A Phase II Study of Infusional 5-Fluorouracil and Low-Dose Leucovorin with Docetaxel for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Efficacy and safety of high-dose vs low-dose leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The clinical benefits of a combination of leucovorin and fluorouracil have been established in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Due to a leucovorin shortage in 2008, many institutions revised their protocols to reduce the dose of leucovorin. After the shortage was resolved, some hospitals still maintained their modified protocols. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low- vs high-dose leucovorin in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

METHOD

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published before May 2019. The meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled effect sizes by using a random effect model. The primary outcomes were median survival time and tumour response rate. Secondary outcomes were haematological and nonhaematological toxicities.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials and four retrospective studies were reviewed. The pooled median survival time was similar between the two dose levels (standard mean difference -0.06, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.08). The pooled tumour response rate was comparatively higher in the high-dose leucovorin regimen (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.55-1.18). No statistically significant difference was found between the haematological and nonhaematological toxicities of the two groups. However, there were fewer diarrhoea events in the low-dose leucovorin regimen.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose leucovorin regimens seemed feasible approaches for colorectal cancer treatment when the shortage happened, because both regimens manifested comparable outcomes in survival time and tumour response rate.

Paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin combination chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (POFL) in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with the POFL regimen: paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m² as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² and leucovorin 400 mg/m² as an intravenous infusion over 2 hours on day 1, followed by 5-fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m² as an infusion over a 46-hour period on 3 consecutive days, in a 2-week cycle.

RESULTS

Twelve patients could not be evaluated for response because of the absence of any measurable lesions or early discontinuation of therapy, so responses were assessed in 126 patients. The overall objective response rate was 56.3% (95% CI, 47.5%-64.9%). The median time to progression was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.6 months), and the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 11.3-13.9 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia (50.7%), peripheral neurotoxicity (16.7%) and alopecia (27.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with POFL offers a new, active and safe approach to the treatment of recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

Docetaxel versus paclitaxel combined with 5-FU and leucovorin in advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of two phase II trials

PURPOSE

This is an ad hoc analysis of two phase II studies which compared the efficacy and safety of two taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who were untreated or had only received first-line chemotherapy, were treated with either paclitaxel (PFL; 175 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (DFL; 75 mg/m(2)) on day 1, followed by a bolus of LV (20 mg/m(2) days 1~3) and a 24-hour infusion of 5-FU (1,000 mg/m(2) days 1~3) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoint included survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients received DFL (first-line [n=38]; and second-line [n=28]) and 60 patients received PFL (first-line [n=37]; and second-line [n=23]). The ORRs were not significantly different between the 2 groups (DFL, 26%; PFL, 38%). With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the progression free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2~6.5 months) for DFL and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.3~5.5 months) for PFL (p=0.17). The overall survival was also comparable between the patients who received DFL and PFL (10.0 months [95% CI, 7.2~12.5 months] and 13.9 months [95% CI, 10.9~19.2 months], respectively; p=0.37). The most frequent grade 3~4 adverse event was neutropenia (DFL, 71%; PFL, 62%). DFL and PFL had different non-hematologic toxicities; specifically, grade >or=3 mucositis (5%) and diarrhea (3%) were common in DFL, while nausea/vomiting (15%) and peripheral neuropathy (5%) were common in PFL.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the two taxanes had similar efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, but different toxicity profiles. Prospective comparative studies are required to further clarify the role of taxanes in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Docetaxel versus paclitaxel combined with 5-FU and leucovorin in advanced gastric cancer: combined analysis of two phase II trials

PURPOSE

This is an ad hoc analysis of two phase II studies which compared the efficacy and safety of two taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in advanced gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who were untreated or had only received first-line chemotherapy, were treated with either paclitaxel (PFL; 175 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (DFL; 75 mg/m(2)) on day 1, followed by a bolus of LV (20 mg/m(2) days 1~3) and a 24-hour infusion of 5-FU (1,000 mg/m(2) days 1~3) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and the secondary endpoint included survival and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients received DFL (first-line [n=38]; and second-line [n=28]) and 60 patients received PFL (first-line [n=37]; and second-line [n=23]). The ORRs were not significantly different between the 2 groups (DFL, 26%; PFL, 38%). With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the progression free survival was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2~6.5 months) for DFL and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.3~5.5 months) for PFL (p=0.17). The overall survival was also comparable between the patients who received DFL and PFL (10.0 months [95% CI, 7.2~12.5 months] and 13.9 months [95% CI, 10.9~19.2 months], respectively; p=0.37). The most frequent grade 3~4 adverse event was neutropenia (DFL, 71%; PFL, 62%). DFL and PFL had different non-hematologic toxicities; specifically, grade >or=3 mucositis (5%) and diarrhea (3%) were common in DFL, while nausea/vomiting (15%) and peripheral neuropathy (5%) were common in PFL.

CONCLUSION

Thus, the two taxanes had similar efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, but different toxicity profiles. Prospective comparative studies are required to further clarify the role of taxanes in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) for tumor vasculogenesis in gastric cancer patients

It has been suggested that vasculogenesis by endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) as well as angiogenesis play an important role in the production of blood vessels in neoplasm. The present study was designed to isolate and characterize the EPC in gastric cancer patients as a tumor specific angiogenesis marker. The cells derived from CD34 positive PBMC presented with a cobblestone appearance at 28 days, revealing differentiation into endothelial cells. They were also positive to the LDL-uptake reaction, showing that they have biological endothelial cell functions. These cells demonstrated tube formation, showing their ability to participate in neovascularization. The cells derived from CD34 positive PBMC expressed CD133 and demonstrated telomerase activity, showing the stem cell character. In xenograft model, EPC derived from CD34 positive PBMC mobilized mainly into tumor area after being injected through tail vein. With isolation, ex vivo amplification and characterization of EPC from gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, endothelial progenitor cells may be used as a candidate prognostic and predictive biomarker for cancer.

