222 base pairs in NS5B region and the determination of hepatitis C virus genotype 6

Profile of the VERSANT HCV genotype 2.0 assay

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is divided into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes. HCV genotype studies reflect the viral transmission patterns as well as human migration routes. In a clinical setting, HCV genotype is a baseline predictor for the sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with peginterferon or some direct acting antivirals (DAAs). The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay has been globally used for HCV genotyping over a decade. Areas covered: The assay is based on reverse hybridization principle. It is evolved from its former versions, and the accuracy and successful genotyping/subtyping rate are substantially improved. It shows an accuracy of 99-100% for genotypes 1-6. It can also reliably identify subtypes 1a and 1b. However, the assay does not allow a high resolution for many other subtypes. Reasons for indeterminate or inaccurate genotyping/subtyping results are discussed. Expert commentary: Genotyping helps to find the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment regimen. The rapid development of anti-HCV treatment regimens, however, is greatly simplifying laboratory tests. In the near future, the need for HCV genotyping and frequent serial on-treatment HCV RNA tests will decrease along with the wide use of the more potent and pan-genotypic DAA regimens.

Performance comparison of the versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (LiPA) and the abbott realtime HCV genotype II assay for detecting hepatitis C virus genotype 6

The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (line probe assay [LiPA] 2.0), based on reverse hybridization, and the Abbott Realtime HCV genotype II assay (Realtime II), based on genotype-specific real-time PCR, have been widely used to analyze hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, their performances for detecting HCV genotype 6 infections have not been well studied. Here, we analyzed genotype 6 in 63 samples from the China HCV Genotyping Study that were originally identified as genotype 6 using the LiPA 2.0. The genotyping results were confirmed by nonstructural 5B (NS5B) or core sequence phylogenetic analysis. A total of 57 samples were confirmed to be genotype 6 (51 genotype 6a, 5 genotype 6n, and 1 genotype 6e). Four samples identified as a mixture of genotypes 6 and 4 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 3b. The remaining two samples classified as genotype 6 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 1b, which were intergenotypic recombinants and excluded from further comparison. In 57 genotype 6 samples detected using the Realtime II version 2.00 assay, 47 genotype 6a samples were identified as genotype 6, one 6e sample was misclassified as genotype 1, and four 6a and five 6n samples yielded indeterminate results. Nine nucleotide profiles in the 5' untranslated region affected the performances of both assays. Therefore, our analysis shows that both assays have limitations in identifying HCV genotype 6. The LiPA 2.0 cannot distinguish some 3b samples from genotype 6 samples. The Realtime II assay fails to identify some 6a and all non-6a subtypes, and it misclassifies genotype 6e as genotype 1.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6: virology, epidemiology, genetic variation and clinical implication

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a serious public health problem affecting 170 million carriers worldwide. It is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer and is the primary cause for liver transplantation worldwide. HCV genotype 6 (HCV-6) is restricted to South China, South-East Asia, and it is also occasionally found in migrant patients from endemic countries. HCV-6 has considerable genetic diversity with 23 subtypes (a to w). Although direct sequencing followed by phylogenetic analysis is the gold standard for HCV-6 genotyping and subtyping, there are also now rapid genotyping tests available such as the reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA II; Innogenetics, Zwijnaarde, Belgium). HCV-6 patients present with similar clinical manifestations as patients infected with other genotypes. Based on current evidence, the optimal treatment duration of HCV-6 with pegylated interferon/ribavirin should be 48 wk, although a shortened treatment duration of 24 wk could be sufficient in patients with low pretreatment viral load who achieve rapid virological response. In addition, the development of direct-acting antiviral agents is ongoing, and they give high response rate when combined with standard therapy. Herein, we review the epidemiology, classification, diagnosis and treatment as it pertain to HCV-6.

Sequencing assays for failed genotyping with the versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA), version 2.0

For optimal antiviral therapy, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype needs to be determined, as it remains a strong predictor of sustained viral response. In this study, we assessed the number of HCV genotyping results that could not be determined using the commercially available line probe assay (LiPA) (Versant hepatitis C virus genotype 2.0 assay) in a large international panel of samples from 9,874 HCV-positive patients. In-house sequencing assays targeting the 5' untranslated region (UTR), core region, NS3 region, and NS5B region of the HCV genome and phylogenetic analyses were used to resolve these LiPA failures. Among all cases, the genotypes of 51 samples (0.52%) could not be determined with the LiPA. These undetermined results were observed more frequently among samples from non-European regions (mainly the Arabian Peninsula). The use of sequencing assays coupled with phylogenetic analysis provided reliable genotype results for 86% of the LiPA failures, which exhibited higher rates of genotypes 4, 5, and 6 than did LiPA-resolved genotypes. As expected, the 5' UTR was not sufficiently variable for clear discrimination between genotypes 1 and 6, but it also resulted in errors in classification of some genotype 3 and 4 cases using well-known Web-based BLAST programs. This study demonstrates the low frequency of genotyping failures with the Versant hepatitis C virus genotype 2.0 assay (LiPA) and also underlines the need for a complex combination of sequences and phylogenetic analyses in order to genotype these particular HCV strains correctly.

