialysis serum sodium averaging 135 ± 3 mmol/L and bicarbonate 23.8 ± 2 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of citrate anticoagulation in the setting of a long-term haemodialysis unit is safe and efficient. Point-of-care measurements of ionized calcium levels are critical to safely and successfully perform citrate anticoagulation.

[Acetate-free hemodialysis: what does it mean?]

Substituting bicarbonate by acetate in dialysis fluids has been proposed for avoiding precipitation of calcium and magnesium carbonates. However, acetate hemodialysis has been abandoned because of deleterious effects of acetate. Conventional bicarbonate hemodialysis is not totally acetate-free, because 3 to 7 mEq/l of acetic acid are added to the dialysate. Acetate-free hemodialysis is possible with another acid (chlorhydric acid or citric acid) or without acid by using some techniques of low-efficiency hemodiafiltration, as acetate-free biofiltration, which avoids the deleterious effect of blood acidification into the dialyzer. In this paper, advantages and disadvantages of different techniques of acetate-free hemodialysis are discussed.