Effect of timing of metastasis/disease recurrence and histologic differentiation on survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced gastric cancer have a median survival (MS) of <9 months. It is unclear whether the MS of patients who have advanced cancer at the time of diagnosis (synchronous, Group A) is different from that for patients who develop advanced cancer after curative surgery (metachronous, Group B). It was hypothesized that survival would be similar.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients treated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center who were in either Group A or Group B were reviewed. Survival of patients was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate hazards ratios that were adjusted for the effects of location of recurrence, histologic differentiation, patient sex and age, the location of the primary tumor, and timing of disease recurrence (Group A or Group B) on survival.

RESULTS

In all, 773 consecutive patients qualified for the analysis. The distribution of age, race, histologic differentiation, and primary tumor location was similar in both groups. The MS of Group A (n = 603 patients) and Group B (n = 170 patients) was the same (7.6 months). Similarly, the location of the primary tumor and patient sex were found to have no impact on survival. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors (World Health Organization grade 3 or 4) were found to have a shorter survival compared with those with well-differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors (grade 1 or 2; P = .004). Patients with distant metastases had a shorter survival (P = .01) than those with locoregional disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that MS is similarly poor in patients with advanced gastric cancer with synchronous metastasis (Group A) or those with metachronous metastasis/disease recurrence (Group B). Poor differentiation and anatomically distant site of metastasis were found to impact MS adversely.

A phase II study of paclitaxel combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin for advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel, infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (FLT regimen) in advanced gastric cancer. The primary end point was the time to progression (TTP).

METHODS

Patients with evaluable disease with or without measurable lesions received 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel on day 1 followed by 20 mg/m2 leucovorin and 24-h infusion of 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 (day 1-3) repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled. The median TTP and overall survival duration were 13 and 60 weeks, respectively. One-year survival rate was 53.3%. Of the 50 patients with measurable lesion, the overall response rate was 31.7%. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia (61.7%).

CONCLUSION

The FLT regimen showed an efficacy comparable to other regimens of cisplatin or anthracycline combinations with the advantage of remarkably low non-hematological toxicity. These data about the efficacy of this regimen need confirmation in a phase III trial.

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: across the years for a standard of care

Chemotherapy is of crucial importance in advanced gastric cancer patients, in order to obtain palliation of symptoms and improve survival. The most extensively studied drugs as single agents are 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitomycin C and etoposide. Newer chemotherapeutic agents include the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and S-1), oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Randomised trials comparing monotherapy with combination regimens have consistently shown increased response rates in favour of combination regimens, whereas only marginally improved survival rates were usually found. Several combination therapies have been developed and have been examined in Phase III trials. However, in most cases, they have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over the reference arm. There is no internationally accepted standard of care, and uncertainty remains regarding the choice of the optimal chemotherapy regimen. The objective of this article is to review the present literature available on major Phase II - III clinical trials, in which patients suffering from advanced gastric cancer were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Docetaxel in the treatment of gastric cancer

Docetaxel is part of the standard chemotherapy in breast, non-small cell lung cancer and androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer and has recently been approved for advanced gastric cancer. It demonstrated promising single-agent efficacy in gastric cancer and was therefore investigated in different combination regimens. The combination of docetaxel with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine, irinotecan or cisplatin demonstrated high efficacy. The triple combination of docetaxel/cisplatin and 5-FU (DCF) was investigated in randomized Phase II trials and a randomized Phase III study (TAX325). In TAX325, DCF demonstrated superiority in terms of time to tumor progression, response rate and survival against a cisplatin/5-FU combination. Docetaxel was therefore approved for advanced gastric cancer by the US FDA and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products and will evolve as an integral part of routine combination regimens against gastric cancer. This review will discuss and interpret the different Phase II and III trials of docetaxel in gastric cancer.

Outcome of gastric cancer patients after successful gastrectomy: influence of the type of recurrence and histology on survival

BACKGROUND

The effect of the location of disease recurrence after curative (R0) gastrectomy on patient survival has not been elucidated. The authors hypothesized that the location of recurrence would have a significant influence on survival.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients who received treatment for gastric cancer at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1985 and 1998 were reviewed. Patients who underwent R0 resection for gastric cancer and subsequently developed localized (anastomotic) recurrence (LR), lymph node (regional) recurrence (NR), or distant metastases (DM) were analyzed for overall survival (OS). All study factors were entered into a Cox proportional hazards model to provide multivariate hazard ratios. The model was adjusted for the effects of primary site of recurrence, histologic grade, patient age, and location of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

This retrospective analysis included 227 consecutive patients. The median survival of patients who developed NR (11 months) was similar to that of patients who developed LR (10 months), but both groups had significantly longer median survival compared with patients who developed DM (7 months; log-rank P = .03). Patients who had well differentiated or moderately differentiated tumors had a longer OS (11 months) than patients who had poorly differentiated tumors (8 months; log-rank P = .02). In this cohort, location of the primary cancer and age at recurrence had no significant impact on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this study suggested that, among patients who undergo R0 gastrectomy for gastric cancer, LR and NR versus DM should be considered a valid stratification factor for randomized trials based on significant differences in survival. Determining whether this stratification should apply to histologic differentiation will require further investigation in a larger multicenter cohort.