Systematic review: epidemiology of hepatitis C genotype 6 and its management

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6 is common among patients from Southeast Asia and the surrounding regions, where HCV prevalence is also high. HCV genotype 6 has great genetic diversity and different response to antiviral therapy compared with the more commonly known genotype 1.

AIM

Our goal was to provide a systematic review of the current literature on the epidemiology, classification and treatment of HCV genotype 6.

METHODS

A search using PubMed for 'hepatitis C' AND 'genotype 6' produced a total of 47 articles, of which 33 articles were found to be relevant and included in this review. Additional articles were identified using the reference lists of these 33 primary articles.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HCV genotype 6 is estimated to be as high as 50% in some regions of Southeast Asia with demonstrated significance among intravenous drug users and thalassemia major patients. Although previous line probe assays may have misclassified HCV genotype 6 as genotype 1, newer line probe assays can more accurately and reliably determine HCV genotype. Patients infected with HCV genotype 6 respond better to interferon-based therapy compared with those infected with genotype 1, although patient baseline clinical characteristics and side effect profiles are similar between HCV genotype 6 and other HCV genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies should seek to clarify issues regarding early predictors for treatment response in patients with HCV genotype 6, and the impact of ethnic and genotypic factors to treatment response in HCV genotype 6 patients.

A shift in the hepatitis C virus genotype dominance in blood donor samples from Thailand

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be classified into six major genotypes. The HCV genotypes variability accounts for its geographical distribution, its responses to treatments and the clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of HCV genotypes among volunteer blood donors in Thailand. Samples from 135 anti-HCV positive blood donors were analyzed. HCV RNA and genotyping was carried out using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genotype-specific primer PCR for a portion of the core region. HCV RNA was detected in 109 samples (80.7%). Genotype analysis demonstrated four different genotypes. The most common was genotype 3a (36.7%), followed by genotype 6 (29.4%), 1a (19.3%), 1b (6.4%) and mixed infection (1.8%). Seven samples were untyped (6.4%) in the present study. In several previous reports, the prevalence found in Thailand was HCV genotypes 3, 1 and 6. The present results show an increasing importance of the genotype 6 in HCV infections. This study has also described for the first time in Thailand mixed infections of HCV genotypes.

Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C genotype 6a from patients with chronic hepatitis C from Hong Kong

There have been relatively few studies on HCV genotype 6 compared to hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. In Hong Kong, a city of about 7 million people, most patients infected with HCV are infected with either genotype 1b or 6a. It is known that HCV 6 is of intermediate responsiveness (i.e., between that of HCV genotype 1 and HCV genotypes 2/3) to standard combination interferon/ribavirin therapy. This study examines the molecular epidemiology of chronic HCV 6a infection in Hong Kong during 1999-2005, as well as characterizing some pre- and post-treatment changes in the NS5B gene in a few patients that underwent combination treatment. Partial non-structural protein sequences (NS5B, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene, positions 397-1,082) were cloned and sequenced in samples from 51 patients that were obtained and archived during 1999-2005. There were three patients with paired pre- and post-treatment samples available for further analysis. Within this NS5B sequence, one significant amino acid mutation was found in each of these patients: Ser272Pro (end-of-treatment response but relapsed), Met312Thr (failed treatment after 3 months due to anemia), and Arg221Lys (end-of-treatment-response but relapsed). This analysis of the pre- and post-treatment NS5B sequences, suggests that whilst post-treatment mutations were identifiable in individual patients, there was no overall characteristic mutation pattern associated with treatment that was common to all treated patients, identified in this small study. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Towards a better resolution of hepatitis C virus variants: CLIP sequencing of an HCV core fragment and automated assignment of genotypes and subtypes

Commercially available assays for typing of hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates satisfy the current clinical needs. They are, however, limited in their ability to identify the multitude of existing HCV subtypes correctly. Therefore, these kits should only be used cautiously in epidemiological studies and will also not meet future clinical demands which might arise, e.g., from the application of HCV subtype-specific antiviral compounds. In an attempt to overcome the drawbacks of commercial typing procedures based on the analysis of the 5' untranslated region (5' UTR), an approach was developed which relies on CLIP sequencing of an HCV core fragment with automated assignments of types and subtypes via an originally created "core-specific" sequence database. The performance characteristics of the new technique were evaluated in comparison to the Trugene 5' NC Genotyping Kit. The core-based sequencing method could regularly detect HCV isolates of genotypes 1-6 with an analytical sensitivity of 5000 IU/ml. The accuracy of typing results obtained by the Trugene test was 97% (genotypes) and 81% (subtypes). The core-linked approach classified all HCV strains correctly on the level of genotypes and led to an adequate subtype assignment in 96% of all cases. This analytical performance characteristics recorded for the newly devised typing technique was superior to those reported for all commercially available assays, including a most recently released new generation of the line probe assay. Consequently, CLIP sequencing of an HCV core fragment with subsequent automated assignment of types and subtypes can be confidently used in clinical laboratory practice to answer current and also future questions in the context of HCV typing.